• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 3
      NFL Week 3
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Falcons-Packers Picks
      • Survivor Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    trump's economy failing; worse than Obama's last 3

    «First Previous 171819 ... 293031 Next Last»
    DeezyAZ81
    Snorkel
    chadebennett
    Midnight1
    fubah2
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 2756
    Posts: 755
    «First Previous 171819 ... 293031 Next Last»
     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 12:40 PM ET #401

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: To further my point, I wonder how many $4,000 per month health insurance premium checks you had to write in the years immediately following the passage of the ACA? Many of my friends and their families were faced with the harsh reality that they either pony up the 4K a month or suffer the consequences of an illness bankrupting their future.  So...how many monthly 4k checks did you have to write?  To my eyes, it seems so much easier to support destructive economic policies when you are on the receiving end.  So....how many monthly checks?  I'm waiting. DEEZY WROTE: I have a family of 4 and never had to dole out 4k a month during Obama's time, so I have no idea what kind of coverage they required or their health backgrounds. Sounds like they must have had some serious health concerns. So, some of your friends had to pay high costs, so you hate the ACA?? Nice argument. Didn't impact you in any way? Love the friends argument. Talk about weak. Deezy. This is where your mind is disconnected from what was happening in the real world. Obviously, we all have different families and friends and we all live in different financial and economic circles. I can assure you, as I am sure Rush can chime in on, that people were getting hosed by the ACA. I'm surprised you are oblivious to the fact, but this is where you and I have a tremendous disconnect.  Rush...please chime in with some of the experiences you witnessed so Deezy can wake up and smell the coffee. And you are wrong to assume it didn't affect me. I owned my own business for 30 years prior to my retirement this year. My rates doubled in the very first year of the ACA. So yes, it did affect me.  That's the problem with you low wage earners. You want EVERYTHING subsidized but are delusional as to where the money actually comes from. Deezy. In regard to the ACA rates, I simply responded to your repeated rude commentary. You called me weak and implied that the ACA did not affect me personally and I replied that my rates doubled in the first year. I have no idea how old you are so perhaps you are of the younger generation which might help explain your rude behavior. Either way, there is no excuse for constantly ridiculing people on this site without merit. Fuha is 66 so he has zero excuse.  I will admit that I have a bias against healthy, able to work freeloaders that are a drain on the tax payer. 5.6% of all government spending is spent on welfare. It would seem that you and Fubha would like to see this % rise. I personally would like to see it fall. If it falls, that would imply that more people are working and supporting themselves. How could that be a bad thing? Of course, if you are 66 and your door opens up to a hallway with kids running around, it's pretty likely that you are part of the 5.6% club and that's pretty pathetic considering the words that Fubha has typed here over the past several days.  Moving on, I don't care about arguing about finances, wealth or being rich. I'm 56 and I retired last year. I have achieved my goals in business and now it's time to play golf. I will check back in on this thread this evening where I am sure I will be, once again, bashed into the high heaven for my comments.....but at least that will give you 5.6%-ers something to spend your time on today.

    You're right. I am rude you are not. Get off your high horse. Enjoy your day. I will not engage in any further banter with you. My age has nothing to do with your constant negativity and elitist attitude. Have fun golfing. an_cheers

    Reply
    Quote Post
    2
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: To further my point, I wonder how many $4,000 per month health insurance premium checks you had to write in the years immediately following the passage of the ACA? Many of my friends and their families were faced with the harsh reality that they either pony up the 4K a month or suffer the consequences of an illness bankrupting their future.  So...how many monthly 4k checks did you have to write?  To my eyes, it seems so much easier to support destructive economic policies when you are on the receiving end.  So....how many monthly checks?  I'm waiting. DEEZY WROTE: I have a family of 4 and never had to dole out 4k a month during Obama's time, so I have no idea what kind of coverage they required or their health backgrounds. Sounds like they must have had some serious health concerns. So, some of your friends had to pay high costs, so you hate the ACA?? Nice argument. Didn't impact you in any way? Love the friends argument. Talk about weak. Deezy. This is where your mind is disconnected from what was happening in the real world. Obviously, we all have different families and friends and we all live in different financial and economic circles. I can assure you, as I am sure Rush can chime in on, that people were getting hosed by the ACA. I'm surprised you are oblivious to the fact, but this is where you and I have a tremendous disconnect.  Rush...please chime in with some of the experiences you witnessed so Deezy can wake up and smell the coffee. And you are wrong to assume it didn't affect me. I owned my own business for 30 years prior to my retirement this year. My rates doubled in the very first year of the ACA. So yes, it did affect me.  That's the problem with you low wage earners. You want EVERYTHING subsidized but are delusional as to where the money actually comes from. Deezy. In regard to the ACA rates, I simply responded to your repeated rude commentary. You called me weak and implied that the ACA did not affect me personally and I replied that my rates doubled in the first year. I have no idea how old you are so perhaps you are of the younger generation which might help explain your rude behavior. Either way, there is no excuse for constantly ridiculing people on this site without merit. Fuha is 66 so he has zero excuse.  I will admit that I have a bias against healthy, able to work freeloaders that are a drain on the tax payer. 5.6% of all government spending is spent on welfare. It would seem that you and Fubha would like to see this % rise. I personally would like to see it fall. If it falls, that would imply that more people are working and supporting themselves. How could that be a bad thing? Of course, if you are 66 and your door opens up to a hallway with kids running around, it's pretty likely that you are part of the 5.6% club and that's pretty pathetic considering the words that Fubha has typed here over the past several days.  Moving on, I don't care about arguing about finances, wealth or being rich. I'm 56 and I retired last year. I have achieved my goals in business and now it's time to play golf. I will check back in on this thread this evening where I am sure I will be, once again, bashed into the high heaven for my comments.....but at least that will give you 5.6%-ers something to spend your time on today.

