If you have doubts about the integrity of our elections, I urge you to become a poll worker. You will see how the system really works, and it will reassure you about the fairness of our elections.
Midnight1 is right. Voters, election workers and election officials aren't problems despite conspiracy theories. Here are some of the facts. 1 Voting by mail and drop boxes are safe ways to vote. 2 Voting machines are more accurate than human counting. 3 Safeguards prevent voting fraud. 4 Non-citizen voting is almost non-existent. 5 Election officials must certify election results. Actually, the problems are the outdated electoral college and suppression of voters. To fix broken system, congress should protect voting rights, ensure popular vote wins, end partisan gerrymandering, strengthen ethics laws and limit campaign financing.
2
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
If you have doubts about the integrity of our elections, I urge you to become a poll worker. You will see how the system really works, and it will reassure you about the fairness of our elections.
Midnight1 is right. Voters, election workers and election officials aren't problems despite conspiracy theories. Here are some of the facts. 1 Voting by mail and drop boxes are safe ways to vote. 2 Voting machines are more accurate than human counting. 3 Safeguards prevent voting fraud. 4 Non-citizen voting is almost non-existent. 5 Election officials must certify election results. Actually, the problems are the outdated electoral college and suppression of voters. To fix broken system, congress should protect voting rights, ensure popular vote wins, end partisan gerrymandering, strengthen ethics laws and limit campaign financing.
If you have doubts about the integrity of our elections, I urge you to become a poll worker. You will see how the system really works, and it will reassure you about the fairness of our elections.
Wrong thread.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
If you have doubts about the integrity of our elections, I urge you to become a poll worker. You will see how the system really works, and it will reassure you about the fairness of our elections.
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: If you have doubts about the integrity of our elections, I urge you to become a poll worker. You will see how the system really works, and it will reassure you about the fairness of our elections. @Midnight1Correct thread! Please continue to speak truth to ignorance.
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: If you have doubts about the integrity of our elections, I urge you to become a poll worker. You will see how the system really works, and it will reassure you about the fairness of our elections. @Midnight1Correct thread! Please continue to speak truth to ignorance.
We have got to lock him (Trump) up before the elections President Joe Biden today Free and fair elections , right ?
Trump wrongdoing is the cause of his own misfortune. Different judges approve lawsuits in multiple cases that emerged after years of investigations. Despite his lawyers repeatedly failing to convince judges to dismiss cases because of valid evidences. State attorney generals and US justice department operate independently of the white house.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa:
We have got to lock him (Trump) up before the elections President Joe Biden today Free and fair elections , right ?
Trump wrongdoing is the cause of his own misfortune. Different judges approve lawsuits in multiple cases that emerged after years of investigations. Despite his lawyers repeatedly failing to convince judges to dismiss cases because of valid evidences. State attorney generals and US justice department operate independently of the white house.
Kamala Harris is the first candidate ever to be entirely created by the Media. She has NO RECORD of accomplishments. Nobody voted for her. Her Popularity was in the toilet just a few months ago. Nothing about her has changed except now that the Media is pushing her on the people non stop.
Kamala has dined out on the idea that she’s “historic,” but never that she’s successful. It’s easy to claim accomplishments as an Attorney General, but the work is actually done by prosecutors across the state. Maybe you make a decree, but you’re not running cases and showing up in court every day – you’re a figurehead, an administrator managing people and budgets more than the day-to-day legal arguments (though, especially in high-profile cases, there is a bit of that).
As a Senator, Kamala did nothing, didn’t even really try. She was only there a couple of years, but she had zero bills become law.
Given the chance at some responsibility as Vice President, Harris balked. Don’t call her Border Czar! It’s a major part of the reason there were stories of tension between the Biden people and the Harris people – she wasn’t reading her briefing papers and was not willing to stick her neck out at all and take the risk to get anything done. Things don’t just happen; someone has to take a risk and the responsibility of things don’t work out. Kamala was not willing to accept that last part.
After 30 years in politics and elected office, she still seems to have no idea what she believes in. Every policy statement she’s ever made, no matter how fervently, has been declared inoperative by her current handlers. She is not capable of articulating any vision. Hell, went asked the basic question about how she is feeling about her chances in Pennsylvania, Harris responded (because I can’t use the word “answered,” since it wasn’t one), “I am feeling very good about Pennsylvania because there are a lot of people in Pennsylvania who deserve to be seen and heard. That’s why I’m here in Johnstown, and I will be continuing to travel around the state.”
