Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
This is the worst team in FBS. WTF am I watching. |
Darshdolan | 10 |
|
|
@smellybunty 21 points in the 4th in this fucking weather is criminal. I had 36.5. |
smellybunty | 2 |
|
|
If they cancel this game bets stand at DraftKings for full game right? |
Darshdolan | 33 |
|
|
Smoked like that at home with no Tatum and an untested Celtics team. Daaaamn. |
Darshdolan | 1 |
|
|
Smoked like that at home with no Tatum and an untested Celtics team. Daaaamn. |
Darshdolan | 1 |
|
|
Anyone following any system plays this year? IE Pacers 1st quarter coming off a loss type plays |
Darshdolan | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by foxhound:
How far is Santa Clara from Palo Alto? A few mins on the BART?[/Qu Quote Originally Posted by foxhound: Closeness of another stadium may play a factor but again. It’s not their home field. I played in college and not being in your locker room not having the little HOME field quirks introductions ect. played a emotional part in my feelings going on the field. Do high school teams that are neighbors call it the same way?? No. USC will show up just as much.
How far is Santa Clara from Palo Alto? A few mins on the BART? |
Darshdolan | 21 |
|
|
I keep reading about the how Stanford is going to upset USC. As much as I would like to happen it’s very unlikely. The value of a -4 spread with USC is huge for me. Stanford has beat some pretty good teams at HOME...on the road Stanford is not the same team. Also USC is coming off a bye!!! 2 weeks to prepare and the healthiest they are been since playing Stanford. The trends tell you to take Stanford but all goods thing must come to a end. USC -4 is the play... |
Darshdolan | 21 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Cooler999: Detroit averages 27 PPG Minny averages 24 PPG The O/U for Thursday is 44.5. Why am I not laying the wood to the OVER? The only negative I can think of is, their both on a short week. Anything else??? Thanks for your input....C The % on the unders in this division is hitting at close to 70%. Also the under has hit 4 out the last 5 games between the viks and lions.
|
Cooler999 | 33 |
|
|
Ohio +4
EMU-2 EMU under 51.5
|
Darshdolan | 1 |
|
|
First TD
Hundley +1600 Adam Jones +800 Marvin Jones Over 55.5 yards All 1 unit. |
Darshdolan | 1 |
|
|
Temp +8
NIU +7.5
|
Darshdolan | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by WISEGUY36: Well , by now most are trying to recover from last nights CMU / WMU game . I did not have any action on it and typically do not bet these kind games for a number of reasons I will try to explain . Let me begin my saying that as we get deeper into the season, Bookmakers are getting smarter and that is reflective in the lines they post. Unless we as bettors are also getting smarter , it is highly likely that bettors are seeing their profits slowly being eroded right now. I bring up last nights game as a classic example of this, Let me cite my reasoning ; 1. In my opinion , as the season progresses, Line value will erode making the bettor assume higher risk. 2. In my opinion , approximately 20 % of all matchups each week are uncappable by conventional methods. 3. While many just want the action , I prefer to wager on games that offer me an edge. Last nights game is a great example of a matchup where an edge was not present. Going back to item # 2 for a moment. Most of the matchups I refer to come from the following conferences. a. Sun Belt b. MAC c. Mountain west 4. CUSA ( lower tier ) They have a few things in common . Not a lot of depth ( as injuries during the season take their toll ) Poor defensive metrics . They can take a lead , but cannot hold it. Totals bettors can get clobbered as well. What does all this mean ? 1 . Look for a defined Schedule edge 2 . Look for the team that has a defined edge in defensive stats. 3. Check injury reports very carefully Of Most Importance Pass on a play that does not provide you a significant edge. For me , by passing on a midweek game , I am more likely to have more capital to fire on better matchups on Saturday In last nights game as an example. CMU had the advantage in Schedule edge. There was no difference in defensive metrics ( both were poor ) IMO , there was no reason to wager on this game. That's just me , but passing on games with no edge for the bettor requires a high level of discipline. That discipline can lead to profitability. GLTA this weekend. CMU DIDNT HAVE AN EDGE??? WMU STARTING QUARTER BACK WAS OUT!!! THIS IS THE WHOLE REASON THEY LOST!!! I call that an edge....
|
WISEGUY36 | 42 |
|
|
Anyone have the odds of the Skins game ending that way? 4 secs in the fourth covers. I really can't believe it.
|
Darshdolan | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by porcelainfist: THIS IS A DOUBLE PLAY, 2 UNITS Been tailing you for a while. Your hot this year. Crazy call on the cavs overtime.
|
porcelainfist | 38 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by VegasVandal: Who do you like later? Taking Miami, and T A M
|
Darshdolan | 4 |
|
|
These games are the exact same. Its like I'm watching reruns but with different teams...
|
Darshdolan | 4 |
|
|
Don't quit your day job...
|
chungnuoc | 20 |
|
|
Bahahaha
|
chungnuoc | 33 |
|
|
Ouch
|
badlands | 5 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.