    You're right. I am rude you are not. Get off your high horse. Enjoy your day. I will not engage in any further banter with you. My age has nothing to do with your constant negativity and elitist attitude. Have fun golfing. an_cheers

     
    Snorkel
    Snorkel
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 1177
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 2:21 PM ET #402

    fubah, deezy - still awaiting on post 318 - Fubah , appreciate the one response but sidestepped the original questions.

    Deezy, you kept pushing for an "economic policy" relentlessly but yet have to answer #318. What say you?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    fubah, deezy - still awaiting on post 318 - Fubah , appreciate the one response but sidestepped the original questions.

    Deezy, you kept pushing for an "economic policy" relentlessly but yet have to answer #318. What say you?

     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 2:26 PM ET #403

    Who said I was a Democrat? If you can read I am a registered Independent. You don't answer any of my questions, why should I answer yours? an_roll_laugh

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    Who said I was a Democrat? If you can read I am a registered Independent. You don't answer any of my questions, why should I answer yours? an_roll_laugh

     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 2:50 PM ET #404

    Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Rush51: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Rush51: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Rush51: Deezy......Am I to believe your "Pew Research Center" source or the "Wall Street Journal ??"  You are not building a very good case for your argument.     The facts are irrefutable..  but continue to plug your ears, cover your mouth, and cover your eyes (insert emoji here. Lol) You should believe the Wall Street Journal considering your were praising it 2 days ago and it is a conservative source.... Conservative Source ?  It presents "factual data" on the topic we are discussing ?   Unlike your favorite sites Vox.com, politico, and msnbc, which are light on facts and heavy on political politicking commentary.  No Thanks. Yes. Your lack of overall knowledge is baffling. I will not be responding to you further. You do not even realize that the Wall Street Journal is a conservative leaning publication? Must be new to politics and reading in general. Have you heard of the Murdoch Family? They happen to own the Wall Street Journal and your favorite new source Fox News??? Not conservative leaning. Geezus you are clueless. My articles are not from Vox, Politico, and MSNBC. Last ones I just posted are from NPR and Forbes with actually numerical facts and data, unlike anything you ever post. In fact you do not even post sources, simply jibberish and claims with no factual support. Have a good life and keep your head in the clouds.   Translation:  I don't have anything intelligent to respond with !  I am defeated ! Ooohhh. Got me. Why don't you post that same WSJ opinion piece from two years ago that was debunked 5 times that you posted 4 times already???? Tell me more.... Rush have you see this one? www.wsj.com/articles/low-income-workers-see-long-awaited-wage-gains-1538771475 It's an opinion piece on blue collar worker wages rising faster than high income earners, which didn't happen. Let me know what you think? You cannot refute the data, unless you believe they used incorrect numbers,  which is silly. BUT, ...... no worries,  I just found another source that substantiates the WSJ's reporting.   It's even from a user friendly USA Today source,  that you will comforting, like a little pillow for you. Lol.  www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/08/14/blue-collar-workers-wages-rising-inequality-shrinking-economy-column/1955329001

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/joshbersin/2018/10/31/why-arent-wages-keeping-up-its-not-the-economy-its-management/#344d265b397e

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Rush51: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Rush51: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Rush51: Deezy......Am I to believe your "Pew Research Center" source or the "Wall Street Journal ??"  You are not building a very good case for your argument.     The facts are irrefutable..  but continue to plug your ears, cover your mouth, and cover your eyes (insert emoji here. Lol) You should believe the Wall Street Journal considering your were praising it 2 days ago and it is a conservative source.... Conservative Source ?  It presents "factual data" on the topic we are discussing ?   Unlike your favorite sites Vox.com, politico, and msnbc, which are light on facts and heavy on political politicking commentary.  No Thanks. Yes. Your lack of overall knowledge is baffling. I will not be responding to you further. You do not even realize that the Wall Street Journal is a conservative leaning publication? Must be new to politics and reading in general. Have you heard of the Murdoch Family? They happen to own the Wall Street Journal and your favorite new source Fox News??? Not conservative leaning. Geezus you are clueless. My articles are not from Vox, Politico, and MSNBC. Last ones I just posted are from NPR and Forbes with actually numerical facts and data, unlike anything you ever post. In fact you do not even post sources, simply jibberish and claims with no factual support. Have a good life and keep your head in the clouds.   Translation:  I don't have anything intelligent to respond with !  I am defeated ! Ooohhh. Got me. Why don't you post that same WSJ opinion piece from two years ago that was debunked 5 times that you posted 4 times already???? Tell me more.... Rush have you see this one? www.wsj.com/articles/low-income-workers-see-long-awaited-wage-gains-1538771475 It's an opinion piece on blue collar worker wages rising faster than high income earners, which didn't happen. Let me know what you think? You cannot refute the data, unless you believe they used incorrect numbers,  which is silly. BUT, ...... no worries,  I just found another source that substantiates the WSJ's reporting.   It's even from a user friendly USA Today source,  that you will comforting, like a little pillow for you. Lol.  www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/08/14/blue-collar-workers-wages-rising-inequality-shrinking-economy-column/1955329001

