Time for you to give it up and go to bed now..you are mistaken me for someone else..
Because,I have not talked about blue collar wages ..
Game, Set , Match !!! 
Don't forget to change your pants before slipping into bed. STINKY ! 
I wasn't even talking about you....clearly you do not know the difference between wealthy and rich though. I do not think anyone is placing you in the wealth class of Bezos, Bloomberg, or Gates, but carry on.
I wasn't even talking about you....clearly you do not know the difference between wealthy and rich though. I do not think anyone is placing you in the wealth class of Bezos, Bloomberg, or Gates, but carry on.
You need to google .. Bezos, Bloomberg,and Gates are not in wealth class..they are RICH...in the Rich class..
Well there is VERY significant overlap in meaning....and those two words are used interchangably in common nomenclature
What percent of your wealth is in the market ?
Incorrect, another indicator you are not wealthy, nor rich, but anyway. But it is possible to be both rich and wealthy. Like Bezos, Buffet, Gates, etc.
The rich have lots of money,, the wealthy don’t worry about money.
WTF is it to you ?? I keep my finances close to my chest,
as should ANYONE who isn't trying to convince others of alleged stature
That YOU want to compare dicks on an internet forum tells me all we need to know.
Now you are making me laugh ..
Here you have mistaken wealth and wealthy..you need to study a little more then come back..
You are wealthy first than comes rich ...
OK dude....I have some more info to post in my other threads, but I wanna thank the adolf-loving trolls here for replying constantly to my threads and pushing them to the top of the forum board!
THANKS!!!
We are talking percent not amount..
Not telling me though is a real tell..
Boy,, you lefties sure get real nasty when you are put up against the wall
Just filling in for Kelly ...
There’s the big difference between those who are considered rich and those who are considered wealthy and those who don't know the difference will incorrectly interchange the words... you are right.
Trump's pre-pandemic economy was actually worse than Obama's last 3 years!
Obama’s last three years had better growth than Trump’s three years, according to FORBES!
from FORBES, source: https://tinyurl.com/ybt67ukp
The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis released its first estimate for the December quarter
and it shows the economy growing at 2.1%. For 2019 GDP growth was 2.3%, which is
down from 2.9% in 2018 and just below 2.4% in 2017, Trump’s first year in office.
Over trump's 12 quarters, only four of them have had GDP growth over 3%
and six were 2.3% or lower. And for the past three quarters, GDP growth has been
only 2.0%, 2.1% and 2.1%, respectively.
This is a far cry from Trump's early boasts of 4%, 5%, and even 6% growth if he was president.
Under Trump business investment has turned NEGATIVE the past three quarters and is
negative or essentially flat when the impact of inventory changes are taken into account.
Trump’s second half GDP growth was WEAKER THAN REPORTED!
June 2019 quarter: Increases from 2% growth to 2.8% growth
September 2019 quarter: *DECREASES* from 2.1% growth to 2.0% growth
December 2019 quarter: *DECREASES* from 2.1% growth to 1.2% growth
The trend of 2.8% growth in the June 2019 quarter to
1.2% in the December 2019 quarter is NOT POSITIVE!!
Obama’s last three years in office had growth rates of at least 2.17% and as high as 3.06%.
For Trump the high point was 2.83% in 2018
when the tax cut seems to have had the largest impact and even fell short of
Obama’s 2014 and 2015 growth rates of 3.06% and 3.05%, respectively.
In 2019 trump's adjusted growth rate was only 1.99%.
This is less than Obama’s three last years in office and less than five of his last six years
despite having both chambers in congress working against him!
I won't post anymore in this thread ..it's dead..
Awwe don't go away all upset little fella 
....just go away.....You offered nothing of value anyway.
Nevertheless, my 66 years of wisdom tells me Slime *will* continue to post to this thread.....Watch!
WTF is it to you ?? I keep my finances close to my chest, as should ANYONE who isn't trying to convince others of alleged stature That YOU want to compare dicks on an internet forum tells me all we need to know.
We are talking percent not amount.. Not telling me though is a real tell.. Boy,, you lefties sure get real nasty when you are put up against the wall
Percent or amount is irrelevent -- I still keep my finances close to my chest, as should ANYONE who isn't trying to convince others of alleged stature. That YOU want to compare dicks on an internet forum tells me all we need to know. Go back to playing with yourself, kid.
DEEZY WROTE: I have a family of 4 and never had to dole out 4k a month during Obama's time, so I have no idea what kind of coverage they required or their health backgrounds. Sounds like they must have had some serious health concerns. So, some of your friends had to pay high costs, so you hate the ACA?? Nice argument. Didn't impact you in any way? Love the friends argument. Talk about weak.
Deezy. This is where your mind is disconnected from what was happening in the real world. Obviously, we all have different families and friends and we all live in different financial and economic circles. I can assure you, as I am sure Rush can chime in on, that people were getting hosed by the ACA. I'm surprised you are oblivious to the fact, but this is where you and I have a tremendous disconnect. Rush...please chime in with some of the experiences you witnessed so Deezy can wake up and smell the coffee. And you are wrong to assume it didn't affect me. I owned my own business for 30 years prior to my retirement this year. My rates doubled in the very first year of the ACA. So yes, it did affect me. That's the problem with you low wage earners. You want EVERYTHING subsidized but are delusional as to where the money actually comes from.
Deezy. In regard to the ACA rates, I simply responded to your repeated rude commentary. You called me weak and implied that the ACA did not affect me personally and I replied that my rates doubled in the first year. I have no idea how old you are so perhaps you are of the younger generation which might help explain your rude behavior. Either way, there is no excuse for constantly ridiculing people on this site without merit. Fuha is 66 so he has zero excuse.
I will admit that I have a bias against healthy, able to work freeloaders that are a drain on the tax payer. 5.6% of all government spending is spent on welfare. It would seem that you and Fubha would like to see this % rise. I personally would like to see it fall. If it falls, that would imply that more people are working and supporting themselves. How could that be a bad thing? Of course, if you are 66 and your door opens up to a hallway with kids running around, it's pretty likely that you are part of the 5.6% club and that's pretty pathetic considering the words that Fubha has typed here over the past several days.
Moving on, I don't care about arguing about finances, wealth or being rich. I'm 56 and I retired last year. I have achieved my goals in business and now it's time to play golf. I will check back in on this thread this evening where I am sure I will be, once again, bashed into the high heaven for my comments.....but at least that will give you 5.6%-ers something to spend your time on today.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
