Wall I will stop taking shots (or anyone for that matter) at you when you treat everyone equally. I do agree many of those threads should probably be moved. But there are tons of left threads that add no value, antagonistic and probably should be moved too. But aren't and never will be. Basically, anything that Fubah bumps daily. How a thread entitled I am Embarrassed for Trump Supporters is allowed to exist in this sub is beyond me (that isn't the only one). Again how is this adding any value or not antagonistic. They are all basically partisan propaganda. He isn't the only one. That is why anyone right leaning seems to take shots at you. Again treat everyone equally. Don't just see things through your blue tinted lenses.
3
@wallstreetcappers
Wall I will stop taking shots (or anyone for that matter) at you when you treat everyone equally. I do agree many of those threads should probably be moved. But there are tons of left threads that add no value, antagonistic and probably should be moved too. But aren't and never will be. Basically, anything that Fubah bumps daily. How a thread entitled I am Embarrassed for Trump Supporters is allowed to exist in this sub is beyond me (that isn't the only one). Again how is this adding any value or not antagonistic. They are all basically partisan propaganda. He isn't the only one. That is why anyone right leaning seems to take shots at you. Again treat everyone equally. Don't just see things through your blue tinted lenses.
Its history...we are not going to shovel hundreds of threads into the box, most of the threads you are complaining about are ones where a certain group interact and do so exclusively and there are bumps yes and there is content also. You cant cherry pick which threads stay and which go especially since many have been here a LONG TIME. I dont get why some of you are so offended that a small group of like minded members post in threads to each other and are bothered by the position or ranking of one thread versus another.
I suggest ALL of you that are so offended to stop going into those threads and stick to those that have your interest. I dont browse those threads but once in a while and especially if a member submits a partisan complaint to our system, then I will go see if there is merit or if its just another stupid retort report which it usually is.
Who cares if fubah or kelly or anyone has some threads, we are not going to play partisan games because one group wants their threads to be higher in the list than another and there really is no clean way to do what you suggest because in reality most ALL of the threads in here could be deleted, all of them and we are not going to do that so live and let live and try to add value not create drama.
1
@jesron1269
Its history...we are not going to shovel hundreds of threads into the box, most of the threads you are complaining about are ones where a certain group interact and do so exclusively and there are bumps yes and there is content also. You cant cherry pick which threads stay and which go especially since many have been here a LONG TIME. I dont get why some of you are so offended that a small group of like minded members post in threads to each other and are bothered by the position or ranking of one thread versus another.
I suggest ALL of you that are so offended to stop going into those threads and stick to those that have your interest. I dont browse those threads but once in a while and especially if a member submits a partisan complaint to our system, then I will go see if there is merit or if its just another stupid retort report which it usually is.
Who cares if fubah or kelly or anyone has some threads, we are not going to play partisan games because one group wants their threads to be higher in the list than another and there really is no clean way to do what you suggest because in reality most ALL of the threads in here could be deleted, all of them and we are not going to do that so live and let live and try to add value not create drama.
Once again, a court has ordered Biden to stop his criminal behavior. The guy gives away billions, allows the country to be invaded, falls down in public, falls asleep in the presence of other world leaders, defies court orders, sells his position, sniffs little girls, spent 40% of his term on vacation, & now tries to sell off materials paid for by tax dollars. But libs think he's a great potus. Unbelievable.
goldfinger 1964
0
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:
Once again, a court has ordered Biden to stop his criminal behavior. The guy gives away billions, allows the country to be invaded, falls down in public, falls asleep in the presence of other world leaders, defies court orders, sells his position, sniffs little girls, spent 40% of his term on vacation, & now tries to sell off materials paid for by tax dollars. But libs think he's a great potus. Unbelievable.
"I dont get why some of you are so offended that a small group of like minded members post in threads to each other and are bothered by the position or ranking of one thread versus another."
Maybe because we don't quote ourselves over and over just to keep a thread up on top.