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/joshbersin/2018/10/31/why-arent-wages-keeping-up-its-not-the-economy-its-management/#344d265b397e

     

     
    Snorkel
    Snorkel
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 1177
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 2:51 PM ET #405

    I did answer your question - none of your responses are independent or you could easily give a response - You can say "They are doing nothing"

    and that will be that. You insist a nauseating amount of time for an answer , yet here we are. What is the problem? I won't ask again and assume

    if any conversation doesn't go the way you wish, then you simply ignore and chalk it up to sidestepping. Typical when you have no answer. That is

    the definition of a Democrat. Notice I said "they"

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    I did answer your question - none of your responses are independent or you could easily give a response - You can say "They are doing nothing"

    and that will be that. You insist a nauseating amount of time for an answer , yet here we are. What is the problem? I won't ask again and assume

    if any conversation doesn't go the way you wish, then you simply ignore and chalk it up to sidestepping. Typical when you have no answer. That is

    the definition of a Democrat. Notice I said "they"

     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 2:57 PM ET #406

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel:

    I did answer your question - none of your responses are independent or you could easily give a response - You can say "They are doing nothing" and that will be that. You insist a nauseating amount of time for an answer , yet here we are. What is the problem? I won't ask again and assume if any conversation doesn't go the way you wish, then you simply ignore and chalk it up to sidestepping. Typical when you have no answer. That is the definition of a Democrat. Notice I said "they"

    Nice try buddy. I asked you a simple question as why my character on a message board matters to you so much, but the character of your favorite President Trump is not a concern of yours? All you did was evade the question like the hypocrite you are. All good. Have an excellent day! 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel:

    I did answer your question - none of your responses are independent or you could easily give a response - You can say "They are doing nothing" and that will be that. You insist a nauseating amount of time for an answer , yet here we are. What is the problem? I won't ask again and assume if any conversation doesn't go the way you wish, then you simply ignore and chalk it up to sidestepping. Typical when you have no answer. That is the definition of a Democrat. Notice I said "they"

    Nice try buddy. I asked you a simple question as why my character on a message board matters to you so much, but the character of your favorite President Trump is not a concern of yours? All you did was evade the question like the hypocrite you are. All good. Have an excellent day! 

     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 2:59 PM ET #407

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel:

    I did answer your question - none of your responses are independent or you could easily give a response - You can say "They are doing nothing" and that will be that. You insist a nauseating amount of time for an answer , yet here we are. What is the problem? I won't ask again and assume if any conversation doesn't go the way you wish, then you simply ignore and chalk it up to sidestepping. Typical when you have no answer. That is the definition of a Democrat. Notice I said "they"

    Just because I do not like Trump does not make me a "Democrat" In fact, many Republicans and Independents cannot stand him, hence one of the lowest approval ratings in modern history, and Republican groups like the Lincoln Project and more organizing and advertising against him. Get a clue dude, your boy Trump is not popular, regardless of political party affiliation. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel:

    I did answer your question - none of your responses are independent or you could easily give a response - You can say "They are doing nothing" and that will be that. You insist a nauseating amount of time for an answer , yet here we are. What is the problem? I won't ask again and assume if any conversation doesn't go the way you wish, then you simply ignore and chalk it up to sidestepping. Typical when you have no answer. That is the definition of a Democrat. Notice I said "they"

    Just because I do not like Trump does not make me a "Democrat" In fact, many Republicans and Independents cannot stand him, hence one of the lowest approval ratings in modern history, and Republican groups like the Lincoln Project and more organizing and advertising against him. Get a clue dude, your boy Trump is not popular, regardless of political party affiliation. 

     
    Snorkel
    Snorkel
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 1177
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 3:15 PM ET #408

    So, no answer from the hero. I'm shocked!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    So, no answer from the hero. I'm shocked!

     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 3:19 PM ET #409

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel:

    So, no answer from the hero. I'm shocked!

    Exactly. Just matching your style of not answering questions. 

    Again, why should I answer your questions if you don't answer mine? Doesn't make much sense to me. Rather pointless discussion if it's one sided. confused

    Carry on. Not even sure what your expression "the hero" is supposed to mean. Doesn't make any sense either. Not surprised. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel:

    So, no answer from the hero. I'm shocked!

    Exactly. Just matching your style of not answering questions. 

    Again, why should I answer your questions if you don't answer mine? Doesn't make much sense to me. Rather pointless discussion if it's one sided. confused

    Carry on. Not even sure what your expression "the hero" is supposed to mean. Doesn't make any sense either. Not surprised. 

