Quote Originally Posted by cd329: Quote Originally Posted by jesron1269: @Barbarossa Yep. Liberalism is a mental health disease. Only cure is for them to taste their own medicine. and trumpism from a career criminal con artist is great. lmfaooooooooooooo. You shouldnt idolize false Gods, read the commandants if you believe in that stuff. Gotta love all the magas in the world who hear a phrase and just cant stop using it. I love that Trump is in your head living rent free. You and the rest of the far left are eat up with Trump Derangement Syndrome. I bet you wake up in the middle of the night seeing this.
Nice try jeri, use my lines that i use here wont work. Like i said you might want to stop idolizing false Gods, it wont end well long term for you. Trump trying to dance is just flat out "WEIRD" (borrowing the word from waltz)
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jarrett75:
Quote Originally Posted by cd329: Quote Originally Posted by jesron1269: @Barbarossa Yep. Liberalism is a mental health disease. Only cure is for them to taste their own medicine. and trumpism from a career criminal con artist is great. lmfaooooooooooooo. You shouldnt idolize false Gods, read the commandants if you believe in that stuff. Gotta love all the magas in the world who hear a phrase and just cant stop using it. I love that Trump is in your head living rent free. You and the rest of the far left are eat up with Trump Derangement Syndrome. I bet you wake up in the middle of the night seeing this.
Nice try jeri, use my lines that i use here wont work. Like i said you might want to stop idolizing false Gods, it wont end well long term for you. Trump trying to dance is just flat out "WEIRD" (borrowing the word from waltz)
It is very difficult to track your complaint because you are square in the middle of it egging him on. You guys bait this member then go running when you KNOW he will reply with emotion and he will go over the top. It is almost like that is the intent of a few of you...put some bait out for cd, get him to reply and bait him more knowing he will blow his top and say something you guys can tattle about.
Why do you even engage with someone you know is dramatic and excessive but is not attacking YOU but has issues with politicians? It would be much easier if one of two things happened-
1) Quit baiting him if you are going to reply to him, stop setting traps to push him over the edge...if you guys are not ganging up on him and baiting it seems he is pretty reasonable and does not go too far. It is when a few of you peck peck peck at him and then you get what you are wanting which is for him to lose his composure
2) Just quit replying to him COMPLETELY..if he replies to you just ignore it or say that to avoid conflict you arent going to debate with him
Those two options are much better than several of you tag teaming him until he slips up.
1
@jesron1269
It is very difficult to track your complaint because you are square in the middle of it egging him on. You guys bait this member then go running when you KNOW he will reply with emotion and he will go over the top. It is almost like that is the intent of a few of you...put some bait out for cd, get him to reply and bait him more knowing he will blow his top and say something you guys can tattle about.
Why do you even engage with someone you know is dramatic and excessive but is not attacking YOU but has issues with politicians? It would be much easier if one of two things happened-
1) Quit baiting him if you are going to reply to him, stop setting traps to push him over the edge...if you guys are not ganging up on him and baiting it seems he is pretty reasonable and does not go too far. It is when a few of you peck peck peck at him and then you get what you are wanting which is for him to lose his composure
2) Just quit replying to him COMPLETELY..if he replies to you just ignore it or say that to avoid conflict you arent going to debate with him
Those two options are much better than several of you tag teaming him until he slips up.
@kcblitzkrieg Better then rolling with a man who faked injury to avoid serving and proceeded to attack the military and servicemen countless times
Simply put no it isn’t. Re-read his illustrious military record again. His own troops speaking out against him. How can you be so obtuse about this? Is it deliberate? You never served so you don’t understand but a man avoiding service isn’t as bad as a man abandoning his troops. One is cowardly and the other puts men’s lives in grave danger. So no you are dead wrong. Serve and then tell me otherwise.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Brooklyncapper:
@kcblitzkrieg Better then rolling with a man who faked injury to avoid serving and proceeded to attack the military and servicemen countless times
Simply put no it isn’t. Re-read his illustrious military record again. His own troops speaking out against him. How can you be so obtuse about this? Is it deliberate? You never served so you don’t understand but a man avoiding service isn’t as bad as a man abandoning his troops. One is cowardly and the other puts men’s lives in grave danger. So no you are dead wrong. Serve and then tell me otherwise.