3
"I dont get why some of you are so offended that a small group of like minded members post in threads to each other and are bothered by the position or ranking of one thread versus another."
Maybe because we don't quote ourselves over and over just to keep a thread up on top.
@unplucked_gem Well thanks for not answering my content based reply...how about this just do a TEENY TEENY bit of research on someone other than Reggie Bush and maybe you can learn something in your youth.
Like a doctorate in alternate medicine? Nah, I think I'm good.
If I thought you were even remotely interested in a dialog, I would. But your continued entry into middle to right leaning threads to peddle illogical contrarian half thoughts while making value judgements on covers members is shamful and has been protested by many.
So, you win and are the sharpest here and I tip my hat to you.
On the way out though, your first entry to this post was to attack uniman in post #14. Where did you address anything the OP had to say prior to then? Cause most of what he said is verifiably accurate
2
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@unplucked_gem Well thanks for not answering my content based reply...how about this just do a TEENY TEENY bit of research on someone other than Reggie Bush and maybe you can learn something in your youth.
Like a doctorate in alternate medicine? Nah, I think I'm good.
If I thought you were even remotely interested in a dialog, I would. But your continued entry into middle to right leaning threads to peddle illogical contrarian half thoughts while making value judgements on covers members is shamful and has been protested by many.
So, you win and are the sharpest here and I tip my hat to you.
On the way out though, your first entry to this post was to attack uniman in post #14. Where did you address anything the OP had to say prior to then? Cause most of what he said is verifiably accurate
Doesnt matter...just focus on other things and quit fixating on the other group. It is obvious your side has serious issues that cause unnecessary friction and problems both in this forum AND other parts of the site. You do not see that group stalking and harassing your side in the mains, wonder why that is.
Leave them alone and quit worrying about what others are doing and being bothered about stupid crap like thread positions.
1
@UNIMAN
Doesnt matter...just focus on other things and quit fixating on the other group. It is obvious your side has serious issues that cause unnecessary friction and problems both in this forum AND other parts of the site. You do not see that group stalking and harassing your side in the mains, wonder why that is.
Leave them alone and quit worrying about what others are doing and being bothered about stupid crap like thread positions.
I frankly do not care about uni or you or others having a position being right or left or anything, where I usually end up being involved is when either someone is abusing another member (uni is one of the worst here in that category) or there is such extreme exaggeration it is borderline insanity, outside of those dynamics I dont have a ton to say in most threads here unless the member is not partisan and likes good conversation which is like nearly nobody so it is not super often I want to play partisan warfare with your side and the other side most of them are not really seeking conversation so it is not often there either.
The bully childish nonsense is what will always bring me into a conversation and that is why I am often involved with several of your side on a very regular basis and why that keeps repeating over and over.
1
@unplucked_gem
I frankly do not care about uni or you or others having a position being right or left or anything, where I usually end up being involved is when either someone is abusing another member (uni is one of the worst here in that category) or there is such extreme exaggeration it is borderline insanity, outside of those dynamics I dont have a ton to say in most threads here unless the member is not partisan and likes good conversation which is like nearly nobody so it is not super often I want to play partisan warfare with your side and the other side most of them are not really seeking conversation so it is not often there either.
The bully childish nonsense is what will always bring me into a conversation and that is why I am often involved with several of your side on a very regular basis and why that keeps repeating over and over.
"The bully childish nonsense is what will always bring me into a conversation and that is why I am often involved with several of your side on a very regular basis and why that keeps repeating over and over."
If I was to interact, I might note something like the first 13 posts were a healthy dialog absent "childish" bullying to warrant bringing anyone anywhere.
I'd probably follow that up by observing that the above statement would be a direct lie, dare say misinformation, in this instance.
More than likely I would close by pointing out that your stated entry into this thread was official capacity but seems to have personal input which is both confusing and disadvantagous to the members of the community as evidenced by objections from your side of the aisle.
