Not so WSC....she is very much in current politics.. As of 23 day's ago in Harvard CAPS/Harris June 2018 presidential poll Joe Biden is the early favorite at 32% to represent the Democrats and try to unseat President Donald Trump in the 2020 election,.............Guess who is in second place ?That's right ! The party's 2016 standard bearer, Hillary Clinton, came in second with 18%...So, by this poll ...with Biden and Hillary the two leading democrat candidates for 2020..how can we not mention her ?
Read what I said again...she is not currently relevant, if anything you can remotely long shot stretch start mentioning her in another year if you seriously feel the need, but the point is as mentioned that YOU and your side mention her much much more than the other, and for someone you obviously despise why do you care two craps about her?
I know she is the ultra conservative crybaby fallback when someone actually calls out the yellow haired guy for whatever moronic stunt he is pulling or how his campaign promises are as toxic as his companies debt was, she is the easy target but isnt that amature hour? She was never elected to anything more than a short spanned NY gig, so why are you so unable to let her go and just focus on whatever current malaise the loud-mouth BK cheater is involved in?
I think if YOU stopped you would find especially here it would be a ghost town with regard to that hated Clinton lady.
Now read again what I said ...Hillary is polling #2
as the candidate to represent the Democrats in 2020...that is current
and relevant..
By the way, Hillary Rodman Clinton was not elected for a short spanned gig
.she was elected NY Senator in 2000 and ..reelected to the Senate in 2006 that's 8 years she
served as Senator from 2001 to 2009...
Good Lord,,,, now you have me defending Hillary ...nice maneuver...I won't let that happen again..
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Not so WSC....she is very much in current politics.. As of 23 day's ago in Harvard CAPS/Harris June 2018 presidential poll Joe Biden is the early favorite at 32% to represent the Democrats and try to unseat President Donald Trump in the 2020 election,.............Guess who is in second place ?That's right ! The party's 2016 standard bearer, Hillary Clinton, came in second with 18%...So, by this poll ...with Biden and Hillary the two leading democrat candidates for 2020..how can we not mention her ?
Read what I said again...she is not currently relevant, if anything you can remotely long shot stretch start mentioning her in another year if you seriously feel the need, but the point is as mentioned that YOU and your side mention her much much more than the other, and for someone you obviously despise why do you care two craps about her?
I know she is the ultra conservative crybaby fallback when someone actually calls out the yellow haired guy for whatever moronic stunt he is pulling or how his campaign promises are as toxic as his companies debt was, she is the easy target but isnt that amature hour? She was never elected to anything more than a short spanned NY gig, so why are you so unable to let her go and just focus on whatever current malaise the loud-mouth BK cheater is involved in?
I think if YOU stopped you would find especially here it would be a ghost town with regard to that hated Clinton lady.
Now read again what I said ...Hillary is polling #2
as the candidate to represent the Democrats in 2020...that is current
and relevant..
By the way, Hillary Rodman Clinton was not elected for a short spanned gig
.she was elected NY Senator in 2000 and ..reelected to the Senate in 2006 that's 8 years she
served as Senator from 2001 to 2009...
Good Lord,,,, now you have me defending Hillary ...nice maneuver...I won't let that happen again..
You are worse than my teenage kid, every possible angle to make a comment lacking any relevance. You obviously dislike her yet you are one of the most regular posters and reference maker of that same person.
And yeah to reply, she was a NY senator, not president or VP or speaker or anything large, but yeah you surely made a solid point and didnt understand the repeated underlying concept...the obvious one.
0
You are worse than my teenage kid, every possible angle to make a comment lacking any relevance. You obviously dislike her yet you are one of the most regular posters and reference maker of that same person.
And yeah to reply, she was a NY senator, not president or VP or speaker or anything large, but yeah you surely made a solid point and didnt understand the repeated underlying concept...the obvious one.
You are striving too hard with the put-downs ...try to debate a topic sometime without them..if you can ...and see how it goes...
Ahhhh another teenage attempt, you are doing a great job. Why are you suggesting that I am putting down my kiddo in such a fashion to compare them to you? Maybe it is not a PUT down, rather an observation of deflection. One can make an observation without it being a put down.
