We all know your track record!!
Man....I wish covers would get in here and clean up all the knucklehead newbies that screw this good sight up every year at this time. I don't know what it is, but when the snow starts to fly all the morons pile into these threads.................
Here is what I'll be doing and why. I got the Vikes and the low. The last 9 games for the Vikes the Under is 7-2.......the last 8 games for the Saints the Under is 6-2.......that is a combined 13-4!!!! And now this number is around 52!!! I can't thank the powers in Vegas more for setting up the opportunity to go low here..........two pretty good running teams, a very good defense and an under rated defense all on the same field after both offenses blew up last week........That is the perfect recipe for an under!!!!
I put 2 units in at +3.5 last night when I got home......I'll wait to play the low till kickoff, as I see most of the herd moving toward the over........that may give me an extra .5 or point by kickoff to go low on. Anyway, GL to everyone and let's all get back to talking football and respectfully disagreeing with one another!!!
Man....I wish covers would get in here and clean up all the knucklehead newbies that screw this good sight up every year at this time. I don't know what it is, but when the snow starts to fly all the morons pile into these threads.................
Here is what I'll be doing and why. I got the Vikes and the low. The last 9 games for the Vikes the Under is 7-2.......the last 8 games for the Saints the Under is 6-2.......that is a combined 13-4!!!! And now this number is around 52!!! I can't thank the powers in Vegas more for setting up the opportunity to go low here..........two pretty good running teams, a very good defense and an under rated defense all on the same field after both offenses blew up last week........That is the perfect recipe for an under!!!!
I put 2 units in at +3.5 last night when I got home......I'll wait to play the low till kickoff, as I see most of the herd moving toward the over........that may give me an extra .5 or point by kickoff to go low on. Anyway, GL to everyone and let's all get back to talking football and respectfully disagreeing with one another!!!
We all know your track record!!
We all know your track record!!
New Orleans - 31 Minnesota - 21
Saints -3.5 under 52.5
The one thing that sticks out like a sore thumb when I analyze this game is the Viking schedule. Overall they played a boatload of crap games. The 3 decent road games they played they lost them, Steelers, Cardinals and the Panthers. Their only significant road win was against the Packers(do you really think the Vikes were going to let Favre lose that one). The Saints schedule was not all that much to brag about either, but they did win some meaningful games along the way, Eagles in Philly,Giants when the g-men were undefeated, Atlanta on Monday night,New England, when many were picking the Pats to win easily. So, in my opinion the Saints got the job done when they HAD TO get it done. In other words PARTYTIME ON BOURBON STREET. Keep those tops pulled down ladies
Good Luck Irish
New Orleans - 31 Minnesota - 21
Saints -3.5 under 52.5
The one thing that sticks out like a sore thumb when I analyze this game is the Viking schedule. Overall they played a boatload of crap games. The 3 decent road games they played they lost them, Steelers, Cardinals and the Panthers. Their only significant road win was against the Packers(do you really think the Vikes were going to let Favre lose that one). The Saints schedule was not all that much to brag about either, but they did win some meaningful games along the way, Eagles in Philly,Giants when the g-men were undefeated, Atlanta on Monday night,New England, when many were picking the Pats to win easily. So, in my opinion the Saints got the job done when they HAD TO get it done. In other words PARTYTIME ON BOURBON STREET. Keep those tops pulled down ladies
Good Luck Irish
New Orleans - 31 Minnesota - 21
Saints -3.5 under 52.5
The one thing that sticks out like a sore thumb when I analyze this game is the Viking schedule. Overall they played a boatload of crap games. The 3 decent road games they played they lost them, Steelers, Cardinals and the Panthers. Their only significant road win was against the Packers(do you really think the Vikes were going to let Favre lose that one). The Saints schedule was not all that much to brag about either, but they did win some meaningful games along the way, Eagles in Philly,Giants when the g-men were undefeated, Atlanta on Monday night,New England, when many were picking the Pats to win easily. So, in my opinion the Saints got the job done when they HAD TO get it done. In other words PARTYTIME ON BOURBON STREET. Keep those tops pulled down ladies
Good Luck Irish
best point made so far and stats for daren sharper made by 808pickyboy. sharper will play a huge part in this game. thanks guys.i am now pulling the trigger.