But we're not doing these types of things anymore and I'll just restate my contribution to the OPs point.....
That final pardon list is going to be telling, let's revisit in a few weeks.
4
"The bully childish nonsense is what will always bring me into a conversation and that is why I am often involved with several of your side on a very regular basis and why that keeps repeating over and over."
If I was to interact, I might note something like the first 13 posts were a healthy dialog absent "childish" bullying to warrant bringing anyone anywhere.
I'd probably follow that up by observing that the above statement would be a direct lie, dare say misinformation, in this instance.
More than likely I would close by pointing out that your stated entry into this thread was official capacity but seems to have personal input which is both confusing and disadvantagous to the members of the community as evidenced by objections from your side of the aisle.
But we're not doing these types of things anymore and I'll just restate my contribution to the OPs point.....
That final pardon list is going to be telling, let's revisit in a few weeks.
"The bully childish nonsense is what will always bring me into a conversation and that is why I am often involved with several of your side on a very regular basis and why that keeps repeating over and over."
@wallstreetcappers
So what exactly drew you to this conversation? I didn't see anyone getting bullied here before you showed up. Did you just see some opinions you disagreed with & decided to come in & chastise them?
I started this thread to sort of counter-balance the forum a bit....... to give the conservative voices here a place to sound off w/o being accused of "antagonizing others" or "being combative". Does the title look spiteful? I'm sure it does, but I figured if the other thread of a similar title has survived this long w/o boxing than this one should fit within the guidelines too. You don't happen to agree with many conservative values & opinions. That's fine. Neither I nor any others here are asking you to change. But quit barking at us about "partisan opinions" when this forum is full of them. Whether you realize it or not, you're quite partisan yourself. Oh you always claim you're not, but your actions show otherwise. You don't show up & hassle any lib posters in their ridiculous, partisan threads. I'm not here to quarrel with you, but you have a habit of chastising people when you don't like their opinions.
I'll try to do my part by just avoiding certain threads. In fact I've tried to not even bother reading many of them, because what's the use? I already know why they were created.
6
"The bully childish nonsense is what will always bring me into a conversation and that is why I am often involved with several of your side on a very regular basis and why that keeps repeating over and over."
@wallstreetcappers
So what exactly drew you to this conversation? I didn't see anyone getting bullied here before you showed up. Did you just see some opinions you disagreed with & decided to come in & chastise them?
I started this thread to sort of counter-balance the forum a bit....... to give the conservative voices here a place to sound off w/o being accused of "antagonizing others" or "being combative". Does the title look spiteful? I'm sure it does, but I figured if the other thread of a similar title has survived this long w/o boxing than this one should fit within the guidelines too. You don't happen to agree with many conservative values & opinions. That's fine. Neither I nor any others here are asking you to change. But quit barking at us about "partisan opinions" when this forum is full of them. Whether you realize it or not, you're quite partisan yourself. Oh you always claim you're not, but your actions show otherwise. You don't show up & hassle any lib posters in their ridiculous, partisan threads. I'm not here to quarrel with you, but you have a habit of chastising people when you don't like their opinions.
I'll try to do my part by just avoiding certain threads. In fact I've tried to not even bother reading many of them, because what's the use? I already know why they were created.
Second part of my comment...funny how both of you focus in on the partisan aspects which suit your partisan narrative, both of you.
Why not instead actually look at my reply then the post previous to it and form an intelligent, accurate and non-partisan conclusion. I stated why in the above messages but neither of you are really interested in making good conversation, considering other opinions and being reasonable to everyone even if you disagree with them. Instead you zone in on the inaccurate and pointed flaws in logic that you seek. I clearly and strongly defined why and when I go into threads and neither of you looked anything past the one perspective that you want to cry about even when that reason is not accurate and the real reason is so obvious and blaring it is hilarious how focused you are on this stalking adventure you are on.
1
@THEMUGG
Second part of my comment...funny how both of you focus in on the partisan aspects which suit your partisan narrative, both of you.