But DIVERSION aside, you dislike Hilary, I think everyone here knows it...why do you tail her around as much as you do given that you really dislike her? Isnt the best solution to not give her attention and let this dislike drive you crazy as it obviously has?
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
You are striving too hard with the put-downs ...try to debate a topic sometime without them..if you can ...and see how it goes...
Ahhhh another teenage attempt, you are doing a great job. Why are you suggesting that I am putting down my kiddo in such a fashion to compare them to you? Maybe it is not a PUT down, rather an observation of deflection. One can make an observation without it being a put down.
But DIVERSION aside, you dislike Hilary, I think everyone here knows it...why do you tail her around as much as you do given that you really dislike her? Isnt the best solution to not give her attention and let this dislike drive you crazy as it obviously has?
My dislike for Hillary and my expression there of is ..much less than the venom you expose over our hatred for our President Donald Trump ....
..and I would be "more than happy" if you took your own advice and not give President Trump so much attention....if you do ..I feel this obsession and hatred you have for him will lessen ..
0
My dislike for Hillary and my expression there of is ..much less than the venom you expose over our hatred for our President Donald Trump ....
..and I would be "more than happy" if you took your own advice and not give President Trump so much attention....if you do ..I feel this obsession and hatred you have for him will lessen ..
Wsc you bash Trump daily and often not about policy but about the way he acts like your having dinner with him tonight. You should take your own advice while stand stand on your perch.
0
Wsc you bash Trump daily and often not about policy but about the way he acts like your having dinner with him tonight. You should take your own advice while stand stand on your perch.
Quote: Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim ...Hillary is polling #2 as the candidate to represent the Democrats in 2020...that is current and relevant.. [/Quote]
But... I've been told since 2016 that polls are meaningless!
Gotta go pee!
0
Quote: Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim ...Hillary is polling #2 as the candidate to represent the Democrats in 2020...that is current and relevant.. [/Quote]
But... I've been told since 2016 that polls are meaningless!
SarasostaSlim promotes delusional conspiracy theories that have been debunked by multiple investigations. According to wikipedia, 5 government investigations all concluded Vincent Foster committed suicide due to overwhelming evidences.
10 government investigations found no evidence of wrongdoing by Obama administration in Benghazi attack. FBI, senate, house intelligence, accountability review board and others reach similar conclusions. No intelligence failure. No delay in CIA rescue team. No missed opportunity for military rescue. Fact checker politifact rated true that Clinton acted properly under the circumstances.
0
SarasostaSlim promotes delusional conspiracy theories that have been debunked by multiple investigations. According to wikipedia, 5 government investigations all concluded Vincent Foster committed suicide due to overwhelming evidences.
10 government investigations found no evidence of wrongdoing by Obama administration in Benghazi attack. FBI, senate, house intelligence, accountability review board and others reach similar conclusions. No intelligence failure. No delay in CIA rescue team. No missed opportunity for military rescue. Fact checker politifact rated true that Clinton acted properly under the circumstances.
SarasostaSlim promotes delusional conspiracy theories that have been debunked by multiple investigations. According to wikipedia, 5 government investigations all concluded Vincent Foster committed suicide due to overwhelming evidences.
Thirdperson,,, I promoted no conspiracy theory about Vincent Foster ,in this thread or in any other thread, in this forum...at any time.
Your comment is misdirected...
You 3rd............ are the one who is putting out fake and counterfeit information...
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
SarasostaSlim promotes delusional conspiracy theories that have been debunked by multiple investigations. According to wikipedia, 5 government investigations all concluded Vincent Foster committed suicide due to overwhelming evidences.
Thirdperson,,, I promoted no conspiracy theory about Vincent Foster ,in this thread or in any other thread, in this forum...at any time.
Your comment is misdirected...
You 3rd............ are the one who is putting out fake and counterfeit information...
My dislike for Hillary and my expression there of is ..much less than the venom you expose over our hatred for our President Donald Trump ......and I would be "more than happy" if you took your own advice and not give President Trump so much attention....if you do ..I feel this obsession and hatred you have for him will lessen ..
pssst....
