How can we leave her alone..when she won't go away ?

You are worse than my teenage kid, every possible angle to make a comment lacking any relevance. You obviously dislike her yet you are one of the most regular posters and reference maker of that same person.

And yeah to reply, she was a NY senator, not president or VP or speaker or anything large, but yeah you surely made a solid point and didnt understand the repeated underlying concept...the obvious one.

Ahhhh another teenage attempt, you are doing a great job. Why are you suggesting that I am putting down my kiddo in such a fashion to compare them to you? Maybe it is not a PUT down, rather an observation of deflection. One can make an observation without it being a put down.

But DIVERSION aside, you dislike Hilary, I think everyone here knows it...why do you tail her around as much as you do given that you really dislike her? Isnt the best solution to not give her attention and let this dislike drive you crazy as it obviously has?

Quote: Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim ...Hillary is polling #2 as the candidate to represent the Democrats in 2020...that is current and relevant.. [/Quote]

But... I've been told since 2016 that polls are meaningless!

 according to my britania encyclopedias...

pssst....

Trump is the CURRENT and ACTIVE leader of this country....

I speak for myself....so I dont have any idea what the crap you are talking about here. I said that you whine about Clinton and obviously dislike her yet you are one of the posters who mention her the MOST. If you dislike someone why bring that person up and complain about them? Just ignore what they are doing and move along. Clinton was not schlonged by Trump, is that really a fitting description for how the election went? She won the popular vote and due to the electoral college joke Trump got more electoral pieces due to the outdated way the EC is organized, but Clinton WON the popular vote? I think you dislike her so much that you obviously misunderstand what happened. 

The point was/is/will be that you really dont like her, I get that...I am not fond of her either but it is mega weak for you to retort the shortcomings and flaws of Trump by deflecting onto her, that is not how you resolve an issue or how you debate a point. Deal with the topic and either debate the point or admit to the point and move on...this "Clinton did XYZ" stuff is a zero answer, especially since the deflection is irrelevant, if you want to deflect then the person you are trying to deflect ON needs to have part ownership of the issue. So if someone confronts Trump for the budget deficit, it is reasonable to say that Obama was also lousy in his later years on the deficit (the earlier years are really not fair game since the condition of the economy warranted extra government spending, that has happened many times and is normal) but not saying "Well Clinton did XYZ".

You equate fans in the stands to the popular vote? Did she or did she not win the popular vote? You are the silly boy who said Trump schlonged Clinton, not me...I do not consider a loss in the popular vote and a win in the EC in the same way you do, as fans in the stands and how many TD's someone scores vs the total points.

The EC is outdated, it needs to be tweaked to represent the movement in population, if not then why have the popular vote in the first place? There is no reason why smaller states should hold a higher weighting with the EC vs the larger states, but if you notice which party has been the recent beneficiary of the EC I am sure zippo will change with the error in this setup.

It would be the same as saying that the state gov vote in AZ would be weighted differently because the high intensity of population of PHX and Tuscon do not represent the total square miles of the state of Arizona so we need to discount the importance of the metro vote and give more weight to the rural vote of Flagstaff and Prescott.

Pure silliness.

WallStreet, take away the sanctuary states of California, New York, New Jersey and Connecticut and then tell me how popular that candidate was. 

Electoral college was a brilliant plan that leveled the playing field with no error in the setup  

Yeah there you go...sanctuary states, as if a person in the larger states matters less than a person in a mid sized state. Makes no sense.

Go back to my Flagstaff example, yeah lets minimize the metro population and maximize other lesser dense populated states.

Brilliant scheme...

Slim today's a great day for me. And after getting to the city and unloading stocks I been sitting on for a couple of years. Been on a bus back to auburn. Thought of why She would be relevant still.... Must be her image to find raises and the ability to Network. Clinton's campaign and the DNC were the same entities. They collected and spent a billion and a half. This is a staggering sum of money for any campaign ever. It is quite possible that she could be with Pelosi and Summer auto correct is killing me here but chuck Pelosi Clinton'sarr working to take back Congress. Maine's second district will spend nearly 20 million alone. Most of that loot will come from outside the state....Dems need her.

Wallstreet are you down with sanctuary cities/states? Yes or no?

Why is this a yes or no only question? There is no YES or NO here...there are points on both sides, I do not blindly say yes or no because doing so means you are siding with the faults that currently exist.

Rather than yes and no why are we not focused on protecting the rights of our citizens and making improvements instead of scrapping something completely OR accepting the existing flaws and complaining about it?

There are MANY middle issues in politics and in society, the yes or no issues are not usually cut and dry unless you blindly side with your party and dismiss what good there is in the item in question...generally speaking of course.

It is a yes or no question quite simple. 

I support sanctuary cities/states yes or no?

Wallstreet are illegal immigrants now "our citizens". What does US citizenship mean if anyone crossing the Rio Grande can take advantage of the same rights as US born? Mass is already queuing up legislation allowing them to vote. 

You down with a Mexican/Syrian/Hatian crossing a river and having the same rights as a US Citizen...yes or no?