I wish you would have been around to set those people straight during the Bush years because he was getting the blame for gas prices. I personally don't blame Obama for the prices today but the people that were blaming Bush are predictably silent now. Kinda like "Bush torture" bad and "Obama Drones" silence.
As far as a rise in healthcare costs, there are price increases in everything over time; healthcare, milk, gas, etc, but prices artificially rising because of govt legislation isn't good for the private sector.
Let Supply & Demand and Competition (The Invisible Hand) determine the prices.
I have stated many times that Dems and Repubs are engaing in equal amounts of hypocrisy on the issues you stated above (and others). I have also stated that the much of the media has always treated Obama with kid gloves, failing to blame him for anything (Bill Clinton said the same thing).
As for the rising costs of insurance, look at the rate increases prior to ObamaCare. You can blame ObamaCare for rate increases and it may have some validity. What do you blame prior to its enaction, though?
0
Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:
I wish you would have been around to set those people straight during the Bush years because he was getting the blame for gas prices. I personally don't blame Obama for the prices today but the people that were blaming Bush are predictably silent now. Kinda like "Bush torture" bad and "Obama Drones" silence.
As far as a rise in healthcare costs, there are price increases in everything over time; healthcare, milk, gas, etc, but prices artificially rising because of govt legislation isn't good for the private sector.
Let Supply & Demand and Competition (The Invisible Hand) determine the prices.
I have stated many times that Dems and Repubs are engaing in equal amounts of hypocrisy on the issues you stated above (and others). I have also stated that the much of the media has always treated Obama with kid gloves, failing to blame him for anything (Bill Clinton said the same thing).
As for the rising costs of insurance, look at the rate increases prior to ObamaCare. You can blame ObamaCare for rate increases and it may have some validity. What do you blame prior to its enaction, though?
Reactionary rate increases are not attributable to a future event, so
just because companies are forecasting increases and trying to be
proactive does not mean they will be correct in EITHER direction
Uh, these people do actuarial tables, rate forecasting, and provide insurance plans for a living.
You don't.
Which is why we end with you refusing to admit ObamaCare has increased insurance costs.
Guess who I believe?
You adopting the position that "they increased the rate, but just because they did doesn't mean their forecast is right" is absurd.
0
Reactionary rate increases are not attributable to a future event, so
just because companies are forecasting increases and trying to be
proactive does not mean they will be correct in EITHER direction
Uh, these people do actuarial tables, rate forecasting, and provide insurance plans for a living.
You don't.
Which is why we end with you refusing to admit ObamaCare has increased insurance costs.
Guess who I believe?
You adopting the position that "they increased the rate, but just because they did doesn't mean their forecast is right" is absurd.
Reactionary rate increases are not attributable to a future event, so
just because companies are forecasting increases and trying to be
proactive does not mean they will be correct in EITHER direction
Another point on this. Raising plan rates because you've been mandated by law to expand benefits now, is not a future event.
0
Reactionary rate increases are not attributable to a future event, so
just because companies are forecasting increases and trying to be
proactive does not mean they will be correct in EITHER direction
Another point on this. Raising plan rates because you've been mandated by law to expand benefits now, is not a future event.
And I'll add, I am far less concerned with the percentages of increases and far more concerned with rates as compared to other nations and measured against income (and obviously income increases).
0
And I'll add, I am far less concerned with the percentages of increases and far more concerned with rates as compared to other nations and measured against income (and obviously income increases).
Reactionary rate increases are not attributable to a future event, so
just because companies are forecasting increases and trying to be
proactive does not mean they will be correct in EITHER direction
Uh, these people do actuarial tables, rate forecasting, and provide insurance plans for a living.
You don't.
Which is why we end with you refusing to admit ObamaCare has increased insurance costs.
Guess who I believe?
You adopting the position that "they increased the rate, but just because they did doesn't mean their forecast is right" is absurd.
Of course that is your response.
So you are saying that actuarial tables and forecasts are never wrong then?
How can you suggest that these companies are doing anything other than guessing? There is no history to provide strong data to make intelligent decisions with regard to cost..if that were the case overall healthcare inflation would not be on a straight line march for the last 3 decades. The fact that costs have been going up higher than general inflation is a sign of failure to the "guesser" who is forecasting the near and mid term costing.
