Less than 50% of Americans have any money in stocks (or bonds)
Thus far in 2020, Gallup finds 55% of Americans reporting that they own stock, based on polls conducted in March and April. This is identical to the average 55% recorded in 2019 and similar to the average of 54% Gallup has measured since 2010.
Stock ownership was more common from 2001 to 2008 when an average 62% of U.S. adults said they owned stock -- but it fell after the 2009 Obama recession and has not fully rebounded.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Less than 50% of Americans have any money in stocks (or bonds)
Thus far in 2020, Gallup finds 55% of Americans reporting that they own stock, based on polls conducted in March and April. This is identical to the average 55% recorded in 2019 and similar to the average of 54% Gallup has measured since 2010.
Stock ownership was more common from 2001 to 2008 when an average 62% of U.S. adults said they owned stock -- but it fell after the 2009 Obama recession and has not fully rebounded.
Then, of course, there's President Obama's assault on the business community through his burdensome regulations. Consider this: The estimated cost of regulations under Obama is a staggering $873 billion. That includes a shocking $344 billion cost in Environmental Protection Agency regulations alone. All told, the number of new regulations that been finalized under President Obama checks in at almost 3,000.
More crap without links to verifiable sources. As usual
0
Quote Originally Posted by chadebennett:
Then, of course, there's President Obama's assault on the business community through his burdensome regulations. Consider this: The estimated cost of regulations under Obama is a staggering $873 billion. That includes a shocking $344 billion cost in Environmental Protection Agency regulations alone. All told, the number of new regulations that been finalized under President Obama checks in at almost 3,000.
More crap without links to verifiable sources. As usual
When it comes to jobs, President Obama is always bragging about how many he's created, but facts are stubborn things. In the past eight years, America has lost more than 300,000 manufacturing jobs and, although the president doesn’t mention it, America had a global trade deficit of over $732 billion last year.
Even more crap without links to verifiable sources. As usual
0
Quote Originally Posted by chadebennett:
When it comes to jobs, President Obama is always bragging about how many he's created, but facts are stubborn things. In the past eight years, America has lost more than 300,000 manufacturing jobs and, although the president doesn’t mention it, America had a global trade deficit of over $732 billion last year.
Even more crap without links to verifiable sources. As usual
Yet another drag on the American economy is ObamaCare, his signature legislation and crowning achievement. Remember when Obama repeatedly told you that under his plan you could keep your doctor, you keep your plan and that that it would drive down overall health costs to the point the average family would save $2,500 a year? And how ObamaCare would actually reduce the deficit?
Still more crap without links to verifiable sources. As usual
0
Quote Originally Posted by chadebennett:
Yet another drag on the American economy is ObamaCare, his signature legislation and crowning achievement. Remember when Obama repeatedly told you that under his plan you could keep your doctor, you keep your plan and that that it would drive down overall health costs to the point the average family would save $2,500 a year? And how ObamaCare would actually reduce the deficit?
Still more crap without links to verifiable sources. As usual
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Less than 50% of Americans have any money in stocks (or bonds) Thus far in 2020, Gallup finds 55% of Americans reporting that they own stock, based on polls conducted in March and April. This is identical to the average 55% recorded in 2019 and similar to the average of 54% Gallup has measured since 2010. Stock ownership was more common from 2001 to 2008 when an average 62% of U.S. adults said they owned stock -- but it fell after the 2009 Obama recession and has not fully rebounded.
The Obama recession??????
You mean Bush recession. It didn't start with Obama my man.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Less than 50% of Americans have any money in stocks (or bonds) Thus far in 2020, Gallup finds 55% of Americans reporting that they own stock, based on polls conducted in March and April. This is identical to the average 55% recorded in 2019 and similar to the average of 54% Gallup has measured since 2010. Stock ownership was more common from 2001 to 2008 when an average 62% of U.S. adults said they owned stock -- but it fell after the 2009 Obama recession and has not fully rebounded.
The Obama recession??????
You mean Bush recession. It didn't start with Obama my man.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Less than 50% of Americans have any money in stocks (or bonds) Thus far in 2020, Gallup finds 55% of Americans reporting that they own stock, based on polls conducted in March and April. This is identical to the average 55% recorded in 2019 and similar to the average of 54% Gallup has measured since 2010. Stock ownership was more common from 2001 to 2008 when an average 62% of U.S. adults said they owned stock -- but it fell after the 2009 Obama recession and has not fully rebounded.
