All Forums | Pro Football

Chicago at Green Bay (11/04/2013)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 21910
Posts: 133
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 5179
Posted: #51

20-31......green bay

 

 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 2635
Posted: #52
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:

Easypics & Pendo, thank you. I thought I was in The Twilight Zone for a minute. Anyone who thinks Cutler is the franchise "guy" to lead the Bears to the Superbowl needs to have their head examined.......

Some need more glasses than anything else . . .
lol

However  for  insights sake , be willing to donate  beer guzzlin'  seeing eye Moose 
 to Vue  n'  his  Cover Kin' folks.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 3
Posted: #53
Quote Originally Posted by BigRorz:

does anyone know a website where u can look back at what the live odds at half time would of been?

i would like to know what the lines were at the half for the colts last night...


Colts -.5/21
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 3
Posted: #54
Quote Originally Posted by donnie318:


1st Half Colts -.5/21
2nd Half Colts -3.5/20
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 2635
Posted: #55
Quote Originally Posted by lordzud:

At 5 dimes I made this bet. Over under for Packers is 30.5 at -105. Meh. But being a good book they give me a ton of options. I bet the over for the Packers at 34.5 and those 4 points give me a +199. Alright! 2 to 1 payout if the Packers score 5 TD's on the Bears. I'm a Chicago resident, I know my Bears. They have no pass rush, their linebackers are replacement level and their pass defenders are banged up and getting on in years. If you give Rogers time, he'll kill you. I wonder what the over under is on Lacy for yards rushing. He is going to get a lot of carries and he won't be stopped by this hapless bunch.

Outside looking in, interesting perspective,may be spot on...
Ever consider respectable glasses ?
GL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 163
Posted: #56
Quote Originally Posted by Zilla504:

CHI+11
UNDER 51

This game is a no play, but I can't no play MNF. I know, stupid. With that said placing 2 bets that will atleast push IMO.

BEARS+10.5
UNDER-51

How do you push on 10.5?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 163
Posted: #57
Quote Originally Posted by fyrproof:


How do you push on 10.5?
Guess you mean between the two.My bad.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 29
Posted: #58
GB is 3-0 @ Home. GB last5  5-0 ATS VS CHI and that's including -13 in 2011. Last 4 gms @ GB, Chi 0-4ATS.  Last 10 gms Da Bears are 3-5-2.. gotta go green tonight.. no cutler as well, give me the over
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 148
Posted: #59

Green Bay easily wins SU, but I feel the cover is in serious question. That being said, it is hardly an endorsement for Chicago...

The best bets here are the OVER and GB ML. The GB ML is obviously not worth the trouble...

These are two teams that are putting up an average of over 30 pts per game, both on the season and in the home/away scenario. Green Bay is at home, with a healthy quarterback and a #2 ranked offense vs Chicago's #26 ranked defense, now without Briggs. Green Bay has the running edge, both offensively and defensively, BUT... both pass defenses are severely lacking (ranked 19th and 26th).

As a result, I believe the ball will be put in the air more than what some might be expecting, and scoring for both sides will not be too much of a problem...

So, I am actually going to make two plays, both 7-pt. teaser parlays: Chicago +17 & Chi/GB +44 and Green Bay -3 & Chi/GB +44... Both at -130.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 5
Posted: #60
If its too good to be true than it is.Everybody is on GreenBay.

Take the Bears +10 on Monday games.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 2
Posted: #61
the favorite is 5-0 ATS last five mtgs and GB is 3-0 at home ATS, should be obvious.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 746
Posted: #62
Quote Originally Posted by Broncosfan13:

Weather Channel:

Rain possible at 7:00 pm   WIND 3 mph



The Weather channel predicts 21 mph wind.  What are you smoking?  Hmmm, Costa Rica  huh,?  you are Probably a sportbook disinfo agent.  0  chance of rain. 

Guys how does 20 plus mph wind affect the pass game?  Im trying to find evidence.  I have nfl game archives, can anybody recommend a game they remember in these same winds?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2013
Posts: 171
Posted: #63
Packers - 10
Under 51

A 6pt teaser of these 2 bets is a virtual lock, and pays close to even money!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #64

UNDER   51

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 707
Posted: #65
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:

O.K., O.K., I'm getting in early with this game because it's been bothering me for a couple of weeks now. This is an open letter to the Chicago Bears organization. First off, firing Lovie Smith (a defensive minded guy) was a HUGE mistake. Next, hiring Trestman, a West Coast style (and Canadian Football) offensive guru? Mistake #2..... Cuntler? Mistake #3, and "T.O." and "Ochocinco" style diva Brandon Marshall? Mistake #4.....

Why, you ask?

Because the Bears are not a high powered offensive team. Never have been, never will be. It's always been ground-and-pound, "Monsters Of The Midway", let the defense manage the clock, take FG's if we have to, manage the game, and then, maybe, throw a couple of passes to mix it up a bit.

