I love the under tonight....
GB is banged up on offense and gave the rock to lacy 29 times last week.
cutler is out and McGowan is playing QB so you know they are gonna pound the rock but GB has top 5 ranked run defense.
add a little rain to the mix and this game should be way under the total..... Way under. I think its a gift....
I'm staying away from the side due to the reasons I just posted. I like GB but could easily se Hester on Monday Night Football giving da bears a backdoor cover....
GL TO ALL!!!
I love the under tonight....
GB is banged up on offense and gave the rock to lacy 29 times last week.
cutler is out and McGowan is playing QB so you know they are gonna pound the rock but GB has top 5 ranked run defense.
add a little rain to the mix and this game should be way under the total..... Way under. I think its a gift....
I'm staying away from the side due to the reasons I just posted. I like GB but could easily se Hester on Monday Night Football giving da bears a backdoor cover....
GL TO ALL!!!
O.K., O.K., I'm getting in early with this game because it's been bothering me for a couple of weeks now. This is an open letter to the Chicago Bears organization. First off, firing Lovie Smith (a defensive minded guy) was a HUGE mistake. Next, hiring Trestman, a West Coast style (and Canadian Football) offensive guru? Mistake #2..... Cuntler? Mistake #3, and "T.O." and "Ochocinco" style diva Brandon Marshall? Mistake #4.....
Why, you ask?
Because the Bears are not a high powered offensive team. Never have been, never will be. It's always been ground-and-pound, "Monsters Of The Midway", let the defense manage the clock, take FG's if we have to, manage the game, and then, maybe, throw a couple of passes to mix it up a bit.
What the Bears need is a game manager - look, you made it all the way to the Superbowl with Rex Grossman for God's sake!!! Just take a look at what the Ravens are doing, because you're both set up kind of the same way. They have 2 Superbowl wins since moving here in 1996 - and who were the QB's? Trent Dilfer and Joe Flacco. Not exactly "gunslingers" now, are they.....
Now, having said all of this, is Josh McCown the answer? I don't know, but I'll tell you this - he won't be throwing 5 FRIGGIN' PICKS EVERY GAME!!!!
Lastly, let's say McCown is the "Game Manager" your team desperately needs, and he rattles off the next 4 games which might be tough because it's Packers, Lions, Ravens, and Rams. Or even if he goes 3-1. Now Cuntler's coming back from his "Vaginal Cramps" - do you pull McCown????
I guess only time will tell.....
Now, to this game - Bears rested, had time to get McCown "indoctrinated", Packers offense beat up, Monday Night Primetime division rival......
Bears M/L - - you heard it here first.........
Good Luck All!!!
O.K., O.K., I'm getting in early with this game because it's been bothering me for a couple of weeks now. This is an open letter to the Chicago Bears organization. First off, firing Lovie Smith (a defensive minded guy) was a HUGE mistake. Next, hiring Trestman, a West Coast style (and Canadian Football) offensive guru? Mistake #2..... Cuntler? Mistake #3, and "T.O." and "Ochocinco" style diva Brandon Marshall? Mistake #4.....
Why, you ask?
Because the Bears are not a high powered offensive team. Never have been, never will be. It's always been ground-and-pound, "Monsters Of The Midway", let the defense manage the clock, take FG's if we have to, manage the game, and then, maybe, throw a couple of passes to mix it up a bit.
What the Bears need is a game manager - look, you made it all the way to the Superbowl with Rex Grossman for God's sake!!! Just take a look at what the Ravens are doing, because you're both set up kind of the same way. They have 2 Superbowl wins since moving here in 1996 - and who were the QB's? Trent Dilfer and Joe Flacco. Not exactly "gunslingers" now, are they.....
Now, having said all of this, is Josh McCown the answer? I don't know, but I'll tell you this - he won't be throwing 5 FRIGGIN' PICKS EVERY GAME!!!!
Lastly, let's say McCown is the "Game Manager" your team desperately needs, and he rattles off the next 4 games which might be tough because it's Packers, Lions, Ravens, and Rams. Or even if he goes 3-1. Now Cuntler's coming back from his "Vaginal Cramps" - do you pull McCown????
I guess only time will tell.....
Now, to this game - Bears rested, had time to get McCown "indoctrinated", Packers offense beat up, Monday Night Primetime division rival......
Bears M/L - - you heard it here first.........
Good Luck All!!!
A beast? Did you know that he's 9-2 against the bears lifetime and those 2 losses came on MNF.. History repeats itself and I like the bears...
A beast? Did you know that he's 9-2 against the bears lifetime and those 2 losses came on MNF.. History repeats itself and I like the bears...
some of you people are really insane.bet the mL on packers laying 50$ to win 10$ your better off betting a horse you get back a lot more.anyway like the under I would think the o/u would have been 54 or around there.after last weeks scoring.just like the browns line at -1 fishy only 50 pts.lot of running watched the pack play the Vikings and rogers waits till 1 second to hike the ball and does not throw a lot if incomplete passes plus lacy averages 24 carries and green bay is 3rd in league in time of possession.that = under to me big .
some of you people are really insane.bet the mL on packers laying 50$ to win 10$ your better off betting a horse you get back a lot more.anyway like the under I would think the o/u would have been 54 or around there.after last weeks scoring.just like the browns line at -1 fishy only 50 pts.lot of running watched the pack play the Vikings and rogers waits till 1 second to hike the ball and does not throw a lot if incomplete passes plus lacy averages 24 carries and green bay is 3rd in league in time of possession.that = under to me big .
some of you people are really insane.bet the mL on packers laying 50$ to win 10$ your better off betting a horse you get back a lot more.anyway like the under I would think the o/u would have been 54 or around there.after last weeks scoring.just like the browns line at -1 fishy only 50 pts.lot of running watched the pack play the Vikings and rogers waits till 1 second to hike the ball and does not throw a lot if incomplete passes plus lacy averages 24 carries and green bay is 3rd in league in time of possession.that = under to me big .
some of you people are really insane.bet the mL on packers laying 50$ to win 10$ your better off betting a horse you get back a lot more.anyway like the under I would think the o/u would have been 54 or around there.after last weeks scoring.just like the browns line at -1 fishy only 50 pts.lot of running watched the pack play the Vikings and rogers waits till 1 second to hike the ball and does not throw a lot if incomplete passes plus lacy averages 24 carries and green bay is 3rd in league in time of possession.that = under to me big .
does anyone know a website where u can look back at what the live odds at half time would of been?
i would like to know what the lines were at the half for the colts last night...
does anyone know a website where u can look back at what the live odds at half time would of been?
i would like to know what the lines were at the half for the colts last night...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.