This is gonna sound crazy but it is a serious question

Was he convicted of gross sexual assault. Was he indicted. Did this even make it to the grand jury????? Then this to me is a story of a lady who wants more money in a divorce proceedings against a former husband.   

Is their even a police report?.....

What difference does it make? Hillary Bernie vs Trump and ?. That's our choice. It's her or him will be our next president.

BWS77, where is Trumps bald spot?

even obama joked about this during his dinner speech

few understand politcs and law. open a law office downtown next to a courthouse and you will figured it out.

I didn't call you a liberal, I said you used a play from the liberal playbook. And it wasn't the first time.

Oh, I forgot since you're probably the only one who can't read AND comprehend at the same time.

Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

I didn't call you a liberal, I said you used a play from the liberal playbook. And it wasn't the first time.

If a wife was sure she wouldn't get alimony it might deter some from stepping out. Men are not the only ones to cheat you know.

The civil courts are not funded like the criminal courts are. Civil courts are paid for by the litigants...meaning they can build as many courthouses as the divorce market can support. 

You read that article wrong (surprised) again. There are 21 states that currently have adultery laws, some misdemeanors, some felony.

Some cities within those states may have ordinances so don't go claiming victory on that point until you're sure you have checked them all. Only need find 5 more to qualify for most so.....

I'll hand it to you...I don't know if I've ever met someone like you who likes to argue so much about immaterial points.

Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:

I understand adultery is a sensitive subject for you, but I doubt your ex-wife's decision was for any reason other than seeking intellectual stimulation. 

Civil courts are not funded by litigants. The court costs, like fines and taxes, are general income for the government, who has the sole control over the courts. Money is then paid for the courts out of those funds. 

Adultery has been prosecuted five times in the last 20 years, most recently in a case in Wisconsin. Your talk of morality whilst defending Trump constantly is laughable. 

Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

Show me where I said that it is prosecuted with vigor.

If my memory serves me correctly, I think I said I wish it would be prosecuted MORE!

As far as WAC assimilation into the army well this road has paved. Women. Have proven they have the heart of stones to kill people and break things behind well as any male soldier.  Many beliwved that women should not be drafted for warand now we are setting up for a machine of equal rights than we now require women to register for a draft. How does this work with the ice Queen administration. 

trump said yesterday at the faith and freedom conference

"no person should be judged by their race"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMzIP2nxsgI

there you go people.

That's why I don't consider you as a conservative. Conservative has values and principles and you just an anti-D and you don't really care much about the character of the person you support.

1. Do you even know what the definition of transgender is? I don’t think you do so let me save you the time of googleing it. It’s a man or woman that doesn’t except the gender assigned to them at birth. There is evidence of thousands of crimes committed by men who pose as women. As a republican, I can tell you I have ZERO fear of transgender people. I DO fear for the safety of my mother, wife, daughter, sister, niece and female cousins. Letting people have unrestricted access the bathroom that doesn’t not correspond with the sex on their birth certificate is a public safety issue. It puts all women in danger.

2. There wasn’t an issue until transgender people started to publicly announce they were using women’s restrooms and it became a public safety issue. Stop with the big government nonsense. Are you against seat belt laws? Are you against public intoxication laws? How about DUI laws? Or building code laws, prescription drug regulation, food regulation, and occupational safety and health laws? You liberal libertarians are nuts.

3. Rape kits and a public safety law are two separate issues that have no relation to each other. You have this delusional belief that republicans just don’t care about rape when in actuality its democrats throwing money blindly at an issue with no clear plan on how to address the problem. And that’s the heart of the issue for fiscal conservative republicans. They believe in a managing a balanced budget and having a clear plan and want to know exactly how the money will be spent. Another issue is police chiefs and sheriffs have finite resources. Also, testing a kit that would not result in a conviction is not a good use of money. Yes liberals, even crime fighters are told to abide by a budget. Some police investigators have also determined the kits that have not been tested already don't need to be. The untested tests have no evidentiary value considering police already know who the suspect is or the police determined no crime occurred in any of those cases. Another thing is congress set up grants in 2013 for police but none of the money was awarded and no protocols have been issued. Let me guess, fiscal conservatives are to blame - DUN-DUN-DUUUUN!!! Most police agencies have no written guidance, no policy, and no law at the state level telling police what to do with this evidence. And as a result, you see widespread inconsistencies in how this evidence is handled. You left leaner's just fabricated a fake narrative about rape kits to attack republicans as unsympathetic when the truth is the issue is more about budget costs and plan of execution.

4. I brought up Islam because you asked me why I consider you left leaner’s to be pedophile enablers. I answered you by saying that you left leaner’s enable, condone, and accept the endorsement and practice of Islam. Islam’s prophet was a pedophile and the Quran is a prescriptive tool used to promote pedophilia, murder, rape, slavery, and terrorism. This is a public safety issue that the left leaner’s ignore. That makes the left leaner’s, like you, accomplices, accessories, aiders and abettors. Most republicans get this.

