Judge Jeanine Pirro’s Words Come Back To Haunt Her
HuffPost -
A resurfaced Fox News clip from 2016 shows Jeanine Pirro ranting about why Hilary Clinton’s criminal investigations should preclude her from being president!
Judge Jeanine Pirro’s Words Come Back To Haunt Her
HuffPost -
A resurfaced Fox News clip from 2016 shows Jeanine Pirro ranting about why Hilary Clinton’s criminal investigations should preclude her from being president!
But are YOU making money off of it: NRGU up 5.88 after hours XOM up Oil up If you like or dislike what is going on politically, put your money to work.
Since this post and AUG 11:
OIL 87.23 up 5.3%
XOM 115.61 up 4.75%
NRGU 534.86 up 12.6%
Futures are way up on all oil and natural gas
0
@Raiders22
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
But are YOU making money off of it: NRGU up 5.88 after hours XOM up Oil up If you like or dislike what is going on politically, put your money to work.
Judge Jeanine Pirro’s Words Come Back To Haunt Her
HuffPost -
A resurfaced Fox News clip from 2016 shows Jeanine Pirro ranting about why Hilary Clinton’s criminal investigations should preclude her from being president!
Judge Jeanine Pirro’s Words Come Back To Haunt Her
HuffPost -
A resurfaced Fox News clip from 2016 shows Jeanine Pirro ranting about why Hilary Clinton’s criminal investigations should preclude her from being president!
Judge Pirro telling FOX NEWS viewers what she believes should happen to candidates under investigation!!!
Hillary Clinton was never charged. Meanwhile Trump faces multiple trials. So he should be disqualified from 2024 election according to Pirro. Furthermore, 14th amendment might be another reason to disqualify him.
5
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Judge Pirro telling FOX NEWS viewers what she believes should happen to candidates under investigation!!!
Hillary Clinton was never charged. Meanwhile Trump faces multiple trials. So he should be disqualified from 2024 election according to Pirro. Furthermore, 14th amendment might be another reason to disqualify him.
Nonpartisan watchdog Government accountability office reports that Trump border wall has harmed environment, endangered species and cultural sites. Cato institute says that Trump wall didn't work against smugglers using ladders and power tools. Center for biological diversify warns that building additional wall would be destructive and useless folly.
5
Nonpartisan watchdog Government accountability office reports that Trump border wall has harmed environment, endangered species and cultural sites. Cato institute says that Trump wall didn't work against smugglers using ladders and power tools. Center for biological diversify warns that building additional wall would be destructive and useless folly.
Nonpartisan watchdog Government accountability office reports that Trump border wall has harmed environment, endangered species and cultural sites. Cato institute says that Trump wall didn't work against smugglers using ladders and power tools. Center for biological diversify warns that building additional wall would be destructive and useless folly.
Good lord...
1
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Nonpartisan watchdog Government accountability office reports that Trump border wall has harmed environment, endangered species and cultural sites. Cato institute says that Trump wall didn't work against smugglers using ladders and power tools. Center for biological diversify warns that building additional wall would be destructive and useless folly.
Nonpartisan watchdog Government accountability office reports that Trump border wall has harmed environment, endangered species and cultural sites. Cato institute says that Trump wall didn't work against smugglers using ladders and power tools. Center for biological diversify warns that building additional wall would be destructive and useless folly.
MAGAs & Trump RICO organized crime
5
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Nonpartisan watchdog Government accountability office reports that Trump border wall has harmed environment, endangered species and cultural sites. Cato institute says that Trump wall didn't work against smugglers using ladders and power tools. Center for biological diversify warns that building additional wall would be destructive and useless folly.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Judge Pirro telling FOX NEWS viewers what she believes should happen to candidates under investigation!!! Hillary Clinton was never charged. Meanwhile Trump faces multiple trials. So he should be disqualified from 2024 election according to Pirro. Furthermore, 14th amendment might be another reason to disqualify him.
@thirdperson
Welp ya, that is what she insisted should happen in such cases
5
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Judge Pirro telling FOX NEWS viewers what she believes should happen to candidates under investigation!!! Hillary Clinton was never charged. Meanwhile Trump faces multiple trials. So he should be disqualified from 2024 election according to Pirro. Furthermore, 14th amendment might be another reason to disqualify him.