     
    Snorkel
    Snorkel
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 1177
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 4:15 PM ET #410

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: I did answer your question - none of your responses are independent or you could easily give a response - You can say "They are doing nothing" and that will be that. You insist a nauseating amount of time for an answer , yet here we are. What is the problem? I won't ask again and assume if any conversation doesn't go the way you wish, then you simply ignore and chalk it up to sidestepping. Typical when you have no answer. That is the definition of a Democrat. Notice I said "they" Nice try buddy. I asked you a simple question as why my character on a message board matters to you so much, but the character of your favorite President Trump is not a concern of yours? All you did was evade the question like the hypocrite you are. All good. Have an excellent day!
    I'll give ya one more shot - I answered the "economic policy questioned you asked - Now, i'll answer your character question, again. Name one time I said anything about trump's character or lack of? I have an opinion of your character

    but will not express it as it doesn't matter. As for trump, his character fits (according to all you haters) right in line with all the Beltway liars, thieves and

    cons that sit in congress today (Both partys) Wouldn't you agree? But, the main point is you guys never call out anyone from the other side. That is the point I've been making forever. So, what say you- My final attempt. Hypocrite is the farthest thing I am. I find it rich you all use that word. Laughable

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: I did answer your question - none of your responses are independent or you could easily give a response - You can say "They are doing nothing" and that will be that. You insist a nauseating amount of time for an answer , yet here we are. What is the problem? I won't ask again and assume if any conversation doesn't go the way you wish, then you simply ignore and chalk it up to sidestepping. Typical when you have no answer. That is the definition of a Democrat. Notice I said "they" Nice try buddy. I asked you a simple question as why my character on a message board matters to you so much, but the character of your favorite President Trump is not a concern of yours? All you did was evade the question like the hypocrite you are. All good. Have an excellent day!
    I'll give ya one more shot - I answered the "economic policy questioned you asked - Now, i'll answer your character question, again. Name one time I said anything about trump's character or lack of? I have an opinion of your character

    but will not express it as it doesn't matter. As for trump, his character fits (according to all you haters) right in line with all the Beltway liars, thieves and

    cons that sit in congress today (Both partys) Wouldn't you agree? But, the main point is you guys never call out anyone from the other side. That is the point I've been making forever. So, what say you- My final attempt. Hypocrite is the farthest thing I am. I find it rich you all use that word. Laughable

     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 4:31 PM ET #411

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel:

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: I did answer your question - none of your responses are independent or you could easily give a response - You can say "They are doing nothing" and that will be that. You insist a nauseating amount of time for an answer , yet here we are. What is the problem? I won't ask again and assume if any conversation doesn't go the way you wish, then you simply ignore and chalk it up to sidestepping. Typical when you have no answer. That is the definition of a Democrat. Notice I said "they" Nice try buddy. I asked you a simple question as why my character on a message board matters to you so much, but the character of your favorite President Trump is not a concern of yours? All you did was evade the question like the hypocrite you are. All good. Have an excellent day! I'll give ya one more shot - I answered the "economic policy questioned you asked - Now, i'll answer your character question, again. Name one time I said anything about trump's character or lack of? I have an opinion of your character but will not express it as it doesn't matter. As for trump, his character fits (according to all you haters) right in line with all the Beltway liars, thieves and cons that sit in congress today (Both partys) Wouldn't you agree? But, the main point is you guys never call out anyone from the other side. That is the point I've been making forever. So, what say you- My final attempt. Hypocrite is the farthest thing I am. I find it rich you all use that word. Laughable

    You did not answer my economic policy question in the least. Gave us some inaccurate blanket statement about Trump's agenda, which is not an economic policy. Clearly, you do not know what the term means. Creating a budget proposal and allocating more money to the military is not a signature "economic policy, it's called the role of the president. A signature policy would be something like the "American Investment Recovery Act of 2009," The Affordable Care Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act of 2010, or creating the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Iranian Nuclear Deal are examples of real, policies.

    Simply saying re-negotiating an existing mutli-state policy like NAFTA is not a Trump signature policy, the pact already existed. Tax cuts are not a signature policy, every recent President does that. So actually you did not answer my economic policy question....wise one, which is why I have been ignoring your questions. 

    You already expressed an opinion of my character, which is my point. Why so down on my character when you know nothing about me? yet provide undying support for the current President who you know is a scum bag? Kind of hypocritical no? I guess you can't see that. 

    Who should I be calling out on "the other side", who shows low character, lack of morals, and no leadership like Trump? Trump is the current President, what "other side" should I be referring to? Past Presidents? 

    Here you go all the Clintons are also low-character, stealing, low-lifes too. Does that make it better that Trump is one of them and currently in office? 

    I don't understand your point. Your feelings are hurt because I don't criticize the "evil Dems"? There I just did. It doesn't detract from the fact that Trump is POS and embarrassing the country. confused

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel:

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: I did answer your question - none of your responses are independent or you could easily give a response - You can say "They are doing nothing" and that will be that. You insist a nauseating amount of time for an answer , yet here we are. What is the problem? I won't ask again and assume if any conversation doesn't go the way you wish, then you simply ignore and chalk it up to sidestepping. Typical when you have no answer. That is the definition of a Democrat. Notice I said "they" Nice try buddy. I asked you a simple question as why my character on a message board matters to you so much, but the character of your favorite President Trump is not a concern of yours? All you did was evade the question like the hypocrite you are. All good. Have an excellent day! I'll give ya one more shot - I answered the "economic policy questioned you asked - Now, i'll answer your character question, again. Name one time I said anything about trump's character or lack of? I have an opinion of your character but will not express it as it doesn't matter. As for trump, his character fits (according to all you haters) right in line with all the Beltway liars, thieves and cons that sit in congress today (Both partys) Wouldn't you agree? But, the main point is you guys never call out anyone from the other side. That is the point I've been making forever. So, what say you- My final attempt. Hypocrite is the farthest thing I am. I find it rich you all use that word. Laughable

    You did not answer my economic policy question in the least. Gave us some inaccurate blanket statement about Trump's agenda, which is not an economic policy. Clearly, you do not know what the term means. Creating a budget proposal and allocating more money to the military is not a signature "economic policy, it's called the role of the president. A signature policy would be something like the "American Investment Recovery Act of 2009," The Affordable Care Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act of 2010, or creating the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Iranian Nuclear Deal are examples of real, policies.