Trump is the CURRENT and ACTIVE leader of this country....
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
My dislike for Hillary and my expression there of is ..much less than the venom you expose over our hatred for our President Donald Trump ......and I would be "more than happy" if you took your own advice and not give President Trump so much attention....if you do ..I feel this obsession and hatred you have for him will lessen ..
pssst....
Trump is the CURRENT and ACTIVE leader of this country....
Trump is the CURRENT and ACTIVE leader of this country....
Oh now I understand.....your side thinks because she was rejected by her own party for President once and schlonged by Donald Trump in the last election..it's not fair to pick on her..
Well, she is out there and calling out the President so she is fair game.
Just today, in a Fest in New York City's Central Park she attack the President saying ...He's a direct threat to our democracy among other not nice things...So If she wants to get on her soapbox and actively slam the President ....I feel free to actively rebuke her ..
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
pssst....
Trump is the CURRENT and ACTIVE leader of this country....
Oh now I understand.....your side thinks because she was rejected by her own party for President once and schlonged by Donald Trump in the last election..it's not fair to pick on her..
Well, she is out there and calling out the President so she is fair game.
Just today, in a Fest in New York City's Central Park she attack the President saying ...He's a direct threat to our democracy among other not nice things...So If she wants to get on her soapbox and actively slam the President ....I feel free to actively rebuke her ..
pssst.... Trump is the CURRENT and ACTIVE leader of this country....
Oh now I understand.....your side thinks because she was rejected by her own party for President once and schlonged by Donald Trump in the last election..it's not fair to pick on her..Well, she is out there and calling out the President so she is fair game.Just today, in a Fest in New York City's Central Park she attack the President saying ...He's a direct threat to our democracy among other not nice things...So If she wants to get on her soapbox and actively slam the President ....I feel free to actively rebuke her ..
I speak for myself....so I dont have any idea what the crap you are talking about here. I said that you whine about Clinton and obviously dislike her yet you are one of the posters who mention her the MOST. If you dislike someone why bring that person up and complain about them? Just ignore what they are doing and move along. Clinton was not schlonged by Trump, is that really a fitting description for how the election went? She won the popular vote and due to the electoral college joke Trump got more electoral pieces due to the outdated way the EC is organized, but Clinton WON the popular vote? I think you dislike her so much that you obviously misunderstand what happened.
The point was/is/will be that you really dont like her, I get that...I am not fond of her either but it is mega weak for you to retort the shortcomings and flaws of Trump by deflecting onto her, that is not how you resolve an issue or how you debate a point. Deal with the topic and either debate the point or admit to the point and move on...this "Clinton did XYZ" stuff is a zero answer, especially since the deflection is irrelevant, if you want to deflect then the person you are trying to deflect ON needs to have part ownership of the issue. So if someone confronts Trump for the budget deficit, it is reasonable to say that Obama was also lousy in his later years on the deficit (the earlier years are really not fair game since the condition of the economy warranted extra government spending, that has happened many times and is normal) but not saying "Well Clinton did XYZ".
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
pssst.... Trump is the CURRENT and ACTIVE leader of this country....
Oh now I understand.....your side thinks because she was rejected by her own party for President once and schlonged by Donald Trump in the last election..it's not fair to pick on her..Well, she is out there and calling out the President so she is fair game.Just today, in a Fest in New York City's Central Park she attack the President saying ...He's a direct threat to our democracy among other not nice things...So If she wants to get on her soapbox and actively slam the President ....I feel free to actively rebuke her ..
I speak for myself....so I dont have any idea what the crap you are talking about here. I said that you whine about Clinton and obviously dislike her yet you are one of the posters who mention her the MOST. If you dislike someone why bring that person up and complain about them? Just ignore what they are doing and move along. Clinton was not schlonged by Trump, is that really a fitting description for how the election went? She won the popular vote and due to the electoral college joke Trump got more electoral pieces due to the outdated way the EC is organized, but Clinton WON the popular vote? I think you dislike her so much that you obviously misunderstand what happened.