Funny how you pin Bush recession on Obama, but do not attach Obama's strong economy to Trump's first few years. The hypocrisy is glaring man.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Less than 50% of Americans have any money in stocks (or bonds) Thus far in 2020, Gallup finds 55% of Americans reporting that they own stock, based on polls conducted in March and April. This is identical to the average 55% recorded in 2019 and similar to the average of 54% Gallup has measured since 2010. Stock ownership was more common from 2001 to 2008 when an average 62% of U.S. adults said they owned stock -- but it fell after the 2009 Obama recession and has not fully rebounded.
Funny how you pin Bush recession on Obama, but do not attach Obama's strong economy to Trump's first few years. The hypocrisy is glaring man.
*NOTE: Before adolf-lovers here wets their collective panties to eliminate poll bias, I show the responses from "MODERATES" (ie, niether Liberals, nor Conservatives) MODERATES decide elections!
Q: Do you approve or disapprove of the way trump is handling jobs & the economy ?
*NOTE: Before adolf-lovers here wets their collective panties to eliminate poll bias, I show the responses from "MODERATES" (ie, niether Liberals, nor Conservatives) MODERATES decide elections!
Q: Do you approve or disapprove of the way trump is handling jobs & the economy ?
Adjusted for inflation, total economic activity in the U.S. grew 17.5% from the end of the Great Recession through the end of the Obama presidency. Excluding the short recovery between the double dip recession of 1980-82, this is arguably the worst recovery from a recession going back to the 1960s. Even the recovery under George W. Bush was stronger (the economy grew a total of 18.7% just prior to the Great Recession).
For comparison, the economy expanded 39.4% during the 1990s expansion under President Clinton; and 38.2% during the 1980s expansion under President Reagan. The 1990s expansion lasted 10 years, and the 1980s expansion lasted 8 years, which were both longer than the 7+ years of economic recovery under President Obama. Still, the shorter-time frame does not explain the large growth discrepancies.
Even more conspicuous, while the average quarterly growth since the end of the Great Recession and the end of the Obama presidency was 2.2%, it slowed to 2.0% in 2015 and 1.9% in 2016. Put differently, economic growth was decelerating as President Obama left office.
0
Adjusted for inflation, total economic activity in the U.S. grew 17.5% from the end of the Great Recession through the end of the Obama presidency. Excluding the short recovery between the double dip recession of 1980-82, this is arguably the worst recovery from a recession going back to the 1960s. Even the recovery under George W. Bush was stronger (the economy grew a total of 18.7% just prior to the Great Recession).
For comparison, the economy expanded 39.4% during the 1990s expansion under President Clinton; and 38.2% during the 1980s expansion under President Reagan. The 1990s expansion lasted 10 years, and the 1980s expansion lasted 8 years, which were both longer than the 7+ years of economic recovery under President Obama. Still, the shorter-time frame does not explain the large growth discrepancies.
Even more conspicuous, while the average quarterly growth since the end of the Great Recession and the end of the Obama presidency was 2.2%, it slowed to 2.0% in 2015 and 1.9% in 2016. Put differently, economic growth was decelerating as President Obama left office.
" To be precise, a narrow majority of Americans does own stocks, according to credible recent studies. But Khanna has a point, that Americans of modest incomes are significantly less invested in the stock market than wealthier Americans are. Other large groups, including minorities and those without a college education, also lag in stock ownership, meaning that the stock rally is largely passing them by. "
0
A verifiable link to a verifiable source (of course) -- which is the proper way to do it:
" To be precise, a narrow majority of Americans does own stocks, according to credible recent studies. But Khanna has a point, that Americans of modest incomes are significantly less invested in the stock market than wealthier Americans are. Other large groups, including minorities and those without a college education, also lag in stock ownership, meaning that the stock rally is largely passing them by. "
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Less than 50% of Americans have any money in stocks (or bonds) Thus far in 2020, Gallup finds 55% of Americans reporting that they own stock, based on polls conducted in March and April. This is identical to the average 55% recorded in 2019 and similar to the average of 54% Gallup has measured since 2010. Stock ownership was more common from 2001 to 2008 when an average 62% of U.S. adults said they owned stock -- but it fell after the 2009 Obama recession and has not fully rebounded.