Come back with some other deflective crap, you are so good at not answering questions and avoiding reality.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:
Reactionary rate increases are not attributable to a future event, so
just because companies are forecasting increases and trying to be
proactive does not mean they will be correct in EITHER direction
Uh, these people do actuarial tables, rate forecasting, and provide insurance plans for a living.
You don't.
Which is why we end with you refusing to admit ObamaCare has increased insurance costs.
Guess who I believe?
You adopting the position that "they increased the rate, but just because they did doesn't mean their forecast is right" is absurd.
Of course that is your response.
So you are saying that actuarial tables and forecasts are never wrong then?
How can you suggest that these companies are doing anything other than guessing? There is no history to provide strong data to make intelligent decisions with regard to cost..if that were the case overall healthcare inflation would not be on a straight line march for the last 3 decades. The fact that costs have been going up higher than general inflation is a sign of failure to the "guesser" who is forecasting the near and mid term costing.
Come back with some other deflective crap, you are so good at not answering questions and avoiding reality.
Walll you dont know what you are talking about. A lot of obamavare has been implemented and the pcip plan was supposed to last until 2014 but they mismanaged the funding. You cant call that an opinion. It is a fact. Companies are dropping their group plans and are going to pay the fines because it will save them money.
The point of the thread was to make a point about why should we let the government take over health care when they cant even manage this small portion of it?
0
Walll you dont know what you are talking about. A lot of obamavare has been implemented and the pcip plan was supposed to last until 2014 but they mismanaged the funding. You cant call that an opinion. It is a fact. Companies are dropping their group plans and are going to pay the fines because it will save them money.
The point of the thread was to make a point about why should we let the government take over health care when they cant even manage this small portion of it?
Walll you dont know what you are talking about. A lot of obamavare has been implemented and the pcip plan was supposed to last until 2014 but they mismanaged the funding. You cant call that an opinion. It is a fact. Companies are dropping their group plans and are going to pay the fines because it will save them money.
The point of the thread was to make a point about why should we let the government take over health care when they cant even manage this small portion of it?
Except the government is far from taking over healthcare. If anything, ObamaCare is an example of corporatism, not socialism.
That is actually its fault (IMO).
0
Quote Originally Posted by waltertaylor24:
Walll you dont know what you are talking about. A lot of obamavare has been implemented and the pcip plan was supposed to last until 2014 but they mismanaged the funding. You cant call that an opinion. It is a fact. Companies are dropping their group plans and are going to pay the fines because it will save them money.
The point of the thread was to make a point about why should we let the government take over health care when they cant even manage this small portion of it?
Except the government is far from taking over healthcare. If anything, ObamaCare is an example of corporatism, not socialism.
You cannot blame Obamacare when the price history of this industry has been out of control for THREE decades..
Right.
It really was EMTALA that started the whole downward spiral (skyrocketing costs of medical care=increase in health insurance payments=increase in premiums).
Interestingly, there were people who predicted this when EMTALA was being debated. Another example of pushing things down the road by our government, although EMTALA was a good thing.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Question..
You cannot blame Obamacare when the price history of this industry has been out of control for THREE decades..
Right.
It really was EMTALA that started the whole downward spiral (skyrocketing costs of medical care=increase in health insurance payments=increase in premiums).
Interestingly, there were people who predicted this when EMTALA was being debated. Another example of pushing things down the road by our government, although EMTALA was a good thing.
I have stated many times that Dems and Repubs are engaing in equal amounts of hypocrisy on the issues you stated above (and others). I have also stated that the much of the media has always treated Obama with kid gloves, failing to blame him for anything (Bill Clinton said the same thing).
As for the rising costs of insurance, look at the rate increases prior to ObamaCare. You can blame ObamaCare for rate increases and it may have some validity. What do you blame prior to its enaction, though?
inflation, operating costs, wages, etc
You're a lawyer, right?
Someone in your position 50 years ago was making about $50K/yr and charged their clientele $20/hr. Now you're making about a million a year and you charge clients $300/hr.
Same principles with healthcare costs.
Same principle as how much it cost a farmer to get his milk into grocery stores 50 years ago and how much it cost that farmer today.
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
I have stated many times that Dems and Repubs are engaing in equal amounts of hypocrisy on the issues you stated above (and others). I have also stated that the much of the media has always treated Obama with kid gloves, failing to blame him for anything (Bill Clinton said the same thing).