The point was/is/will be that you really dont like her, I get that...I am not fond of her either but it is mega weak for you to retort the shortcomings and flaws of Trump by deflecting onto her, that is not how you resolve an issue or how you debate a point. Deal with the topic and either debate the point or admit to the point and move on...this "Clinton did XYZ" stuff is a zero answer, especially since the deflection is irrelevant, if you want to deflect then the person you are trying to deflect ON needs to have part ownership of the issue. So if someone confronts Trump for the budget deficit, it is reasonable to say that Obama was also lousy in his later years on the deficit (the earlier years are really not fair game since the condition of the economy warranted extra government spending, that has happened many times and is normal) but not saying "Well Clinton did XYZ".
I speak for myself....so I dont have any idea what the crap you are talking about here. I said that you whine about Clinton and obviously dislike her yet you are one of the posters who mention her the MOST. If you dislike someone why bring that person up and complain about them? Just ignore what they are doing and move along. Clinton was not schlonged by Trump, is that really a fitting description for how the election went? She won the popular vote and due to the electoral college joke Trump got more electoral pieces due to the outdated way the EC is organized, but Clinton WON the popular vote? I think you dislike her so much that you obviously misunderstand what happened.
Now ,,you are getting completely ridiculous WSC..
By saying the above in bold..that’s like saying that the Philadelphia Eagles only won the Superbowl because they scored more touchdowns in spite of the fact there were more Patriots fans in the stadium......lmao
You are reeealy stretching now........looks like it's time to move on.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
I speak for myself....so I dont have any idea what the crap you are talking about here. I said that you whine about Clinton and obviously dislike her yet you are one of the posters who mention her the MOST. If you dislike someone why bring that person up and complain about them? Just ignore what they are doing and move along. Clinton was not schlonged by Trump, is that really a fitting description for how the election went? She won the popular vote and due to the electoral college joke Trump got more electoral pieces due to the outdated way the EC is organized, but Clinton WON the popular vote? I think you dislike her so much that you obviously misunderstand what happened.
Now ,,you are getting completely ridiculous WSC..
By saying the above in bold..that’s like saying that the Philadelphia Eagles only won the Superbowl because they scored more touchdowns in spite of the fact there were more Patriots fans in the stadium......lmao
You are reeealy stretching now........looks like it's time to move on.
I speak for myself....so I dont have any idea what the crap you are talking about here. I said that you whine about Clinton and obviously dislike her yet you are one of the posters who mention her the MOST. If you dislike someone why bring that person up and complain about them? Just ignore what they are doing and move along. Clinton was not schlonged by Trump, is that really a fitting description for how the election went? She won the popular vote and due to the electoral college joke Trump got more electoral pieces due to the outdated way the EC is organized, but Clinton WON the popular vote? I think you dislike her so much that you obviously misunderstand what happened.
Now ,,you are getting completely ridiculous WSC..By saying the above in bold..that’s like saying that the Philadelphia Eagles only won the Superbowl because they scored more touchdowns in spite of the fact there were more Patriots fans in the stadium......lmaoYou are reeealy stretching now........looks like it's time to move on.
You equate fans in the stands to the popular vote? Did she or did she not win the popular vote? You are the silly boy who said Trump schlonged Clinton, not me...I do not consider a loss in the popular vote and a win in the EC in the same way you do, as fans in the stands and how many TD's someone scores vs the total points.
The EC is outdated, it needs to be tweaked to represent the movement in population, if not then why have the popular vote in the first place? There is no reason why smaller states should hold a higher weighting with the EC vs the larger states, but if you notice which party has been the recent beneficiary of the EC I am sure zippo will change with the error in this setup.
It would be the same as saying that the state gov vote in AZ would be weighted differently because the high intensity of population of PHX and Tuscon do not represent the total square miles of the state of Arizona so we need to discount the importance of the metro vote and give more weight to the rural vote of Flagstaff and Prescott.
