The motive for hanging on to highly classified documents has to be seen in the context that Trump doesn’t read, has no interest in policy, is interested only in himself and is focused only on protecting or enriching himself.
Was his plan to sell these documents or attempt to blackmail someone with them or use them for future business leverage or
ALL OF THE ABOVE?
2
The motive for hanging on to highly classified documents has to be seen in the context that Trump doesn’t read, has no interest in policy, is interested only in himself and is focused only on protecting or enriching himself.
Was his plan to sell these documents or attempt to blackmail someone with them or use them for future business leverage or
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: The law prohibits DOJ from discussing a search warrant that is under seal. Secrecy rules are designed to protect the person under investigation. You know who could discuss it? Donald Trump, who would have received a copy of the inventory of items seized. Does anyone think that if Trump believed presenting the warrant would help him, legitimately or otherwise, he wouldn't? He would be blasting the details all over. And he is not. Just give that a little thought...I find it strange that I haven't heard Ivanka or Jared say anything yet.Dumb and Dumber(eric and junior)have said something about it,but i haven't heard anything from the kushner's yet. What kind of strikes me is the way eric said "You know they broke into a safe.He didn't even have anything in the safe".I would bet they did find something in the safe,but eric's gonna try and get ahead of that story by saying nothing was in there.Then when they do disclose that they found whatever in the safe.He can say i told you even before they disclosed what they said they found in the safe,that nothing was in there.That proves they must of planted whatever they say they got in the safe.I heard they brought a safe cracker to the residence when the search warrant was served,I don't know if that's normal procedure or not.But somehow they knew the safe was going to be an important part of the things they wanted to search.Almost like someone who the government has been talking to said,you will find what your looking for in the safe.I had also heard that the government didn't allow any of the trumps or people who worked there to be around when they were conducting the search.So how would eric know if they found anything or not in the safe?I'm sure the government filmed the search and filmed the moment they cracked and opened the safe,but eric probably doesn't realize that.I'm probably wrong,and it's probably just cause I've been drinking and celebrating this historical couple days for this country,but it just struck me as strange the way he casually made sure to say that nothing was in the safe.
Maybe I have missed it,so if I have please let me know what they've said.But I still haven't heard a statement from Ivanka or Jared,I find that pretty strange.Now that they got the 2 billion from the Saudi's,maybe they realize they don't need to ruin the rest of their lives and their childrens lives,by following a big lie,just to protect her lying father.
1
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: The law prohibits DOJ from discussing a search warrant that is under seal. Secrecy rules are designed to protect the person under investigation. You know who could discuss it? Donald Trump, who would have received a copy of the inventory of items seized. Does anyone think that if Trump believed presenting the warrant would help him, legitimately or otherwise, he wouldn't? He would be blasting the details all over. And he is not. Just give that a little thought...I find it strange that I haven't heard Ivanka or Jared say anything yet.Dumb and Dumber(eric and junior)have said something about it,but i haven't heard anything from the kushner's yet. What kind of strikes me is the way eric said "You know they broke into a safe.He didn't even have anything in the safe".I would bet they did find something in the safe,but eric's gonna try and get ahead of that story by saying nothing was in there.Then when they do disclose that they found whatever in the safe.He can say i told you even before they disclosed what they said they found in the safe,that nothing was in there.That proves they must of planted whatever they say they got in the safe.I heard they brought a safe cracker to the residence when the search warrant was served,I don't know if that's normal procedure or not.But somehow they knew the safe was going to be an important part of the things they wanted to search.Almost like someone who the government has been talking to said,you will find what your looking for in the safe.I had also heard that the government didn't allow any of the trumps or people who worked there to be around when they were conducting the search.So how would eric know if they found anything or not in the safe?I'm sure the government filmed the search and filmed the moment they cracked and opened the safe,but eric probably doesn't realize that.I'm probably wrong,and it's probably just cause I've been drinking and celebrating this historical couple days for this country,but it just struck me as strange the way he casually made sure to say that nothing was in the safe.