    Simply saying re-negotiating an existing mutli-state policy like NAFTA is not a Trump signature policy, the pact already existed. Tax cuts are not a signature policy, every recent President does that. So actually you did not answer my economic policy question....wise one, which is why I have been ignoring your questions. 

    You already expressed an opinion of my character, which is my point. Why so down on my character when you know nothing about me? yet provide undying support for the current President who you know is a scum bag? Kind of hypocritical no? I guess you can't see that. 

    Who should I be calling out on "the other side", who shows low character, lack of morals, and no leadership like Trump? Trump is the current President, what "other side" should I be referring to? Past Presidents? 

    Here you go all the Clintons are also low-character, stealing, low-lifes too. Does that make it better that Trump is one of them and currently in office? 

    I don't understand your point. Your feelings are hurt because I don't criticize the "evil Dems"? There I just did. It doesn't detract from the fact that Trump is POS and embarrassing the country. confused

     
    chadebennett
    chadebennett
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2011
    Posts: 614
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 4:42 PM ET #412

    DeezyAZ81 = Jim Acousta

    Jim does not answer questions.

    He just asks ridiculous questions and has a bad case of Trump derangement syndrome.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    DeezyAZ81 = Jim Acousta

    Jim does not answer questions.

    He just asks ridiculous questions and has a bad case of Trump derangement syndrome.

     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 4:45 PM ET #413

    Nice Try Kayleigh,

    Your nickname just doesn't stick like mine. Come up with your own style please. You are talking about answering questions? confused All you do all day is copy and paste from Trump's Twitter feed and your press briefing write-up's Kayleigh. Good one though. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Nice Try Kayleigh,

    Your nickname just doesn't stick like mine. Come up with your own style please. You are talking about answering questions? confused All you do all day is copy and paste from Trump's Twitter feed and your press briefing write-up's Kayleigh. Good one though. 

     
    chadebennett
    chadebennett
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2011
    Posts: 614
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 4:56 PM ET #414

    Don't be mad Jim an_happydude

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Don't be mad Jim an_happydude

     

     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 5:01 PM ET #415

    Quote Originally Posted by chadebennett:

    Don't be mad Jim

    All I get is Jim? Not even Don Lemon? Weak as hell. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by chadebennett:

    Don't be mad Jim

    All I get is Jim? Not even Don Lemon? Weak as hell. 

     
    Midnight1
    Midnight1
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2007
    Posts: 25498
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 5:13 PM ET #416

    Ignore him Deezy...Slim will be gone in November.

    Slim and I made a wager that if Trump were to lose he will leave the website. If Joe loses, I will leave the website.

    We'll see how much his word is worth in November. He just has to extinguish the burning crosses before he leaves.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    Ignore him Deezy...Slim will be gone in November.

    Slim and I made a wager that if Trump were to lose he will leave the website. If Joe loses, I will leave the website.

    We'll see how much his word is worth in November. He just has to extinguish the burning crosses before he leaves.

     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 5:19 PM ET #417

    Yeah I wrote him off last night, when he was claiming he was as wealthy as Jeff Bezos. I do not pay much attention to him and bots like Kayleigh Bennett. an_roll_laugh

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    Yeah I wrote him off last night, when he was claiming he was as wealthy as Jeff Bezos. I do not pay much attention to him and bots like Kayleigh Bennett. an_roll_laugh

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53202
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 5:29 PM ET #418

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:

    responded to your repeated rude commentary. You called me weak and implied that the ACA did not affect me personally and I replied that my rates doubled in the first year. I have no idea how old you are so perhaps you are of the younger generation which might help explain your rude behavior. Either way, there is no excuse for constantly ridiculing people on this site without merit. Fuha is 66 so he has zero excuse.  I will admit that I have a bias against healthy, able to work freeloaders that are a drain on the tax payer. 5.6% of all government spending is spent on welfare. It would seem that you and Fubha would like to see this % rise. I personally would like to see it fall. If it falls, that would imply that more people are working and supporting themselves. How could that be a bad thing? Of course, if you are 66 and your door opens up to a hallway with kids running around, it's pretty likely that you are part of the 5.6% club and that's pretty pathetic considering the words that Fubha has typed here over the past several days.  Moving on, I don't care about arguing about finances, wealth or being rich. I'm 56 and I retired last year. I have achieved my goals in business and now it's time to play golf. I will check back in on this thread this evening where I am sure I will be, once again, bashed into the high heaven for my comments.....but at least that will give you 5.6%-ers something to spend your time on today.

     

    oh boo-hoo.... YOU are paying more for health insurance....waaaa - waaaa

    Meanwhile,  139,000 Americans are dead largely due to the sociopath republicans voted for.