I absolutely don’t bait him. I am sick and tired of him (and a few others) inserting Trump in EVERY conversation when Trump was never brought up. This topic is about the abomination of a man that Walz is. He consistently goes off topic and brings it to Trump. But I do believe wishing death on anyone or being crazy enough to be willing to sacrifice your own life/freedom (even if just in theory) to bring death to someone is over the top crazy. That merits a boxing.
Edit: Okay I see the boxing. Thank you. If you need to box me now due to my name calling I will take my punishment. I just couldn’t take his bullshit another second.
3
@wallstreetcappers
I absolutely don’t bait him. I am sick and tired of him (and a few others) inserting Trump in EVERY conversation when Trump was never brought up. This topic is about the abomination of a man that Walz is. He consistently goes off topic and brings it to Trump. But I do believe wishing death on anyone or being crazy enough to be willing to sacrifice your own life/freedom (even if just in theory) to bring death to someone is over the top crazy. That merits a boxing.
Edit: Okay I see the boxing. Thank you. If you need to box me now due to my name calling I will take my punishment. I just couldn’t take his bullshit another second.
Simply put yes TF it is. Trump attacking mccain so badly he was banned from his funeral. Mccain was a real man unlike tgat conman baby! Attacked generals countless times who served 30 years for this country. Attacked gold star families. Spare me the bs! My family fought in ww2 proudly. No one in his worthless family served.
I cant wait til november when he loses bigly
Success is never final, failure is never fatal, and it's the courage that counts.
2
@jesron1269
Simply put yes TF it is. Trump attacking mccain so badly he was banned from his funeral. Mccain was a real man unlike tgat conman baby! Attacked generals countless times who served 30 years for this country. Attacked gold star families. Spare me the bs! My family fought in ww2 proudly. No one in his worthless family served.
Then ask your family member who served if there is a difference. You never need in a fox hole. You have no idea what you are talking about. My family has been in WW1, WW2, Vietnam/Korean war and myself and my brothers all in Afghanistan at various times. Abandoning your post is the worst thing you can do. Call Trump a coward or whatever you like but Walz takes the cake. His men don’t say many positive things about him. Period. I don’t know personally a man who served under him but I asked my friends. Once I have a first person account that confirms what I have read you are a fool to think otherwise.
4
@Brooklyncapper
Then ask your family member who served if there is a difference. You never need in a fox hole. You have no idea what you are talking about. My family has been in WW1, WW2, Vietnam/Korean war and myself and my brothers all in Afghanistan at various times. Abandoning your post is the worst thing you can do. Call Trump a coward or whatever you like but Walz takes the cake. His men don’t say many positive things about him. Period. I don’t know personally a man who served under him but I asked my friends. Once I have a first person account that confirms what I have read you are a fool to think otherwise.
Also I met McCain. Several times. Have you? You know anything personally about the man? I seen this man no more than 20 feet from me threatening to kill another Senator (Sen Brown of Colorado to be exact) for ever saying anything about a POW when never indeed a POW. I was 24 years old and working the US Veterans Affairs committee. I said right then and there that man cannot be President. He is too easily goated into an escalated assault. He isn’t Presidental. That is how I voted for Obama his first term. Some of the things Trump said about him isn’t wrong. Mean but not wrong. So spare me your tears about a man you don’t give two shits about or even know.