@thirdperson
Welp ya, that is what she insisted should happen in such cases
A federal judge on Friday rejected former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows’ [a top lieutenant in trump's Organized Crime network] bid to move his Georgia RICO mob criminal case to federal court, a significant setback for Meadows and a troubling sign for the 4-time indicted GOP crime boss leader, Donald Trump.
The judge’s decision could set the tone for the other defendants also trying to move their cases.
It’s an ominous sign for the RICO mob co-defendants who are hoping to invoke the same federal immunity protections, which Meadows failed to gain.
5
HUGE setback for RICO criminals
CNN —
A federal judge on Friday rejected former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows’ [a top lieutenant in trump's Organized Crime network] bid to move his Georgia RICO mob criminal case to federal court, a significant setback for Meadows and a troubling sign for the 4-time indicted GOP crime boss leader, Donald Trump.
The judge’s decision could set the tone for the other defendants also trying to move their cases.
It’s an ominous sign for the RICO mob co-defendants who are hoping to invoke the same federal immunity protections, which Meadows failed to gain.
CNN — A federal judge on Friday rejected former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows’ [a top lieutenant in trump'sOrganized Crime network] bid to move his Georgia RICOmob criminal case to federal court, a significant setback for Meadows and a troubling sign for the 4-time indictedGOP crime boss leader, Donald Trump. The judge’s decision could set the tone for the other defendants also trying to move their cases. It’s an ominous sign for the RICO mob co-defendants who are hoping to invoke the same federal immunity protections, which Meadows failed to gain.
The indictment identifies eight overt acts Meadows allegedly took in furtherance of the scheme to overturn the 2020 election results. Meadows argued that these actions were part of his federal duties – and thus, the case should be moved to federal court – but Jones disagreed.
“The Court finds insufficient evidence to establish that the gravamen, or a heavy majority of overt acts alleged against Meadows relate to his role as White House Chief of Staff,” Jones wrote, adding that “Meadows failed to provide sufficient evidence that these actions related to any legitimate purpose of the executive branch.”
3
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
HUGE setback for trump and his RICO accomplices
CNN — A federal judge on Friday rejected former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows’ [a top lieutenant in trump'sOrganized Crime network] bid to move his Georgia RICOmob criminal case to federal court, a significant setback for Meadows and a troubling sign for the 4-time indictedGOP crime boss leader, Donald Trump. The judge’s decision could set the tone for the other defendants also trying to move their cases. It’s an ominous sign for the RICO mob co-defendants who are hoping to invoke the same federal immunity protections, which Meadows failed to gain.
The indictment identifies eight overt acts Meadows allegedly took in furtherance of the scheme to overturn the 2020 election results. Meadows argued that these actions were part of his federal duties – and thus, the case should be moved to federal court – but Jones disagreed.
“The Court finds insufficient evidence to establish that the gravamen, or a heavy majority of overt acts alleged against Meadows relate to his role as White House Chief of Staff,” Jones wrote, adding that “Meadows failed to provide sufficient evidence that these actions related to any legitimate purpose of the executive branch.”
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: HUGE setback for RICO criminals @fubah2 They almost had a chance of escaping justice if it could have been moved to federal court
@Zeus4par
Almost!
Meanwhile,
DeSantis' map aimed to diminish Black vote
AP -
A Florida redistricting plan pushed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis violates the state constitution and is prohibited from being used for any future U.S. congressional elections since it diminishes the ability of Black voters in north Florida to pick a representative of their choice, a state judge ruled.
The voting rights groups that challenged the scheme in court “have shown that the enacted plan results in the diminishment of Black voters’ ability to elect their candidate of choice in violation of the Florida Constitution,” Judge Marsh wrote.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: HUGE setback for RICO criminals @fubah2 They almost had a chance of escaping justice if it could have been moved to federal court
@Zeus4par
Almost!
Meanwhile,
DeSantis' map aimed to diminish Black vote
AP -
A Florida redistricting plan pushed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis violates the state constitution and is prohibited from being used for any future U.S. congressional elections since it diminishes the ability of Black voters in north Florida to pick a representative of their choice, a state judge ruled.
The voting rights groups that challenged the scheme in court “have shown that the enacted plan results in the diminishment of Black voters’ ability to elect their candidate of choice in violation of the Florida Constitution,” Judge Marsh wrote.