Honestly, could you imagine a more worthless word salad answer?
3
@Barbarossa
Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa:
Kamala Harris is the first candidate ever to be entirely created by the Media. She has NO RECORD of accomplishments. Nobody voted for her. Her Popularity was in the toilet just a few months ago. Nothing about her has changed except now that the Media is pushing her on the people non stop.
Kamala has dined out on the idea that she’s “historic,” but never that she’s successful. It’s easy to claim accomplishments as an Attorney General, but the work is actually done by prosecutors across the state. Maybe you make a decree, but you’re not running cases and showing up in court every day – you’re a figurehead, an administrator managing people and budgets more than the day-to-day legal arguments (though, especially in high-profile cases, there is a bit of that).
As a Senator, Kamala did nothing, didn’t even really try. She was only there a couple of years, but she had zero bills become law.
Given the chance at some responsibility as Vice President, Harris balked. Don’t call her Border Czar! It’s a major part of the reason there were stories of tension between the Biden people and the Harris people – she wasn’t reading her briefing papers and was not willing to stick her neck out at all and take the risk to get anything done. Things don’t just happen; someone has to take a risk and the responsibility of things don’t work out. Kamala was not willing to accept that last part.
After 30 years in politics and elected office, she still seems to have no idea what she believes in. Every policy statement she’s ever made, no matter how fervently, has been declared inoperative by her current handlers. She is not capable of articulating any vision. Hell, went asked the basic question about how she is feeling about her chances in Pennsylvania, Harris responded (because I can’t use the word “answered,” since it wasn’t one), “I am feeling very good about Pennsylvania because there are a lot of people in Pennsylvania who deserve to be seen and heard. That’s why I’m here in Johnstown, and I will be continuing to travel around the state.”
Honestly, could you imagine a more worthless word salad answer?
Kamala doesn’t do the work because she’s never had to do the work. She wasn’t chosen as Biden’s VP because of her grasp of the issues she demonstrated against Joe in the primary, she was picked because Democrats love to use the word “historic” as a shield. Why would anyone think she’d be any different now?
When you can’t respond to a basic question about what you’re allegedly running for president to do without rambling on about a fictionalized version of your biography, you have no substance. Kamala Harris has no substance, nothing. She doesn’t even have the sizzle, let alone the steak. She’s sock puppet, interested in the trappings of power for its own sake and the glory that accompanies it. The Vice President has all the access needed to educate herself on all the issues of the day, to be able to speak about them honestly and coherently, she’s simply neglected to do so.
Kamala Harris is much, much worse than any of us ever thought. I challenge anyone to watch this whole interview she just did and come away with any other realization.
3
@Barbarossa
Kamala doesn’t do the work because she’s never had to do the work. She wasn’t chosen as Biden’s VP because of her grasp of the issues she demonstrated against Joe in the primary, she was picked because Democrats love to use the word “historic” as a shield. Why would anyone think she’d be any different now?
When you can’t respond to a basic question about what you’re allegedly running for president to do without rambling on about a fictionalized version of your biography, you have no substance. Kamala Harris has no substance, nothing. She doesn’t even have the sizzle, let alone the steak. She’s sock puppet, interested in the trappings of power for its own sake and the glory that accompanies it. The Vice President has all the access needed to educate herself on all the issues of the day, to be able to speak about them honestly and coherently, she’s simply neglected to do so.
Kamala Harris is much, much worse than any of us ever thought. I challenge anyone to watch this whole interview she just did and come away with any other realization.
There's nothing authentic about Harris. Her position on anything depends on where she's at on any given day, & even then she never fully commits to it. She tries to sound intelligent & deep but fools very few people. I can see why they tried to limit her exposure initially, but it was inevitable that the people would see she has no substance.
2
@Raiders22
There's nothing authentic about Harris. Her position on anything depends on where she's at on any given day, & even then she never fully commits to it. She tries to sound intelligent & deep but fools very few people. I can see why they tried to limit her exposure initially, but it was inevitable that the people would see she has no substance.
