@MizuNoYoNiNaru
100% of the articles expressing an opinion on this particular subject state that Harris' turnout effort is markedly better than Trump's.
@MizuNoYoNiNaru
100% of the articles expressing an opinion on this particular subject state that Harris' turnout effort is markedly better than Trump's.
@MizuNoYoNiNaru
100% of the articles expressing an opinion on this particular subject state that Harris' turnout effort is markedly better than Trump's.
@UNIMAN
Thus my comment about the 50 translators needed due to his decline in mental capacity. I dont care what he MEANT to say, it is what he DOES say. Stop making excuses for Trump and hold him to the same standards you do to anyone around you. Do you tolerate drunk uncle rambling and insulting in your house? If so congrats because I do not and you should not.
The message needs to be said not this mucking wandering nonsense filled with attacks and insults, your allowance and excuses for Trump is insulting and why does your side continue to make apologies for this jerk?
@UNIMAN
Thus my comment about the 50 translators needed due to his decline in mental capacity. I dont care what he MEANT to say, it is what he DOES say. Stop making excuses for Trump and hold him to the same standards you do to anyone around you. Do you tolerate drunk uncle rambling and insulting in your house? If so congrats because I do not and you should not.
The message needs to be said not this mucking wandering nonsense filled with attacks and insults, your allowance and excuses for Trump is insulting and why does your side continue to make apologies for this jerk?
@Raiders22
If I wanted to know what your pocket experts thought I would inquire about it, if I wanted a wandering off topic reply to ME I would inquire about it.
If I wanted a direct and reasonable reply regarding ON TOPIC conversation I know I wont find it with you. Comparing Harris and Trump with regards to public speaking is such a weak endeavor there is no comparison. No public speaker is perfect and able to reply on the fly without having issues. I was not comparing how Harris acts in the very moment versus Trump, but if you want to she beats him in that regard as well. If you do not understand the concept and point I was making about content and direction of the candidate it is because you are partisan and an apologist for an abhorrent candidate.
Stop excusing the bully zero ego dope, just own the ticket, face up to his mental decline and toxic abusive nature.
@Raiders22
If I wanted to know what your pocket experts thought I would inquire about it, if I wanted a wandering off topic reply to ME I would inquire about it.
If I wanted a direct and reasonable reply regarding ON TOPIC conversation I know I wont find it with you. Comparing Harris and Trump with regards to public speaking is such a weak endeavor there is no comparison. No public speaker is perfect and able to reply on the fly without having issues. I was not comparing how Harris acts in the very moment versus Trump, but if you want to she beats him in that regard as well. If you do not understand the concept and point I was making about content and direction of the candidate it is because you are partisan and an apologist for an abhorrent candidate.
Stop excusing the bully zero ego dope, just own the ticket, face up to his mental decline and toxic abusive nature.
@wallstreetcappers
Comparing Harris and Trump with regards to public speaking is such a weak endeavor there is no comparison.
Correct. Trump is simply far better. He can speak off the cuff and can speak at length without seeming confused.
Her pace is slow and halting; Trump is much faster and self-confident.
You do not need to 'ask'; it is freely given.
@wallstreetcappers
Comparing Harris and Trump with regards to public speaking is such a weak endeavor there is no comparison.
Correct. Trump is simply far better. He can speak off the cuff and can speak at length without seeming confused.
Her pace is slow and halting; Trump is much faster and self-confident.
You do not need to 'ask'; it is freely given.
@Raiders22
Correct with your partisan deflecting reply, you are definitely predictable. Did your pocket pundits tell you he is better off the cuff? Then it must be so.
@Raiders22
Correct with your partisan deflecting reply, you are definitely predictable. Did your pocket pundits tell you he is better off the cuff? Then it must be so.
@wallstreetcappers
No sir. Anyone can see it.
The difference is amazing.
That is why Trump was able to go to any and all podcasts and sit down.
Harris is simply incapable of doing it. When she tries she looks out of her depth, unsure of herself, and her ignorance of the topics show.
You are quite predictable as well. As I said before, you are blinded by your hatred of Trump and will not allow there to be any possible good by him.
As I said before, you have also lost any credibility on Trump a long time ago because of this hatred.
@wallstreetcappers
No sir. Anyone can see it.
The difference is amazing.
That is why Trump was able to go to any and all podcasts and sit down.
Harris is simply incapable of doing it. When she tries she looks out of her depth, unsure of herself, and her ignorance of the topics show.
You are quite predictable as well. As I said before, you are blinded by your hatred of Trump and will not allow there to be any possible good by him.
As I said before, you have also lost any credibility on Trump a long time ago because of this hatred.
Trump went on podcasts because Barron told him to so he could reach a younger audience. He said as much on Rogan. Harris already gets a younger audience. Trumps appearances were cringy and out of place. It was weird.
Trump went on podcasts because Barron told him to so he could reach a younger audience. He said as much on Rogan. Harris already gets a younger audience. Trumps appearances were cringy and out of place. It was weird.
@BWS77
I will take your word for it being cringy to you. I only saw snippets here and there.
But a lot of the people I saw talking about them did not feel the same.
But you are correct. You have to reach the younger folks. Obama started that with the social media stuff.
But Trump also went on a lot of places that did not cater to younger folks. I am also not so sure the Rogan demographic is exactly young.
It is also his most viewed podcast ever.
But, either way it is a great way to reach a larger and more diverse audience than in years past.
