@BigGame90
Two big mistakes took place.
Don't try to run away from police & the officer shouldn't have taken his weapon out of the holster. The man was no longer a threat & help was on the way.
@BigGame90
Two big mistakes took place.
Don't try to run away from police & the officer shouldn't have taken his weapon out of the holster. The man was no longer a threat & help was on the way.
@BigGame90
Two big mistakes took place.
Don't try to run away from police & the officer shouldn't have taken his weapon out of the holster. The man was no longer a threat & help was on the way.
no doubt the police most certainly seem to be at fault in a serious way here for using excessive force and to shoot him in that area?.was it a "mistake" to direct the shot specifically at the guys head?hard to believe...there are many other options to incapacitate somebody....im not sure what the legal protocols and technical details are as they relate to such an incident but the officer should be accountable in a major way one would think.
but once again,why are these people NOT COMPLYING????you can argue all day and all night about what certain laws should apply in society and what police should be able to do in a general sense,thats another issue altogether......but the fact as it stands that we all understand remains that legally and practically speaking we as citizens are 100% obliged to obey and comply in a certain way in any verbal or physical interaction with the police...everyone knows this.you would have to be braindead not to know and understand.and yet EVERY SINGLE TIME one of these tragedies comes out there is ALWAYS some form of resistance or non-compliance.why?????had there been total and utter submission would the result have been the same regardless??we will never know.but can anyone show me one time.just ONE time.where one of these shootings has occurred after the victim had been passive and compliant in every regard?
no doubt the police most certainly seem to be at fault in a serious way here for using excessive force and to shoot him in that area?.was it a "mistake" to direct the shot specifically at the guys head?hard to believe...there are many other options to incapacitate somebody....im not sure what the legal protocols and technical details are as they relate to such an incident but the officer should be accountable in a major way one would think.
but once again,why are these people NOT COMPLYING????you can argue all day and all night about what certain laws should apply in society and what police should be able to do in a general sense,thats another issue altogether......but the fact as it stands that we all understand remains that legally and practically speaking we as citizens are 100% obliged to obey and comply in a certain way in any verbal or physical interaction with the police...everyone knows this.you would have to be braindead not to know and understand.and yet EVERY SINGLE TIME one of these tragedies comes out there is ALWAYS some form of resistance or non-compliance.why?????had there been total and utter submission would the result have been the same regardless??we will never know.but can anyone show me one time.just ONE time.where one of these shootings has occurred after the victim had been passive and compliant in every regard?
Two big mistakes took place. Don't try to run away from police & the officer shouldn't have taken his weapon out of the holster.
The man was no longer a threat & help was on the way.
@Midnight1
That's the bottom line when it comes to use of deadly force.
Nothing else matters.
Two big mistakes took place. Don't try to run away from police & the officer shouldn't have taken his weapon out of the holster.
The man was no longer a threat & help was on the way.
@Midnight1
That's the bottom line when it comes to use of deadly force.
Nothing else matters.
Two big mistakes took place. Don't try to run away from police & the officer shouldn't have taken his weapon out of the holster.
The man was no longer a threat & help was on the way.
@Midnight1
That's the bottom line when it comes to use of deadly force.
Nothing else matters.
agree but the defenders of police violence against minorities must be so proud
Two big mistakes took place. Don't try to run away from police & the officer shouldn't have taken his weapon out of the holster.
The man was no longer a threat & help was on the way.
@Midnight1
That's the bottom line when it comes to use of deadly force.
Nothing else matters.
agree but the defenders of police violence against minorities must be so proud
BLM supporter cocks a pistol threatening a driver trying to get through a street that’s meant to be driven on at the Partrick Lyoya protest in Grand Rapids, Michigan
Video:
https://twitter.com/drewhlive/status/1515502968329572352?s=21&t=eGjV9SzyA--Ue1CcTGqrkg
BLM supporter cocks a pistol threatening a driver trying to get through a street that’s meant to be driven on at the Partrick Lyoya protest in Grand Rapids, Michigan
Video:
https://twitter.com/drewhlive/status/1515502968329572352?s=21&t=eGjV9SzyA--Ue1CcTGqrkg
agree but the defenders of police violence against minorities must be so proud
Still that's another two unarmed African-Americans gunned down with excessive use of force by white officers.
agree but the defenders of police violence against minorities must be so proud
Still that's another two unarmed African-Americans gunned down with excessive use of force by white officers.