5
@Brooklyncapper
Also I met McCain. Several times. Have you? You know anything personally about the man? I seen this man no more than 20 feet from me threatening to kill another Senator (Sen Brown of Colorado to be exact) for ever saying anything about a POW when never indeed a POW. I was 24 years old and working the US Veterans Affairs committee. I said right then and there that man cannot be President. He is too easily goated into an escalated assault. He isn’t Presidental. That is how I voted for Obama his first term. Some of the things Trump said about him isn’t wrong. Mean but not wrong. So spare me your tears about a man you don’t give two shits about or even know.
same could be said about others as well...so now if a poster cannot handle the interaction because of their strong political opinion they yield, you are told to not interact with them instead of telling that poster to stop with the antagonizing posts so that others will stop interacting with them...it's shame on you and asking you to do something versus going to the poster whom is being alleged can't resist with their strong opinionated posts...seems like a misguided approach instead of going at it from the source...or maybe he feels that you can be reached and the other poster cannot....
Interesting development...I'll be watching this system closely
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
2
@jesron1269
same could be said about others as well...so now if a poster cannot handle the interaction because of their strong political opinion they yield, you are told to not interact with them instead of telling that poster to stop with the antagonizing posts so that others will stop interacting with them...it's shame on you and asking you to do something versus going to the poster whom is being alleged can't resist with their strong opinionated posts...seems like a misguided approach instead of going at it from the source...or maybe he feels that you can be reached and the other poster cannot....
Interesting development...I'll be watching this system closely
Problem there is again as usual, CONTEXT. You love tossing in the drama and forcing some partisan nonsense, so watch that system closely as you are part of the problem in baiting members.
I know you dont give two craps about being impartial or looking at all aspects you just have your list that you prefer and you have a list you do not and you react accordingly. I have seen cd on the site as long as you have and Ive seen him battle through tons of nonsense that you were involved in over the years and are involved in now. Is it rocket science that he gets upset easy when provoked? THAT is my reply to the other member, if someone is going to get provoked we ask that you try to avoid the conflict, being an adult that is what you should do...and I do think you fully understand that he gets upset when poked and provoked but outside that he is reasonable. You more than anyone with the history around him should steer completely away from pushing him and that is what I strongly suggested the other day.
I read the exchange between cd and several others in this thread and Ive seen them in others, you and some others are stirring the pot trying to get him boxed for something he really did not say the way it was framed, he did not directly wish death on those two, that is not how it went and it was not in sequence at all. Can you pull a few words out of context and try to frame him? Sure...but fortunately we can see all messages and follow the flow and also know background on you all so there is much more to this SYSTEM than a few picked words given that some of you harass him and know he will blow up, it seems intentional.
If we were to outlaw any mixed content about politicians I would have zapped the lot of you for the extremely tacky tampon comments and the slander you guys are piling on. That comment is insulting, degrading to women and to that politician. It serves no purpose, it is not adding value to discussion here and it is in very poor taste. So much content in this forum is in poor taste and unfortunately your lot is backing a politician in this race that is the KING of poor taste and lack of class, so you are behind in the game before you even start since Trump is a zero ego scuz and does not have respect for anyone but himself...so you cannot be ticked off when the other side points out the character and traits he demonstrates pretty much every waking day and that is just who he is.
1
@ABooksNightmare
Problem there is again as usual, CONTEXT. You love tossing in the drama and forcing some partisan nonsense, so watch that system closely as you are part of the problem in baiting members.
I know you dont give two craps about being impartial or looking at all aspects you just have your list that you prefer and you have a list you do not and you react accordingly. I have seen cd on the site as long as you have and Ive seen him battle through tons of nonsense that you were involved in over the years and are involved in now. Is it rocket science that he gets upset easy when provoked? THAT is my reply to the other member, if someone is going to get provoked we ask that you try to avoid the conflict, being an adult that is what you should do...and I do think you fully understand that he gets upset when poked and provoked but outside that he is reasonable. You more than anyone with the history around him should steer completely away from pushing him and that is what I strongly suggested the other day.
