BetCrimes1984

Legend

Posts: 45602

Member Since: January 2004

Last Activity: 21 April 2025

Status: Offline

About me:

Signature:

Filter Posts by:

Entries	Thread Author	Posts	Activity
replied to New users cannot post more than 5 times a day in Covers Help View Post \| View Thread	footballguys	3	May 23, 2023 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Covers accounts from the early 2000's in General Discussion Jan. 2004 Back in the day the best threads were always in the penalty box. Dudes went stir crazy in confinement. View Post \| View Thread	Ragone15	134	September 11, 2022 View Post \| View Thread
replied to World Cup 2018 in FIFA World Cup Excuse me for 'hijacking' your thread, van, but I think these stats deserve to be viewed (& obv. this thread is well viewed) and it might be useful for you to learn as well going forward: Couple of historical scoreline angles that I can't see being ignored... (1) All 8 WC's that have involved the R16 format have delivered a 90 min 0-0 knockout result. 8 knockout games in and none so far. To me, Uru/Fra & Swe/Eng would seem to be the biggest candidates to end the drought. I think the other two games will deliver at least 2 goals each. (2) All 8 WC's that have involved the R16 format have delivered a 2-1 knockout result. There's been 26(!) of these results (17 in 90 mins; 9 after ET: the only WC of the 8 to not deliver a 90 min 2-1 result happens to be the only WC ever played in Asia), that's a rate greater than 3 per WC yet here we've had none with half of the knockout games done & dusted. While history guarantees nothing in the present, I struggle to believe that both of these scorelines will just happen to fail to appear for the first time at the same WC. One of them? Always a chance, but both? Don't believe it. View Post \| View Thread	vanzack	799	July 05, 2018 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Who said that the UNDER was the play in "elimination games"? in NBA Betting 2nd Round & onwards of playoffs All Elimination Games: U/O 61-48-1 Elimination Games being game 4 or 5 of a Series: U/O 17-25 Elimination Games being game 6 or 7 of a Series: U/O 44-23-1 Since 2003-04 from the 2nd Round onwards, games 4 & 5 that have doubled as elimination games have gone o/u 25-17. Those bettors actually aware of the stats KNOW that Overs are the play in one-sided series which see the initial elimination games arrive 'early'. According to these recent historical stats, Over will again be the play for next game as well. Hustle's ignorance to the fore again View Post \| View Thread	hustle_man	4	June 09, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to 5-10-17 History Lesson, Pens at Caps, Oilers at Ducks in NHL Betting Quote Originally Posted by LeRinkRat: Penguins @ Rangers this series becomes only the fourth best-of-7 /NHL playoff series to follow a win/site order of LLWLWW @ HHVVHV through six games. In each of the previous three such instances, the team posting that win/site order won Game 7 at home. The last team to do so: The Washington Capitals over the New York Rangers in their 2009 NHL Preliminary-round series Oilers @ Ducks Considering win order; considering site order: The team tied LLWWWL with site order HHVVHV (Anaheim) has the following best-of-7 playoff series and games record through the 2017 NHL and Preliminary rounds: Game 7 record, NHL only, all rounds: 4-5 (.444) Game 7 record, NHL only, Quarterfinals round: 1-3 (.250) Thanks for these, Rat. The history that matters to me first & foremost is the specific win order married to venue order, round irrelevant. View Post \| View Thread	Lippsman	26	May 10, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to 3rd quarter O/U only 52.5? in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by jmag805: Betcrimes, are you betting the under? According to your numbers the under is the play for the 2nd half. I post at another site basically, so saw your post too late to respond re the 2h starting. I bet live, so looked for a good 2h under line live. View Post \| View Thread	jmag805	11	May 02, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to 3rd quarter O/U only 52.5? in NBA Betting the 2h pts scoring for 1h totals of 120 pts or more in the playoffs so far 1h ---2h 120 - 111 121 - 107 121 - 111 123 - 105 123 - 110 123 - 111 125 - 92 130 - 96 View Post \| View Thread	jmag805	11	May 02, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Facts for World Series! in MLB Betting