All Forums | Politics

Fox News is going to lose this defamation suit

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2076
Posts: 185
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2020
Posts: 3554
Posted: #51

@wallstreetcappers

 peace_5

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2020
Posts: 3554
Posted: #52

@wallstreetcappers

 peace_5

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 2751
Posted: #53

Man, Tucker Carlson hates Trump? Why has he been breathlessly scrubbing Trump’s cojones for 6-7 years now? Oh yeah, that’s right - he fears Trump because Trump could hurt Fox. Such honorable intentions from such a brave soul (who asked former neighbor Hunter Biden to write a college recommendation for his kid)

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 2751
Posted: #54

Wow, so much going on in the last week! Perhaps the biggest red flag is that the PLAINTIFF is moving for summary judgment (never happens) because here Fox has already admitted that what it said was false, it just disputes the actual malice standard. Why would Dominion make such a bold move? Well they have all the TEXTS AND EMAILS that prove FOX ADMITTEDLY LIED TO THEIR OWN RUBES I MEAN LOYAL AUDIENCE MEMBERS. 

But if Fox loses without a trial on the merits (ie if they lose on summary judgment) the Corp may sue its own producers and talent as it is a publicly held company. FAUCKS owes a duty to its shareholders. So, if blatantly lying arseholes like Fraud Hannity, F*cker Carlson, or Liar Ingraham and their evil producers lied and led Fox to a billion dollar damages award, well they can be held personally liable toward the corporation. 
That’s rich because guess which party (the Dotard party) is trying to make it easier to sue for defamation and libel right now? Bad timing you silly, stupid fox. These silly stupid fox never seem to know where their heads or tails are pointed. 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 32519
Posted: #55

Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

Man, Tucker Carlson hates Trump? Why has he been breathlessly scrubbing Trump’s cojones for 6-7 years now? Oh yeah, that’s right - he fears Trump because Trump could hurt Fox. Such honorable intentions from such a brave soul (who asked former neighbor Hunter Biden to write a college recommendation for his kid)

 

Really?!?!   surprised

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 2751
Posted: #56

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Man, Tucker Carlson hates Trump? Why has he been breathlessly scrubbing Trump’s cojones for 6-7 years now? Oh yeah, that’s right - he fears Trump because Trump could hurt Fox. Such honorable intentions from such a brave soul (who asked former neighbor Hunter Biden to write a college recommendation for his kid)   Really?!?!

Yes indeed, Tucker Carlson famously asked Hunter Biden to write a recommendation letter for his oldest son. The two were neighbors and on good terms until Tucker thought he could get ratings by bashing his old neighbor.

#factsyouwonthearonFoxNews

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/19/look-time-tucker-carlson-asked-hunter-biden-favor/

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 32519
Posted: #57

Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

Yes indeed, Tucker Carlson famously asked Hunter Biden to write a recommendation letter for his oldest son.

The two were neighbors and on good terms until Tucker thought he could get ratings by bashing his old neighbor.

#factsyouwonthearonFoxNews   https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/19/look-time-tucker-carlson-asked-hunter-biden-favor/

Interesting news. peace_5

But with that revelation Tucker's actions don't surprise me.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 32519
Posted: #58

trump says PhuckerCarlson doesn't hate him... not really.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 2751
Posted: #59

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

trump says PhuckerCarlson doesn't hate him... not really.

Tucker Carlson is now on record as hating Trump. So calling all dotards - which one do you renounce - Sucker Carlson, or Donerd Cankles Draft Dodger Trump? And go! new_devil

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2015
Posts: 14590
Posted: #60

Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:

Quote Originally Posted by ColonelKlink: The corrupt liberal media and our corrupt 'leaders' have worked hand in hand for a long time. One covering the other. Sad that some on these hallowed pages don't see it and therefore blindly support and vote for it.  https://www.foxnews.com/video/6321875232112You sit here and constantly bitch and whine about the so-called "corrupt liberal media" working together with our "corrupt leaders".But then when your corrupt conservative media outlet is caught red handed on tape,telling lies (Fake News) and covering for the republican presidents lie about the election results.What do you do?You write a post continuing to bitch and whine about the "corrupt liberal media",not one fucking word against the conservative media lying out of their *ss's. And then you talk about how sad it is on these "hallowed pages" that certain people don't see it while "blindly supporting and voting for it".Which is exactly what YOU do.Talk about a hypocrite,you do exactly what you're bitching about other people doing.

 

I have some tissues left over if you need them?