I read the exchange between cd and several others in this thread and Ive seen them in others, you and some others are stirring the pot trying to get him boxed for something he really did not say the way it was framed, he did not directly wish death on those two, that is not how it went and it was not in sequence at all. Can you pull a few words out of context and try to frame him? Sure...but fortunately we can see all messages and follow the flow and also know background on you all so there is much more to this SYSTEM than a few picked words given that some of you harass him and know he will blow up, it seems intentional.
If we were to outlaw any mixed content about politicians I would have zapped the lot of you for the extremely tacky tampon comments and the slander you guys are piling on. That comment is insulting, degrading to women and to that politician. It serves no purpose, it is not adding value to discussion here and it is in very poor taste. So much content in this forum is in poor taste and unfortunately your lot is backing a politician in this race that is the KING of poor taste and lack of class, so you are behind in the game before you even start since Trump is a zero ego scuz and does not have respect for anyone but himself...so you cannot be ticked off when the other side points out the character and traits he demonstrates pretty much every waking day and that is just who he is.
Better then rolling with a man who faked injury to avoid serving and proceeded to attack the military and servicemen countless times
Are you referring to Biden OR Trump for their purposeful end around military service ???
Regardless, wrong thread for topic and I could give a shitt less about either one of those guys. You are fooling yourself if you think "stolen valor" is anywhere comparable to simply "not serving".
The bolded statement above is extremely low IQ and shows a blatant ignorance in one's ability to decipher simple logic between subject / topic at hand. It reminds me of straw man but I'm sure there is better logic term for this, please educate yourself so that you can better contribute to this sub forum
"A straw man fallacy is a type of informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone misrepresents an opponent's argument and then refutes that distorted version instead of the original. The goal is to make the opponent's argument seem weaker so it can be more easily attacked. Straw man arguments can be exaggerated, oversimplified, or illogical, and are often used to distract from relevant points."
Thank you America
0
@Brooklyncapper
Better then rolling with a man who faked injury to avoid serving and proceeded to attack the military and servicemen countless times
Are you referring to Biden OR Trump for their purposeful end around military service ???
Regardless, wrong thread for topic and I could give a shitt less about either one of those guys. You are fooling yourself if you think "stolen valor" is anywhere comparable to simply "not serving".
The bolded statement above is extremely low IQ and shows a blatant ignorance in one's ability to decipher simple logic between subject / topic at hand. It reminds me of straw man but I'm sure there is better logic term for this, please educate yourself so that you can better contribute to this sub forum
"A straw man fallacy is a type of informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone misrepresents an opponent's argument and then refutes that distorted version instead of the original. The goal is to make the opponent's argument seem weaker so it can be more easily attacked. Straw man arguments can be exaggerated, oversimplified, or illogical, and are often used to distract from relevant points."
@Midnight1 You a fan of Mr. Stolen Valor huh..... that is one thing I would've expected you to stand on your values against. Fakeness claim of military rank, disingenuous embellishment of military record.... NOW that is some real POS stuff right there..... I don't think you guys realize how big a f-up this is..... should've rolled with Shapiro
kc, I'm not picking up what you're putting down.
The man served our country for 24 years, put in for retirement before his unit was deployed & most veterans I know are proud of his service. We are proud of everyone that has served our country including JV Vance. As far as I know, Walz hasn't claimed any medals he didn't earn & hasn't embellished his rank. He has never claimed to be a military hero. If he had made these false claims, I would be all over him like I was Troy Nehls from Texas who had the audacity of wearing a combat medal he hadn't earned.
1
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:
@Midnight1 You a fan of Mr. Stolen Valor huh..... that is one thing I would've expected you to stand on your values against. Fakeness claim of military rank, disingenuous embellishment of military record.... NOW that is some real POS stuff right there..... I don't think you guys realize how big a f-up this is..... should've rolled with Shapiro
kc, I'm not picking up what you're putting down.