New Orleans - 31 Minnesota - 21
Saints -3.5 under 52.5
The one thing that sticks out like a sore thumb when I analyze this game is the Viking schedule. Overall they played a boatload of crap games. The 3 decent road games they played they lost them, Steelers, Cardinals and the Panthers. Their only significant road win was against the Packers(do you really think the Vikes were going to let Favre lose that one). The Saints schedule was not all that much to brag about either, but they did win some meaningful games along the way, Eagles in Philly,Giants when the g-men were undefeated, Atlanta on Monday night,New England, when many were picking the Pats to win easily. So, in my opinion the Saints got the job done when they HAD TO get it done. In other words PARTYTIME ON BOURBON STREET. Keep those tops pulled down ladies
Good Luck Irish
best point made so far and stats for daren sharper made by 808pickyboy. sharper will play a huge part in this game. thanks guys.i am now pulling the trigger.
Just looking forward to your baseball plays this season!!!
Just looking forward to your baseball plays this season!!!
Both teams have hard luck histories making them both so called "underdogs" and fan favorites to win. That said, they still have to play and there are factors to consider before betting. Playing in the Super Dome might help the Saints win, but ------Will they cover?
More on that later
I think the combination of home field advantage, better special team play, and Reggie Bush focus and determmmination and of course Brees will allow New Orleans to cover the 3.5 - 4 spread.
Good Luck to all.
Both teams have hard luck histories making them both so called "underdogs" and fan favorites to win. That said, they still have to play and there are factors to consider before betting. Playing in the Super Dome might help the Saints win, but ------Will they cover?
More on that later
I think the combination of home field advantage, better special team play, and Reggie Bush focus and determmmination and of course Brees will allow New Orleans to cover the 3.5 - 4 spread.
Good Luck to all.
New Orleans - 31 Minnesota - 21
Saints -3.5 under 52.5
The one thing that sticks out like a sore thumb when I analyze this game is the Viking schedule. Overall they played a boatload of crap games. The 3 decent road games they played they lost them, Steelers, Cardinals and the Panthers. Their only significant road win was against the Packers(do you really think the Vikes were going to let Favre lose that one). The Saints schedule was not all that much to brag about either, but they did win some meaningful games along the way, Eagles in Philly,Giants when the g-men were undefeated, Atlanta on Monday night,New England, when many were picking the Pats to win easily. So, in my opinion the Saints got the job done when they HAD TO get it done. In other words PARTYTIME ON BOURBON STREET. Keep those tops pulled down ladies
Good Luck Irish
New Orleans - 31 Minnesota - 21
Saints -3.5 under 52.5
The one thing that sticks out like a sore thumb when I analyze this game is the Viking schedule. Overall they played a boatload of crap games. The 3 decent road games they played they lost them, Steelers, Cardinals and the Panthers. Their only significant road win was against the Packers(do you really think the Vikes were going to let Favre lose that one). The Saints schedule was not all that much to brag about either, but they did win some meaningful games along the way, Eagles in Philly,Giants when the g-men were undefeated, Atlanta on Monday night,New England, when many were picking the Pats to win easily. So, in my opinion the Saints got the job done when they HAD TO get it done. In other words PARTYTIME ON BOURBON STREET. Keep those tops pulled down ladies
Good Luck Irish
. . .And the absolute tale-tell sign "4Sure" is 808Picky:
"like 808 said, offense for colts to good for jets to catch up or stay close. offense for jets do not need a great defense to hold them down enough for their offense to pull ahead."