I think there's some tampons in the closet we don't need anymore, you may need those too.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2015
Posts: 14590
Posted: #61

I don't care what anyone says

There's is no way JoeXi won a legitimate election

 

 

There is only one day in 4 years to vote. If you can't get yourself there with a valid ID on that day... you're a loser and shouldn't be voting anyway

 

the day will come when proof comes out, I'm not worried

an_popcorn

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 7153
Posted: #62

Quote Originally Posted by ColonelKlink:

There's is no way JoeXi won a legitimate election     There is only one day in 4 years to vote. If you can't get yourself there with a valid ID on that day... you're a loser and shouldn't be voting anyway   the day will come when proof comes out,

Delusional to deny reality of 2020 election results.  Years later, still no evidence of stolen election as Trump claims despite multiple lawsuits and audits.    No way Trump should be president after losing popular vote two consecutive times.  Courts have determined that voter suppression is a far greater problem than very rare voting fraud.  Limiting voting to just one day would disenfranchise millions of eligible voters and threaten democracy.   So voting should be made easier instead of harder.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 3073
Posted: #63

Klink... states admitted to violating their own election laws... using covid as an excuse to do so.. in their states constitutions there were provisions and protocols put in place for situations like that there ignored any never used.  Social media admitted to receiving money from our own governmental agencies to protect the biden cartel, hide the truth about covid and their shady business dealings and through algorithms peruade voters to think a certain way.   I could see why people would think this was a dirty election.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2021
Posts: 5263
Posted: #64

Quote Originally Posted by scooby-doos:

Klink... states admitted to violating their own election laws... using covid as an excuse to do so.. in their states constitutions there were provisions and protocols put in place for situations like that there ignored any never used.  Social media admitted to receiving money from our own governmental agencies to protect the biden cartel, hide the truth about covid and their shady business dealings and through algorithms peruade voters to think a certain way.   I could see why people would think this was a dirty election.

an_roll_laugh

 

 

 

 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 3178
Posted: #65

Quote Originally Posted by ColonelKlink:

I don't care what anyone says There's is no way JoeXi won a legitimate election     There is only one day in 4 years to vote. If you can't get yourself there with a valid ID on that day... you're a loser and shouldn't be voting anyway   the day will come when proof comes out, I'm not worried
You would think you and your dipsh*t loser buddies would be able to find some proof in the 3 years since it happened,but yet you clowns can't come up with a single thing.You're just as bad as Rudy with his "We've got lots of theories,we just don't have evidence".In other words "We don't have any evidence something happened,but we lost and are to cowardly to admit it,so we have to tell our voters something".

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 2751
Posted: #66

Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 2751
Posted: #67

Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:

Heres what Harder said:

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 32519
Posted: #68

Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:

And he is very likely correct in that belief.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 3554
Posted: #69

Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:
Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 8631
Posted: #70

Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove:

Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming.

Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial. 

Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial. an_light

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 3554
Posted: #71

Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming. Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial.  Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial.
Everybody has a price. I think Dominion will settle if the price is right. As tight as I've heard he is with his money, I still believe Murdoch would pay the full 1.6 billion or more to see this distraction go away. Hell, he can probably find that much by looking under his couch cushions. He'll just mark it up as the price of doing business. It won't change anything, sadly. I hope you're right and I'm wrong about this case and we see it go to court. But Dominion's lawyers have already subpoenaed a who's who of republican show dogs to the party, including Rupert Murdoch himself. Hard for me to believe a 90 year old billionaire wants anything to do with that circus.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 8631
Posted: #72

Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove:

Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming. Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial.  Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial.Everybody has a price. I think Dominion will settle if the price is right. As tight as I've heard he is with his money, I still believe Murdoch would pay the full 1.6 billion or more to see this distraction go away. Hell, he can probably find that much by looking under his couch cushions. He'll just mark it up as the price of doing business. It won't change anything, sadly. I hope you're right and I'm wrong about this case and we see it go to court. But Dominion's lawyers have already subpoenaed a who's who of republican show dogs to the party, including Rupert Murdoch himself. Hard for me to believe a 90 year old billionaire wants anything to do with that circus.