    TRUTHS about adolf coming out in another LIVE TV interview tonite, CNN 8 ET

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:

    responded to your repeated rude commentary. You called me weak and implied that the ACA did not affect me personally and I replied that my rates doubled in the first year. I have no idea how old you are so perhaps you are of the younger generation which might help explain your rude behavior. Either way, there is no excuse for constantly ridiculing people on this site without merit. Fuha is 66 so he has zero excuse.  I will admit that I have a bias against healthy, able to work freeloaders that are a drain on the tax payer. 5.6% of all government spending is spent on welfare. It would seem that you and Fubha would like to see this % rise. I personally would like to see it fall. If it falls, that would imply that more people are working and supporting themselves. How could that be a bad thing? Of course, if you are 66 and your door opens up to a hallway with kids running around, it's pretty likely that you are part of the 5.6% club and that's pretty pathetic considering the words that Fubha has typed here over the past several days.  Moving on, I don't care about arguing about finances, wealth or being rich. I'm 56 and I retired last year. I have achieved my goals in business and now it's time to play golf. I will check back in on this thread this evening where I am sure I will be, once again, bashed into the high heaven for my comments.....but at least that will give you 5.6%-ers something to spend your time on today.

     

    oh boo-hoo.... YOU are paying more for health insurance....waaaa - waaaa

    Meanwhile,  139,000 Americans are dead largely due to the sociopath republicans voted for.

    TRUTHS about adolf coming out in another LIVE TV interview tonite, CNN 8 ET

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53202
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 5:34 PM ET #419

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:

     

     

    Get off your high horse. Enjoy your day. I will not engage in any further banter with you. My age has nothing to do with your constant negativity and elitist attitude. Have fun golfing.

     

     Tell him (or her whatever the case may be using a female avatar)   an_clap

    That person wants to whine about social issues (off-topic) that he/she despises,

    whilst ignoring the 139,000 Americans who have died by covid needlessly,

    largely due to the slow reaction of a sociopath president -- who, as a result,

    has plunged the US into $26.5 TRILLION National Debt for which ALL OF US

    will be paying eventually...

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:

     

     

    Get off your high horse. Enjoy your day. I will not engage in any further banter with you. My age has nothing to do with your constant negativity and elitist attitude. Have fun golfing.

     

     Tell him (or her whatever the case may be using a female avatar)   an_clap

    That person wants to whine about social issues (off-topic) that he/she despises,

    whilst ignoring the 139,000 Americans who have died by covid needlessly,

    largely due to the slow reaction of a sociopath president -- who, as a result,

    has plunged the US into $26.5 TRILLION National Debt for which ALL OF US

    will be paying eventually...

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53202
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 5:39 PM ET #420

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Who said I was a Democrat? If you can read I am a registered Independent. You don't answer any of my questions, why should I answer yours?

     

    As usual, the dummies think, if anyone dares disagree with adolf,

    then that person MUST be a Democrat.....and they believe that *ALL* republican rednecks, hillbillies, confederate-lovers, bigots and ALL INDEPENDENTS adore and worship trump's used toilet-paper....

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Who said I was a Democrat? If you can read I am a registered Independent. You don't answer any of my questions, why should I answer yours?

     

    As usual, the dummies think, if anyone dares disagree with adolf,

    then that person MUST be a Democrat.....and they believe that *ALL* republican rednecks, hillbillies, confederate-lovers, bigots and ALL INDEPENDENTS adore and worship trump's used toilet-paper....

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53202
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 5:41 PM ET #421

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel:

    fubah, deezy - still awaiting on post 318 - Fubah , appreciate the one response but sidestepped the original questions. Deezy, you kept pushing for an "economic policy" relentlessly but yet have to answer #318. What say you?

    You need an answer to your Qs, go ask a Dem.

     

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel:

    fubah, deezy - still awaiting on post 318 - Fubah , appreciate the one response but sidestepped the original questions. Deezy, you kept pushing for an "economic policy" relentlessly but yet have to answer #318. What say you?

    You need an answer to your Qs, go ask a Dem.

     

     

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53202
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 5:43 PM ET #422

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Just because I do not like Trump does not make me a "Democrat" In fact, many Republicans and Independents cannot stand him, hence one of the lowest approval ratings in modern history, and Republican groups like the Lincoln Project and more organizing and advertising against him. Get a clue dude, your boy Trump is not popular, regardless of political party affiliation.

    Snorky wants a DEM to play with him, I guess, because nobody else will.

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Just because I do not like Trump does not make me a "Democrat" In fact, many Republicans and Independents cannot stand him, hence one of the lowest approval ratings in modern history, and Republican groups like the Lincoln Project and more organizing and advertising against him. Get a clue dude, your boy Trump is not popular, regardless of political party affiliation.

    Snorky wants a DEM to play with him, I guess, because nobody else will.