The Indians conceded only 3 total runs in their 4 LCS wins. Since the LCS went to the best-of-7 format in 1985, there have only been 10 other teams (out of 61) who conceded 6 total runs or less in their 4 LCS wins. Of those 10 teams, 4 achieved the feat in the same year as their opposite LCS winner thus met in the WS which nullifies their stats (obv. 1 had to be a WS winner & 1 had to be a WS loser). Of the remaining 6 teams? They went 0-6 in the WS. GL with Cleveland being the first team to win the WS when facing a team who conceded 7+ runs in their 4 LCS wins. View Post \| View Thread	famaroneinc	7	October 25, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to indian home field in MLB Betting Quote Originally Posted by mrcoo168: why? It's because the previous commish was an idiot. View Post \| View Thread	mrcoo168	7	October 25, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to My play of the Year in MLB Betting - Only 3 of the last 12 WS g1's have totaled less than 8 runs - Only 3 of the last 16 WS g1's have totaled less than 7 runs. - Since 1991 only 2 of 15 WS g1's played in an AL park have totaled less than 7 runs. Recent history is with your bet, GL View Post \| View Thread	Algorithm	3	October 25, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to world series game 1 in MLB Betting - Only 3 of the last 12 WS g1's have totaled less than 8 runs - Only 3 of the last 16 WS g1's have totaled less than 7 runs. - Since 1991 only 2 of 15 WS g1's played in an AL park have totaled less than 7 runs Recent history is with your total bet. GL View Post \| View Thread	scheer_bets	3	October 25, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to MNF Biggest Bet of the Year in NFL Betting In the history of the modern era of the NFL (1980 onwards, 36 completed seasons), there has never been a season before now in which the MNF time-slot saw its initial 7 games of the new season come & go without featuring at least 1 game in which a losing team put up a team total between 17-31 pts. The 7 MNF losers so far this season have put up scores of 16, 0, 14, 32, 10, 14 & 3 pts. To put this 17-31 pt loser scoring range in some sort of context: 42.8% of all losers from the other primetime games (TNF & SNF) this season have put up scores within this range & 49.0% of all losers from all non-MNF games played so far this season have put up scores within this range. The picture painted from all of the above is rather clear: this is a highly unusual 'drought' to be taking place. The most obvious option this relates to for the coming game is the Texans TT: lined @14.5, this drought ending precludes the under option cashing. With the full game total lined 40.5 there's slightly more scope for the under to come in, but only at the very lowest end of the loser's score range (17-19 pts). The Texans have conceded plenty in their 2 losses (27 & 31 pts) while the Broncos have conceded at least 17 pts in 3 of their 4 wins (the only exception vs. a non-conference opponent). Just food for thought, take it fwiw. View Post \| View Thread	Pandalicious	33	October 24, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Question for the probability/value players in MLB Betting Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984: Home team elimination game results 1995-2006: 23-19 SU 2007-2016: 23-10 SU Home team results for Game 6's specifically 1995-2006: 6-8 SU (2-4 when off a g5 win) 2007-2016: 8-3 SU (3-1 when off a g5 win) It should be noted that these are LCS results, they do not include LDS or WS results. View Post \| View Thread	undermysac	18	October 22, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Question for the probability/value players in MLB Betting Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa: I'm a Dodger fan and this Cub team could have folded a few times already like others plus we have bullpen issues. Objectively looking at the Cubs, you should get it done and have earned it. But one guy who could blow it all is Chapman. The Dodgers have hit him all Series. LA has scored runs off Chapman in 1 of 3 appearances. In that instance he inherited a 6 run lead and therefore didn't have to f*k about whether he conceded runs or not. In his other 2 appearances, he's given up 1 hit against 8 batters faced. So no, LA has not done squat against Chapman "all series", they did so in 1 game in which it didn't matter a jot. View Post \| View Thread	undermysac	18	October 22, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Question