• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 3
      NFL Week 3
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    Fox News is going to lose this defamation suit

    «First Previous 345 ... 678 Next Last»
    Aronrogers
    Sidehatch
    fubah2
    ColonelKlink
    thirdperson
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 2081
    Posts: 185
    «First Previous 345 ... 678 Next Last»
     
    Aronrogers
    Aronrogers
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2020
    Posts: 3554
    Posted: Mar. 8, 2023 - 9:12 PM ET #51

    @wallstreetcappers

     peace_5

    Reply

    @wallstreetcappers

     peace_5

     
    Aronrogers
    Aronrogers
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2020
    Posts: 3554
    Posted: Mar. 8, 2023 - 9:19 PM ET #52

    @wallstreetcappers

     peace_5

    Reply

    @wallstreetcappers

     peace_5

     
    Sidehatch
    Sidehatch
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 3240
    Posted: Mar. 8, 2023 - 11:42 PM ET #53

    Man, Tucker Carlson hates Trump? Why has he been breathlessly scrubbing Trump’s cojones for 6-7 years now? Oh yeah, that’s right - he fears Trump because Trump could hurt Fox. Such honorable intentions from such a brave soul (who asked former neighbor Hunter Biden to write a college recommendation for his kid)

    Reply

    Man, Tucker Carlson hates Trump? Why has he been breathlessly scrubbing Trump’s cojones for 6-7 years now? Oh yeah, that’s right - he fears Trump because Trump could hurt Fox. Such honorable intentions from such a brave soul (who asked former neighbor Hunter Biden to write a college recommendation for his kid)

     
    Sidehatch
    Sidehatch
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 3240
    Posted: Mar. 10, 2023 - 1:57 AM ET #54

    Wow, so much going on in the last week! Perhaps the biggest red flag is that the PLAINTIFF is moving for summary judgment (never happens) because here Fox has already admitted that what it said was false, it just disputes the actual malice standard. Why would Dominion make such a bold move? Well they have all the TEXTS AND EMAILS that prove FOX ADMITTEDLY LIED TO THEIR OWN RUBES I MEAN LOYAL AUDIENCE MEMBERS. 

    But if Fox loses without a trial on the merits (ie if they lose on summary judgment) the Corp may sue its own producers and talent as it is a publicly held company. FAUCKS owes a duty to its shareholders. So, if blatantly lying arseholes like Fraud Hannity, F*cker Carlson, or Liar Ingraham and their evil producers lied and led Fox to a billion dollar damages award, well they can be held personally liable toward the corporation. 
    That’s rich because guess which party (the Dotard party) is trying to make it easier to sue for defamation and libel right now? Bad timing you silly, stupid fox. These silly stupid fox never seem to know where their heads or tails are pointed. 

    Reply

    Wow, so much going on in the last week! Perhaps the biggest red flag is that the PLAINTIFF is moving for summary judgment (never happens) because here Fox has already admitted that what it said was false, it just disputes the actual malice standard. Why would Dominion make such a bold move? Well they have all the TEXTS AND EMAILS that prove FOX ADMITTEDLY LIED TO THEIR OWN RUBES I MEAN LOYAL AUDIENCE MEMBERS. 

    But if Fox loses without a trial on the merits (ie if they lose on summary judgment) the Corp may sue its own producers and talent as it is a publicly held company. FAUCKS owes a duty to its shareholders. So, if blatantly lying arseholes like Fraud Hannity, F*cker Carlson, or Liar Ingraham and their evil producers lied and led Fox to a billion dollar damages award, well they can be held personally liable toward the corporation. 
    That’s rich because guess which party (the Dotard party) is trying to make it easier to sue for defamation and libel right now? Bad timing you silly, stupid fox. These silly stupid fox never seem to know where their heads or tails are pointed. 