Still that's another two unarmed African-Americans gunned down with excessive use of force by white officers.
joe bidens fault
Still that's another two unarmed African-Americans gunned down with excessive use of force by white officers.
joe bidens fault
You can make assumptions all day. It should have never gotten to that situation in the first place.
Rewind
Comply. Take your fix it ticket. 2 weeks later the ticket is fixed. Easy.
Why do citizens escalate these situations and put themselves in jeopardy? Are we not teaching children/ young adults and even adults how to comply with officers to make their jobs easier? Maybe that whole "RESIST" movement was the wrong message to send or they never fully addressed the resist aspect. Maybe some groups want these situations to happen so they can continue to push their agenda that cops are bad. What was the message behind "RESIST" in the first place? Protest peacefully, sure. RESIST an officer trying to serve the public which is the oath they took, wrong.
It's not that difficult to comply, listen, obey and follow orders from authority.
You can make assumptions all day. It should have never gotten to that situation in the first place.
Rewind
Comply. Take your fix it ticket. 2 weeks later the ticket is fixed. Easy.
Why do citizens escalate these situations and put themselves in jeopardy? Are we not teaching children/ young adults and even adults how to comply with officers to make their jobs easier? Maybe that whole "RESIST" movement was the wrong message to send or they never fully addressed the resist aspect. Maybe some groups want these situations to happen so they can continue to push their agenda that cops are bad. What was the message behind "RESIST" in the first place? Protest peacefully, sure. RESIST an officer trying to serve the public which is the oath they took, wrong.
It's not that difficult to comply, listen, obey and follow orders from authority.
joe bidens fault
That's what many neo-fascists are saying.
Just as bad, imo, are the apologists for the wrongful police action who also blame the unarmed black victims for their own deaths at the hands of a white police officer
joe bidens fault
That's what many neo-fascists are saying.
Just as bad, imo, are the apologists for the wrongful police action who also blame the unarmed black victims for their own deaths at the hands of a white police officer
Everyone rushes to conclusions without waiting for facts. The Sharptons and crumps of the world who prey on their own, blm only gets involved when it only benefits them. People will be still alive today if only they complied. That simple. Nobody mentions the fact that majority are criminals already. Again, comply ...not so hard.
Everyone rushes to conclusions without waiting for facts. The Sharptons and crumps of the world who prey on their own, blm only gets involved when it only benefits them. People will be still alive today if only they complied. That simple. Nobody mentions the fact that majority are criminals already. Again, comply ...not so hard.
joe bidens fault
That's what many neo-fascists are saying.
Just as bad, imo, are the apologists for the wrongful police action who also blame the unarmed black victims for their own deaths at the hands of a white police officer
yep and if the unarmed black man is wrestled to the ground for a traffic violation then its ok for an officer to shoot the unarmed black man lying on the ground in the back of the head , according to those same "apologists "
joe bidens fault
That's what many neo-fascists are saying.
Just as bad, imo, are the apologists for the wrongful police action who also blame the unarmed black victims for their own deaths at the hands of a white police officer
yep and if the unarmed black man is wrestled to the ground for a traffic violation then its ok for an officer to shoot the unarmed black man lying on the ground in the back of the head , according to those same "apologists "
Completely right.
Just comply. Don't resist. Don't fight back. Don't run. Stay in your car, put your hands on the wheel. Answer questions honestly.
C.O.M.P.L.Y
Completely right.
Just comply. Don't resist. Don't fight back. Don't run. Stay in your car, put your hands on the wheel. Answer questions honestly.
C.O.M.P.L.Y
Quote Originally Posted by baish2012: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by baish2012: Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: Two big mistakes took place. Don't try to run away from police & the officer shouldn't have taken his weapon out of the holster. The man was no longer a threat & help was on the way. @Midnight1 That's the bottom line when it comes to use of deadly force. Nothing else matters. agree but the defenders of police violence against minorities must be so proud Still that's another two unarmed African-Americans gunned down with excessive use of force by white officers.
joe bidens fault
That's what many neo-fascists are saying.