Maybe I have missed it,so if I have please let me know what they've said.But I still haven't heard a statement from Ivanka or Jared,I find that pretty strange.Now that they got the 2 billion from the Saudi's,maybe they realize they don't need to ruin the rest of their lives and their childrens lives,by following a big lie,just to protect her lying father.
The POS was found with stolen documents. And when given the chance to return them, he only returned about 50% of them. How can anyone defend those actions?
But
But
But Biden is stoopid!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
The POS was found with stolen documents. And when given the chance to return them, he only returned about 50% of them. How can anyone defend those actions?
Quote Originally Posted by sundance: The very heroic and brave agents of the FBI might have placed listening devices at Mar-A-Lago!Quit watching old Mission Impossible reruns you gullible fool.This post will self destruct in 5 seconds.
Guy gets out of rehab. Comes back the same day and posts the same unproven, conspiracy bs. Cannot imagine having that kind of a mentality.
1
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:
Quote Originally Posted by sundance: The very heroic and brave agents of the FBI might have placed listening devices at Mar-A-Lago!Quit watching old Mission Impossible reruns you gullible fool.This post will self destruct in 5 seconds.
Guy gets out of rehab. Comes back the same day and posts the same unproven, conspiracy bs. Cannot imagine having that kind of a mentality.
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by sundance: The very heroic and brave agents of the FBI might have placed listening devices at Mar-A-Lago!Quit watching old Mission Impossible reruns you gullible fool.This post will self destruct in 5 seconds. Guy gets out of rehab. Comes back the same day and posts the same unproven, conspiracy bs. Cannot imagine having that kind of a mentality.
I am still wondering why I was placed in rehab? Prove to me the very brave and heroic FBI agents did not place listening devices at Mar-A-Lago.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by sundance: The very heroic and brave agents of the FBI might have placed listening devices at Mar-A-Lago!Quit watching old Mission Impossible reruns you gullible fool.This post will self destruct in 5 seconds. Guy gets out of rehab. Comes back the same day and posts the same unproven, conspiracy bs. Cannot imagine having that kind of a mentality.
I am still wondering why I was placed in rehab? Prove to me the very brave and heroic FBI agents did not place listening devices at Mar-A-Lago.
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by sundance: The very heroic and brave agents of the FBI might have placed listening devices at Mar-A-Lago!Quit watching old Mission Impossible reruns you gullible fool.This post will self destruct in 5 seconds. Guy gets out of rehab. Comes back the same day and posts the same unproven, conspiracy bs. Cannot imagine having that kind of a mentality. I am still wondering why I was placed in rehab? Prove to me the very brave and heroic FBI agents did not place listening devices at Mar-A-Lago.
You have to prove your completely BS ideas have some merit,we don't have to prove they don't,you can tell your a trumper.
1
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by sundance: The very heroic and brave agents of the FBI might have placed listening devices at Mar-A-Lago!Quit watching old Mission Impossible reruns you gullible fool.This post will self destruct in 5 seconds. Guy gets out of rehab. Comes back the same day and posts the same unproven, conspiracy bs. Cannot imagine having that kind of a mentality. I am still wondering why I was placed in rehab? Prove to me the very brave and heroic FBI agents did not place listening devices at Mar-A-Lago.
You have to prove your completely BS ideas have some merit,we don't have to prove they don't,you can tell your a trumper.
Quote Originally Posted by sundance: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by sundance: The very heroic and brave agents of the FBI might have placed listening devices at Mar-A-Lago!Quit watching old Mission Impossible reruns you gullible fool.This post will self destruct in 5 seconds. Guy gets out of rehab. Comes back the same day and posts the same unproven, conspiracy bs. Cannot imagine having that kind of a mentality. I am still wondering why I was placed in rehab? Prove to me the very brave and heroic FBI agents did not place listening devices at Mar-A-Lago.You have to prove your completely BS ideas have some merit,we don't have to prove they don't,you can tell your a trumper.
Can you imagine if that is how life and the legal/criminal justice system worked???
Hey you, prove your are not a murderer or a rapist.
These trumpers are looney tunes.