The man served our country for 24 years, put in for retirement before his unit was deployed & most veterans I know are proud of his service. We are proud of everyone that has served our country including JV Vance. As far as I know, Walz hasn't claimed any medals he didn't earn & hasn't embellished his rank. He has never claimed to be a military hero. If he had made these false claims, I would be all over him like I was Troy Nehls from Texas who had the audacity of wearing a combat medal he hadn't earned.
That is how I voted for Obama his first term. Some of the things Trump said about him isn’t wrong. Mean but not wrong. So spare me your tears about a man you don’t give two shits about or even know.
Yep.... that makes 2 of us
Thank you America
0
@jesron1269
That is how I voted for Obama his first term. Some of the things Trump said about him isn’t wrong. Mean but not wrong. So spare me your tears about a man you don’t give two shits about or even know.
As far as I know, Walz hasn't claimed any medals he didn't earn & hasn't embellished his rank. He has never claimed to be a military hero. If he had made these false claims
I understand.... I will help show you the way. He is POS. Rank embellishment and false combat claims. Abandoned unit months before shipping out for Iraq during GWOT.
Its all out there, just hasn't been put into the MSM news cycle yet (for some strange reason).
Thank you America
0
@Midnight1
As far as I know, Walz hasn't claimed any medals he didn't earn & hasn't embellished his rank. He has never claimed to be a military hero. If he had made these false claims
I understand.... I will help show you the way. He is POS. Rank embellishment and false combat claims. Abandoned unit months before shipping out for Iraq during GWOT.
Its all out there, just hasn't been put into the MSM news cycle yet (for some strange reason).
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg: @Midnight1 You a fan of Mr. Stolen Valor huh..... that is one thing I would've expected you to stand on your values against. Fakeness claim of military rank, disingenuous embellishment of military record.... NOW that is some real POS stuff right there..... I don't think you guys realize how big a f-up this is..... should've rolled with Shapiro kc, I'm not picking up what you're putting down. The man served our country for 24 years, put in for retirement before his unit was deployed & most veterans I know are proud of his service. We are proud of everyone that has served our country including JV Vance. As far as I know, Walz hasn't claimed any medals he didn't earn & hasn't embellished his rank. He has never claimed to be a military hero. If he had made these false claims, I would be all over him like I was Troy Nehls from Texas who had the audacity of wearing a combat medal he hadn't earned.
Yea, I'm not convinced on the whole military embellishing thing just yet either...
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
1
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg: @Midnight1 You a fan of Mr. Stolen Valor huh..... that is one thing I would've expected you to stand on your values against. Fakeness claim of military rank, disingenuous embellishment of military record.... NOW that is some real POS stuff right there..... I don't think you guys realize how big a f-up this is..... should've rolled with Shapiro kc, I'm not picking up what you're putting down. The man served our country for 24 years, put in for retirement before his unit was deployed & most veterans I know are proud of his service. We are proud of everyone that has served our country including JV Vance. As far as I know, Walz hasn't claimed any medals he didn't earn & hasn't embellished his rank. He has never claimed to be a military hero. If he had made these false claims, I would be all over him like I was Troy Nehls from Texas who had the audacity of wearing a combat medal he hadn't earned.
Yea, I'm not convinced on the whole military embellishing thing just yet either...
Typical deflection, completely in character for you. Its ok that you have a past with the guy I just ask you avoid baiting him and provoking. Same goes with brooklyn and how you guys try to push him over the edge in the same way many do with cd.
0
@ABooksNightmare
Typical deflection, completely in character for you. Its ok that you have a past with the guy I just ask you avoid baiting him and provoking. Same goes with brooklyn and how you guys try to push him over the edge in the same way many do with cd.
Needed a new thread to document this real POS.... like I said, big mistake passing on Shapiro but they want to save him for 2028, and rightfully so. Dude is gonna headline his own ticket.
