Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
I don’t think the casual CBB fan realizes that this Miami team was formed based on recruiting current NCAA star players to transfer using NIL money. This is isn’t some “gutty little team”. Miami is a team of future NBA players. |
CorneliusCook | 10 |
|
|
Miami is going to win straight up today. They are a team of destiny. That is all. |
CorneliusCook | 10 |
|
|
Under all the way! UNT basketball is the truth. It’s ugly but effective. |
Peanutzz | 12 |
|
|
Not me!! UNT all the way… this is a revenge game from their most recent game in the Conf USA Tournament. I think FAU is going to beat SDSU on Saturday precisely because of the style of play they have seen from UNT. North Texas makes that entire conference battle tested! |
Peanutzz | 12 |
|
|
I took an exact final result of “Miami over Florida Atlantic” at +1200. I’ve watched this entire tournament and this is mainly going off the eye test. These two teams just seem to have the “IT” factor. the casual bettor is just seeing “San Diego St.” and “UConn” on paper and thinking of them as the more traditional basketball schools. They probably have no idea what lies in store with these Florida schools. |
CrazyMilkMan | 7 |
|
|
@Fallser29 This is absolutely the right take. The public has crowned UConn the “overwhelming favorite” of this Final 4 for some reason. Why? Because they cruised in 3 straight games? They lost 7 games this year and are only a 4 seed (losing to Marquette less than 2 weeks ago) Miami is VERY good and has been disrespected all tournament long (underdogs 3 games in a row). They will bring the FIGHT on Saturday!! |
Fallser29 | 13 |
|
|
does anyone know what the answer to this was? Seemed like Edelman didn’t thank anybody. Confused as to how this will be graded. |
CorneliusCook | 2 |
|
|
A “Sharp” is someone who goes against the majority opinion. Which wins/loses 50% of the time in my experience. They should be called “contrarians” because they win/lose just as much as everyone else. |
Lynchrules | 24 |
|
|
The craziest thing is that this guy played in his first Super Bowl vs the St. Louis Rams in 2002 and then 17 years (!!!) later is going to face the LA Rams in a Super Bowl. So many things in our world and lives have changed over 17 years but one constant is Tom Brady playing in Super Bowls. I used to hate the guy and root against NE with a passion. But now that I’m getting up there in years, I can’t help but admire a 41 year old guy pulling it off year after year and not slowing down. Much respect GOAT, thanks for the $$$!! |
Maximus1978 | 51 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by WHATTAPLAY:
Jared Goff "is serviceable" ?????"He is at least a year away" ????Let's see...where is Goff now............OHHHH, one game away from taking his team to the Super Bowl.Yeah, you're definitely thinking of Dak Prescott, Cousins, Smith or Bortles.Stick to your day job. This whole "analyst" thing ain't for you. are you Sean McVay’s mom? |
vetdrm | 12 |
|
|
Anything Over on Rams penalties and penalty yards. Talib and Peters are such hot heads and I suspect their “game plan” is going to be to much the sh*t out of Thomas and Kamara. Forseeing PIs and personal fouls galore! |
Covers-Team | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jaybucko: These guys will hit Homers if there was 80 mph wind blowing inwards. That is always a scare with the way this series has gone. But let's not forget that three of the games in this series were not home run derbies. The two that weren't were massive displays. I'll grant you that.
|
CorneliusCook | 5 |
|
|
It's cold and damp in L.A. today. A BIG difference from the conditions in game 1 and 2. Don't expect many balls flying out of the ball park tonight. The team that wins is gonna have to string together base runners and hits. Something to consider with props and the run line.
|
CorneliusCook | 5 |
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkOJ9uNj9EY
see you guys in the Final 4
|
CorneliusCook | 1 |
|
|
This Zags team is on the brink of their first Final 4. They are going to be nervous as all hell. Meanwhile X is hot and has nothing to lose. This line should be closer to -3.5 and ML -220 IMO. Anyone think that Gonzaga easily covers the big line?
|
CorneliusCook | 13 |
|
|
replied to
Zags are -10 against Xavier in the early going. KU -6 against the Duck
in College Basketball
Xavier is comparable to University of San Francisco...a team that Gonzaga anhialated twice this year!!! This is no contes: Zags 89, Xavire 41. Book it!!!
|
jrgumpert | 18 |
|
|
The venue is what keeps me from betting on Oregon here. The further away they are from home, the more mortal they become IMO. Kansas City is FAR from Eugene or any of the Pac 12/Neutral sites that they have been playing at lately. I'm worried they play disorriented and flat.
|
GarySanders | 12 |
|
|
So the Super Bowl had ZERO lead changes total? It seems so bizarre that a game could be completed and have a winner but yet their was never a lead change?
|
CorneliusCook | 11 |
|
|
I bet this prop in Vegas, YES at +400. The prop simply stated:
'Will there be a lead change the last two minutes of the game" I thought this was a winner being that the Patriots took the lead on the very last play of the game (their only lead by the way). Can anyone help explain why the sportsbook called this a loser?
|
CorneliusCook | 11 |
|
|
The sportsbook at the South Point ruled "no" on the "lead change in last two minutes of game". My argument was that once the game went to OT, he had won the bet because a new team was going to have the lead at the end.
My friend had $50 on it to win $200 at +400. Is this worth fighting and if so, how would he go about even doing that? |
cbuc | 16 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.