1
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:
Quote Originally Posted by sundance: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by sundance: The very heroic and brave agents of the FBI might have placed listening devices at Mar-A-Lago!Quit watching old Mission Impossible reruns you gullible fool.This post will self destruct in 5 seconds. Guy gets out of rehab. Comes back the same day and posts the same unproven, conspiracy bs. Cannot imagine having that kind of a mentality. I am still wondering why I was placed in rehab? Prove to me the very brave and heroic FBI agents did not place listening devices at Mar-A-Lago.You have to prove your completely BS ideas have some merit,we don't have to prove they don't,you can tell your a trumper.
Can you imagine if that is how life and the legal/criminal justice system worked???
Hey you, prove your are not a murderer or a rapist.
For those complaining that the POS could hold this up by suing to block the release of the warrant, you're missing the point. The point isn't to unseal the warrant. The point is to force the POS to respond. If he sues to block, that UNDERMINES trump's whole grievance.
The POS painted himself into a corner here. If he sues to block the release, everyone will know DOJ has him by the short hairs. If he doesn’t sue to block the release, everyone will *see* that the DOJ has him by the short hairs.
He's always thought he was the smartest guy in the room & once again he has been proven wrong.
Deflect, delay & deny isn't going to work this time!
1
For those complaining that the POS could hold this up by suing to block the release of the warrant, you're missing the point. The point isn't to unseal the warrant. The point is to force the POS to respond. If he sues to block, that UNDERMINES trump's whole grievance.
The POS painted himself into a corner here. If he sues to block the release, everyone will know DOJ has him by the short hairs. If he doesn’t sue to block the release, everyone will *see* that the DOJ has him by the short hairs.
He's always thought he was the smartest guy in the room & once again he has been proven wrong.
Deflect, delay & deny isn't going to work this time!
For those complaining that the POS could hold this up by suing to block the release of the warrant, you're missing the point. The point isn't to unseal the warrant. The point is to force the POS to respond. If he sues to block, that UNDERMINES trump's whole grievance. The POS painted himself into a corner here. If he sues to block the release, everyone will know DOJ has him by the short hairs. If he doesn’t sue to block the release, everyone will *see* that the DOJ has him by the short hairs. He's always thought he was the smartest guy in the room & once again he has been proven wrong. Deflect, delay & deny isn't going to work this time!
that makes a whole lot of sense ,midnight1
which means the chump cult on cable tv , and all social media wont understand
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
2
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
For those complaining that the POS could hold this up by suing to block the release of the warrant, you're missing the point. The point isn't to unseal the warrant. The point is to force the POS to respond. If he sues to block, that UNDERMINES trump's whole grievance. The POS painted himself into a corner here. If he sues to block the release, everyone will know DOJ has him by the short hairs. If he doesn’t sue to block the release, everyone will *see* that the DOJ has him by the short hairs. He's always thought he was the smartest guy in the room & once again he has been proven wrong. Deflect, delay & deny isn't going to work this time!
that makes a whole lot of sense ,midnight1
which means the chump cult on cable tv , and all social media wont understand
What happened to the following? President Donald Trump is wondering. It is regarding our 1st half white President? The link below is not a mean Trump tweet. I promise!
What happened to the following? President Donald Trump is wondering. It is regarding our 1st half white President? The link below is not a mean Trump tweet. I promise!
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: For those complaining that the POS could hold this up by suing to block the release of the warrant, you're missing the point. The point isn't to unseal the warrant. The point is to force the POS to respond. If he sues to block, that UNDERMINES trump's whole grievance. The POS painted himself into a corner here. If he sues to block the release, everyone will know DOJ has him by the short hairs. If he doesn’t sue to block the release, everyone will *see* that the DOJ has him by the short hairs. He's always thought he was the smartest guy in the room & once again he has been proven wrong. Deflect, delay & deny isn't going to work this time!
that makes a whole lot of sense ,midnight1 which means the chump cult on cable tv , and all social media wont understand
And by default that would include in here too
2
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: For those complaining that the POS could hold this up by suing to block the release of the warrant, you're missing the point. The point isn't to unseal the warrant. The point is to force the POS to respond. If he sues to block, that UNDERMINES trump's whole grievance. The POS painted himself into a corner here. If he sues to block the release, everyone will know DOJ has him by the short hairs. If he doesn’t sue to block the release, everyone will *see* that the DOJ has him by the short hairs. He's always thought he was the smartest guy in the room & once again he has been proven wrong. Deflect, delay & deny isn't going to work this time!
that makes a whole lot of sense ,midnight1 which means the chump cult on cable tv , and all social media wont understand
It was a beautiful raid. A perfect raid. People tell me they've never seen such as perfect raid.