Just as bad, imo, are the apologists for the wrongful police action who also blame the unarmed black victims for their own deaths at the hands of a white police officer
yep and if the unarmed black man is wrestled to the ground for a traffic violation then its ok for an officer to shoot the unarmed black man lying on the ground in the back of the head , according to those same "apologists "
So an unarmed black male is fearful of racist harm to himself at the hands of a white officer and resists to protect himself from anticipated racism. His fears of racist violence against him are soon realized because the cop who had wrestled him to the ground with backup on the way decides to shoot the unarmed black male in the back of the head.
Quote Originally Posted by baish2012: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by baish2012: Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: Two big mistakes took place. Don't try to run away from police & the officer shouldn't have taken his weapon out of the holster. The man was no longer a threat & help was on the way. @Midnight1 That's the bottom line when it comes to use of deadly force. Nothing else matters. agree but the defenders of police violence against minorities must be so proud Still that's another two unarmed African-Americans gunned down with excessive use of force by white officers.
joe bidens fault
That's what many neo-fascists are saying.
Just as bad, imo, are the apologists for the wrongful police action who also blame the unarmed black victims for their own deaths at the hands of a white police officer
yep and if the unarmed black man is wrestled to the ground for a traffic violation then its ok for an officer to shoot the unarmed black man lying on the ground in the back of the head , according to those same "apologists "
So an unarmed black male is fearful of racist harm to himself at the hands of a white officer and resists to protect himself from anticipated racism. His fears of racist violence against him are soon realized because the cop who had wrestled him to the ground with backup on the way decides to shoot the unarmed black male in the back of the head.
joe bidens fault
That's what many neo-fascists are saying.
Just as bad, imo, are the apologists for the wrongful police action who also blame the unarmed black victims for their own deaths at the hands of a white police officer
yep and if the unarmed black man is wrestled to the ground for a traffic violation then its ok for an officer to shoot the unarmed black man lying on the ground in the back of the head , according to those same "apologists "
So an unarmed black male is fearful of racist harm to himself at the hands of a white officer and resists to protect himself from anticipated racism. His fears of racist violence against him are soon realized because the cop who had wrestled him to the ground with backup on the way decides to shoot the unarmed black male in the back of the head.
Correct. Being fearful of racist violence perpetrated by a white police officer is apparently a death sentence now.
joe bidens fault
That's what many neo-fascists are saying.
Just as bad, imo, are the apologists for the wrongful police action who also blame the unarmed black victims for their own deaths at the hands of a white police officer
yep and if the unarmed black man is wrestled to the ground for a traffic violation then its ok for an officer to shoot the unarmed black man lying on the ground in the back of the head , according to those same "apologists "
So an unarmed black male is fearful of racist harm to himself at the hands of a white officer and resists to protect himself from anticipated racism. His fears of racist violence against him are soon realized because the cop who had wrestled him to the ground with backup on the way decides to shoot the unarmed black male in the back of the head.
Correct. Being fearful of racist violence perpetrated by a white police officer is apparently a death sentence now.
The man was no longer a threat & help was on the way.
If you are no longer a threat - you get shot in the back of the head. Must be an "unwritten rule" of policing that I am unaware.
The man was no longer a threat & help was on the way.
If you are no longer a threat - you get shot in the back of the head. Must be an "unwritten rule" of policing that I am unaware.
That's what many neo-fascists are saying.
Just as bad, imo, are the apologists for the wrongful police action who also blame the unarmed black victims for their own deaths at the hands of a white police officer
yep and if the unarmed black man is wrestled to the ground for a traffic violation then its ok for an officer to shoot the unarmed black man lying on the ground in the back of the head , according to those same "apologists "
So an unarmed black male is fearful of racist harm to himself at the hands of a white officer and resists to protect himself from anticipated racism. His fears of racist violence against him are soon realized because the cop who had wrestled him to the ground with backup on the way decides to shoot the unarmed black male in the back of the head.
yep non-compliance is an automatic death sentence . it states that in the law and all police manuals everybody should b aware of this fact
That's what many neo-fascists are saying.
Just as bad, imo, are the apologists for the wrongful police action who also blame the unarmed black victims for their own deaths at the hands of a white police officer
yep and if the unarmed black man is wrestled to the ground for a traffic violation then its ok for an officer to shoot the unarmed black man lying on the ground in the back of the head , according to those same "apologists "
So an unarmed black male is fearful of racist harm to himself at the hands of a white officer and resists to protect himself from anticipated racism. His fears of racist violence against him are soon realized because the cop who had wrestled him to the ground with backup on the way decides to shoot the unarmed black male in the back of the head.
yep non-compliance is an automatic death sentence . it states that in the law and all police manuals everybody should b aware of this fact
Gotta be a true idiot to run away and fight the police over a minor traffic incident like incorrect plates. What's the saying? Play stupid games, win stupid prizes?