I think if she loses this could very well be one of the reasons. I think her handlers simply realized early on after a few attempts that it was not her thing.
So, they stayed away from a great opportunity for her to reach folks she might not otherwise have reached.
I think she could easily have rehearsed some and done them. She could have done it the same way she did in the debate. All she had to do was stick to what she knew and had rehearsed and always bring any question back to that in a solid way.
It is for sure the future for candidates I think. TV interviews are not the same as before.
@BWS77
I will take your word for it being cringy to you. I only saw snippets here and there.
But a lot of the people I saw talking about them did not feel the same.
But you are correct. You have to reach the younger folks. Obama started that with the social media stuff.
But Trump also went on a lot of places that did not cater to younger folks. I am also not so sure the Rogan demographic is exactly young.
It is also his most viewed podcast ever.
But, either way it is a great way to reach a larger and more diverse audience than in years past.
I think if she loses this could very well be one of the reasons. I think her handlers simply realized early on after a few attempts that it was not her thing.
So, they stayed away from a great opportunity for her to reach folks she might not otherwise have reached.
I think she could easily have rehearsed some and done them. She could have done it the same way she did in the debate. All she had to do was stick to what she knew and had rehearsed and always bring any question back to that in a solid way.
It is for sure the future for candidates I think. TV interviews are not the same as before.
Trump in PA talking about the protective glass at the podium:
"I have a piece of glass over here and I don't have a piece there. I have a piece of glass here (looking straight ahead) but all we have really over here is the Fake News, right? And to get me somebody would have to shoot through the Fake News... and I don't mind that so much. I don't mind. I don't mind that."
Trump in PA talking about the protective glass at the podium:
"I have a piece of glass over here and I don't have a piece there. I have a piece of glass here (looking straight ahead) but all we have really over here is the Fake News, right? And to get me somebody would have to shoot through the Fake News... and I don't mind that so much. I don't mind. I don't mind that."
Is that a challenge?
Is that a challenge?
So much to dissect here, but just know this going forward
Wallstreet is going to be so mad, on a bender of banning.
what you reap is what you sow
Trump by 10
So much to dissect here, but just know this going forward
Wallstreet is going to be so mad, on a bender of banning.
what you reap is what you sow
Trump by 10
I want to 100% clear, I was not alive during this bone spur draft dodge event. But my father is a Vietnam vet, 55 years later I still won't ask him questions
It's interesting to me watching this play out, and to hear how Trump dodged the draft for bone spurs and the same people if they were alive were also burning their own draft cards. Most of the critics that trash Trump about this were not even of draft age in the 60's so its a grain of salt
armchair QB
I want to 100% clear, I was not alive during this bone spur draft dodge event. But my father is a Vietnam vet, 55 years later I still won't ask him questions
It's interesting to me watching this play out, and to hear how Trump dodged the draft for bone spurs and the same people if they were alive were also burning their own draft cards. Most of the critics that trash Trump about this were not even of draft age in the 60's so its a grain of salt
armchair QB
Crickets. Not surprised. If they can't spin it to defend him they just ignore it.
Crickets. Not surprised. If they can't spin it to defend him they just ignore it.
What are you talking about? You didn't ask a question. What warranted a response?
What are you talking about? You didn't ask a question. What warranted a response?
Funny how that works.....
Funny how that works.....
But it's the biggest election that we've ever had.....
This is the new spin on the nitwit propaganda and all we've heard the last few elections....ridiculous....it's just another election on our due process and whoever wins, we as people lose...that's the fact here
But it's the biggest election that we've ever had.....
This is the new spin on the nitwit propaganda and all we've heard the last few elections....ridiculous....it's just another election on our due process and whoever wins, we as people lose...that's the fact here
That's because her fanbase is so old, they may kick the bucket before next election.
That's because her fanbase is so old, they may kick the bucket before next election.
Something is being lost on most as we progress forward....America is not the same America as it once was in the eyes of others....we've lost our varnish and I'm afraid we are weathered and will be unable to repair itself....
Something is being lost on most as we progress forward....America is not the same America as it once was in the eyes of others....we've lost our varnish and I'm afraid we are weathered and will be unable to repair itself....
Yeah you’re right . But feels bad ya know . Cuz not a single person in here is gonna change things .
Whether we’re talking about things on a grandiose scale like a National Election ,
or just the simple and played out goings on that happen in some petrified little forum belonging to a website that’s based in Canada that somehow is having major problems with all the free contests that it offers ,
because really , have you seen the HELP FORUM lately ? Even my girls Tam and Deb stopped responding to peeps because maybe there are no real answers .
Yeah you’re right . But feels bad ya know . Cuz not a single person in here is gonna change things .
Whether we’re talking about things on a grandiose scale like a National Election ,
or just the simple and played out goings on that happen in some petrified little forum belonging to a website that’s based in Canada that somehow is having major problems with all the free contests that it offers ,
because really , have you seen the HELP FORUM lately ? Even my girls Tam and Deb stopped responding to peeps because maybe there are no real answers .
RAGE is on exhibit by that statement alone
But Oh Wait..Joe ROGAN endorses " Red Man".. now how many podcast followers does he have..
Let's ALL HOPE that God's Spirit crushes the "Culture of Death" ...we can only Pray
RAGE is on exhibit by that statement alone
But Oh Wait..Joe ROGAN endorses " Red Man".. now how many podcast followers does he have..
Let's ALL HOPE that God's Spirit crushes the "Culture of Death" ...we can only Pray
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.