Pure silliness.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
I speak for myself....so I dont have any idea what the crap you are talking about here. I said that you whine about Clinton and obviously dislike her yet you are one of the posters who mention her the MOST. If you dislike someone why bring that person up and complain about them? Just ignore what they are doing and move along. Clinton was not schlonged by Trump, is that really a fitting description for how the election went? She won the popular vote and due to the electoral college joke Trump got more electoral pieces due to the outdated way the EC is organized, but Clinton WON the popular vote? I think you dislike her so much that you obviously misunderstand what happened.
Now ,,you are getting completely ridiculous WSC..By saying the above in bold..that’s like saying that the Philadelphia Eagles only won the Superbowl because they scored more touchdowns in spite of the fact there were more Patriots fans in the stadium......lmaoYou are reeealy stretching now........looks like it's time to move on.
You equate fans in the stands to the popular vote? Did she or did she not win the popular vote? You are the silly boy who said Trump schlonged Clinton, not me...I do not consider a loss in the popular vote and a win in the EC in the same way you do, as fans in the stands and how many TD's someone scores vs the total points.
The EC is outdated, it needs to be tweaked to represent the movement in population, if not then why have the popular vote in the first place? There is no reason why smaller states should hold a higher weighting with the EC vs the larger states, but if you notice which party has been the recent beneficiary of the EC I am sure zippo will change with the error in this setup.
It would be the same as saying that the state gov vote in AZ would be weighted differently because the high intensity of population of PHX and Tuscon do not represent the total square miles of the state of Arizona so we need to discount the importance of the metro vote and give more weight to the rural vote of Flagstaff and Prescott.
Slim today's a great day for me. And after getting to the city and unloading stocks I been sitting on for a couple of years. Been on a bus back to auburn. Thought of why She would be relevant still.... Must be her image to find raises and the ability to Network. Clinton's campaign and the DNC were the same entities. They collected and spent a billion and a half. This is a staggering sum of money for any campaign ever. It is quite possible that she could be with Pelosi and Summer auto correct is killing me here but chuck Pelosi Clinton'sarr working to take back Congress. Maine's second district will spend nearly 20 million alone. Most of that loot will come from outside the state....Dems need her.
0
Slim today's a great day for me. And after getting to the city and unloading stocks I been sitting on for a couple of years. Been on a bus back to auburn. Thought of why She would be relevant still.... Must be her image to find raises and the ability to Network. Clinton's campaign and the DNC were the same entities. They collected and spent a billion and a half. This is a staggering sum of money for any campaign ever. It is quite possible that she could be with Pelosi and Summer auto correct is killing me here but chuck Pelosi Clinton'sarr working to take back Congress. Maine's second district will spend nearly 20 million alone. Most of that loot will come from outside the state....Dems need her.
Yeah there you go...sanctuary states, as if a person in the larger states matters less than a person in a mid sized state. Makes no sense. Go back to my Flagstaff example, yeah lets minimize the metro population and maximize other lesser dense populated states. Brilliant scheme...
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Yeah there you go...sanctuary states, as if a person in the larger states matters less than a person in a mid sized state. Makes no sense. Go back to my Flagstaff example, yeah lets minimize the metro population and maximize other lesser dense populated states. Brilliant scheme...
Wallstreet are you down with sanctuary cities/states? Yes or no?
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Yeah there you go...sanctuary states, as if a person in the larger states matters less than a person in a mid sized state. Makes no sense. Go back to my Flagstaff example, yeah lets minimize the metro population and maximize other lesser dense populated states. Brilliant scheme...
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Yeah there you go...sanctuary states, as if a person in the larger states matters less than a person in a mid sized state. Makes no sense. Go back to my Flagstaff example, yeah lets minimize the metro population and maximize other lesser dense populated states. Brilliant scheme...
Wallstreet are you down with sanctuary cities/states? Yes or no?
Yeah there you go...sanctuary states, as if a person in the larger states matters less than a person in a mid sized state. Makes no sense. Go back to my Flagstaff example, yeah lets minimize the metro population and maximize other lesser dense populated states. Brilliant scheme...
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Yeah there you go...sanctuary states, as if a person in the larger states matters less than a person in a mid sized state. Makes no sense. Go back to my Flagstaff example, yeah lets minimize the metro population and maximize other lesser dense populated states. Brilliant scheme...