Needed a new thread to document this real POS.... like I said, big mistake passing on Shapiro but they want to save him for 2028, and rightfully so. Dude is gonna headline his own ticket.
Veterans criticize Vance for attacking the military record of Walz. Eustice praises Walz as a great soldier. "When Walz chose to leave, he had every right to leave." After 24 years of military service, Walz filed papers to run for congress and retired months before notification arrived of his battalion deployment in Iraq. Walz became the top ranking enlisted soldier in congress. Fighting for veteran benefits. However Vance served military for only 4 years and as a war correspondent in Iraq.
0
Veterans criticize Vance for attacking the military record of Walz. Eustice praises Walz as a great soldier. "When Walz chose to leave, he had every right to leave." After 24 years of military service, Walz filed papers to run for congress and retired months before notification arrived of his battalion deployment in Iraq. Walz became the top ranking enlisted soldier in congress. Fighting for veteran benefits. However Vance served military for only 4 years and as a war correspondent in Iraq.
@Midnight1 As far as I know, Walz hasn't claimed any medals he didn't earn & hasn't embellished his rank. He has never claimed to be a military hero. If he had made these false claims I understand.... I will help show you the way. He is POS. Rank embellishment and false combat claims. Abandoned unit months before shipping out for Iraq during GWOT. Its all out there, just hasn't been put into the MSM news cycle yet (for some strange reason).
I know there were a couple in his unit that didn't like him but show me a unit that doesn't have the same issue. Believe it or not, soldiers hold petty grievances against others all the time during a time of relative peace. During war, there's no time for insignificant character flaws becoming an issue.
Please post any legitimate reports to the contrary regarding his service.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:
@Midnight1 As far as I know, Walz hasn't claimed any medals he didn't earn & hasn't embellished his rank. He has never claimed to be a military hero. If he had made these false claims I understand.... I will help show you the way. He is POS. Rank embellishment and false combat claims. Abandoned unit months before shipping out for Iraq during GWOT. Its all out there, just hasn't been put into the MSM news cycle yet (for some strange reason).
I know there were a couple in his unit that didn't like him but show me a unit that doesn't have the same issue. Believe it or not, soldiers hold petty grievances against others all the time during a time of relative peace. During war, there's no time for insignificant character flaws becoming an issue.
Please post any legitimate reports to the contrary regarding his service.
I'm not saying you are wrong and midnight is right or vice versa...I'm just saying that I am not sold yet on the issue....these attacks tend to come out once these individuals enter into the spotlight and then the discrediting starts by both sides...right now each side is trying to discredit the others pick as to taint to the public with their limited attention span to persuade votes...each claim to have facts to support eithers side...we have to weed through the bullshit and figure out which is more accurate...timing is everything and that includes Walz and his handlings...with regard to the deserting aspect, there does seem to be reports that support that the timing was close but that he acted prior to deployment of his team....
There is just a lot to dissect with this shit, which sucks as a person trying to follow along...the discrediting of one another has become such a focal point now a days as opposed to what they stand for now and what they can do to better our country, which at this point I don't know if it can be done....it's shit like this that muddies anything from ever getting done...
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
0
@kcblitzkrieg
I'm not saying you are wrong and midnight is right or vice versa...I'm just saying that I am not sold yet on the issue....these attacks tend to come out once these individuals enter into the spotlight and then the discrediting starts by both sides...right now each side is trying to discredit the others pick as to taint to the public with their limited attention span to persuade votes...each claim to have facts to support eithers side...we have to weed through the bullshit and figure out which is more accurate...timing is everything and that includes Walz and his handlings...with regard to the deserting aspect, there does seem to be reports that support that the timing was close but that he acted prior to deployment of his team....
There is just a lot to dissect with this shit, which sucks as a person trying to follow along...the discrediting of one another has become such a focal point now a days as opposed to what they stand for now and what they can do to better our country, which at this point I don't know if it can be done....it's shit like this that muddies anything from ever getting done...