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53227
    Posted: Mar. 10, 2023 - 2:30 PM ET #55

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Man, Tucker Carlson hates Trump? Why has he been breathlessly scrubbing Trump’s cojones for 6-7 years now? Oh yeah, that’s right - he fears Trump because Trump could hurt Fox. Such honorable intentions from such a brave soul (who asked former neighbor Hunter Biden to write a college recommendation for his kid)

     

    Really?!?!   surprised

     

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Man, Tucker Carlson hates Trump? Why has he been breathlessly scrubbing Trump’s cojones for 6-7 years now? Oh yeah, that’s right - he fears Trump because Trump could hurt Fox. Such honorable intentions from such a brave soul (who asked former neighbor Hunter Biden to write a college recommendation for his kid)

     

    Really?!?!   surprised

     

     
    Sidehatch
    Sidehatch
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 3240
    Posted: Mar. 10, 2023 - 9:47 PM ET #56

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Man, Tucker Carlson hates Trump? Why has he been breathlessly scrubbing Trump’s cojones for 6-7 years now? Oh yeah, that’s right - he fears Trump because Trump could hurt Fox. Such honorable intentions from such a brave soul (who asked former neighbor Hunter Biden to write a college recommendation for his kid)   Really?!?!

    Yes indeed, Tucker Carlson famously asked Hunter Biden to write a recommendation letter for his oldest son. The two were neighbors and on good terms until Tucker thought he could get ratings by bashing his old neighbor.

    #factsyouwonthearonFoxNews

     

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/19/look-time-tucker-carlson-asked-hunter-biden-favor/

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Man, Tucker Carlson hates Trump? Why has he been breathlessly scrubbing Trump’s cojones for 6-7 years now? Oh yeah, that’s right - he fears Trump because Trump could hurt Fox. Such honorable intentions from such a brave soul (who asked former neighbor Hunter Biden to write a college recommendation for his kid)   Really?!?!

    Yes indeed, Tucker Carlson famously asked Hunter Biden to write a recommendation letter for his oldest son. The two were neighbors and on good terms until Tucker thought he could get ratings by bashing his old neighbor.

    #factsyouwonthearonFoxNews

     

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/19/look-time-tucker-carlson-asked-hunter-biden-favor/

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53227
    Posted: Mar. 13, 2023 - 10:31 AM ET #57

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Yes indeed, Tucker Carlson famously asked Hunter Biden to write a recommendation letter for his oldest son.

    The two were neighbors and on good terms until Tucker thought he could get ratings by bashing his old neighbor.

    #factsyouwonthearonFoxNews   https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/19/look-time-tucker-carlson-asked-hunter-biden-favor/

    Interesting news. peace_5

    But with that revelation Tucker's actions don't surprise me.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Yes indeed, Tucker Carlson famously asked Hunter Biden to write a recommendation letter for his oldest son.

    The two were neighbors and on good terms until Tucker thought he could get ratings by bashing his old neighbor.

    #factsyouwonthearonFoxNews   https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/19/look-time-tucker-carlson-asked-hunter-biden-favor/

    Interesting news. peace_5

    But with that revelation Tucker's actions don't surprise me.

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53227
    Posted: Mar. 15, 2023 - 2:29 AM ET #58

    trump says PhuckerCarlson doesn't hate him... not really.

    Reply

    trump says PhuckerCarlson doesn't hate him... not really.

     
    Sidehatch
    Sidehatch
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 3240
    Posted: Mar. 16, 2023 - 2:40 AM ET #59

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    trump says PhuckerCarlson doesn't hate him... not really.

    Tucker Carlson is now on record as hating Trump. So calling all dotards - which one do you renounce - Sucker Carlson, or Donerd Cankles Draft Dodger Trump? And go! new_devil

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    trump says PhuckerCarlson doesn't hate him... not really.