Wallstreet are you down with sanctuary cities/states? Yes or no?
Why is this a yes or no only question? There is no YES or NO here...there are points on both sides, I do not blindly say yes or no because doing so means you are siding with the faults that currently exist.
Rather than yes and no why are we not focused on protecting the rights of our citizens and making improvements instead of scrapping something completely OR accepting the existing flaws and complaining about it?
There are MANY middle issues in politics and in society, the yes or no issues are not usually cut and dry unless you blindly side with your party and dismiss what good there is in the item in question...generally speaking of course.
0
Quote Originally Posted by HockeyTeeth:
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Yeah there you go...sanctuary states, as if a person in the larger states matters less than a person in a mid sized state. Makes no sense. Go back to my Flagstaff example, yeah lets minimize the metro population and maximize other lesser dense populated states. Brilliant scheme...
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Yeah there you go...sanctuary states, as if a person in the larger states matters less than a person in a mid sized state. Makes no sense. Go back to my Flagstaff example, yeah lets minimize the metro population and maximize other lesser dense populated states. Brilliant scheme...
Wallstreet are you down with sanctuary cities/states? Yes or no?
Why is this a yes or no only question? There is no YES or NO here...there are points on both sides, I do not blindly say yes or no because doing so means you are siding with the faults that currently exist.
Rather than yes and no why are we not focused on protecting the rights of our citizens and making improvements instead of scrapping something completely OR accepting the existing flaws and complaining about it?
There are MANY middle issues in politics and in society, the yes or no issues are not usually cut and dry unless you blindly side with your party and dismiss what good there is in the item in question...generally speaking of course.
SarasostaSlim promotes delusional conspiracy theories that have been debunked by multiple investigations. According to wikipedia, 5 government investigations all concluded Vincent Foster committed suicide due to overwhelming evidences.
10 government investigations found no evidence of wrongdoing by Obama administration in Benghazi attack. FBI, senate, house intelligence, accountability review board and others reach similar conclusions. No intelligence failure. No delay in CIA rescue team. No missed opportunity for military rescue. Fact checker politifact rated true that Clinton acted properly under the circumstances.
You have such faith in what the government tells you... Where are the WMD's in Iraq? There was overwhelming evidence that the intelligence agencies provided to prove it was worth going to war in Iraq. Does that not cause you any pause?
They out and out lied to your face about Benghazi being about a video, any attack on the date September 11th is not about a video.
Can you not think for yourself? As usual "according to" leads again.
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
SarasostaSlim promotes delusional conspiracy theories that have been debunked by multiple investigations. According to wikipedia, 5 government investigations all concluded Vincent Foster committed suicide due to overwhelming evidences.
10 government investigations found no evidence of wrongdoing by Obama administration in Benghazi attack. FBI, senate, house intelligence, accountability review board and others reach similar conclusions. No intelligence failure. No delay in CIA rescue team. No missed opportunity for military rescue. Fact checker politifact rated true that Clinton acted properly under the circumstances.
You have such faith in what the government tells you... Where are the WMD's in Iraq? There was overwhelming evidence that the intelligence agencies provided to prove it was worth going to war in Iraq. Does that not cause you any pause?
They out and out lied to your face about Benghazi being about a video, any attack on the date September 11th is not about a video.
Can you not think for yourself? As usual "according to" leads again.
Wallstreet are illegal immigrants now "our citizens". What does US citizenship mean if anyone crossing the Rio Grande can take advantage of the same rights as US born? Mass is already queuing up legislation allowing them to vote.
You down with a Mexican/Syrian/Hatian crossing a river and having the same rights as a US Citizen...yes or no?
0
Wallstreet are illegal immigrants now "our citizens". What does US citizenship mean if anyone crossing the Rio Grande can take advantage of the same rights as US born? Mass is already queuing up legislation allowing them to vote.
You down with a Mexican/Syrian/Hatian crossing a river and having the same rights as a US Citizen...yes or no?
now you have me defending Hillary ...nice maneuver...I won't let that happen again..
according to my britania encyclopedias...
Hot Forum Topics