SPAMMING the forum with a NEW THREAD just because it ia alleged a politician stated a lie/misinformation means (by precedent set) this forum can be FLOODED with hundreds of NEW THREADS for the same purpose whenever any politician is accused of lying, including the whoppers by trump and vance, et al...
There are plenty of threads here where those comments can and should be posted....NOT clogging the forum with brand new threads.
2
SPAMMING the forum with a NEW THREAD just because it ia alleged a politician stated a lie/misinformation means (by precedent set) this forum can be FLOODED with hundreds of NEW THREADS for the same purpose whenever any politician is accused of lying, including the whoppers by trump and vance, et al...
There are plenty of threads here where those comments can and should be posted....NOT clogging the forum with brand new threads.
Thank you for you highly opinionated response and misguided facts about the situation...
I actually have never had a problem with cd, ever, but you claim I have...you sure do seem to know a lot about me and my dealings and yet they are way off base....until recently when he started with the personal name calling I never really interacted with him...
carry on with your untruths...I mean you still think I am a Republican and can't resist stating it over and over again...you must be one of them master baitors you are referring to...you can't resist lumping people into groups...it aches you that I do not pick a side
&
Have a great day
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
1
@wallstreetcappers
Thank you for you highly opinionated response and misguided facts about the situation...
I actually have never had a problem with cd, ever, but you claim I have...you sure do seem to know a lot about me and my dealings and yet they are way off base....until recently when he started with the personal name calling I never really interacted with him...
carry on with your untruths...I mean you still think I am a Republican and can't resist stating it over and over again...you must be one of them master baitors you are referring to...you can't resist lumping people into groups...it aches you that I do not pick a side
As an alleged former "military guy" you should know better..... blind partisan support over your fellow brothers is not how it works in the real world, quite the opposite....
This is no "minor transgression" that should be lumped in a thread with a bunch of partisan cry babies.
Everyone is free to do your own homework on the following information. I welcome any corrections to the timeline or details. The internet loves "receipts".
As an alleged former "military guy" you should know better..... blind partisan support over your fellow brothers is not how it works in the real world, quite the opposite....
This is no "minor transgression" that should be lumped in a thread with a bunch of partisan cry babies.
Everyone is free to do your own homework on the following information. I welcome any corrections to the timeline or details. The internet loves "receipts".
I said the guy you are backing, where did I say you were a REPUB? I reference that you are backing Trump...and others are the same. It is curious though because the current state of the TNC in my view means the RNC really does not exist, Trump took it over and installed his family his schemes his agenda and his brand. So how can I call you that since I really feel it does not exist currently?
I said, say, will continue to say that you are backing Trump..that means you are backing Trump and nothing else. But hey if you like lumping me into a group and baiting me with untruths then you are doing a swell job.
We both know your level of interact in the box with regards to the past with cd...so no reason for you to suggest otherwise. Newhart reference...lmao
My back and forth with you is due to your weird interjection on a reply I made to someone else, kinda strange how you love baiting and spinning and then claiming harm after I see and reply directly to you. Post 158
0
@ABooksNightmare
LOL
I said the guy you are backing, where did I say you were a REPUB? I reference that you are backing Trump...and others are the same. It is curious though because the current state of the TNC in my view means the RNC really does not exist, Trump took it over and installed his family his schemes his agenda and his brand. So how can I call you that since I really feel it does not exist currently?
I said, say, will continue to say that you are backing Trump..that means you are backing Trump and nothing else. But hey if you like lumping me into a group and baiting me with untruths then you are doing a swell job.
We both know your level of interact in the box with regards to the past with cd...so no reason for you to suggest otherwise. Newhart reference...lmao
My back and forth with you is due to your weird interjection on a reply I made to someone else, kinda strange how you love baiting and spinning and then claiming harm after I see and reply directly to you. Post 158
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