Gotta be a true idiot to run away and fight the police over a minor traffic incident like incorrect plates. What's the saying? Play stupid games, win stupid prizes?
If you are no longer a threat - you get shot in the back of the head. Must be an "unwritten rule" of policing that I am unaware.
what ? u didnt know this is the law of the land ? an unarmed black man MUST be shot in the back of the head for traffic violations ! its in all the law books !! surprised u didnt know that
If you are no longer a threat - you get shot in the back of the head. Must be an "unwritten rule" of policing that I am unaware.
what ? u didnt know this is the law of the land ? an unarmed black man MUST be shot in the back of the head for traffic violations ! its in all the law books !! surprised u didnt know that
Ever hear of anyone getting shot when they comply? Weird concept, right?!
Ever hear of anyone getting shot when they comply? Weird concept, right?!
what ? u didnt know this is the law of the land ? an unarmed black man MUST be shot in the back of the head for traffic violations ! its in all the law books !! surprised u didnt know that
Yeah, Fubah, what gives? You didn't know that the law states white officers have the legal right to shoot black men in the BACK of the skull if the black male is fearful of racist violence during a routine traffic stop??! You didn't know this?? WTF? Everybody knows this.
what ? u didnt know this is the law of the land ? an unarmed black man MUST be shot in the back of the head for traffic violations ! its in all the law books !! surprised u didnt know that
Yeah, Fubah, what gives? You didn't know that the law states white officers have the legal right to shoot black men in the BACK of the skull if the black male is fearful of racist violence during a routine traffic stop??! You didn't know this?? WTF? Everybody knows this.
what ? u didnt know this is the law of the land ? an unarmed black man MUST be shot in the back of the head for traffic violations ! its in all the law books !! surprised u didnt know that
Yeah, Fubah, what gives? You didn't know that the law states white officers have the legal right to shoot black men in the BACK of the skull if the black male is fearful of racist violence during a routine traffic stop??! You didn't know this?? WTF? Everybody knows this.
Well excuse me for living!
I had always believed there was a law about reasonable use of force. Nothing about that officers actions, after he wrestled the man to the ground in position to handcuff him and with backup police on the way, was reasonable. A gun shot to the back of the head of an *UNARMED* man lying on the ground FACE DOWN no less is NEVER justified under any circumstance!
what ? u didnt know this is the law of the land ? an unarmed black man MUST be shot in the back of the head for traffic violations ! its in all the law books !! surprised u didnt know that
Yeah, Fubah, what gives? You didn't know that the law states white officers have the legal right to shoot black men in the BACK of the skull if the black male is fearful of racist violence during a routine traffic stop??! You didn't know this?? WTF? Everybody knows this.
Well excuse me for living!
I had always believed there was a law about reasonable use of force. Nothing about that officers actions, after he wrestled the man to the ground in position to handcuff him and with backup police on the way, was reasonable. A gun shot to the back of the head of an *UNARMED* man lying on the ground FACE DOWN no less is NEVER justified under any circumstance!
Maybe BLM org should be spending their funds on helping black lives/ communities instead of buying up mansions in CA and lavish material items, right? Is BLM really about helping the community, or moving to new communities? Maybe they should be spending their "donations" and funds on teaching young adults how to handle themselves in presence of authority so they can become more civil with authorities so they don't fear police. Just a thought.
Maybe BLM org should be spending their funds on helping black lives/ communities instead of buying up mansions in CA and lavish material items, right? Is BLM really about helping the community, or moving to new communities? Maybe they should be spending their "donations" and funds on teaching young adults how to handle themselves in presence of authority so they can become more civil with authorities so they don't fear police. Just a thought.
Comply. Not a difficult concept to comprehend. Should be taught in all schools, regardless of color of your skin. Would go along way in society for those that show up to school.
Comply. Not a difficult concept to comprehend. Should be taught in all schools, regardless of color of your skin. Would go along way in society for those that show up to school.
ya ! what gives ? its the law ! if you dont comply with a racist cop he has the right to kill u
ya ! what gives ? its the law ! if you dont comply with a racist cop he has the right to kill u
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.