Even Alex Jones is laughing at you pinning Bush' Great Recession on Obama. Your partisan bs shines through and this is why nothing you say can be taken seriously in this discussion.
I am sure you are one of the guys claiming Obama caused nine-eleven and COVID-19 too,
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Less than 50% of Americans have any money in stocks (or bonds) Thus far in 2020, Gallup finds 55% of Americans reporting that they own stock, based on polls conducted in March and April. This is identical to the average 55% recorded in 2019 and similar to the average of 54% Gallup has measured since 2010. Stock ownership was more common from 2001 to 2008 when an average 62% of U.S. adults said they owned stock -- but it fell after the 2009 Obama recession and has not fully rebounded.
Even Alex Jones is laughing at you pinning Bush' Great Recession on Obama. Your partisan bs shines through and this is why nothing you say can be taken seriously in this discussion.
I am sure you are one of the guys claiming Obama caused nine-eleven and COVID-19 too,
after the 2009 Obama recession and has not fully rebounded.
The Obama recession??????
You mean Bush recession. It didn't start with Obama my man.
Ha-ha, yeah!! You know Dee.... the recession STARTED by that black guy who is married to Michelle Obama. The 10% unemployment was all HIS fault. He created a total mess with the recession he started and never did anything right.
America was saved by trumpty-dumpty! As adolf-fart-lovers love to say: "We should all acknowledge the fact we wouldn't be in the position we are in *TODAY* (July 16) without trump!"
And that's a FACT.
1
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlime:
after the 2009 Obama recession and has not fully rebounded.
The Obama recession??????
You mean Bush recession. It didn't start with Obama my man.
Ha-ha, yeah!! You know Dee.... the recession STARTED by that black guy who is married to Michelle Obama. The 10% unemployment was all HIS fault. He created a total mess with the recession he started and never did anything right.
America was saved by trumpty-dumpty! As adolf-fart-lovers love to say: "We should all acknowledge the fact we wouldn't be in the position we are in *TODAY* (July 16) without trump!"
Adjusted for inflation, total economic activity in the U.S. grew 17.5% from the end of the Great Recession through the end of the Obama presidency. Excluding the short recovery between the double dip recession of 1980-82, this is arguably the worst recovery from a recession going back to the 1960s. Even the recovery under George W. Bush was stronger (the economy grew a total of 18.7% just prior to the Great Recession). For comparison, the economy expanded 39.4% during the 1990s expansion under President Clinton; and 38.2% during the 1980s expansion under President Reagan. The 1990s expansion lasted 10 years, and the 1980s expansion lasted 8 years, which were both longer than the 7+ years of economic recovery under President Obama. Still, the shorter-time frame does not explain the large growth discrepancies. Even more conspicuous, while the average quarterly growth since the end of the Great Recession and the end of the Obama presidency was 2.2%, it slowed to 2.0% in 2015 and 1.9% in 2016. Put differently, economic growth was decelerating as President Obama left office.
Still more crap without links to verifiable sources. As usual
0
Quote Originally Posted by chadebennett:
Adjusted for inflation, total economic activity in the U.S. grew 17.5% from the end of the Great Recession through the end of the Obama presidency. Excluding the short recovery between the double dip recession of 1980-82, this is arguably the worst recovery from a recession going back to the 1960s. Even the recovery under George W. Bush was stronger (the economy grew a total of 18.7% just prior to the Great Recession). For comparison, the economy expanded 39.4% during the 1990s expansion under President Clinton; and 38.2% during the 1980s expansion under President Reagan. The 1990s expansion lasted 10 years, and the 1980s expansion lasted 8 years, which were both longer than the 7+ years of economic recovery under President Obama. Still, the shorter-time frame does not explain the large growth discrepancies. Even more conspicuous, while the average quarterly growth since the end of the Great Recession and the end of the Obama presidency was 2.2%, it slowed to 2.0% in 2015 and 1.9% in 2016. Put differently, economic growth was decelerating as President Obama left office.