     

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53202
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 5:44 PM ET #423

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: I did answer your question - none of your responses are independent or you could easily give a response - You can say "They are doing nothing" and that will be that. You insist a nauseating amount of time for an answer , yet here we are. What is the problem? I won't ask again and assume if any conversation doesn't go the way you wish, then you simply ignore and chalk it up to sidestepping. Typical when you have no answer. That is the definition of a Democrat. Notice I said "they" Nice try buddy. I asked you a simple question as why my character on a message board matters to you so much, but the character of your favorite President Trump is not a concern of yours? All you did was evade the question like the hypocrite you are. All good. Have an excellent day! I'll give ya one more shot - I answered the "economic policy questioned you asked - Now, i'll answer your character question, again. Name one time I said anything about trump's character or lack of? I have an opinion of your character but will not express it as it doesn't matter. As for trump, his character fits (according to all you haters) right in line with all the Beltway liars, thieves and cons that sit in congress today (Both partys) Wouldn't you agree? But, the main point is you guys never call out anyone from the other side. That is the point I've been making forever. So, what say you- My final attempt. Hypocrite is the farthest thing I am. I find it rich you all use that word. Laughable You did not answer my economic policy question in the least. Gave us some inaccurate blanket statement about Trump's agenda, which is not an economic policy. Clearly, you do not know what the term means. Creating a budget proposal and allocating more money to the military is not a signature "economic policy, it's called the role of the president. A signature policy would be something like the "American Investment Recovery Act of 2009," The Affordable Care Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act of 2010, or creating the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Iranian Nuclear Deal are examples of real, policies. Simply saying re-negotiating an existing mutli-state policy like NAFTA is not a Trump signature policy, the pact already existed. Tax cuts are not a signature policy, every recent President does that. So actually you did not answer my economic policy question....wise one, which is why I have been ignoring your questions.  You already expressed an opinion of my character, which is my point. Why so down on my character when you know nothing about me? yet provide undying support for the current President who you know is a scum bag? Kind of hypocritical no? I guess you can't see that.  Who should I be calling out on "the other side", who shows low character, lack of morals, and no leadership like Trump? Trump is the current President, what "other side" should I be referring to? Past Presidents?  Here you go all the Clintons are also low-character, stealing, low-lifes too. Does that make it better that Trump is one of them and currently in office?  I don't understand your point. Your feelings are hurt because I don't criticize the "evil Dems"? There I just did. It doesn't detract from the fact that Trump is POS and embarrassing the country.
      an_clap

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: I did answer your question - none of your responses are independent or you could easily give a response - You can say "They are doing nothing" and that will be that. You insist a nauseating amount of time for an answer , yet here we are. What is the problem? I won't ask again and assume if any conversation doesn't go the way you wish, then you simply ignore and chalk it up to sidestepping. Typical when you have no answer. That is the definition of a Democrat. Notice I said "they" Nice try buddy. I asked you a simple question as why my character on a message board matters to you so much, but the character of your favorite President Trump is not a concern of yours? All you did was evade the question like the hypocrite you are. All good. Have an excellent day! I'll give ya one more shot - I answered the "economic policy questioned you asked - Now, i'll answer your character question, again. Name one time I said anything about trump's character or lack of? I have an opinion of your character but will not express it as it doesn't matter. As for trump, his character fits (according to all you haters) right in line with all the Beltway liars, thieves and cons that sit in congress today (Both partys) Wouldn't you agree? But, the main point is you guys never call out anyone from the other side. That is the point I've been making forever. So, what say you- My final attempt. Hypocrite is the farthest thing I am. I find it rich you all use that word. Laughable You did not answer my economic policy question in the least. Gave us some inaccurate blanket statement about Trump's agenda, which is not an economic policy. Clearly, you do not know what the term means. Creating a budget proposal and allocating more money to the military is not a signature "economic policy, it's called the role of the president. A signature policy would be something like the "American Investment Recovery Act of 2009," The Affordable Care Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act of 2010, or creating the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Iranian Nuclear Deal are examples of real, policies. Simply saying re-negotiating an existing mutli-state policy like NAFTA is not a Trump signature policy, the pact already existed. Tax cuts are not a signature policy, every recent President does that. So actually you did not answer my economic policy question....wise one, which is why I have been ignoring your questions.  You already expressed an opinion of my character, which is my point. Why so down on my character when you know nothing about me? yet provide undying support for the current President who you know is a scum bag? Kind of hypocritical no? I guess you can't see that.  Who should I be calling out on "the other side", who shows low character, lack of morals, and no leadership like Trump? Trump is the current President, what "other side" should I be referring to? Past Presidents?  Here you go all the Clintons are also low-character, stealing, low-lifes too. Does that make it better that Trump is one of them and currently in office?  I don't understand your point. Your feelings are hurt because I don't criticize the "evil Dems"? There I just did. It doesn't detract from the fact that Trump is POS and embarrassing the country.
      an_clap

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53202
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 5:46 PM ET #424

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Nice Try Kayleigh, Your nickname just doesn't stick like mine. Come up with your own style please. You are talking about answering questions?  All you do all day is copy and paste from Trump's Twitter feed and your press briefing write-up's Kayleigh. Good one though.

     

    Kayleigh is back!

    I thought she was supposed to be walking back some trump lies

    or defending trump's brilliant speech about dishwashers and showers LOL an_happydude

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Nice Try Kayleigh, Your nickname just doesn't stick like mine. Come up with your own style please. You are talking about answering questions?  All you do all day is copy and paste from Trump's Twitter feed and your press briefing write-up's Kayleigh. Good one though.

     

    Kayleigh is back!