Why not instead actually look at my reply then the post previous to it and form an intelligent, accurate and non-partisan conclusion. I stated why in the above messages but neither of you are really interested in making good conversation, considering other opinions and being reasonable to everyone even if you disagree with them. Instead you zone in on the inaccurate and pointed flaws in logic that you seek. I clearly and strongly defined why and when I go into threads and neither of you looked anything past the one perspective that you want to cry about even when that reason is not accurate and the real reason is so obvious and blaring it is hilarious how focused you are on this stalking adventure you are on.
"I dont get why some of you are so offended that a small group of like minded members post in threads to each other and are bothered by the position or ranking of one thread versus another."
I don't stalk anyone. In the sports betting forums usually checkout the most recent threads. What I see is obvious, hurts this site for someone's strange desires, shake my head and move on.
When a thread is started stating I am embarrassed for Trump followers I see you were the first to contribute. When I search for a thread called I am embarrassed for Biden followers/voters find 5 of them ended up in the penalty box. Surprised this one has lasted this long.
But it does seem your bothered by these right leaning threads as you continually interject yourself into a small group of like minded members posts.
2
"I dont get why some of you are so offended that a small group of like minded members post in threads to each other and are bothered by the position or ranking of one thread versus another."
I don't stalk anyone. In the sports betting forums usually checkout the most recent threads. What I see is obvious, hurts this site for someone's strange desires, shake my head and move on.
When a thread is started stating I am embarrassed for Trump followers I see you were the first to contribute. When I search for a thread called I am embarrassed for Biden followers/voters find 5 of them ended up in the penalty box. Surprised this one has lasted this long.
But it does seem your bothered by these right leaning threads as you continually interject yourself into a small group of like minded members posts.
Liberalism is a mental disorder. They can't handle the truth and don't believe they are ever wrong. Spent 4 years of hearing their horsecrap, called every name in the book and now we are finally getting some truths, which they can't handle. People get called racist, bigot. Fascist. Nazi, among others and they get boxed and or banned for defending themselves. Very sad.
6
Liberalism is a mental disorder. They can't handle the truth and don't believe they are ever wrong. Spent 4 years of hearing their horsecrap, called every name in the book and now we are finally getting some truths, which they can't handle. People get called racist, bigot. Fascist. Nazi, among others and they get boxed and or banned for defending themselves. Very sad.
No, nobody here was talking about Trump until JP chimed in with something irrelevant, & once he was rebuked you decided to chime in. You failed to grasp the context just like JP. Many posts later, here we are. Now that I question your action, you try to justify it with a condescending reply. Did it ever occur to you that you could've initially told JP " hey, your reply swung & missed at what The Mugg posted". Did you even read it? Why even respond at all? Who's stalking who here?
You know you could've come into this thread & said something like "That's not a good look for Biden", but instead you rush to defend a Trump-basher. You're biased, just like everyone else. That doesn't make you a bad person, just human like everyone else.
4
@wallstreetcappers
No, nobody here was talking about Trump until JP chimed in with something irrelevant, & once he was rebuked you decided to chime in. You failed to grasp the context just like JP. Many posts later, here we are. Now that I question your action, you try to justify it with a condescending reply. Did it ever occur to you that you could've initially told JP " hey, your reply swung & missed at what The Mugg posted". Did you even read it? Why even respond at all? Who's stalking who here?
You know you could've come into this thread & said something like "That's not a good look for Biden", but instead you rush to defend a Trump-basher. You're biased, just like everyone else. That doesn't make you a bad person, just human like everyone else.
Liberalism is a mental disorder. They can't handle the truth and don't believe they are ever wrong. Spent 4 years of hearing their horsecrap, called every name in the book and now we are finally getting some truths, which they can't handle. People get called racist, bigot. Fascist. Nazi, among others and they get boxed and or banned for defending themselves. Very sad.