I can see why they tried to limit her exposure initially, but it was inevitable
Yes....it was a "doom loop" for sure. It worked well at first, the full power of the mainstream media apparatus behind her, momentum can only take you so far....
It was inevitable that they would have to put her out in more unscripted appearances....this was bound to be the result of such.
Now an impromptu presser, the focus of such to invoke Hitler's name. Desperation in the air. 12 days....
I can see why they tried to limit her exposure initially, but it was inevitable
Yes....it was a "doom loop" for sure. It worked well at first, the full power of the mainstream media apparatus behind her, momentum can only take you so far....
It was inevitable that they would have to put her out in more unscripted appearances....this was bound to be the result of such.
Now an impromptu presser, the focus of such to invoke Hitler's name. Desperation in the air. 12 days....
Kamala Harris has no substance, nothing. She doesn’t even have the sizzle, let alone the steak. She’s sock puppet, interested in the trappings of power for its own sake and the glory that accompanies it. The Vice President has all the access needed to educate herself on all the issues of the day, to be able to speak about them honestly and coherently, she’s simply neglected to do so.
Kamala Harris is much, much worse than any of us ever thought.
Inexcusable for an incumbent power.....
That is what many of us already knew though as soon as the coup was completed and she was announced as the new candidate. The hatred so many harbor blinds them from the truths and realities of the world we live in and they choose to bury their heads in the sand rather than face reality. Keep up the good fight
America First
1
@Raiders22
Kamala Harris has no substance, nothing. She doesn’t even have the sizzle, let alone the steak. She’s sock puppet, interested in the trappings of power for its own sake and the glory that accompanies it. The Vice President has all the access needed to educate herself on all the issues of the day, to be able to speak about them honestly and coherently, she’s simply neglected to do so.
Kamala Harris is much, much worse than any of us ever thought.
Inexcusable for an incumbent power.....
That is what many of us already knew though as soon as the coup was completed and she was announced as the new candidate. The hatred so many harbor blinds them from the truths and realities of the world we live in and they choose to bury their heads in the sand rather than face reality. Keep up the good fight
Your group acts like Harris is so terrible at public speaking and has accomplished so little as if your guy has done ANYTHING better? Who is a better public speaker? Who has milked their voter base for private personal gain? Who has accomplished large mass initiatives ON THEIR OWN in the face of adversity?
Bring a solid candidate to the dance before you go spitting on the other side, Trump is horrid in every way you are trying to soil Harris, or do you have some substance to back up your insults and degrading comments?
What adversity did your guy face when he was in the seat and with that adversity (newsflash there was none) what did HE ACCOMPLISH on his own that had high high high value? His tax holiday for TRILLION dollar multi national corps? Tax code change that slashed middle class tax deductions? The wall?
I also find it super hilarious that your side tries to insult Harris for doing nothing as VP...lol when has ANY VP done ANYTHING in the VP seat? Did Pence revolutionize the position with ground breaking legislation? Did Cheney trailblaze the position and create massive benefit as VP? LOL of course not so as usual your side attacks and blames with absolutely ZERO examples or evidence of claim when your side is in the seat.
Carry on...lmao
3
@THEMUGG
Your group acts like Harris is so terrible at public speaking and has accomplished so little as if your guy has done ANYTHING better? Who is a better public speaker? Who has milked their voter base for private personal gain? Who has accomplished large mass initiatives ON THEIR OWN in the face of adversity?
Bring a solid candidate to the dance before you go spitting on the other side, Trump is horrid in every way you are trying to soil Harris, or do you have some substance to back up your insults and degrading comments?
What adversity did your guy face when he was in the seat and with that adversity (newsflash there was none) what did HE ACCOMPLISH on his own that had high high high value? His tax holiday for TRILLION dollar multi national corps? Tax code change that slashed middle class tax deductions? The wall?
I also find it super hilarious that your side tries to insult Harris for doing nothing as VP...lol when has ANY VP done ANYTHING in the VP seat? Did Pence revolutionize the position with ground breaking legislation? Did Cheney trailblaze the position and create massive benefit as VP? LOL of course not so as usual your side attacks and blames with absolutely ZERO examples or evidence of claim when your side is in the seat.
You do an excellent job in missing the point here, as in many situations you don't agree with.