NO LESS THAN ten times in the last two weeks does Picky begin a phrase this way. As if all others are lacking in general comprehension, and didn't read it the first time from the original poster. Laugh. That, and the repeated absence of recognizing proper use of 'too' from his "to". All merely a coincidence. Whah ha! No.
What a complete farce. PickyBoy, you are hereby exposed. Wait - no, thanks for your continued picking expertise. Without your help, I wouldn't be so brazen, balls-out on these wagers. Thanks again. <Comments you won't ever read here in the three-dimensional world>. My continued laughs of the week, provided by no one other than yourself.
. . .And the absolute tale-tell sign "4Sure" is 808Picky:
"like 808 said, offense for colts to good for jets to catch up or stay close. offense for jets do not need a great defense to hold them down enough for their offense to pull ahead."
NO LESS THAN ten times in the last two weeks does Picky begin a phrase this way. As if all others are lacking in general comprehension, and didn't read it the first time from the original poster. Laugh. That, and the repeated absence of recognizing proper use of 'too' from his "to". All merely a coincidence. Whah ha! No.
What a complete farce. PickyBoy, you are hereby exposed. Wait - no, thanks for your continued picking expertise. Without your help, I wouldn't be so brazen, balls-out on these wagers. Thanks again. <Comments you won't ever read here in the three-dimensional world>. My continued laughs of the week, provided by no one other than yourself.
Saints get exposed. Cowboyz beat the Saints easily & the Vikes crushed the Cowgirlz...... I stand on 31-17 Favre GL to all
Saints get exposed. Cowboyz beat the Saints easily & the Vikes crushed the Cowgirlz...... I stand on 31-17 Favre GL to all
PickyBoy.
You're on! It seems you also have a lock on the most ricoculous (ridiculous and ludicrous together) statements thus far for 2010. Especially with such gems as:
"You know I make better picks and cap games better than you do and actually has someone that follows my picks who wins and you just cant stand it."
I "know" this how? 'Cos your multiple-personality, posting disorder-addicted self is in Hawaii, and I wager every day - be it football, basketball or hockey? You go convince yourself, and 4Sure (also YOU) a bit more, and post further ramblings.
You have the Over, I take the Under: Saints 31 Vikings 20
Then, (which most all will doubt) you'll be on your way. Still, something writing claptrap bang-on, slang-for-slang like you will resurface even before the game is over, and your fate subsequently sealed. We'll see your losing self back here, addicted-like, as "4Sure".
You haven't fully evolved, be it capping or walking upright, and holding a spoon, yet I'll still accept your "wager".
Picky takes OVER, at Saints 38 Vikings 27
Taunted UNDER, at Saints 31 Vikings 20
PickyBoy.
You're on! It seems you also have a lock on the most ricoculous (ridiculous and ludicrous together) statements thus far for 2010. Especially with such gems as:
"You know I make better picks and cap games better than you do and actually has someone that follows my picks who wins and you just cant stand it."
I "know" this how? 'Cos your multiple-personality, posting disorder-addicted self is in Hawaii, and I wager every day - be it football, basketball or hockey? You go convince yourself, and 4Sure (also YOU) a bit more, and post further ramblings.
You have the Over, I take the Under: Saints 31 Vikings 20
Then, (which most all will doubt) you'll be on your way. Still, something writing claptrap bang-on, slang-for-slang like you will resurface even before the game is over, and your fate subsequently sealed. We'll see your losing self back here, addicted-like, as "4Sure".
You haven't fully evolved, be it capping or walking upright, and holding a spoon, yet I'll still accept your "wager".
Picky takes OVER, at Saints 38 Vikings 27
Taunted UNDER, at Saints 31 Vikings 20
Just looking forward to your baseball plays this season!!!
Just looking forward to your baseball plays this season!!!
Just thought it would be enough to post the pros about the team I'm betting..
Good Luck to you too.
Just thought it would be enough to post the pros about the team I'm betting..
Good Luck to you too.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.