    I thought she was supposed to be walking back some trump lies

    or defending trump's brilliant speech about dishwashers and showers LOL an_happydude

     
     
    Snorkel
    Snorkel
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 1177
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2020 - 5:47 PM ET #425

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: I did answer your question - none of your responses are independent or you could easily give a response - You can say "They are doing nothing" and that will be that. You insist a nauseating amount of time for an answer , yet here we are. What is the problem? I won't ask again and assume if any conversation doesn't go the way you wish, then you simply ignore and chalk it up to sidestepping. Typical when you have no answer. That is the definition of a Democrat. Notice I said "they" Nice try buddy. I asked you a simple question as why my character on a message board matters to you so much, but the character of your favorite President Trump is not a concern of yours? All you did was evade the question like the hypocrite you are. All good. Have an excellent day! I'll give ya one more shot - I answered the "economic policy questioned you asked - Now, i'll answer your character question, again. Name one time I said anything about trump's character or lack of? I have an opinion of your character but will not express it as it doesn't matter. As for trump, his character fits (according to all you haters) right in line with all the Beltway liars, thieves and cons that sit in congress today (Both partys) Wouldn't you agree? But, the main point is you guys never call out anyone from the other side. That is the point I've been making forever. So, what say you- My final attempt. Hypocrite is the farthest thing I am. I find it rich you all use that word. Laughable You did not answer my economic policy question in the least. Gave us some inaccurate blanket statement about Trump's agenda, which is not an economic policy. Clearly, you do not know what the term means. Creating a budget proposal and allocating more money to the military is not a signature "economic policy, it's called the role of the president. A signature policy would be something like the "American Investment Recovery Act of 2009," The Affordable Care Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act of 2010, or creating the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Iranian Nuclear Deal are examples of real, policies. Simply saying re-negotiating an existing mutli-state policy like NAFTA is not a Trump signature policy, the pact already existed. Tax cuts are not a signature policy, every recent President does that. So actually you did not answer my economic policy question....wise one, which is why I have been ignoring your questions.  You already expressed an opinion of my character, which is my point. Why so down on my character when you know nothing about me? yet provide undying support for the current President who you know is a scum bag? Kind of hypocritical no? I guess you can't see that.  Who should I be calling out on "the other side", who shows low character, lack of morals, and no leadership like Trump? Trump is the current President, what "other side" should I be referring to? Past Presidents?  Here you go all the Clintons are also low-character, stealing, low-lifes too. Does that make it better that Trump is one of them and currently in office?  I don't understand your point. Your feelings are hurt because I don't criticize the "evil Dems"? There I just did. It doesn't detract from the fact that Trump is POS and embarrassing the country.

    I am not down on your character - I don't give two shi ts about you - Was lookin for an answer you won't address - so be it - I don't live in your world.

    Enuf  of the one-sided banter. Have a nice day

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: I did answer your question - none of your responses are independent or you could easily give a response - You can say "They are doing nothing" and that will be that. You insist a nauseating amount of time for an answer , yet here we are. What is the problem? I won't ask again and assume if any conversation doesn't go the way you wish, then you simply ignore and chalk it up to sidestepping. Typical when you have no answer. That is the definition of a Democrat. Notice I said "they" Nice try buddy. I asked you a simple question as why my character on a message board matters to you so much, but the character of your favorite President Trump is not a concern of yours? All you did was evade the question like the hypocrite you are. All good. Have an excellent day! I'll give ya one more shot - I answered the "economic policy questioned you asked - Now, i'll answer your character question, again. Name one time I said anything about trump's character or lack of? I have an opinion of your character but will not express it as it doesn't matter. As for trump, his character fits (according to all you haters) right in line with all the Beltway liars, thieves and cons that sit in congress today (Both partys) Wouldn't you agree? But, the main point is you guys never call out anyone from the other side. That is the point I've been making forever. So, what say you- My final attempt. Hypocrite is the farthest thing I am. I find it rich you all use that word. Laughable You did not answer my economic policy question in the least. Gave us some inaccurate blanket statement about Trump's agenda, which is not an economic policy. Clearly, you do not know what the term means. Creating a budget proposal and allocating more money to the military is not a signature "economic policy, it's called the role of the president. A signature policy would be something like the "American Investment Recovery Act of 2009," The Affordable Care Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act of 2010, or creating the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Iranian Nuclear Deal are examples of real, policies. Simply saying re-negotiating an existing mutli-state policy like NAFTA is not a Trump signature policy, the pact already existed. Tax cuts are not a signature policy, every recent President does that. So actually you did not answer my economic policy question....wise one, which is why I have been ignoring your questions.  You already expressed an opinion of my character, which is my point. Why so down on my character when you know nothing about me? yet provide undying support for the current President who you know is a scum bag? Kind of hypocritical no? I guess you can't see that.  Who should I be calling out on "the other side", who shows low character, lack of morals, and no leadership like Trump? Trump is the current President, what "other side" should I be referring to? Past Presidents?  Here you go all the Clintons are also low-character, stealing, low-lifes too. Does that make it better that Trump is one of them and currently in office?  I don't understand your point. Your feelings are hurt because I don't criticize the "evil Dems"? There I just did. It doesn't detract from the fact that Trump is POS and embarrassing the country.

    I am not down on your character - I don't give two shi ts about you - Was lookin for an answer you won't address - so be it - I don't live in your world.

    Enuf  of the one-sided banter. Have a nice day

     

    All Forums | Politics
    «First Previous 171819 ... 293031 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 449,825 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 259,781 Covers arrow
    • Couple thoughts 4,192 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 09/22/2026 475 Covers arrow
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 58,363 Covers arrow
    • ?? KBO Plays 🥎 15,127 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 2,866 Covers arrow
    • Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity 26,205 Covers arrow
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 23,698 Covers arrow
    • Something to think about Tuesday 2,319 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.