for the probability/value players in MLB Betting Home team elimination game results 1995-2006: 23-19 SU 2007-2016: 23-10 SU Home team results for Game 6's specifically 1995-2006: 6-8 SU (2-4 when off a g5 win) 2007-2016: 8-3 SU (3-1 when off a g5 win) View Post \| View Thread	undermysac	18	October 22, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to O's vs. BJs live chat in MLB Betting for those who are unaware, the first team to score 3 runs has never lost one of these 1-off WC games. View Post \| View Thread	OGiant23	112	October 04, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to NBA Finals Game 7 history in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984: Since the ABA-NBA merger in 1976, there has been 6 previous occasions where the same two teams played each other in consecutive NBA finals. The record of the team who won the initial finals meeting in the second finals? 1-5. The one exception to avoid losing had Michael Jordan in its starting 5. Q: Who won the initial finals meeting between these two teams last year? View Post \| View Thread	Mortgageguru	24	June 19, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to NBA Finals Game 7 history in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by Mortgageguru: 9 times NBA teams were able to erase a 3-1 deficit to win the series. Then in the next round those teams are 6-3 winning that series. More history that favors Dubs. 2 of those 6 teams to win their next series were only playing 2nd round opponents: a situation that has no historical resemblance to the Dubs situation (of playing a Conference champion caliber opponent), so naturally those 2 results are completely irrelevant. Since the ABA-NBA merger, there have been 2 teams who erased a 3-1 deficit to win their Conference finals: those 2 teams then went 1-1 in the NBA finals proper. Specific history does not favour the Dubs. View Post \| View Thread	Mortgageguru	24	June 19, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to NBA Finals Game 7 history in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by bmiller1632: Betcrimes so i take it you like the Cavs to win it? Home teams have generally ruled this situation historically, but here there are things on the ground which undermine past stats. Iggy is lame to what degree? Curry is lame to X degree thus his output has been inconsistent these finals. Bogut is so lame he isn't even present (in the 8 playoff games prior to this game 7 that Bogut has been unable to play at least 14 mins in, GS trailed at half-time: is Bogut going to play 14+ mins in this coming game?) Barnes has gone completely AWOL on offense (2/22 L2 games). In short, this isn't the same Warriors team that was firing on all cylinders to set a new reg. season record, it's an inferior version. If all these players were healthy & in the zone, GS would obviously be the no-brainer choice, but then if they functioning like that this series would not still be being played. The very fact it's still going on points to the Cavs having capitalized on said issues. So the question someone thinking about betting on this game is, why are they going to stop capitalizing on those issues in this next game? Is Bogut suddenly fit? Curry suddenly fully fit? Iggy suddenly free of back issues? Has Barnes suddenly found his stroke & no longer utterly AWOL? Logic dictates that Klay Thompson & Draymond Green will be key figures in deciding where this game goes. If those 2 don't fire, GS could get not just beaten but buried. I'm going to have numerous options into this game with live betting at my book, so I can afford to wait and see the early going before making a commitment. But to those who fancy GS for pre-match betting, I suggest looking at Thompson & Green props, they'll pay a lot better than the GS ml & they can still win even if GS lose the game. View Post \| View Thread	Mortgageguru	24	June 19, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to NBA Finals Game 7 history in NBA Betting Since the ABA-NBA merger in 1976, there has been 6 previous occasions where the same two teams played each other in consecutive NBA finals. The record of the team who won the initial finals meeting in the second finals? 1-5. The one exception to avoid losing had Michael Jordan in its starting 5. Q: Who won the initial finals meeting between these two teams last year? View Post \| View Thread	Mortgageguru	24	June 18, 2016 View Post \| View Thread