Still more crap without links to verifiable sources. As usual
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlime: after the 2009 Obama recession and has not fully rebounded. The Obama recession?????? You mean Bush recession. It didn't start with Obama my man. Ha-ha, yeah!! You know Dee.... the recession STARTED by that black guy who is married to Michelle Obama. The 10% unemployment was all HIS fault. He created a total mess with the recession he started and never did anything right. America was saved by trumpty-dumpty! As adolf-fart-lovers love to say: "We should all acknowledge the fact we wouldn't be in the position we are in *TODAY* (July 16) without trump!" And that's a FACT.
Clearly, this guy is too partisan to understand facts, or does not know when Obama was elected and officially sworn into office. The Great Recession actually started in 2007 and mostly lasted through 2008. Obama wasn't sworn into office until January of 2009, but yeah let's call it Obama's recession. Selective memory around here or just partisan nonsense.
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlime: after the 2009 Obama recession and has not fully rebounded. The Obama recession?????? You mean Bush recession. It didn't start with Obama my man. Ha-ha, yeah!! You know Dee.... the recession STARTED by that black guy who is married to Michelle Obama. The 10% unemployment was all HIS fault. He created a total mess with the recession he started and never did anything right. America was saved by trumpty-dumpty! As adolf-fart-lovers love to say: "We should all acknowledge the fact we wouldn't be in the position we are in *TODAY* (July 16) without trump!" And that's a FACT.
Clearly, this guy is too partisan to understand facts, or does not know when Obama was elected and officially sworn into office. The Great Recession actually started in 2007 and mostly lasted through 2008. Obama wasn't sworn into office until January of 2009, but yeah let's call it Obama's recession. Selective memory around here or just partisan nonsense.
Quote Originally Posted by chadebennett: Adjusted for inflation, total economic activity in the U.S. grew 17.5% from the end of the Great Recession through the end of the Obama presidency. Excluding the short recovery between the double dip recession of 1980-82, this is arguably the worst recovery from a recession going back to the 1960s. Even the recovery under George W. Bush was stronger (the economy grew a total of 18.7% just prior to the Great Recession). For comparison, the economy expanded 39.4% during the 1990s expansion under President Clinton; and 38.2% during the 1980s expansion under President Reagan. The 1990s expansion lasted 10 years, and the 1980s expansion lasted 8 years, which were both longer than the 7+ years of economic recovery under President Obama. Still, the shorter-time frame does not explain the large growth discrepancies. Even more conspicuous, while the average quarterly growth since the end of the Great Recession and the end of the Obama presidency was 2.2%, it slowed to 2.0% in 2015 and 1.9% in 2016. Put differently, economic growth was decelerating as President Obama left office. Still more crap without links to verifiable sources. As usual
Just ignore Kayleigh. She is writing all of this bs herself.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by chadebennett: Adjusted for inflation, total economic activity in the U.S. grew 17.5% from the end of the Great Recession through the end of the Obama presidency. Excluding the short recovery between the double dip recession of 1980-82, this is arguably the worst recovery from a recession going back to the 1960s. Even the recovery under George W. Bush was stronger (the economy grew a total of 18.7% just prior to the Great Recession). For comparison, the economy expanded 39.4% during the 1990s expansion under President Clinton; and 38.2% during the 1980s expansion under President Reagan. The 1990s expansion lasted 10 years, and the 1980s expansion lasted 8 years, which were both longer than the 7+ years of economic recovery under President Obama. Still, the shorter-time frame does not explain the large growth discrepancies. Even more conspicuous, while the average quarterly growth since the end of the Great Recession and the end of the Obama presidency was 2.2%, it slowed to 2.0% in 2015 and 1.9% in 2016. Put differently, economic growth was decelerating as President Obama left office. Still more crap without links to verifiable sources. As usual
Just ignore Kayleigh. She is writing all of this bs herself.
Clearly, this guy is too partisan to understand facts, or does not know when Obama was elected and officially sworn into office. The Great Recession actually started in 2007 and mostly lasted through 2008. Obama wasn't sworn into office until January of 2009, but yeah let's call it Obama's recession. Selective memory around here or just partisan nonsense.
This recession did not in 2008..it ended on Obama's watch in2009....get the facts correct.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Clearly, this guy is too partisan to understand facts, or does not know when Obama was elected and officially sworn into office. The Great Recession actually started in 2007 and mostly lasted through 2008. Obama wasn't sworn into office until January of 2009, but yeah let's call it Obama's recession. Selective memory around here or just partisan nonsense.