As for the rising costs of insurance, look at the rate increases prior to ObamaCare. You can blame ObamaCare for rate increases and it may have some validity. What do you blame prior to its enaction, though?
inflation, operating costs, wages, etc
You're a lawyer, right?
Someone in your position 50 years ago was making about $50K/yr and charged their clientele $20/hr. Now you're making about a million a year and you charge clients $300/hr.
Same principles with healthcare costs.
Same principle as how much it cost a farmer to get his milk into grocery stores 50 years ago and how much it cost that farmer today.
Someone in your position 50 years ago was making about $50K/yr and charged their clientele $20/hr. Now you're making about a million a year and you charge clients $300/hr.
Same principles with healthcare costs.
Same principle as how much it cost a farmer to get his milk into grocery stores 50 years ago and how much it cost that farmer today.
Except healthcare, exponentially, has increased at a rate much higher than produce or other things (for a good comparison, examine health insurance premium increases versus car insurance premium increases).
Based on what you stated above, they should be somewhat equivocal, at least, on a percetile of increases.
Yet they aren't close.
In other words, what factors have caused such a hike in health insurance prior to Obama and do you blame anyone for that?
0
Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:
inflation, operating costs, wages, etc
You're a lawyer, right?
Someone in your position 50 years ago was making about $50K/yr and charged their clientele $20/hr. Now you're making about a million a year and you charge clients $300/hr.
Same principles with healthcare costs.
Same principle as how much it cost a farmer to get his milk into grocery stores 50 years ago and how much it cost that farmer today.
Except healthcare, exponentially, has increased at a rate much higher than produce or other things (for a good comparison, examine health insurance premium increases versus car insurance premium increases).
Based on what you stated above, they should be somewhat equivocal, at least, on a percetile of increases.
Yet they aren't close.
In other words, what factors have caused such a hike in health insurance prior to Obama and do you blame anyone for that?
Someone in your position 50 years ago was making about $50K/yr and charged their clientele $20/hr. Now you're making about a million a year and you charge clients $300/hr.
Same principles with healthcare costs.
Same principle as how much it cost a farmer to get his milk into grocery stores 50 years ago and how much it cost that farmer today.
dj does make a million/year but what he doesn't tell you is that his year goes from january to june and then he's made his money and takes the rest of the year off.
0
Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:
inflation, operating costs, wages, etc
You're a lawyer, right?
Someone in your position 50 years ago was making about $50K/yr and charged their clientele $20/hr. Now you're making about a million a year and you charge clients $300/hr.
Same principles with healthcare costs.
Same principle as how much it cost a farmer to get his milk into grocery stores 50 years ago and how much it cost that farmer today.
dj does make a million/year but what he doesn't tell you is that his year goes from january to june and then he's made his money and takes the rest of the year off.
dj does make a million/year but what he doesn't tell you is that his year goes from january to june and then he's made his money and takes the rest of the year off.
I would clean the toilets out at that firm but DJ said they discriminate against conservatives.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
dj does make a million/year but what he doesn't tell you is that his year goes from january to june and then he's made his money and takes the rest of the year off.
I would clean the toilets out at that firm but DJ said they discriminate against conservatives.
They is the government. The people he put in charge of the pcip plan, which is the federal risk pool. Key word is federal.
I agree that pricing has been an issue for a long time, but how can you say obamacare is going to lower prices. So you think it is fair to say that healthy people should pay more because you can't charge more for pre-existing conditions?
You can put your own percentage on what has been emplemented. The only things that hasn't is the mandate and insurance companies has to take people with pre-existing conditions.
I have put many people on the pcip plan. It was a good plan for people with pre-existing conditions. Do I get paid anything for it? No, but it is the right thing to do. If the government can't run that, what makes you think they can run the whole thing?
0
So my claim is wrong?
They is the government. The people he put in charge of the pcip plan, which is the federal risk pool. Key word is federal.
I agree that pricing has been an issue for a long time, but how can you say obamacare is going to lower prices. So you think it is fair to say that healthy people should pay more because you can't charge more for pre-existing conditions?
You can put your own percentage on what has been emplemented. The only things that hasn't is the mandate and insurance companies has to take people with pre-existing conditions.
I have put many people on the pcip plan. It was a good plan for people with pre-existing conditions. Do I get paid anything for it? No, but it is the right thing to do. If the government can't run that, what makes you think they can run the whole thing?
I think what the issue is, like many issues with the current President is he opens his mouth and says one thing (prob believes it I guess) but most ppl who pay attention enough know he is full of doggie doo doo.