About Us

Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials

Betting Guides

Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming

Sports Betting

US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps

Contests

Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools

The Covers community has

618,670

lifetime members worldwide

Join our community today

Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.

Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.

Entries	Thread Author	Posts	Activity
replied to New users cannot post more than 5 times a day in Covers Help View Post \| View Thread	footballguys	3	May 23, 2023 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Covers accounts from the early 2000's in General Discussion Jan. 2004 Back in the day the best threads were always in the penalty box. Dudes went stir crazy in confinement. View Post \| View Thread	Ragone15	134	September 11, 2022 View Post \| View Thread
replied to World Cup 2018 in FIFA World Cup Excuse me for 'hijacking' your thread, van, but I think these stats deserve to be viewed (& obv. this thread is well viewed) and it might be useful for you to learn as well going forward: Couple of historical scoreline angles that I can't see being ignored... (1) All 8 WC's that have involved the R16 format have delivered a 90 min 0-0 knockout result. 8 knockout games in and none so far. To me, Uru/Fra & Swe/Eng would seem to be the biggest candidates to end the drought. I think the other two games will deliver at least 2 goals each. (2) All 8 WC's that have involved the R16 format have delivered a 2-1 knockout result. There's been 26(!) of these results (17 in 90 mins; 9 after ET: the only WC of the 8 to not deliver a 90 min 2-1 result happens to be the only WC ever played in Asia), that's a rate greater than 3 per WC yet here we've had none with half of the knockout games done & dusted. While history guarantees nothing in the present, I struggle to believe that both of these scorelines will just happen to fail to appear for the first time at the same WC. One of them? Always a chance, but both? Don't believe it. View Post \| View Thread	vanzack	799	July 05, 2018 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Who said that the UNDER was the play in "elimination games"? in NBA Betting 2nd Round & onwards of playoffs All Elimination Games: U/O 61-48-1 Elimination Games being game 4 or 5 of a Series: U/O 17-25 Elimination Games being game 6 or 7 of a Series: U/O 44-23-1 Since 2003-04 from the 2nd Round onwards, games 4 & 5 that have doubled as elimination games have gone o/u 25-17. Those bettors actually aware of the stats KNOW that Overs are the play in one-sided series which see the initial elimination games arrive 'early'. According to these recent historical stats, Over will again be the play for next game as well. Hustle's ignorance to the fore again View Post \| View Thread	hustle_man	4	June 09, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to 5-10-17 History Lesson, Pens at Caps, Oilers at Ducks in NHL Betting Quote Originally Posted by LeRinkRat: Penguins @ Rangers this series becomes only the fourth best-of-7 /NHL playoff series to follow a win/site order of LLWLWW @ HHVVHV through six games. In each of the previous three such instances, the team posting that win/site order won Game 7 at home. The last team to do so: The Washington Capitals over the New York Rangers in their 2009 NHL Preliminary-round series Oilers @ Ducks Considering win order; considering site order: The team tied LLWWWL with site order HHVVHV (Anaheim) has the following best-of-7 playoff series and games record through the 2017 NHL and Preliminary rounds: Game 7 record, NHL only, all rounds: 4-5 (.444) Game 7 record, NHL only, Quarterfinals round: 1-3 (.250) Thanks for these, Rat. The history that matters to me first & foremost is the specific win order married to venue order, round irrelevant. View Post \| View Thread	Lippsman	26	May 10, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to 3rd quarter O/U only 52.5? in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by jmag805: Betcrimes, are you betting the under? According to your numbers the under is the play for the 2nd half. I post at another site basically, so saw your post too late to respond re the 2h starting. I bet live, so looked for a good 2h under line live. View Post \| View Thread	jmag805	11	May 02, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to 3rd quarter O/U only 52.5? in NBA Betting the 2h pts scoring for 1h totals of 120 pts or more in the playoffs so far 1h ---2h 120 - 111 121 - 107 121 - 111 123 - 105 123 - 110 123 - 111 125 - 92 130 - 96 View Post \| View Thread	jmag805	11	May 02, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Facts for World Series! in MLB Betting The Indians conceded only 3 total runs in their 4 LCS wins. Since the LCS went to the best-of-7 format in 1985, there have only been 10 other teams (out of 61) who conceded 6 total runs or less in their 4 LCS wins. Of those 10 teams, 4 achieved the feat in the same year as their opposite LCS winner thus met in the WS which nullifies their stats (obv. 1 had to be a WS winner & 1 had to be a WS loser). Of the remaining 6 teams? They went 0-6 in the WS. GL with Cleveland being the first team to win the WS when facing a team who conceded 7+ runs in their 4 LCS wins. View Post \| View Thread	famaroneinc	7	October 25, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to indian home field in MLB Betting Quote Originally Posted by mrcoo168: why? It's because the previous commish was an idiot. View Post \| View Thread	mrcoo168	7	October 25, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to My play of the Year in MLB Betting - Only 3 of the last 12 WS g1's have totaled less than 8 runs - Only 3 of the last 16 WS g1's have totaled less than 7 runs. - Since 1991 only 2 of 15 WS g1's played in an AL park have totaled less than 7 runs. Recent history is with your bet, GL View Post \| View Thread	Algorithm	3	October 25, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to world series game 1 in MLB Betting - Only 3 of the last 12 WS g1's have totaled less than 8 runs - Only 3 of the last 16 WS g1's have totaled less than 7 runs. - Since 1991 only 2 of 15 WS g1's played in an AL park have totaled less than 7 runs Recent history is with your total bet. GL View Post \| View Thread	scheer_bets	3	October 25, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to MNF Biggest Bet of the Year in NFL Betting In the history of the modern era of the NFL (1980 onwards, 36 completed seasons), there has never been a season before now in which the MNF time-slot saw its initial 7 games of the new season come & go without featuring at least 1 game in which a losing team put up a team total between 17-31 pts. The 7 MNF losers so far this season have put up scores of 16, 0, 14, 32, 10, 14 & 3 pts. To put this 17-31 pt loser scoring range in some sort of context: 42.8% of all losers from the other primetime games (TNF & SNF) this season have put up scores within this range & 49.0% of all losers from all non-MNF games played so far this season have put up scores within this range. The picture painted from all of the above is rather clear: this is a highly unusual 'drought' to be taking place. The most obvious option this relates to for the coming game is the Texans TT: lined @14.5, this drought ending precludes the under option cashing. With the full game total lined 40.5 there's slightly more scope for the under to come in, but only at the very lowest end of the loser's score range (17-19 pts). The Texans have conceded plenty in their 2 losses (27 & 31 pts) while the Broncos have conceded at least 17 pts in 3 of their 4 wins (the only exception vs. a non-conference opponent). Just food for thought, take it fwiw. View Post \| View Thread	Pandalicious	33	October 24, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Question for the probability/value players in MLB Betting Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984: Home team elimination game results 1995-2006: 23-19 SU 2007-2016: 23-10 SU Home team results for Game 6's specifically 1995-2006: 6-8 SU (2-4 when off a g5 win) 2007-2016: 8-3 SU (3-1 when off a g5 win) It should be noted that these are LCS results, they do not include LDS or WS results. View Post \| View Thread	undermysac	18	October 22, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Question for the probability/value players in MLB Betting Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa: I'm a Dodger fan and this Cub team could have folded a few times already like others plus we have bullpen issues. Objectively looking at the Cubs, you should get it done and have earned it. But one guy who could blow it all is Chapman. The Dodgers have hit him all Series. LA has scored runs off Chapman in 1 of 3 appearances. In that instance he inherited a 6 run lead and therefore didn't have to f*k about whether he conceded runs or not. In his other 2 appearances, he's given up 1 hit against 8 batters faced. So no, LA has not done squat against Chapman "all series", they did so in 1 game in which it didn't matter a jot. View