I agree with everything you said except "Liberalism is a mental disorder". Have seen plenty of so-called rightwingers who are "way out in left field". So nuts can be found everywhere. What I do is try not to label an entire group based on a few that stand out.
It's a gambling site so expect the majority to be liberal leaning as I believe conservatives partake in gambling activities less often.
And yes, the name calling is non-stop because they do it "within the rules", always generally speaking, never calling one out by name, rather grouping a whole all the while directed at you. Then when you respond directly, off to the box. That's their game, and yes it's a game. Sad.
2
Quote Originally Posted by scooby-doos:
Liberalism is a mental disorder. They can't handle the truth and don't believe they are ever wrong. Spent 4 years of hearing their horsecrap, called every name in the book and now we are finally getting some truths, which they can't handle. People get called racist, bigot. Fascist. Nazi, among others and they get boxed and or banned for defending themselves. Very sad.
I agree with everything you said except "Liberalism is a mental disorder". Have seen plenty of so-called rightwingers who are "way out in left field". So nuts can be found everywhere. What I do is try not to label an entire group based on a few that stand out.
It's a gambling site so expect the majority to be liberal leaning as I believe conservatives partake in gambling activities less often.
And yes, the name calling is non-stop because they do it "within the rules", always generally speaking, never calling one out by name, rather grouping a whole all the while directed at you. Then when you respond directly, off to the box. That's their game, and yes it's a game. Sad.
The problem is when you shade one politician and are partisan and blatantly so then that is when I MIGHT step in. That is what I said in my original reply when asked. I gave like three scenarios that bring me to engage and one of them is extreme partisan nonsense and as you just said you were not discussing Trump...well you HAVE TO discuss Trump to be non-partisan, how is this concept not easily understood?
You cant blanket generalize and blame one politician while ignoring another and then expect nobody to point out the blaringly obvious truth and reality of the flaws that you guys make being so extremely partisan.
Trump IS a politician, he can and should be included in most ANY current political conversation and especially ones where you guys blanket blame one person when as I have said our congress is the body who makes and forwards policy and influences governmental decisions, and our current political landscape is deadlocked soon to be slightly reversed in 2025 but still deadlocked..thus if you want to fault a politician, fault the BODY not one single person. THEN when you ignore the insanity which is Trump and shade what little he did on his last trip, AND the absurd promises and lies to get elected, well how can you not give a full non-partisan observation and discussion?
Your group is biased and partisan then you get your feathers ruffled when I and a few others include the TNC in the analysis yet it is fully applicable and it is absurd to not give a full and fair analysis.
Is your side wanting true discussion and conversation or are you just wanting to take a wizz on Biden until you get bored and moved on?
1
@THEMUGG
The problem is when you shade one politician and are partisan and blatantly so then that is when I MIGHT step in. That is what I said in my original reply when asked. I gave like three scenarios that bring me to engage and one of them is extreme partisan nonsense and as you just said you were not discussing Trump...well you HAVE TO discuss Trump to be non-partisan, how is this concept not easily understood?
You cant blanket generalize and blame one politician while ignoring another and then expect nobody to point out the blaringly obvious truth and reality of the flaws that you guys make being so extremely partisan.
Trump IS a politician, he can and should be included in most ANY current political conversation and especially ones where you guys blanket blame one person when as I have said our congress is the body who makes and forwards policy and influences governmental decisions, and our current political landscape is deadlocked soon to be slightly reversed in 2025 but still deadlocked..thus if you want to fault a politician, fault the BODY not one single person. THEN when you ignore the insanity which is Trump and shade what little he did on his last trip, AND the absurd promises and lies to get elected, well how can you not give a full non-partisan observation and discussion?
Your group is biased and partisan then you get your feathers ruffled when I and a few others include the TNC in the analysis yet it is fully applicable and it is absurd to not give a full and fair analysis.
Is your side wanting true discussion and conversation or are you just wanting to take a wizz on Biden until you get bored and moved on?