This recession did not in 2008..it ended on Obama's watch in2009....get the facts correct.
Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Deezy - what has the current democratic party done to help the President of the United States - NAME ONE?????????????? That is not the topic we are focused on at the moment. Keep up. The support should be reciprocal. The President shows no support for any Dems in office or "Democratic" states, so why should they show him love? All he does is attack the blue states, and claim he shouldn't support Democratic governors. You think that is leadership? He is the President of all states, not just Republican ones. By the way I am still waiting on the name of one signature economic policy from Trump, and not a single one of the Trumpers can name one. Hilarious. 1)Renegotiated NAFTA- 2)Energy independence. 3)Funded a depleted military 4) Immediate health care for vets 5)Brought back manufacturing jobs. Change your smartass attitude if you think you can be respectful to others who don't agree with you. Says alot about a man's character wouldn't you agree! Again these aren't signature policies. Thanks though. Presidents are supposed to negotiate foreign policy deals as heads of foreign policy. Again not signature policies. Trump did not create the original NAFTA deal, and his renegotiating that deal, which seeks to snuff our friendly allies in the North (Canada) who have been tremendous trade partners is not exactly beneficial in my eyes. Depleted military??? Funny Obama and Trump's spending on military on an annual basis is extremely similar. $600 billion to around $700 billion. So is his budget more, yes. But the military was not "depleted" in any sense. That is pure nonsense. Sounds like you buy into a lot of the rhetoric. Anyway. Have a great day sunshine! https://theconversation.com/trumps-planned-military-buildup-is-based-on-faulty-claims-not-good-strategy-73883 My attitude is my business thanks. Thanks for proving my point about character! Pretty ironic stressing character in posts defending Trump. you care about character in a free message board but not from your President??? Interesting. He is never an immoral, smart a$&”, who insults anyone that disagrees with him! Too funny.
Show me one post where I defend trumps character. You simply keep spewing the hate
and refuse to give him zero credit for anything. YET, YOU NEVER state how worthless your side has been . THAT I find ironic. Where is your party in
defending the police? What has your party done to squash the looting and burning (Even minority owned businesses)? What has your party done to
squash the mob mentality? You simply bash the shit out of trump while your party sits back and watch the country go to shit. But hey it's trump fault.
What say you about your party's let's do what we always do - NOTHING! Tell me how wonderful your party is ? NOW you answer a question for a change
hero!
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Deezy - what has the current democratic party done to help the President of the United States - NAME ONE?????????????? That is not the topic we are focused on at the moment. Keep up. The support should be reciprocal. The President shows no support for any Dems in office or "Democratic" states, so why should they show him love? All he does is attack the blue states, and claim he shouldn't support Democratic governors. You think that is leadership? He is the President of all states, not just Republican ones. By the way I am still waiting on the name of one signature economic policy from Trump, and not a single one of the Trumpers can name one. Hilarious. 1)Renegotiated NAFTA- 2)Energy independence. 3)Funded a depleted military 4) Immediate health care for vets 5)Brought back manufacturing jobs. Change your smartass attitude if you think you can be respectful to others who don't agree with you. Says alot about a man's character wouldn't you agree! Again these aren't signature policies. Thanks though. Presidents are supposed to negotiate foreign policy deals as heads of foreign policy. Again not signature policies. Trump did not create the original NAFTA deal, and his renegotiating that deal, which seeks to snuff our friendly allies in the North (Canada) who have been tremendous trade partners is not exactly beneficial in my eyes. Depleted military??? Funny Obama and Trump's spending on military on an annual basis is extremely similar. $600 billion to around $700 billion. So is his budget more, yes. But the military was not "depleted" in any sense. That is pure nonsense. Sounds like you buy into a lot of the rhetoric. Anyway. Have a great day sunshine! https://theconversation.com/trumps-planned-military-buildup-is-based-on-faulty-claims-not-good-strategy-73883 My attitude is my business thanks. Thanks for proving my point about character! Pretty ironic stressing character in posts defending Trump. you care about character in a free message board but not from your President??? Interesting. He is never an immoral, smart a$&”, who insults anyone that disagrees with him! Too funny.