A very, very good profit in the last month on these plays.
OIL 89.01 up 7.4%
XOM 117.49 up 6.5%
NRGU 546.15 up 15%
Futures are way up on all oil and natural gas
Compared to S&P 500 up .4%
So, a very, very good profit and run-up on energy so far with this move compared to a flat S&P 500 during this time period. A large profit has been locked in, hopefully, more to come.
0
@Raiders22
Since this post on AUG 11:
A very, very good profit in the last month on these plays.
OIL 89.01 up 7.4%
XOM 117.49 up 6.5%
NRGU 546.15 up 15%
Futures are way up on all oil and natural gas
Compared to S&P 500 up .4%
So, a very, very good profit and run-up on energy so far with this move compared to a flat S&P 500 during this time period. A large profit has been locked in, hopefully, more to come.
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: HUGE setback for RICO criminals @fubah2 They almost had a chance of escaping justice if it could have been moved to federal court @Zeus4par Almost! Meanwhile, DeSantis' map aimed to diminish Black voteAP - A Florida redistricting plan pushed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis violates the state constitution and is prohibited from being used for any future U.S. congressional elections since it diminishes the ability of Black voters in north Florida to pick a representative of their choice, a state judge ruled. The voting rights groups that challenged the schemein court “have shown that the enacted plan results in the diminishment of Black voters’ ability to elect their candidate of choice in violation of the Florida Constitution,” Judge Marsh wrote.
typical of ron de satan
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: HUGE setback for RICO criminals @fubah2 They almost had a chance of escaping justice if it could have been moved to federal court @Zeus4par Almost! Meanwhile, DeSantis' map aimed to diminish Black voteAP - A Florida redistricting plan pushed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis violates the state constitution and is prohibited from being used for any future U.S. congressional elections since it diminishes the ability of Black voters in north Florida to pick a representative of their choice, a state judge ruled. The voting rights groups that challenged the schemein court “have shown that the enacted plan results in the diminishment of Black voters’ ability to elect their candidate of choice in violation of the Florida Constitution,” Judge Marsh wrote.
Another witness disappoints the GOP as part of its anti-Biden crusade
Fox News aired an interview with a former Ukrainian president who effectively knee-capped the Republicans’ corruption case against President Biden.
The biggest problem with the congressional Republicans’ crusade against President Joe Biden is that the party simply can’t find any incriminating evidence, despite months of desperate searching. The second biggest problem with the GOP crusade is that key figures in the party’s investigation keep telling truths that Republicans don’t want to hear.
One of the more dramatic examples of this came last month, when the public first saw the transcript of Devon Archer’s Q&A with the House Oversight Committee. Archer was a former Hunter Biden business associate, which created real excitement among Republicans — right up until the witness discredited each of the party’s core claims against the president.
Eric Schwerin, meanwhile, was also a Hunter Biden business partner, which also created an opportunity for the GOP. But as we learned last week, Schwerin told Republican investigators that the president wasn’t part of his son’s private-sector work.
Perhaps former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko would tell the party what it wants to hear? As it turns out, no.
1
Another witness disappoints the GOP as part of its anti-Biden crusade
Fox News aired an interview with a former Ukrainian president who effectively knee-capped the Republicans’ corruption case against President Biden.
The biggest problem with the congressional Republicans’ crusade against President Joe Biden is that the party simply can’t find any incriminating evidence, despite months of desperate searching. The second biggest problem with the GOP crusade is that key figures in the party’s investigation keep telling truths that Republicans don’t want to hear.
One of the more dramatic examples of this came last month, when the public first saw the transcript of Devon Archer’s Q&A with the House Oversight Committee. Archer was a former Hunter Biden business associate, which created real excitement among Republicans — right up until the witness discredited each of the party’s core claims against the president.
Eric Schwerin, meanwhile, was also a Hunter Biden business partner, which also created an opportunity for the GOP. But as we learned last week, Schwerin told Republican investigators that the president wasn’t part of his son’s private-sector work.
Perhaps former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko would tell the party what it wants to hear? As it turns out, no.
Perhaps former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko would tell the party what it wants to hear? As it turns out, no.