The point is, it took an DNC coup de etat to remove the incumbent President in favor of Kamala. The sitting President of the United States was replaced because the regime apparatus didn't like his chances of winning the election. If you are going to replace the sitting POTUS then the replacement better be competent enough to win.... aka someone like Shapiro. This has nothing to do with Trump, he was a known entity, Kamala was an opportunity for a fresh message and face. They fumbled the bag big time here.
America First
1
@wallstreetcappers
You do an excellent job in missing the point here, as in many situations you don't agree with.
The point is, it took an DNC coup de etat to remove the incumbent President in favor of Kamala. The sitting President of the United States was replaced because the regime apparatus didn't like his chances of winning the election. If you are going to replace the sitting POTUS then the replacement better be competent enough to win.... aka someone like Shapiro. This has nothing to do with Trump, he was a known entity, Kamala was an opportunity for a fresh message and face. They fumbled the bag big time here.
I think that EVERYONE should have the opportunity to play their partisan game without having to be attacked or insulted for their opinions or points of view .
We’re not solving world hunger here gentlemen . If we are being transparent here then men should be allowed to make declarations and not be hassled incessantly for it . On both sides of the partisan coin .
I’m for equality . And for truth . And for everyone’s civil rights to be taken seriously . If you don’t see my point , or can’t quite clearly get the gist of my rationale , then in my opinion that is not very democratic at all .
Our once great nation suffers because of these small discrepancies between what is said aloud in reference to what our liberties are , and what is actually allowed or tolerated , because they are not one and the same .
It’s bait and switch . I came here for the freedom and was instead attempted to be sold censorship and vitriol with a side of shut the hell up .
this ain’t the America my father came to as an immigrant anymore . It’s something else . Something perverse . And cynical . So depressing .
Goose/Gander . Go after both sides or don’t go after any . Period point blank .
BACK PATTING and KISSING threads are like passing HAM SANDWICHES around over and over-wall
2
I think that EVERYONE should have the opportunity to play their partisan game without having to be attacked or insulted for their opinions or points of view .
We’re not solving world hunger here gentlemen . If we are being transparent here then men should be allowed to make declarations and not be hassled incessantly for it . On both sides of the partisan coin .
I’m for equality . And for truth . And for everyone’s civil rights to be taken seriously . If you don’t see my point , or can’t quite clearly get the gist of my rationale , then in my opinion that is not very democratic at all .
Our once great nation suffers because of these small discrepancies between what is said aloud in reference to what our liberties are , and what is actually allowed or tolerated , because they are not one and the same .
It’s bait and switch . I came here for the freedom and was instead attempted to be sold censorship and vitriol with a side of shut the hell up .
this ain’t the America my father came to as an immigrant anymore . It’s something else . Something perverse . And cynical . So depressing .
Goose/Gander . Go after both sides or don’t go after any . Period point blank .
@Raiders22 There's nothing authentic about Harris. Her position on anything depends on where she's at on any given day, & even then she never fully commits to it. She tries to sound intelligent & deep but fools very few people. I can see why they tried to limit her exposure initially, but it was inevitable that the people would see she has no substance.
Now do Trump!
1
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:
@Raiders22 There's nothing authentic about Harris. Her position on anything depends on where she's at on any given day, & even then she never fully commits to it. She tries to sound intelligent & deep but fools very few people. I can see why they tried to limit her exposure initially, but it was inevitable that the people would see she has no substance.
Read the thread then read my reply and understand the reply. Your side has attacked her and blamed her for things as VP, your side has attacked her public speaking and blamed her for things for which she had zero influence or contribution.
Your reply is just the same retort instead of blaming her for VP silliness you fault her for being nominated. The DNC can nominate whatever individual they want and what does it matter if it was Harris exactly? Why are you so fixated on the Biden swap, are you mad that it made the race tighter against your candidate? I have seen you make multiple comments about that situation and it has made zero sense to me what your issue is? The DNC followed their own protocol and to me the much larger injustice was how they tipped the table against Sanders and gave it to Biden on the last one...he was in the lower quartile for delegates but they schemed a way to shift the exiting candidates delegates to Biden when he was not the leader...that to me seems much more bizarre than whatever you are taking issue with.
