Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
The whole first half announcers were saying how great the Titans are in the second half this year and if Henry gets 100 yards they have a great chance to win and that pats are 17-0 when they don't give up 120 yards rushing. Blah blah
Pats -145 is a gift! |
Big_Soap | 2 |
|
|
I like. Thinking the same thing. |
legendDominican | 4 |
|
|
Green33 had BYU at -1.5 and +3.5 that field goal was my hedge! Terrible int at the end though.
njsupreme that is exactly what I am doing. I will say this something so close should have been viewed via replay. It looked good to me.
|
Big_Soap | 14 |
|
|
FAKE NEWS! |
Big_Soap | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
Quote Originally Posted by Big_Soap: Hawaii played in Boise on December 7th.... Quote Originally Posted by TheBallDontLie: I agree with that but I do think there is something to be said about them averaging over 39 points the last two years they played and last 41 points the last 4 times they met regardless. One thing that has not changed about Hawaii is there defense is still suspect at best. Sitake also has ties to Hawaii living there when he was younger. BYU also has had 3 weeks to prepare where as Hawaii had to travel to Idaho last week. I think it all sets up very nicely for an easy BYU cover. $$$They may win but how are games in 2011 and 2012 remotely relevant? Even the last two seasons for that matter when Hawaii has looked like a much different team.
You are correct the Mountain West Championship was not last week. Thank you for pointing that out for.
Any thoughts on why you think Hawaii can cover? |
Big_Soap | 24 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TheBallDontLie:
They may win but how are games in 2011 and 2012 remotely relevant? Even the last two seasons for that matter when Hawaii has looked like a much different team.
I agree with that but I do think there is something to be said about them averaging over 39 points the last two years they played and last 41 points the last 4 times they met regardless. One thing that has not changed about Hawaii is there defense is still suspect at best. Sitake also has ties to Hawaii living there when he was younger. BYU also has had 3 weeks to prepare where as Hawaii had to travel to Idaho last week. I think it all sets up very nicely for an easy BYU cover. $$$
|
Big_Soap | 24 |
|
|
BYU has beat Hawaii 4 out of their last 4 meetings. 49-23 @Hawaii 30-20 47-0 @ Hawaii 41-20 Kalani Sitake is also 2-0 with BYU in Bowl appearances.
BYU Moneyline, the points whatever. Change my mind! |
Big_Soap | 24 |
|
|
Buff -7. Buff much better team. Kent St. +7. UTAH st. does not want to be there.
$$$$$$$ |
Big_Soap | 1 |
|
|
Everyone is on the wrong side. |
Big_Soap | 7 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Crazygambler371:
With ms st being at home needing a win to get to a bowl they win by a td or more and over the total
Miss St. Has a win vs and FCS opponent there for they are not bowl eligible even if they do win. have to go with OLE MISS |
PhillyGuy2377 | 9 |
|
|
Last week Dogs dogs both covered on thursday and friday night. Last night both dogs covered. Time for the favorite to cover. Give me Navy. |
Moneymoney84 | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by stressfreelife:
Washington +3. Excellent Coach coming off a bye and he is exceptional. UW Wins the game. USC +4.5 .... I was at the Wazzu/Oregon game last Saturday and Oregon did OK, but were in no way dominant and should have lost that game at home as their defense was carved up. If they didn't have #7 they would have smoked.
WAZZU is the best offense Oregon has played all year so I was not surprised by that. USC is arguably the best team left on their schedule for the rest of the season. I am on the fence with USC covering this game. I liked USC until I saw everyone in the media is picking USC. |
stressfreelife | 3 |
|
|
Initially I was all over USC and felt they could potentially win out right. Now I have jumped ship due to everyone on USC. The BEAR, Scott Van Mush and Colin Cowherd. Seems like they are trying to get money on USC now. Thoughts?? |
Big_Soap | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:
Don't get me wrong , I'd love to see the Trojans lose s/up , as Im heavy on Utes South future.....Maybe the Buffs cover , but they've looked like Trash ......Hope you guys cash easy Best of Luck Brothers
Heavy on UTES against Cal tomorrow! |
DoubleUp4Life | 16 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Ifan_Bates:
This is a Friday night game... Nothing what so ever goes the way it should or is supposed to
That too!
Plus everyone is on USC. |
DoubleUp4Life | 16 |
|
|
You have to go with the buffs at home. USC has OREGON next week at home trap game USC is much better at home. |
DoubleUp4Life | 16 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by JS12: I hate taking public dogs. Most of the time when I do this I lose. Weird that AZ is favored by that much. Means only one thing...Gimme the Cats. Exactly
|
Irish7878 | 3 |
|
|
Great quote Bubba
"Nobody eats there own like the PAC-12." This had me rolling. Truer words were never spoken. CAL's Defense is Raw. Great secondary play and they have 2 legit running backs. If Garber can play like he did last week moving forward they will be a tough team to beat.
I think CAL D feasts on freshman QB. Bubba one of us has to win. I have CAL, UTAH, and AZ this week. Tough spot for UCLA and WASU playing on the road after that 130 point shootout until 1030 pacific time. BOL |
BubbaGumpShrimp | 10 |
|
|
Opened at 3.5 now is down to 2.5 to a decent not near the talent level they have played the last few weeks TOLEDO team. Game is televised on ESPN+ and is early. Something does not add up. Can anyone give some input why Toledo could win this game? |
Big_Soap | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by lajohn:
USC is THAT bad???
They are much better at home. Got lucky with several long vertical throws. I think UTAH was just not ready to play.
Washington all day with -10 |
sydneys-best | 24 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.