    Tucker Carlson is now on record as hating Trump. So calling all dotards - which one do you renounce - Sucker Carlson, or Donerd Cankles Draft Dodger Trump? And go! new_devil

     
    ColonelKlink
    ColonelKlink
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2015
    Posts: 14590
    Posted: Mar. 16, 2023 - 8:05 AM ET #60

    Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:

    Quote Originally Posted by ColonelKlink: The corrupt liberal media and our corrupt 'leaders' have worked hand in hand for a long time. One covering the other. Sad that some on these hallowed pages don't see it and therefore blindly support and vote for it.  https://www.foxnews.com/video/6321875232112You sit here and constantly bitch and whine about the so-called "corrupt liberal media" working together with our "corrupt leaders".But then when your corrupt conservative media outlet is caught red handed on tape,telling lies (Fake News) and covering for the republican presidents lie about the election results.What do you do?You write a post continuing to bitch and whine about the "corrupt liberal media",not one fucking word against the conservative media lying out of their *ss's. And then you talk about how sad it is on these "hallowed pages" that certain people don't see it while "blindly supporting and voting for it".Which is exactly what YOU do.Talk about a hypocrite,you do exactly what you're bitching about other people doing.

     

    I have some tissues left over if you need them?

    I think there's some tampons in the closet we don't need anymore, you may need those too.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:

    Quote Originally Posted by ColonelKlink: The corrupt liberal media and our corrupt 'leaders' have worked hand in hand for a long time. One covering the other. Sad that some on these hallowed pages don't see it and therefore blindly support and vote for it.  https://www.foxnews.com/video/6321875232112You sit here and constantly bitch and whine about the so-called "corrupt liberal media" working together with our "corrupt leaders".But then when your corrupt conservative media outlet is caught red handed on tape,telling lies (Fake News) and covering for the republican presidents lie about the election results.What do you do?You write a post continuing to bitch and whine about the "corrupt liberal media",not one fucking word against the conservative media lying out of their *ss's. And then you talk about how sad it is on these "hallowed pages" that certain people don't see it while "blindly supporting and voting for it".Which is exactly what YOU do.Talk about a hypocrite,you do exactly what you're bitching about other people doing.

     

    I have some tissues left over if you need them?

    I think there's some tampons in the closet we don't need anymore, you may need those too.

     
    ColonelKlink
    ColonelKlink
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2015
    Posts: 14590
    Posted: Mar. 16, 2023 - 8:16 AM ET #61

    I don't care what anyone says

    There's is no way JoeXi won a legitimate election

     

     

    There is only one day in 4 years to vote. If you can't get yourself there with a valid ID on that day... you're a loser and shouldn't be voting anyway

     

    the day will come when proof comes out, I'm not worried

    an_popcorn

    Reply

    I don't care what anyone says

    There's is no way JoeXi won a legitimate election

     

     

    There is only one day in 4 years to vote. If you can't get yourself there with a valid ID on that day... you're a loser and shouldn't be voting anyway

     

    the day will come when proof comes out, I'm not worried

    an_popcorn

     
    thirdperson
    thirdperson
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2005
    Posts: 9424
    Posted: Mar. 16, 2023 - 9:58 AM ET #62

    Quote Originally Posted by ColonelKlink:

    There's is no way JoeXi won a legitimate election     There is only one day in 4 years to vote. If you can't get yourself there with a valid ID on that day... you're a loser and shouldn't be voting anyway   the day will come when proof comes out,

    Delusional to deny reality of 2020 election results.  Years later, still no evidence of stolen election as Trump claims despite multiple lawsuits and audits.    No way Trump should be president after losing popular vote two consecutive times.  Courts have determined that voter suppression is a far greater problem than very rare voting fraud.  Limiting voting to just one day would disenfranchise millions of eligible voters and threaten democracy.   So voting should be made easier instead of harder.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by ColonelKlink:

    There's is no way JoeXi won a legitimate election     There is only one day in 4 years to vote. If you can't get yourself there with a valid ID on that day... you're a loser and shouldn't be voting anyway   the day will come when proof comes out,

    Delusional to deny reality of 2020 election results.  Years later, still no evidence of stolen election as Trump claims despite multiple lawsuits and audits.    No way Trump should be president after losing popular vote two consecutive times.  Courts have determined that voter suppression is a far greater problem than very rare voting fraud.  Limiting voting to just one day would disenfranchise millions of eligible voters and threaten democracy.   So voting should be made easier instead of harder.

     
    scooby-doos
    scooby-doos
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2010
    Posts: 3194
    Posted: Mar. 16, 2023 - 10:26 AM ET #63

    Klink... states admitted to violating their own election laws... using covid as an excuse to do so.. in their states constitutions there were provisions and protocols put in place for situations like that there ignored any never used.  Social media admitted to receiving money from our own governmental agencies to protect the biden cartel, hide the truth about covid and their shady business dealings and through algorithms peruade voters to think a certain way.   I could see why people would think this was a dirty election.