Show me one post where I defend trumps character. You simply keep spewing the hate
and refuse to give him zero credit for anything. YET, YOU NEVER state how worthless your side has been . THAT I find ironic. Where is your party in
defending the police? What has your party done to squash the looting and burning (Even minority owned businesses)? What has your party done to
squash the mob mentality? You simply bash the shit out of trump while your party sits back and watch the country go to shit. But hey it's trump fault.
What say you about your party's let's do what we always do - NOTHING! Tell me how wonderful your party is ? NOW you answer a question for a change
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Clearly, this guy is too partisan to understand facts, or does not know when Obama was elected and officially sworn into office. The Great Recession actually started in 2007 and mostly lasted through 2008. Obama wasn't sworn into office until January of 2009, but yeah let's call it Obama's recession. Selective memory around here or just partisan nonsense. This recession did not in 2008..it ended on Obama's watch in2009....get the facts correct.
Correct. Obama ended the recession in 2009. But somehow it was his recession to begin with in 2007 before he was even elected? This was Bush' Great Recession, which is usually referred to as the Great Recession of 2008. This is not Obama's get the the facts correct. It is clear you have no intention of actually conveying facts, just partisan nonsense.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Clearly, this guy is too partisan to understand facts, or does not know when Obama was elected and officially sworn into office. The Great Recession actually started in 2007 and mostly lasted through 2008. Obama wasn't sworn into office until January of 2009, but yeah let's call it Obama's recession. Selective memory around here or just partisan nonsense. This recession did not in 2008..it ended on Obama's watch in2009....get the facts correct.
Correct. Obama ended the recession in 2009. But somehow it was his recession to begin with in 2007 before he was even elected? This was Bush' Great Recession, which is usually referred to as the Great Recession of 2008. This is not Obama's get the the facts correct. It is clear you have no intention of actually conveying facts, just partisan nonsense.
This recession did not in 2008..it ended on Obama's watch in2009....get the facts correct.
Well he never said it ended in 2008. It technically began in late 2007 under our last *REPUBLICAN*administration; the bulk of the disaster though was in 2008 (mostly) and into 2009.......
But THANKS for pointing out that the devastating recession which started
during our last *REPUBLICAN*administration,
was "ENDED on Obama's watch!" Way to go Obama !!!
Meanwhile,
here we are in the midst of ANOTHER failing *REPUBLICAN* administration,
and what do we have... ? yet another clusterph**k
1
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlime:
This recession did not in 2008..it ended on Obama's watch in2009....get the facts correct.
Well he never said it ended in 2008. It technically began in late 2007 under our last *REPUBLICAN*administration; the bulk of the disaster though was in 2008 (mostly) and into 2009.......
But THANKS for pointing out that the devastating recession which started
during our last *REPUBLICAN*administration,
was "ENDED on Obama's watch!" Way to go Obama !!!
Meanwhile,
here we are in the midst of ANOTHER failing *REPUBLICAN* administration,
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Deezy - what has the current democratic party done to help the President of the United States - NAME ONE?????????????? That is not the topic we are focused on at the moment. Keep up. The support should be reciprocal. The President shows no support for any Dems in office or "Democratic" states, so why should they show him love? All he does is attack the blue states, and claim he shouldn't support Democratic governors. You think that is leadership? He is the President of all states, not just Republican ones. By the way I am still waiting on the name of one signature economic policy from Trump, and not a single one of the Trumpers can name one. Hilarious. 1)Renegotiated NAFTA- 2)Energy independence. 3)Funded a depleted military 4) Immediate health care for vets 5)Brought back manufacturing jobs. Change your smartass attitude if you think you can be respectful to others who don't agree with you. Says alot about a man's character wouldn't you agree! Again these aren't signature policies. Thanks though. Presidents are supposed to negotiate foreign policy deals as heads of foreign policy. Again not signature policies. Trump did not create the original NAFTA deal, and his renegotiating that deal, which seeks to snuff our friendly allies in the North (Canada) who have been tremendous trade partners is not exactly beneficial in my eyes. Depleted military??? Funny Obama and Trump's spending on military on an annual basis is extremely similar. $600 billion to around $700 billion. So is his budget more, yes. But the military was not "depleted" in any sense. That is pure nonsense. Sounds like you buy into a lot of the rhetoric. Anyway. Have a great day sunshine! https://theconversation.com/trumps-planned-military-buildup-is-based-on-faulty-claims-not-good-strategy-73883 My attitude is my business thanks. Thanks for proving my point about character! Pretty ironic stressing character in posts defending Trump. you care about character in a free message board but not from your President??? Interesting. He is never an immoral, smart a$&”, who insults anyone that disagrees with him! Too funny. Show me one post where I defend trumps character. You simply keep spewing the hate and refuse to give him zero credit for anything. YET, YOU NEVER state how worthless your side has been . THAT I find ironic. Where is your party in defending the police? What has your party done to squash the looting and burning (Even minority owned businesses)? What has your party done to squash the mob mentality? You simply bash the shit out of trump while your party sits back and watch the country go to shit. But hey it's trump fault. What say you about your party's let's do what we always do - NOTHING! Tell me how wonderful your party is ? NOW you answer a question for a change hero!