On Fox news, president Poroshenko denounces prosecutor Shokin as a "completely crazy person" without a "word of truth." Ukraine parliament voted to remove Shokin because he was corrupt. Not because of investigation of Burisma. So Shokin isn't a credible witness. Senate and Ukrainian investigations found no evidence of wrongdoing by Bidens. Therefore House's Biden impeachment inquiry is nothing more than a political stunt or witch hunt.
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Perhaps former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko would tell the party what it wants to hear? As it turns out, no.
On Fox news, president Poroshenko denounces prosecutor Shokin as a "completely crazy person" without a "word of truth." Ukraine parliament voted to remove Shokin because he was corrupt. Not because of investigation of Burisma. So Shokin isn't a credible witness. Senate and Ukrainian investigations found no evidence of wrongdoing by Bidens. Therefore House's Biden impeachment inquiry is nothing more than a political stunt or witch hunt.
It’s backwards plus front words , attacks that punch the gut then squirts , it’s dirty undies with poop residuals , that seep through to the dungarees and perfume the room to the pinnacle , of bad odors , I’m not the standard motor , when emoting on the grotesque , stand up little soldiers , cuz no one is working , you’re all just resting , detestable entities sexing the degeneracy where discrepancy breeds…..
BACK PATTING and KISSING threads are like passing HAM SANDWICHES around over and over-wall
0
It’s backwards plus front words , attacks that punch the gut then squirts , it’s dirty undies with poop residuals , that seep through to the dungarees and perfume the room to the pinnacle , of bad odors , I’m not the standard motor , when emoting on the grotesque , stand up little soldiers , cuz no one is working , you’re all just resting , detestable entities sexing the degeneracy where discrepancy breeds…..
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Perhaps former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko would tell the party what it wants to hear? As it turns out, no.
On Fox news, president Poroshenko denounces prosecutor Shokin as a "completely crazy person" without a "word of truth." Ukraine parliament voted to remove Shokin because he was corrupt. Not because of investigation of Burisma. So Shokin isn't a credible witness. Senate and Ukrainian investigations found no evidence of wrongdoing by Bidens. Therefore House's Biden impeachment inquiry is nothing more than a political stunt or witch hunt.
@thirdperson
Bingo. Of course we suspected this much right from the get-go.
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Perhaps former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko would tell the party what it wants to hear? As it turns out, no.
On Fox news, president Poroshenko denounces prosecutor Shokin as a "completely crazy person" without a "word of truth." Ukraine parliament voted to remove Shokin because he was corrupt. Not because of investigation of Burisma. So Shokin isn't a credible witness. Senate and Ukrainian investigations found no evidence of wrongdoing by Bidens. Therefore House's Biden impeachment inquiry is nothing more than a political stunt or witch hunt.
@thirdperson
Bingo. Of course we suspected this much right from the get-go.
New witness testimony disputes whistleblower's claims
Washington CNN — New testimony from a number of FBI and Internal Revenue Service officials casts doubt on key claims from an IRS whistleblower who alleges there was political interference in the federal investigation of Hunter Biden’s taxes.
According to transcripts provided to CNN, several FBI and IRS officials brought in for closed-door testimony by House Republicans in recent days said they don’t remember US Attorney David Weiss saying that he lacked the authority to decide whether to bring charges against the president’s son, or that Weiss said he had been denied a request for special counsel status.
1
New witness testimony disputes whistleblower's claims
Washington CNN — New testimony from a number of FBI and Internal Revenue Service officials casts doubt on key claims from an IRS whistleblower who alleges there was political interference in the federal investigation of Hunter Biden’s taxes.
According to transcripts provided to CNN, several FBI and IRS officials brought in for closed-door testimony by House Republicans in recent days said they don’t remember US Attorney David Weiss saying that he lacked the authority to decide whether to bring charges against the president’s son, or that Weiss said he had been denied a request for special counsel status.
New witness testimony disputes whistleblower's claims
@fubah2Every credible witness to the case has basically said the same thing, that there's no substance to the republican's claims. This compares with the January 6 committee hearings where there were dozens of credible witnesses providing testimony against Trump and his fascist accomplices, and all of them were republicans!
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
New witness testimony disputes whistleblower's claims
@fubah2Every credible witness to the case has basically said the same thing, that there's no substance to the republican's claims. This compares with the January 6 committee hearings where there were dozens of credible witnesses providing testimony against Trump and his fascist accomplices, and all of them were republicans!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.