    Reply

    Klink... states admitted to violating their own election laws... using covid as an excuse to do so.. in their states constitutions there were provisions and protocols put in place for situations like that there ignored any never used.  Social media admitted to receiving money from our own governmental agencies to protect the biden cartel, hide the truth about covid and their shady business dealings and through algorithms peruade voters to think a certain way.   I could see why people would think this was a dirty election.

     
    Zeus4par
    Zeus4par
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2021
    Posts: 6070
    Posted: Mar. 16, 2023 - 10:42 AM ET #64

    Quote Originally Posted by scooby-doos:

    Klink... states admitted to violating their own election laws... using covid as an excuse to do so.. in their states constitutions there were provisions and protocols put in place for situations like that there ignored any never used.  Social media admitted to receiving money from our own governmental agencies to protect the biden cartel, hide the truth about covid and their shady business dealings and through algorithms peruade voters to think a certain way.   I could see why people would think this was a dirty election.

    an_roll_laugh

     

     

     

     

     

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by scooby-doos:

    Klink... states admitted to violating their own election laws... using covid as an excuse to do so.. in their states constitutions there were provisions and protocols put in place for situations like that there ignored any never used.  Social media admitted to receiving money from our own governmental agencies to protect the biden cartel, hide the truth about covid and their shady business dealings and through algorithms peruade voters to think a certain way.   I could see why people would think this was a dirty election.

    an_roll_laugh

     

     

     

     

     

     
    MrWhatsItToYa
    MrWhatsItToYa
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2014
    Posts: 3239
    Posted: Mar. 16, 2023 - 1:49 PM ET #65

    Quote Originally Posted by ColonelKlink:

    I don't care what anyone says There's is no way JoeXi won a legitimate election     There is only one day in 4 years to vote. If you can't get yourself there with a valid ID on that day... you're a loser and shouldn't be voting anyway   the day will come when proof comes out, I'm not worried
    You would think you and your dipsh*t loser buddies would be able to find some proof in the 3 years since it happened,but yet you clowns can't come up with a single thing.You're just as bad as Rudy with his "We've got lots of theories,we just don't have evidence".In other words "We don't have any evidence something happened,but we lost and are to cowardly to admit it,so we have to tell our voters something".

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by ColonelKlink:

    I don't care what anyone says There's is no way JoeXi won a legitimate election     There is only one day in 4 years to vote. If you can't get yourself there with a valid ID on that day... you're a loser and shouldn't be voting anyway   the day will come when proof comes out, I'm not worried
    You would think you and your dipsh*t loser buddies would be able to find some proof in the 3 years since it happened,but yet you clowns can't come up with a single thing.You're just as bad as Rudy with his "We've got lots of theories,we just don't have evidence".In other words "We don't have any evidence something happened,but we lost and are to cowardly to admit it,so we have to tell our voters something".

     
    Sidehatch
    Sidehatch
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 3240
    Posted: Mar. 17, 2023 - 10:58 PM ET #66

    Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:

    Reply

    Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:

     
    Sidehatch
    Sidehatch
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 3240
    Posted: Mar. 18, 2023 - 10:59 PM ET #67

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:

    Heres what Harder said:

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:

    Heres what Harder said:

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53227
    Posted: Mar. 19, 2023 - 8:20 AM ET #68

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:

    And he is very likely correct in that belief.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:

    And he is very likely correct in that belief.