What the Bears need is a game manager - look, you made it all the way to the Superbowl with Rex Grossman for God's sake!!! Just take a look at what the Ravens are doing, because you're both set up kind of the same way. They have 2 Superbowl wins since moving here in 1996 - and who were the QB's? Trent Dilfer and Joe Flacco. Not exactly "gunslingers" now, are they.....

Now, having said all of this, is Josh McCown the answer? I don't know, but I'll tell you this - he won't be throwing 5 FRIGGIN' PICKS EVERY GAME!!!!

Lastly, let's say McCown is the "Game Manager" your team desperately needs, and he rattles off the next 4 games which might be tough because it's Packers, Lions, Ravens, and Rams. Or even if he goes 3-1. Now Cuntler's coming back from his "Vaginal Cramps" - do you pull McCown????

I guess only time will tell.....

Now, to this game - Bears rested, had time to get McCown "indoctrinated", Packers offense beat up, Monday Night Primetime division rival......

Bears M/L - - you heard it here first.........

Good Luck All!!!

note to self ... never listen to a thing "thequadyeah" has to say about NFL... I also stopped reading about half way through... probably worst NFL write up ive ever read on this site... not sure you could write a worse one if you tried....

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 707
Posted: #66

@ quad

 

and the only thing I was asking "why" about when reading your write up is why you clicked submit...

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 103
Posted: #67

THE TEASER OF THE DAY IS THE PACKERS -.05/ OVER 76ERS 202.5/ ROCKETS+12.5....... UNTIL NEXTS TIME GOOD LUCK !!!!!

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 6659
Posted: #68
Quote Originally Posted by KOVO:

the favorite is 5-0 ATS last five mtgs and GB is 3-0 at home ATS, should be obvious.


Going by past trends means nothing other than a pattern you are betting with. Patterns change often. So have fun with that. 

By the way, BREAKING NEWS.....Just got some inside info....CUNTLER IS GOING TO BE PLAYING TONIGHT..........................................................................................................................'lol I'm kidding.........


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 2635
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by mellowman7883:


The Weather channel predicts 21 mph wind.  What are you smoking?  Hmmm, Costa Rica  huh,?  you are Probably a sportbook disinfo agent.  0  chance of rain. 

Guys how does 20 plus mph wind affect the pass game?  Im trying to find evidence.  I have nfl game archives, can anybody recommend a game they remember in these same winds?

20 MPH would be factor in certain stadiums depending on architecture n' proximity of ocean ,lake ect. ( Meadowlands ,Soldier Field,CandleStick) Worst to my knowledge.
Nothing that will affect vet A. Rogers pass happy attack figurin'  to exploit Bears soft secondary or affect Bears figurin' to stick to conservative run n' screen attack. 
Will have more impact on field position battle + Special teams : Advantage Bears.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 6659
Posted: #70
Quote Originally Posted by Herbhealsme:

note to self ... never listen to a thing "thequadyeah" has to say about NFL... I also stopped reading about half way through... probably worst NFL write up ive ever read on this site... not sure you could write a worse one if you tried....


Why don't you guys get off the Quads Nuts already. After the Bears dominate the Packers tonight you guys won't be thinking it was a dumb write up. BEARS ML is all you need to look at.  Forget the cuntler. LOL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 106
Posted: #71
Quote Originally Posted by Herbhealsme:

note to self ... never listen to a thing "thequadyeah" has to say about NFL... I also stopped reading about half way through... probably worst NFL write up ive ever read on this site... not sure you could write a worse one if you tried....

Quad is actually a very good writer, and supports his arguments with facts. Too bad you missed the denouement because he set it up well. Maybe it's that Poe influence around Halloween  that figured into his writing...although, this time around he'd probably write: Hark, the Packer, NEVERMORE!

How come kickers are seldom mentioned on this site? Is there a live blog for this site, where we can comment about our picks during the game?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 707
Posted: #72

@ mgm ... bears could roll and id still think it was a dumb write up.... ill admit hes made some good write-ups in past but that one was like gary busey got drunk and hacked into his account... just lol of a write up

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 50
Posted: #73
?? This is the look the Bears will have on their faces after the game...just like Chokler has every game ( I did like the Cuntler name in upper quote..it's very fitting!!! ) !! Simple explanation ....
GREEN BAY (-10.5)  38 - 17  A-ROD TORCHES this soooo called great "D" of da-Bears! Oh, by the way, the Bears are a joke just like their wimp-a zzz  QB!! Go cheezeee-heads!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 32952
Posted: #74
Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits:


Why don't you guys get off the Quads Nuts already. After the Bears dominate the Packers tonight you guys won't be thinking it was a dumb write up. BEARS ML is all you need to look at.  Forget the cuntler. LOL

Now this is at least the funniest post of the day! 
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 1743
Posted: #75

I see 20mph..... That certainly can't help the passing game.... Probably hurt josh nor than Aaron.

 

will it be raining?

 

I like the under regardless

All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.