I wish I could of seen the traitors face when they told him.F*ckin priceless,eric was probably acting like King Edwards (Longshanks) son in Braveheart,sitting in the corner crying.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
It was a beautiful raid. A perfect raid. People tell me they've never seen such as perfect raid.
I wish I could of seen the traitors face when they told him.F*ckin priceless,eric was probably acting like King Edwards (Longshanks) son in Braveheart,sitting in the corner crying.
Sorry but Donnie will not be indicated. Best opinion I agree with.
Second, from the perspective of criminal investigation, the surprise raid was a highly unusual, aggressive step. In almost all criminal investigations of nonviolent conduct, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice would have requested cooperation from the defendant’s lawyers, not surprised the defendant and broken into his safe.
And third, despite the drama, executing the search warrant is far from a guarantee that any criminal action will be taken. In fact, there is some reason to think that the public raid will take some of the heat off Attorney General Merrick Garland, whom President Joe Biden has been urging to act against Trump — without forcing him into a prosecution decision he has strong reason to avoid.
Start with history. Other former presidents have been in trouble. But they managed to avoid criminal prosecution, and that includes, it would appear, being made subject to a search warrant.
0
Sorry but Donnie will not be indicated. Best opinion I agree with.
Second, from the perspective of criminal investigation, the surprise raid was a highly unusual, aggressive step. In almost all criminal investigations of nonviolent conduct, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice would have requested cooperation from the defendant’s lawyers, not surprised the defendant and broken into his safe.
And third, despite the drama, executing the search warrant is far from a guarantee that any criminal action will be taken. In fact, there is some reason to think that the public raid will take some of the heat off Attorney General Merrick Garland, whom President Joe Biden has been urging to act against Trump — without forcing him into a prosecution decision he has strong reason to avoid.
Start with history. Other former presidents have been in trouble. But they managed to avoid criminal prosecution, and that includes, it would appear, being made subject to a search warrant.
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by sundance: The very heroic and brave agents of the FBI might have placed listening devices at Mar-A-Lago!Quit watching old Mission Impossible reruns you gullible fool.This post will self destruct in 5 seconds.
Guy gets out of rehab. Comes back the same day and posts the same unproven, conspiracy bs. Cannot imagine having that kind of a mentality.
Welp, leopard and spots and all that.
Besides, the search warrant, which was signed off by a republican judge, was executed by a republican FBI agent and chief, who was specifically chosen by Trump to hold that position.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by sundance: The very heroic and brave agents of the FBI might have placed listening devices at Mar-A-Lago!Quit watching old Mission Impossible reruns you gullible fool.This post will self destruct in 5 seconds.
Guy gets out of rehab. Comes back the same day and posts the same unproven, conspiracy bs. Cannot imagine having that kind of a mentality.
Welp, leopard and spots and all that.
Besides, the search warrant, which was signed off by a republican judge, was executed by a republican FBI agent and chief, who was specifically chosen by Trump to hold that position.
President Trump and his family were able to watch the FBI 'raid' on his home at Mar-A-Lago on closed circuit television while in NYC. The very brave and heroic agents of the FBI who descended upon Mar-A-Lago in force requested the security cameras be turned off! Imagine that! Why would they want the cameras turned off? Anyway. The cameras remained on during the 'raid'. Did 45 set up the very brave and very heroic FBI agents for total failure? Only time will tell.
0
President Trump and his family were able to watch the FBI 'raid' on his home at Mar-A-Lago on closed circuit television while in NYC. The very brave and heroic agents of the FBI who descended upon Mar-A-Lago in force requested the security cameras be turned off! Imagine that! Why would they want the cameras turned off? Anyway. The cameras remained on during the 'raid'. Did 45 set up the very brave and very heroic FBI agents for total failure? Only time will tell.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.