     
    DrStrangelove
    DrStrangelove
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2008
    Posts: 3713
    Posted: Mar. 20, 2023 - 3:53 PM ET #69

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:
    Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:
    Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming.

     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Mar. 20, 2023 - 6:32 PM ET #70

    Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove:

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming.

    Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial. 

    Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial. an_light

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove:

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming.

    Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial. 

    Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial. an_light

     
    DrStrangelove
    DrStrangelove
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2008
    Posts: 3713
    Posted: Mar. 21, 2023 - 12:00 AM ET #71

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming. Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial.  Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial.
    Everybody has a price. I think Dominion will settle if the price is right. As tight as I've heard he is with his money, I still believe Murdoch would pay the full 1.6 billion or more to see this distraction go away. Hell, he can probably find that much by looking under his couch cushions. He'll just mark it up as the price of doing business. It won't change anything, sadly. I hope you're right and I'm wrong about this case and we see it go to court. But Dominion's lawyers have already subpoenaed a who's who of republican show dogs to the party, including Rupert Murdoch himself. Hard for me to believe a 90 year old billionaire wants anything to do with that circus.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming. Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial.  Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial.
    Everybody has a price. I think Dominion will settle if the price is right. As tight as I've heard he is with his money, I still believe Murdoch would pay the full 1.6 billion or more to see this distraction go away. Hell, he can probably find that much by looking under his couch cushions. He'll just mark it up as the price of doing business. It won't change anything, sadly. I hope you're right and I'm wrong about this case and we see it go to court. But Dominion's lawyers have already subpoenaed a who's who of republican show dogs to the party, including Rupert Murdoch himself. Hard for me to believe a 90 year old billionaire wants anything to do with that circus.

     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Mar. 21, 2023 - 2:34 AM ET #72

    Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove:

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming. Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial.  Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial.Everybody has a price. I think Dominion will settle if the price is right. As tight as I've heard he is with his money, I still believe Murdoch would pay the full 1.6 billion or more to see this distraction go away. Hell, he can probably find that much by looking under his couch cushions. He'll just mark it up as the price of doing business. It won't change anything, sadly. I hope you're right and I'm wrong about this case and we see it go to court. But Dominion's lawyers have already subpoenaed a who's who of republican show dogs to the party, including Rupert Murdoch himself. Hard for me to believe a 90 year old billionaire wants anything to do with that circus.

    Yeah I understand that Fox certainly does not want this going to trial. Billionaires don't like losing billions regardless of how much cash they have, which is one of the reasons why Murdoch is in this mess in the first place. He was afraid of telling the truth to his viewers, which would lose him money. I'm not sure Dominion wants to settle. I am pretty sure the reason they brought this lawsuit forward was to destroy Fox for their lies, not for cash. I guess we will see. Dominion should say we will settle for $20 billion, which Murdoch does not have. Name a number he cannot afford. Say the price is going up or we are going to trial. an_light

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove:

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming. Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial.  Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial.Everybody has a price. I think Dominion will settle if the price is right. As tight as I've heard he is with his money, I still believe Murdoch would pay the full 1.6 billion or more to see this distraction go away. Hell, he can probably find that much by looking under his couch cushions. He'll just mark it up as the price of doing business. It won't change anything, sadly. I hope you're right and I'm wrong about this case and we see it go to court. But Dominion's lawyers have already subpoenaed a who's who of republican show dogs to the party, including Rupert Murdoch himself. Hard for me to believe a 90 year old billionaire wants anything to do with that circus.