@THEMUGG The problem is when you shade one politician and are partisan and blatantly so then that is when I MIGHT step in. That is what I said in my original reply when asked. I gave like three scenarios that bring me to engage and one of them is extreme partisan nonsense and as you just said you were not discussing Trump...well you HAVE TO discuss Trump to be non-partisan, how is this concept not easily understood? You cant blanket generalize and blame one politician while ignoring another and then expect nobody to point out the blaringly obvious truth and reality of the flaws that you guys make being so extremely partisan. Trump IS a politician, he can and should be included in most ANY current political conversation and especially ones where you guys blanket blame one person when as I have said our congress is the body who makes and forwards policy and influences governmental decisions, and our current political landscape is deadlocked soon to be slightly reversed in 2025 but still deadlocked..thus if you want to fault a politician, fault the BODY not one single person. THEN when you ignore the insanity which is Trump and shade what little he did on his last trip, AND the absurd promises and lies to get elected, well how can you not give a full non-partisan observation and discussion? Your group is biased and partisan then you get your feathers ruffled when I and a few others include the TNC in the analysis yet it is fully applicable and it is absurd to not give a full and fair analysis. Is your side wanting true discussion and conversation or are you just wanting to take a wizz on Biden until you get bored and moved on?
"wizz on Biden"? How much "wizzing" on Trump have you and others spewed (most of it FALSE) the last eight plus years?
2
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@THEMUGG The problem is when you shade one politician and are partisan and blatantly so then that is when I MIGHT step in. That is what I said in my original reply when asked. I gave like three scenarios that bring me to engage and one of them is extreme partisan nonsense and as you just said you were not discussing Trump...well you HAVE TO discuss Trump to be non-partisan, how is this concept not easily understood? You cant blanket generalize and blame one politician while ignoring another and then expect nobody to point out the blaringly obvious truth and reality of the flaws that you guys make being so extremely partisan. Trump IS a politician, he can and should be included in most ANY current political conversation and especially ones where you guys blanket blame one person when as I have said our congress is the body who makes and forwards policy and influences governmental decisions, and our current political landscape is deadlocked soon to be slightly reversed in 2025 but still deadlocked..thus if you want to fault a politician, fault the BODY not one single person. THEN when you ignore the insanity which is Trump and shade what little he did on his last trip, AND the absurd promises and lies to get elected, well how can you not give a full non-partisan observation and discussion? Your group is biased and partisan then you get your feathers ruffled when I and a few others include the TNC in the analysis yet it is fully applicable and it is absurd to not give a full and fair analysis. Is your side wanting true discussion and conversation or are you just wanting to take a wizz on Biden until you get bored and moved on?
"wizz on Biden"? How much "wizzing" on Trump have you and others spewed (most of it FALSE) the last eight plus years?
So can you speak in non-partisan terms? It does not seem so. And you wonder why you get replies as you do..everything to you is partisan when in reality and truth NOTHING is partisan.
Insanity trying to have conversation with so many of you partisan wired thinkers.
1
@BigfootIsThere
So can you speak in non-partisan terms? It does not seem so. And you wonder why you get replies as you do..everything to you is partisan when in reality and truth NOTHING is partisan.
Insanity trying to have conversation with so many of you partisan wired thinkers.
@BigfootIsThere Do think any of Bidens deeds or subsequent cover ups will come to light over the next 6 months?
Some MIGHT but media won't report or it will be spun that it was Trump's fault. NEVER hear a peep about the FALSE letter signed by 51 so called intelligence officers that the Big Guy 10%'s son's laptop was Russian disinformation.
0
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
@BigfootIsThere Do think any of Bidens deeds or subsequent cover ups will come to light over the next 6 months?
Some MIGHT but media won't report or it will be spun that it was Trump's fault. NEVER hear a peep about the FALSE letter signed by 51 so called intelligence officers that the Big Guy 10%'s son's laptop was Russian disinformation.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