Yeah I understand that Fox certainly does not want this going to trial. Billionaires don't like losing billions regardless of how much cash they have, which is one of the reasons why Murdoch is in this mess in the first place. He was afraid of telling the truth to his viewers, which would lose him money. I'm not sure Dominion wants to settle. I am pretty sure the reason they brought this lawsuit forward was to destroy Fox for their lies, not for cash. I guess we will see. Dominion should say we will settle for $20 billion, which Murdoch does not have. Name a number he cannot afford. Say the price is going up or we are going to trial. an_light

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 8631
Posted: #73

Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming. Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial.  Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial.Everybody has a price. I think Dominion will settle if the price is right. As tight as I've heard he is with his money, I still believe Murdoch would pay the full 1.6 billion or more to see this distraction go away. Hell, he can probably find that much by looking under his couch cushions. He'll just mark it up as the price of doing business. It won't change anything, sadly. I hope you're right and I'm wrong about this case and we see it go to court. But Dominion's lawyers have already subpoenaed a who's who of republican show dogs to the party, including Rupert Murdoch himself. Hard for me to believe a 90 year old billionaire wants anything to do with that circus. Yeah I understand that Fox certainly does not want this going to trial. Billionaires don't like losing billions regardless of how much cash they have, which is one of the reasons why Murdoch is in this mess in the first place. He was afraid of telling the truth to his viewers, which would lose him money. I'm not sure Dominion wants to settle. I am pretty sure the reason they brought this lawsuit forward was to destroy Fox for their lies, not for cash. I guess we will see. Dominion should say we will settle for $20 billion, which Murdoch does not have. Name a number he cannot afford. Say the price is going up or we are going to trial.

I didn't realize Dominion was suing for only 1.6 billion. They should have originally sued for $10 billion. 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2021
Posts: 5263
Posted: #74

Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming. Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial.  Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial.Everybody has a price. I think Dominion will settle if the price is right. As tight as I've heard he is with his money, I still believe Murdoch would pay the full 1.6 billion or more to see this distraction go away. Hell, he can probably find that much by looking under his couch cushions. He'll just mark it up as the price of doing business. It won't change anything, sadly. I hope you're right and I'm wrong about this case and we see it go to court. But Dominion's lawyers have already subpoenaed a who's who of republican show dogs to the party, including Rupert Murdoch himself. Hard for me to believe a 90 year old billionaire wants anything to do with that circus. Yeah I understand that Fox certainly does not want this going to trial. Billionaires don't like losing billions regardless of how much cash they have, which is one of the reasons why Murdoch is in this mess in the first place. He was afraid of telling the truth to his viewers, which would lose him money. I'm not sure Dominion wants to settle. I am pretty sure the reason they brought this lawsuit forward was to destroy Fox for their lies, not for cash. I guess we will see. Dominion should say we will settle for $20 billion, which Murdoch does not have. Name a number he cannot afford. Say the price is going up or we are going to trial.

an_cheers

 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2021
Posts: 5263
Posted: #75

Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Donald Trump’s attorney Charles Harder doesn’t think Fox will fare well if the case goes before a jury:Hard for me to believe this case will see a jury. I don't think Fox wants to see their darling liars Tucker and Laura taking the stand. How would they defend themselves when their own texts and emails are already out there on full display for the jury to see? Unless the Fox lawyers have some trick up their sleeve, I see a settlement coming. Why would Dominion settle? Dominion should up the asking price by a few billion in negotiations or just refuse to negotiate and force the trial.  Settling is not only up to Fox News, Dominion has to be willing to as well. Hopefully, they won't and this goes to trial.Everybody has a price. I think Dominion will settle if the price is right. As tight as I've heard he is with his money, I still believe Murdoch would pay the full 1.6 billion or more to see this distraction go away. Hell, he can probably find that much by looking under his couch cushions. He'll just mark it up as the price of doing business. It won't change anything, sadly. I hope you're right and I'm wrong about this case and we see it go to court. But Dominion's lawyers have already subpoenaed a who's who of republican show dogs to the party, including Rupert Murdoch himself. Hard for me to believe a 90 year old billionaire wants anything to do with that circus. Yeah I understand that Fox certainly does not want this going to trial. Billionaires don't like losing billions regardless of how much cash they have, which is one of the reasons why Murdoch is in this mess in the first place. He was afraid of telling the truth to his viewers, which would lose him money. I'm not sure Dominion wants to settle. I am pretty sure the reason they brought this lawsuit forward was to destroy Fox for their lies, not for cash. I guess we will see. Dominion should say we will settle for $20 billion, which Murdoch does not have. Name a number he cannot afford. Say the price is going up or we are going to trial. I didn't realize Dominion was suing for only 1.6 billion. They should have originally sued for $10 billion.

At least!   thumbs_up

 

All Forums | Politics
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.