There is evidence of thousands of crimes committed by men who pose as women.

all i'm asking is for you to prove this statement to establish that transgender people causing crimes in bathrooms is such a problem that we need big government to make more laws and bigger government to address it.

once that happens, if it ever does, then we can move on to step two which is whether big government creating a safe space for scared rightwingers actually will solve the alleged problem.  but, we aren't quite at step two yet.

OK. Crimes committed by men posing as women.

James Jimmy Lilly, 24, a transgender Bluefield man involved in youth ministry at local Episcopal churches was arrested and charged with multiple counts of sexual abuse of a juvenile. He was charged with one count of incest, one count of second-degree sexual assault and 31 counts of first-degree sexual abuse. The victim was a juvenile female. The abuse began when the victim was 9 to 10 years old, and continued until she was 16.

Taylor Buehler, 18, snuck into a women’s bathroom at a community college while wearing a bra and wig and later admitted to taking a shower in the women’s locker room. A predatory sex offender who dressed as a female and entered the women's locker room at North Clackamas Aquatic Park was sentenced to nine months in jail.

Hadden Irving Clark, known as the Cross-dressing cannibal, loved to wear women’s clothes and killed multiple women and actually claims to be a woman. He told police that he thought if he drank the blood of women and ate some of their remains that it would transform him into a woman. He pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and was later convicted of another murder giving him a total of 60 years in prison. 10 more years were added to his sentence for robbery.

Thomas Lee Benson, 39, dressed as a woman to enter the women's locker room at North Clackamas Aquatic Park. Benson was convicted of sexually abusing children 18 years ago and has a history of dressing as a woman. He was convicted in October of second-degree criminal trespassing, unlawful entry into a motor vehicle and frequenting a place where children regularly congregate -- a crime for predatory sex offenders. Sgt. Adam Phillips, Clackamas County Sheriff's Office spokesman, said Benson was convicted of first-degree sexual abuse and paying to view child pornography. In 2001, he was convicted of second-degree trespassing for entering a locker room at an aquatic center. Seven years later, he was convicted of unlawful contact with a child. "Mr. Benson has been known to dress as a female to gain access to undressed minor females by frequenting restrooms, dressing rooms, changing rooms, aquatic centers and pool locker rooms," Phillips said. "Mr. Benson has been known to use money, candy and threats to gain access to his victims."

Christopher Hambrook, 37, under the name “Jessica,” was able to get into the women’s shelters, where he sexually assaulted several women in 2012. The court heard how one woman awoke to find Hambrook assaulting her on her bed. “Her tights had been pulled down past her bottom and her bathing suit had been pulled to the side,” court documents reveal. “She yelled at the accused, demanding to know what he was doing. He simply covered his face with his hands, said ‘Oops!’ and started giggling.” The court also heard evidence of Hambrook terrorizing a deaf woman living in the shelter. “The accused grabbed the complainant’s hand and forcibly placed it on his crotch area while his penis was erect,” the court heard. The same deaf women reported that Hambrook would peer at her through a gap between the door and its frame while she showered. Hambrook also served four years in jail for a 2002 sexual assault of a five-year-old girl who was a family friend and for raping a mentally challenged 27-year-old woman.

I’m confused. Why would male right-wingers be afraid? Republican men who use the men’s room have nothing to fear. The predators are using the women’s restrooms not the men’s to attack women. Are you talking about female republican women?

I think this is enough proof. I could keep going but why waste the time. I love your arrogance and ignorance. It humors me. That’s why I’m playing along. You tired of me schooling you and want to move on to step two now?  

great, not sure your sources but maybe you have 4 examples over who knows what period of time in the entire country and only one of which involved a bathroom.  let's create more laws and bigger government. 

i'm just trying to show you how to be a real conservative rather than a big government liberal who wants big brother to protect you. 

you may be too far gone on the big government/safe space liberal spectrum, but in case you ever want to try and become a real conservative one day, here's a handy three step process to go through to determine whether more laws and bigger government is the answer to your fears and concerns:

1. is there a verified, proven problem that needs to be addressed by more laws and bigger government?  in this scenario we'd be looking for some kind of consistent, significant pattern of transgender people committing crimes inside bathrooms. 

2. if so, is the new law and bigger government likely to solve or improve the problem?  here, we'd need proof that creating a safe space in bathrooms is likely to deter criminals from committing the crimes that were proven to often occur in part one.  not just laws to try to appease rightwing bed wetting over the issue.

3. if the answers to 1 and 2 are yes, are there already laws in place to deal with the problem so that we don't need any more?  for instance, if we are trying deter rape or child molestation, don't we already have such laws in place to do that?  if so, we don't need even more laws, and bigger government as it becomes redundant.

so, i implore you to stop looking to big government to create a safe space for you.  stop being such a liberal who wants big brother to solve your issues, whether real or perceived.

follow these steps to become a limited government conservative.