The point is you are acting like character matters, and yet have undying support for Trump, who has some of the lowest character and morality of any human being on Earth, which is pretty darn ironic.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel:
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Deezy - what has the current democratic party done to help the President of the United States - NAME ONE?????????????? That is not the topic we are focused on at the moment. Keep up. The support should be reciprocal. The President shows no support for any Dems in office or "Democratic" states, so why should they show him love? All he does is attack the blue states, and claim he shouldn't support Democratic governors. You think that is leadership? He is the President of all states, not just Republican ones. By the way I am still waiting on the name of one signature economic policy from Trump, and not a single one of the Trumpers can name one. Hilarious. 1)Renegotiated NAFTA- 2)Energy independence. 3)Funded a depleted military 4) Immediate health care for vets 5)Brought back manufacturing jobs. Change your smartass attitude if you think you can be respectful to others who don't agree with you. Says alot about a man's character wouldn't you agree! Again these aren't signature policies. Thanks though. Presidents are supposed to negotiate foreign policy deals as heads of foreign policy. Again not signature policies. Trump did not create the original NAFTA deal, and his renegotiating that deal, which seeks to snuff our friendly allies in the North (Canada) who have been tremendous trade partners is not exactly beneficial in my eyes. Depleted military??? Funny Obama and Trump's spending on military on an annual basis is extremely similar. $600 billion to around $700 billion. So is his budget more, yes. But the military was not "depleted" in any sense. That is pure nonsense. Sounds like you buy into a lot of the rhetoric. Anyway. Have a great day sunshine! https://theconversation.com/trumps-planned-military-buildup-is-based-on-faulty-claims-not-good-strategy-73883 My attitude is my business thanks. Thanks for proving my point about character! Pretty ironic stressing character in posts defending Trump. you care about character in a free message board but not from your President??? Interesting. He is never an immoral, smart a$&”, who insults anyone that disagrees with him! Too funny. Show me one post where I defend trumps character. You simply keep spewing the hate and refuse to give him zero credit for anything. YET, YOU NEVER state how worthless your side has been . THAT I find ironic. Where is your party in defending the police? What has your party done to squash the looting and burning (Even minority owned businesses)? What has your party done to squash the mob mentality? You simply bash the shit out of trump while your party sits back and watch the country go to shit. But hey it's trump fault. What say you about your party's let's do what we always do - NOTHING! Tell me how wonderful your party is ? NOW you answer a question for a change hero!
The point is you are acting like character matters, and yet have undying support for Trump, who has some of the lowest character and morality of any human being on Earth, which is pretty darn ironic.
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Clearly, this guy is too partisan to understand facts, or does not know when Obama was elected and officially sworn into office. The Great Recession actually started in 2007 and mostly lasted through 2008. Obama wasn't sworn into office until January of 2009, but yeah let's call it Obama's recession. Selective memory around here or just partisan nonsense. This recession did not in 2008..it ended on Obama's watch in2009....get the facts correct.
I never said the recession ended in 2008. Reading comprehension 101 brotha.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Clearly, this guy is too partisan to understand facts, or does not know when Obama was elected and officially sworn into office. The Great Recession actually started in 2007 and mostly lasted through 2008. Obama wasn't sworn into office until January of 2009, but yeah let's call it Obama's recession. Selective memory around here or just partisan nonsense. This recession did not in 2008..it ended on Obama's watch in2009....get the facts correct.
I never said the recession ended in 2008. Reading comprehension 101 brotha.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
yet another clusterph**k
Hot Forum Topics