Post \| View Thread	undermysac	18	October 22, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Question for the probability/value players in MLB Betting Home team elimination game results 1995-2006: 23-19 SU 2007-2016: 23-10 SU Home team results for Game 6's specifically 1995-2006: 6-8 SU (2-4 when off a g5 win) 2007-2016: 8-3 SU (3-1 when off a g5 win) View Post \| View Thread	undermysac	18	October 22, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to O's vs. BJs live chat in MLB Betting for those who are unaware, the first team to score 3 runs has never lost one of these 1-off WC games. View Post \| View Thread	OGiant23	112	October 04, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to NBA Finals Game 7 history in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984: Since the ABA-NBA merger in 1976, there has been 6 previous occasions where the same two teams played each other in consecutive NBA finals. The record of the team who won the initial finals meeting in the second finals? 1-5. The one exception to avoid losing had Michael Jordan in its starting 5. Q: Who won the initial finals meeting between these two teams last year? View Post \| View Thread	Mortgageguru	24	June 19, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to NBA Finals Game 7 history in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by Mortgageguru: 9 times NBA teams were able to erase a 3-1 deficit to win the series. Then in the next round those teams are 6-3 winning that series. More history that favors Dubs. 2 of those 6 teams to win their next series were only playing 2nd round opponents: a situation that has no historical resemblance to the Dubs situation (of playing a Conference champion caliber opponent), so naturally those 2 results are completely irrelevant. Since the ABA-NBA merger, there have been 2 teams who erased a 3-1 deficit to win their Conference finals: those 2 teams then went 1-1 in the NBA finals proper. Specific history does not favour the Dubs. View Post \| View Thread	Mortgageguru	24	June 19, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to NBA Finals Game 7 history in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by bmiller1632: Betcrimes so i take it you like the Cavs to win it? Home teams have generally ruled this situation historically, but here there are things on the ground which undermine past stats. Iggy is lame to what degree? Curry is lame to X degree thus his output has been inconsistent these finals. Bogut is so lame he isn't even present (in the 8 playoff games prior to this game 7 that Bogut has been unable to play at least 14 mins in, GS trailed at half-time: is Bogut going to play 14+ mins in this coming game?) Barnes has gone completely AWOL on offense (2/22 L2 games). In short, this isn't the same Warriors team that was firing on all cylinders to set a new reg. season record, it's an inferior version. If all these players were healthy & in the zone, GS would obviously be the no-brainer choice, but then if they functioning like that this series would not still be being played. The very fact it's still going on points to the Cavs having capitalized on said issues. So the question someone thinking about betting on this game is, why are they going to stop capitalizing on those issues in this next game? Is Bogut suddenly fit? Curry suddenly fully fit? Iggy suddenly free of back issues? Has Barnes suddenly found his stroke & no longer utterly AWOL? Logic dictates that Klay Thompson & Draymond Green will be key figures in deciding where this game goes. If those 2 don't fire, GS could get not just beaten but buried. I'm going to have numerous options into this game with live betting at my book, so I can afford to wait and see the early going before making a commitment. But to those who fancy GS for pre-match betting, I suggest looking at Thompson & Green props, they'll pay a lot better than the GS ml & they can still win even if GS lose the game. View Post \| View Thread	Mortgageguru	24	June 19, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to NBA Finals Game 7 history in NBA Betting Since the ABA-NBA merger in 1976, there has been 6 previous occasions where the same two teams played each other in consecutive NBA finals. The record of the team who won the initial finals meeting in the second finals? 1-5. The one exception to avoid losing had Michael Jordan in its starting 5. Q: Who won the initial finals meeting between these two teams last year? View Post \| View Thread	Mortgageguru	24	June 18, 2016 View Post \| View Thread

BetCrimes1984 Follow Follow Unfollow

BetCrimes1984