Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Didnt see him play a snap |
Celtics33 | 3 |
|
|
This one could get ugly real fast.
|
Badger66 | 4 |
|
|
Looking at this game differently only because Atlanta really needs to start hitting stride to get into the playoffs. Can't see them looking ahead here. They need this win.
|
mrusso | 21 |
|
|
I hear ya dude. Every morning you have to scroll through spam and it's been going on for weeks. Starting to think they don't know how to fix it.
|
shark_apreza | 8 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by EastsideBangers: In my opinion, this is nothing more than a smoke screen with the intention of making Carolina have to focus their attention on the possibility of Rodgers playing as opposed to focusing all of their attention on having a game plan just for Hundley It’s the old bait and switch Hundley isn't anywhere near good enough for this to be a factor
|
spotslife1 | 36 |
|
|
Long time Pats fan and I would not put a dime on the Patriots in that stadium.
|
LeagueCapper | 148 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by zebrakiller: CHERCK Seahwks history ofgetting revnge for play off losses within 3 years i think it's 100% under carrol o wait got my playbook here 2011 hameered bears in chicago 38-14 as a road dog +3 lost to Bears PO's div rds in 2010 the only 7-9 team ever in nfl history to make the playoffs lost to atl in 2012 PO 2nd rd 2013 Hammered Falcons @ Atl as a 3 pt road chalk 33-10 that was thier superbowl year also 2016 revnged losing to pats in bowl @ NE as a 7.5 dog 31-24 also avnged losing to Panthers in 2015 PO's they smaered Panthers in 2016 40-7 -9 pts home fav. yooo dudes 100% avenging playoff losses and they played 11 days ago TNF a pckem now huh hmmmmmmmmmm In all fairness, you'd have to factor in no Sherman, Chancellor & a shitty offensive line into the equation. Not saying they won't win, but these are all major factors in the outcome. If the defensive line can get to Ryan they can win this game but if they can't Ryan will shred that secondary.
|
vankiep_0007 | 24 |
|
|
Iowa in Kinnick will handle Purdue.
|
MikeMed | 31 |
|
|
This game definitely stood out to me. West Virginia got absolutely man handled by Oklahoma State last week at home. Iowa State is playing on another level right now with a lot of confidence. They're playing as underdogs until they get their due respect. I like them outright, forget the points.
|
Flush1 | 5 |
|
|
Don't ever blindly follow Bads. That's like rule #1.
|
Allwyn9435 | 15 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by JoeyMargs: I think that Oakland has what it takes to win a likely 20-17 game, they have the offensive weapons to win. Assweiller is in the bottom rankings for everything QB related in the NFL. He doesn't even take advantage of Hopkins, They were shutout last year in the playoffs and Hoyer threw 5 picks. I think that this will likely be the same outcome of a one and done not shutout. I am mainly taking the ML because I think they have the ability to win. It is a very small play but I will be making a play on the spread as I think that the raiders, who play well on the road will be able to score some points on this overrated Texans D Assweiller will throw a pick when they need him not too most and lose the game for him. Hopefully OBrian gets canned I can see where you're coming from but I have zero reason to believe that Connor Cook will go out and win a playoff game on the road. Osweiller is terrible but all he has to do is manage the game and not turn the ball over. Texans will force Cook to beat them, that won't happen. |
ActionMagnet | 78 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by JoeyMargs: Completely agree. Sure Houston may win this game, but anyone that thinks Houstons D is legit will see that idea be squished When they go into New England and play a real offense not a 3rd string and get shutout AGAIN. The Texans are an overrated team with the worst quarterback in the NFL only second to Case Keenum. Oakland ML and +4 here BOL too all So what in your opinion gives Oakland the edge here to play the moneyline?
|
ActionMagnet | 78 |
|
|
You lost me at comparing McCarthy to Belichick.
|
GimmeMoneyNow | 30 |
|
|
I'd give Detroit a chance with the way Seattle's offensive line has been and their defense has played without Thomas. Also, the Giants with a stout defense. Defense wins championships.
|
wildcat95 | 17 |
|
|
Do you honestly think Cook is going into this game thinking I have nothing to lose? The kids getting thrown into the playoffs, essentially thrown to the wolves. His head will be spinning with what the Houston defense will be throwing at him.
|
ActionMagnet | 78 |
|
|
Houston gets Nate Washington and Cecil Shorts back. That at least gives Hoyer options other than Hopkins. Not saying they win or even cover but it does certainly help. Wound think O'Briens job has to be on the line also.
|
PhillyBrown | 12 |
|
|
Well you answered my question, your opinion is worth shit by default
|
RandyResort | 15 |
|
|
What's your angle here to back the Colts? No disrespect just curious as to why you see the Colts covering this number?
|
RandyResort | 15 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Ocean12: Stupid bet rats win mark my word this is a Lozzer It's loser. Now go take a lap. |
sureshot1212 | 9 |
|
|
Hard to back the Lions. They've looked bad and Stafford took a beating last week. Good luck with your plays this week.
|
TRAIN69 | 13 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.