Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
6 3’s in a row in a 2 minute stretch. 1Q Under was well on pace to hit till that run. This league is laughable |
stevietotals24 | 11 |
|
|
Very! ULL had a 14 point lead with 3 minutes left and their leading scorer went 1/4 from the FT line in the last 2 minutes! |
alloceanview | 6 |
|
|
@Colt2111
Quote Originally Posted by Colt2111:
Super Bowl MVP Position QB (-275) vs The Field (+210) Play: The Field (+210) Great value play here when you could argue that the 2 best players aren’t even the quarterbacks. My full write-up is on my thread. |
mr_bollox | 35 |
|
|
@Miracling2 Appreciate what you do! Just a heads up that these teams played 2 days ago, and the 1H hit 64 after the game had started with no points in the first 3 minutes of the game. |
Miracling2 | 83 |
|
|
@Colt2111
|
Colt2111 | 2 |
|
|
Super Bowl MVP Position
QB (-275) vs The Field (+210)
Play: The Field (+210)
Great value play here when you could argue that the 2 best players aren’t even the quarterbacks.
My full write-up is on my thread.
|
mr_bollox | 35 |
|
|
Super Bowl MVP Position
QB (-275) vs The Field (+210)
If you look at the game and how the MVP market is priced right now it is way too inflated on quarterbacks that quite frankly won’t have as much of an impact (as big of an impact) as the odds suggest. Stafford being barely above even money at +150 (currently) for MVP is crazy when his team is favored at -190/-200. If you think he’s the reason they’re in this position you must’ve not seen the defense or his #1 weapon that happened to be named OPOY play this season. As far as Joey Ice is concerned, I love the narrative and support he’s generated because its all well deserved but for this team to win its going to take more then the best of Joe Burrow to stop the Rams. I personally believe the way football is played in the AFC and the way its played in the NFC is completely different. Such as this past year we get the same type of matchup and despite this Bengals offense being great, the Chiefs offense that went to the Super Bowl was even better against a worst (by metrics) defense then the Bengals will be playing Sunday. So to have the Field at (+210) that includes both teams in what I truly believe is a 50/50 chance to win the award is a steal and its not even 50/50 cause we literally have everyone but 2 players and I’d argue that they’re not even the 2 best players in this game. This is great value as offshore books have this at (+155/+160).
The Field +210 (Bet MGM)
|
Colt2111 | 2 |
|
|
Super Bowl MVP Position
QB (-275) vs The Field (+210)
If you look at the game this Sunday the MVP market is too inflated on quarterbacks that quite frankly wont have as much of an impact (as big of an impact) as the odds suggest. Stafford being +100 even money for MVP is a joke. If you think he’s the reason they’re in this position you must’ve not seen the defense or his #1 weapon that happened to be named OPOY play this season. I would suggest the same narrative for Joey ICE too, yes he is a great quarterback and doesn’t have nearly as many pieces as Stafford, but lets not disregard what Chase, Mix and Higgins have done for him. He won’t make or break his teams chances of winning this game, (I.E. Titans game). So to have the Field at +210 in what I truly believe is 50/50 is a steal and its not even 50/50 cause we literally have everyone but 2 players and I’d argue that they’re not even the 2 best players in this game. This is great value, and as offshore books have this at (+155/+160).
The Field +210 (Bet MGM)
|
TRAIN69 | 35 |
|
|
Arizona vs Illinois line was 157 when you posted to buy to 158 was -135/140 depending on your book. I just hope no one paid that price regardless of the outcome of the wager, best of luck on your action. |
Morrissey | 6 |
|
|
No problem @SirBruce. It’s been an entertaining thus far as you guys have been saying. I do believe that the #’s will end up evening out and end up closer to the closing number that the books had before kickoff. That is why I myself just played the 2H Under 22.5.
|
SirBruce | 103 |
|
|
@SirBruce Yeah exactly to what CFLCHEF was alluding to.. despite a majority of people laying the number with Calgary the line continued to drop the opposite way. I wouldn’t call this reverse line movement without exactly knowing the ticket count but indication would say the books got significant/smart money on Edmonton or just information. |
SirBruce | 103 |
|
|
That line movement right before kick-off (line dropping from +5.5 to +4.5) I believe was good indication of what was to come at least in my opinion. Cause without knowing the official ticket count and from perception alone it seemed as if everyone and anyone was licking there chops to lay the # with Calgary. |
SirBruce | 103 |
|
|
Sad to see a great turn to an automatic fade. |
Colt2111 | 10 |
|
|
Monday: Pistons -2 L
Tuesday: Bucks -1.5 W
Wednesday: Suns -1 L
Thursday: Raptors -2 L
Friday: Utah -4 W
Saturday: Washington -3.5 L
Sunday: Suns -7 L
Monday: Utah -2 L
Tuesday: Bulls +4.5 L |
Colt2111 | 10 |
|
|
Monday: Pistons -2 L
Tuesday: Bucks -1.5 W
Wednesday: Suns -1 L
Thursday: Raptors -2 L
Friday: Utah -4 W
Saturday: Washington -3.5 L
Sunday: Suns -7 L
Monday: Utah -2 L
Should we start fading or?
|
Colt2111 | 21 |
|
|
Week of 05/03
Monday: Pistons -2 L
Tuesday: Bucks -1.5 W
Wednesday: Suns -1 L
Thursday: Raptors -2 L
Friday: Utah -4 W
Saturday: Washington -3.5 L
Sunday: Suns -7 L
Finished 2-5 for the week.
|
Colt2111 | 37 |
|
|
Monday: Pistons -2 L
Tuesday: Bucks -1.5 W
Wednesday: Suns -1 L
Thursday: Raptors -2 L
Friday: Utah -4 W
Saturday: Washington -3.5 L |
Colt2111 | 34 |
|
|
Week of 05/03
Monday: Pistons -2 L
Tuesday: Bucks -1.5 W
Wednesday: Suns -1 L
Thursday: Raptors -2 L
Friday: Utah -4 W
DM if you want today’s play.
|
Colt2111 | 34 |
|
|
DM for play.
last post got deleted |
Colt2111 | 7 |
|
|
Week of 05/03
Monday: Pistons -2 L Tuesday: Bucks -1.5 W
Wednesday: Suns -1 L
Thursday: Raptors -2 L
|
Colt2111 | 30 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.