    Yeah I understand that Fox certainly does not want this going to trial. Billionaires don't like losing billions regardless of how much cash they have, which is one of the reasons why Murdoch is in this mess in the first place. He was afraid of telling the truth to his viewers, which would lose him money. I'm not sure Dominion wants to settle. I am pretty sure the reason they brought this lawsuit forward was to destroy Fox for their lies, not for cash. I guess we will see. Dominion should say we will settle for $20 billion, which Murdoch does not have. Name a number he cannot afford. Say the price is going up or we are going to trial. an_light

     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Mar. 21, 2023 - 2:47 AM ET #73

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming. Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial.  Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial.Everybody has a price. I think Dominion will settle if the price is right. As tight as I've heard he is with his money, I still believe Murdoch would pay the full 1.6 billion or more to see this distraction go away. Hell, he can probably find that much by looking under his couch cushions. He'll just mark it up as the price of doing business. It won't change anything, sadly. I hope you're right and I'm wrong about this case and we see it go to court. But Dominion's lawyers have already subpoenaed a who's who of republican show dogs to the party, including Rupert Murdoch himself. Hard for me to believe a 90 year old billionaire wants anything to do with that circus. Yeah I understand that Fox certainly does not want this going to trial. Billionaires don't like losing billions regardless of how much cash they have, which is one of the reasons why Murdoch is in this mess in the first place. He was afraid of telling the truth to his viewers, which would lose him money. I'm not sure Dominion wants to settle. I am pretty sure the reason they brought this lawsuit forward was to destroy Fox for their lies, not for cash. I guess we will see. Dominion should say we will settle for $20 billion, which Murdoch does not have. Name a number he cannot afford. Say the price is going up or we are going to trial.

    I didn't realize Dominion was suing for only 1.6 billion. They should have originally sued for $10 billion. 

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming. Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial.  Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial.Everybody has a price. I think Dominion will settle if the price is right. As tight as I've heard he is with his money, I still believe Murdoch would pay the full 1.6 billion or more to see this distraction go away. Hell, he can probably find that much by looking under his couch cushions. He'll just mark it up as the price of doing business. It won't change anything, sadly. I hope you're right and I'm wrong about this case and we see it go to court. But Dominion's lawyers have already subpoenaed a who's who of republican show dogs to the party, including Rupert Murdoch himself. Hard for me to believe a 90 year old billionaire wants anything to do with that circus. Yeah I understand that Fox certainly does not want this going to trial. Billionaires don't like losing billions regardless of how much cash they have, which is one of the reasons why Murdoch is in this mess in the first place. He was afraid of telling the truth to his viewers, which would lose him money. I'm not sure Dominion wants to settle. I am pretty sure the reason they brought this lawsuit forward was to destroy Fox for their lies, not for cash. I guess we will see. Dominion should say we will settle for $20 billion, which Murdoch does not have. Name a number he cannot afford. Say the price is going up or we are going to trial.

    I didn't realize Dominion was suing for only 1.6 billion. They should have originally sued for $10 billion. 

     
    Zeus4par
    Zeus4par
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2021
    Posts: 6070
    Posted: Mar. 21, 2023 - 6:54 AM ET #74

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming. Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial.  Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial.Everybody has a price. I think Dominion will settle if the price is right. As tight as I've heard he is with his money, I still believe Murdoch would pay the full 1.6 billion or more to see this distraction go away. Hell, he can probably find that much by looking under his couch cushions. He'll just mark it up as the price of doing business. It won't change anything, sadly. I hope you're right and I'm wrong about this case and we see it go to court. But Dominion's lawyers have already subpoenaed a who's who of republican show dogs to the party, including Rupert Murdoch himself. Hard for me to believe a 90 year old billionaire wants anything to do with that circus. Yeah I understand that Fox certainly does not want this going to trial. Billionaires don't like losing billions regardless of how much cash they have, which is one of the reasons why Murdoch is in this mess in the first place. He was afraid of telling the truth to his viewers, which would lose him money. I'm not sure Dominion wants to settle. I am pretty sure the reason they brought this lawsuit forward was to destroy Fox for their lies, not for cash. I guess we will see. Dominion should say we will settle for $20 billion, which Murdoch does not have. Name a number he cannot afford. Say the price is going up or we are going to trial.