Are you mad because there was a better choice for the DNC (I doubt) are you mad that it made the race tighter? Are you mad that Harris is not qualified? If you are making a list of not qualified there are several elected presidents less qualified than Harris...like both Bush names and Trump also belongs on that list. Harris has more experience and time on the job than your guy does, so what is the issue exactly?
0
@kcblitzkrieg
Read the thread then read my reply and understand the reply. Your side has attacked her and blamed her for things as VP, your side has attacked her public speaking and blamed her for things for which she had zero influence or contribution.
Your reply is just the same retort instead of blaming her for VP silliness you fault her for being nominated. The DNC can nominate whatever individual they want and what does it matter if it was Harris exactly? Why are you so fixated on the Biden swap, are you mad that it made the race tighter against your candidate? I have seen you make multiple comments about that situation and it has made zero sense to me what your issue is? The DNC followed their own protocol and to me the much larger injustice was how they tipped the table against Sanders and gave it to Biden on the last one...he was in the lower quartile for delegates but they schemed a way to shift the exiting candidates delegates to Biden when he was not the leader...that to me seems much more bizarre than whatever you are taking issue with.
Are you mad because there was a better choice for the DNC (I doubt) are you mad that it made the race tighter? Are you mad that Harris is not qualified? If you are making a list of not qualified there are several elected presidents less qualified than Harris...like both Bush names and Trump also belongs on that list. Harris has more experience and time on the job than your guy does, so what is the issue exactly?
He made his point . He should be allowed to have his opinion without being attacked for it . There are many threads in this forum where your thoughts opposing Trump and everything that he stands for can more easily mingle and find refuge .
Perhaps you should peruse through one of those threads , as there are many , instead of instigating and making trouble in an obvious RNC thread .
Are the Republicans in here not given the privilege of bantering about to and fro at their leisure without the constant blockade that comes from combative rebuttals ?
Like you chastise so many for in the DNC threads ?
if they just ignore you as if you never existed , and simply refuse to respond to you , that would not be against forum rules but just a lousy immature way to handle things ……
Correct ?
Let’s play fair on both sides of the partisan coin . These men are entitled to their beliefs without the provocation or harassment that comes from someone whose political ideals clearly do not align with the overwhelming majority in this thread . I’m trying to find some semblance of peace and balance in this forum . Avoiding these types of threads could possibly be the right call in order to make that scenario come just a little closer to fruition .
BACK PATTING and KISSING threads are like passing HAM SANDWICHES around over and over-wall
2
He made his point . He should be allowed to have his opinion without being attacked for it . There are many threads in this forum where your thoughts opposing Trump and everything that he stands for can more easily mingle and find refuge .
Perhaps you should peruse through one of those threads , as there are many , instead of instigating and making trouble in an obvious RNC thread .
Are the Republicans in here not given the privilege of bantering about to and fro at their leisure without the constant blockade that comes from combative rebuttals ?
Like you chastise so many for in the DNC threads ?
if they just ignore you as if you never existed , and simply refuse to respond to you , that would not be against forum rules but just a lousy immature way to handle things ……
Correct ?
Let’s play fair on both sides of the partisan coin . These men are entitled to their beliefs without the provocation or harassment that comes from someone whose political ideals clearly do not align with the overwhelming majority in this thread . I’m trying to find some semblance of peace and balance in this forum . Avoiding these types of threads could possibly be the right call in order to make that scenario come just a little closer to fruition .
@Barbarossa Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa: https://x.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1848987021261345204 seriously ? the President of the United States ?
Cocaine is a hell of a drug
let that sink in , Afuera #Doge
0
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
@Barbarossa Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa: https://x.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1848987021261345204 seriously ? the President of the United States ?
First off, and this has been well established and documented over the past 4 years here, I am not “mad” at anyone. I do not let my emotions control my critical thinking, deductive reasoning and evaluation tools. Because I comment on things that I find value in commenting doesn’t make me “fixated”. I choose to ignore and not spend much time in here anymore because it is truly a waste of time and I do not find the entertainment value here busting balls like it used to be in the good ole days.
The “Biden swap” as you call it was an unprecedented event in our political history. It was as close as a coup de etat as you will see in this Country. I do not apologize for continuing to remind people what the reality of the situation is. “Tighter race” lmao yeah 3 months ago….oh how things have changed.