What I am referring to is his claim that heath care costs would go down under his plan.
We dont need to wait until the law is enacted in full to know his claim is false. His plan, yes his plan, is full of holes and "unintended" consequences.
I am all for fiing health care in this country but now we need to fix Obamacares 1st
0
I think what the issue is, like many issues with the current President is he opens his mouth and says one thing (prob believes it I guess) but most ppl who pay attention enough know he is full of doggie doo doo.
What I am referring to is his claim that heath care costs would go down under his plan.
We dont need to wait until the law is enacted in full to know his claim is false. His plan, yes his plan, is full of holes and "unintended" consequences.
I am all for fiing health care in this country but now we need to fix Obamacares 1st
I think the result of this plan goes to show the state of our healthcare system.
All these people pour into the PCIP and why did they do that?
That's it? Another question?
Tell me how I'm an uniformed broker. Tell me how you know so much more about this subject than I do. You don't know anything about the insurance business. You just look at everything your way and think you are correct.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
I think the result of this plan goes to show the state of our healthcare system.
All these people pour into the PCIP and why did they do that?
That's it? Another question?
Tell me how I'm an uniformed broker. Tell me how you know so much more about this subject than I do. You don't know anything about the insurance business. You just look at everything your way and think you are correct.
Since private sector mostly run healthcare industry, Obamacare shouldn't be expected to lower costs. Main benefit of Obamacare is helping uninsured Americans obtain insurance. Obamacare is in a early introductory stage and iInsuring millions is expected to take years. Overwhelming demand for pre-existing insurance plan indicates success and not failure.
0
Since private sector mostly run healthcare industry, Obamacare shouldn't be expected to lower costs. Main benefit of Obamacare is helping uninsured Americans obtain insurance. Obamacare is in a early introductory stage and iInsuring millions is expected to take years. Overwhelming demand for pre-existing insurance plan indicates success and not failure.
Who is "they" and how did "they" mismanaging the money turn into Obama's fault (yet again)?
Remember, Reagan drove the economy into the abyss, but Obama's signature legislation, written by his White House and the party he leads in congress, is not his fault!
Really. It isn't.
0
Question..
Who is "they" and how did "they" mismanaging the money turn into Obama's fault (yet again)?
Remember, Reagan drove the economy into the abyss, but Obama's signature legislation, written by his White House and the party he leads in congress, is not his fault!
So you are saying that actuarial tables and forecasts are never wrong then?
How can you suggest that these companies are doing anything other than guessing? There is no history to provide strong data to make intelligent decisions with regard to cost..if that were the case overall healthcare inflation would not be on a straight line march for the last 3 decades. The fact that costs have been going up higher than general inflation is a sign of failure to the "guesser" who is forecasting the near and mid term costing.
Come back with some other deflective crap, you are so good at not answering questions and avoiding reality.
Yes, of course it my response. My response demonstrates you don't understand this topic at all.
See, insurance companies aren't guessing on costs for benefits they have to provide now. Today. For things that started last year.
But it is cute for you to pretend they aren't responding to parts of the law that aren't in effect now, and I didn't clearly state that.
You realize when you type "deflecting' you're projecting, right?
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Of course that is your response.
So you are saying that actuarial tables and forecasts are never wrong then?
How can you suggest that these companies are doing anything other than guessing? There is no history to provide strong data to make intelligent decisions with regard to cost..if that were the case overall healthcare inflation would not be on a straight line march for the last 3 decades. The fact that costs have been going up higher than general inflation is a sign of failure to the "guesser" who is forecasting the near and mid term costing.
Come back with some other deflective crap, you are so good at not answering questions and avoiding reality.
Yes, of course it my response. My response demonstrates you don't understand this topic at all.
See, insurance companies aren't guessing on costs for benefits they have to provide now. Today. For things that started last year.
But it is cute for you to pretend they aren't responding to parts of the law that aren't in effect now, and I didn't clearly state that.
You realize when you type "deflecting' you're projecting, right?
But it is fun to watch you pretend, after making 3 posts on health care inflation in the US, you're concerned about the costs relative to other nations.
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
As you know, percentages can be completely manipulated depending upon the statistical data and variables used.
This chart shows overall increases in several fashions.
But it is fun to watch you pretend, after making 3 posts on health care inflation in the US, you're concerned about the costs relative to other nations.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.