    an_cheers

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming. Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial.  Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial.Everybody has a price. I think Dominion will settle if the price is right. As tight as I've heard he is with his money, I still believe Murdoch would pay the full 1.6 billion or more to see this distraction go away. Hell, he can probably find that much by looking under his couch cushions. He'll just mark it up as the price of doing business. It won't change anything, sadly. I hope you're right and I'm wrong about this case and we see it go to court. But Dominion's lawyers have already subpoenaed a who's who of republican show dogs to the party, including Rupert Murdoch himself. Hard for me to believe a 90 year old billionaire wants anything to do with that circus. Yeah I understand that Fox certainly does not want this going to trial. Billionaires don't like losing billions regardless of how much cash they have, which is one of the reasons why Murdoch is in this mess in the first place. He was afraid of telling the truth to his viewers, which would lose him money. I'm not sure Dominion wants to settle. I am pretty sure the reason they brought this lawsuit forward was to destroy Fox for their lies, not for cash. I guess we will see. Dominion should say we will settle for $20 billion, which Murdoch does not have. Name a number he cannot afford. Say the price is going up or we are going to trial.

    an_cheers

     
     
    Zeus4par
    Zeus4par
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2021
    Posts: 6070
    Posted: Mar. 21, 2023 - 6:54 AM ET #75

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming. Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial.  Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial.Everybody has a price. I think Dominion will settle if the price is right. As tight as I've heard he is with his money, I still believe Murdoch would pay the full 1.6 billion or more to see this distraction go away. Hell, he can probably find that much by looking under his couch cushions. He'll just mark it up as the price of doing business. It won't change anything, sadly. I hope you're right and I'm wrong about this case and we see it go to court. But Dominion's lawyers have already subpoenaed a who's who of republican show dogs to the party, including Rupert Murdoch himself. Hard for me to believe a 90 year old billionaire wants anything to do with that circus. Yeah I understand that Fox certainly does not want this going to trial. Billionaires don't like losing billions regardless of how much cash they have, which is one of the reasons why Murdoch is in this mess in the first place. He was afraid of telling the truth to his viewers, which would lose him money. I'm not sure Dominion wants to settle. I am pretty sure the reason they brought this lawsuit forward was to destroy Fox for their lies, not for cash. I guess we will see. Dominion should say we will settle for $20 billion, which Murdoch does not have. Name a number he cannot afford. Say the price is going up or we are going to trial. I didn't realize Dominion was suing for only 1.6 billion. They should have originally sued for $10 billion.

    At least!   thumbs_up

     

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming. Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial.  Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial.Everybody has a price. I think Dominion will settle if the price is right. As tight as I've heard he is with his money, I still believe Murdoch would pay the full 1.6 billion or more to see this distraction go away. Hell, he can probably find that much by looking under his couch cushions. He'll just mark it up as the price of doing business. It won't change anything, sadly. I hope you're right and I'm wrong about this case and we see it go to court. But Dominion's lawyers have already subpoenaed a who's who of republican show dogs to the party, including Rupert Murdoch himself. Hard for me to believe a 90 year old billionaire wants anything to do with that circus. Yeah I understand that Fox certainly does not want this going to trial. Billionaires don't like losing billions regardless of how much cash they have, which is one of the reasons why Murdoch is in this mess in the first place. He was afraid of telling the truth to his viewers, which would lose him money. I'm not sure Dominion wants to settle. I am pretty sure the reason they brought this lawsuit forward was to destroy Fox for their lies, not for cash. I guess we will see. Dominion should say we will settle for $20 billion, which Murdoch does not have. Name a number he cannot afford. Say the price is going up or we are going to trial. I didn't realize Dominion was suing for only 1.6 billion. They should have originally sued for $10 billion.

    At least!   thumbs_up

     

    All Forums | Politics
    «First Previous 345 ... 678 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 449,931
    • Thursday 09/24/2026 685
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 58,440
    • Falcons vs Packers TNF in-game live 2,142
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 100,333
    • ***Macwesties * Thur. * Sun. Sept. 24, 27, 2026 * Week #3 * NFL Football Plays* 4,172
    • PART DEUX 339
    • Happening just recently . . . 34,755
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 24,613
    • ?? KBO Plays 🥎 15,254

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.