If you go back to my post in the thread and read it and understand it, then you will see that my comment was not about Kamala. It was about the fact that SHE was the candidate they chose to replace the sitting POTUS. It is not HER fault, not at all. I’m not “blaming” her for anything. It is the regime who decided she will be the next sock puppet to be the face of the regime. When you choose someone that needs to be shielded from who she really is then you are already in trouble.
We KNOW who Trump is. It is well documented. They knew what the bar was and they just need to go a bit above that level. Again, Shapiro would have done this very well. They failed. She is dumb AF. Simple. Sarah Pailin style. Shapiro or anyone else would have been a much better choice. “She is a stronger candidate than Biden” Really!? She is barely a bump above him with regards to putting together any unscripted coherent argument.
Yes, I agree with you on Bernie. But that is how the regime works. That is why we must save America before it is too late. 2028 will be too late.
America First
0
@wallstreetcappers
Top of the morning to you good sir.
First off, and this has been well established and documented over the past 4 years here, I am not “mad” at anyone. I do not let my emotions control my critical thinking, deductive reasoning and evaluation tools. Because I comment on things that I find value in commenting doesn’t make me “fixated”. I choose to ignore and not spend much time in here anymore because it is truly a waste of time and I do not find the entertainment value here busting balls like it used to be in the good ole days.
The “Biden swap” as you call it was an unprecedented event in our political history. It was as close as a coup de etat as you will see in this Country. I do not apologize for continuing to remind people what the reality of the situation is. “Tighter race” lmao yeah 3 months ago….oh how things have changed.
If you go back to my post in the thread and read it and understand it, then you will see that my comment was not about Kamala. It was about the fact that SHE was the candidate they chose to replace the sitting POTUS. It is not HER fault, not at all. I’m not “blaming” her for anything. It is the regime who decided she will be the next sock puppet to be the face of the regime. When you choose someone that needs to be shielded from who she really is then you are already in trouble.
We KNOW who Trump is. It is well documented. They knew what the bar was and they just need to go a bit above that level. Again, Shapiro would have done this very well. They failed. She is dumb AF. Simple. Sarah Pailin style. Shapiro or anyone else would have been a much better choice. “She is a stronger candidate than Biden” Really!? She is barely a bump above him with regards to putting together any unscripted coherent argument.
Yes, I agree with you on Bernie. But that is how the regime works. That is why we must save America before it is too late. 2028 will be too late.
I disagree with it being the worst case I consider the Bernie gut punch worse, Biden was on his way out of the race he was like 5th if I recall. The reality is as you mentioned the DNC can do what they want inside the constraints of the party. I find it quizzical you would say Harris is like Palin, you cant be serious in saying that. Palin was the mayor of a teeny Alaska town with a very limited education and no experience. Harris has a law degree has held many positions of importance and has a track record which is superior to either Vance or Trump and especially Palin. It isnt like I am some super fan of Harris but you are very far off in your comparison and in minimizing her as a candidate.
I'd say Harris is superior to any POTUS the GOP has put on the platter dating back to pre-Bush Lite. You cant judge someone based on their following of existing legal framework and responsibilities. No need to heckle or bash me for feeling differently but I consider her a solid candidate and very deserving. If you want to tear down a candidate based on their cherry picked track record then make sure you do the same for all parties involved not just the DNC.
1
@kcblitzkrieg
I disagree with it being the worst case I consider the Bernie gut punch worse, Biden was on his way out of the race he was like 5th if I recall. The reality is as you mentioned the DNC can do what they want inside the constraints of the party. I find it quizzical you would say Harris is like Palin, you cant be serious in saying that. Palin was the mayor of a teeny Alaska town with a very limited education and no experience. Harris has a law degree has held many positions of importance and has a track record which is superior to either Vance or Trump and especially Palin. It isnt like I am some super fan of Harris but you are very far off in your comparison and in minimizing her as a candidate.
I'd say Harris is superior to any POTUS the GOP has put on the platter dating back to pre-Bush Lite. You cant judge someone based on their following of existing legal framework and responsibilities. No need to heckle or bash me for feeling differently but I consider her a solid candidate and very deserving. If you want to tear down a candidate based on their cherry picked track record then make sure you do the same for all parties involved not just the DNC.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
