Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Horrible... worst pain of your life, I can relate. I had l4-l5 disc issue that required surgery. It gets better with time.
Wishing you a speed recovery
|
Letsgo2theBeau | 18 |
|
|
Posting this thread on the internet... yeah, that will show em...
Totally working
|
frankpau430 | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KingRGIII: You guys are all my brothers regardless of skin color. actually my bad, I like how this thread ended. Covers is a place where skin color doesn't matter. Not sure why people bring it up so much when it is of no consequence. So I like how this ends where we all brothers regardless of skin color rather than looking like complete douchebags talking about blm, black/white pride getting all serious and effected on a thread that seems was just meant to troll people concerned with race. Hopefully this thread ends on this positive note and not ruined by people's own personal issues that they cant manage
|
KingRGIII | 36 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KingRGIII: Guess Trump backers got offended. My apologies. lol you made this thread just to troll and get the emotional trump backers all riled up and effected by it. I cheer for kaep the same way I cheered for tebow. Blocking out their personal agenda and enjoying a qb that is a dual threat with their legs. |
KingRGIII | 36 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan: Gandhi, I like how you used my name 3 dozen times in this one post. It shows that I am on your mind. To answer your question, Gandhi, I am proud to be of Italian heritage. I am proud to be a successful business man. I am proud of my family. I am proud to be an American. I am proud to be under your skin. And yes, I am proud to be white. There is this thing called black pride. I believe in it. I believe that everyone should take pride in who they are, in what they are. Obviously, you have no pride. This is not a reflection on me, it is a reflection on your upbringing. Go ahead and cry "racist", I am unaffected by it, and I am still proud You say you are unefffected but like a moth to a flame you can't stilffle yourself from responding in a long winded post that goes double digits in lines. Uneffected would be not responding and you're obviously... not that... lol. What is it when someone says one thing but does another? Hughpocrite And no need to go all cheswick psycho again.... I'm just having fun joking around... instead try and show us you're "uneffected" by not responding..
|
KingRGIII | 36 |
|
|
You always gotta wonder when a poster creates a thread like this.
But I guess you see people get all psycho when they become unglued.
|
OSO | 10 |
|
|
Surprised "conservatives" wouldn't be all over this
|
gmanusc2001 | 11 |
|
|
Sara, perhaps you could give us some actual plays that we could profit from and be a legit contributing member of this forum?
Why not suggest some bets and give the rational why and help other profit rather than just sarcastic and petty games and antics? Why not be and asset to the forum and others rather than just trying to spin threads and detract from the intelligent conversations of the gamblers here hat are trying to make money? I don't know why you put so much effort in detracting from that... Please friend, join us in the political gambling discussion with out the silly games and antics...
|
Inyourlife16 | 48 |
|
|
Trump actual did better with the shackles on.
At least that is what the numbers show us |
zelo123 | 20 |
|
|
No need for rigging the sensible average middle class voting majority is keeping trump out just fine.
Not to mention trump seemingly trying to lose this single handedly. This is far from a tie being decided by weeks of hanging chads
|
bigvern1013 | 225 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by No_Contest: The Orange Octopus is losing, accept it deplorables. Lol It's just baffling how much effort is being put into manufacturing something other than this plain and simple truth
|
zelo123 | 29 |
|
|
First off, I'm not a Hillary supporter. So you're already starting off wrong.
Second trump did not hit a home run with the abortion issue at all. This was a cupcake question designed for him to simply saying that he is prolife he does not believe in roe v wade and wants it appeared in a clear and difinitive manner but instead slithered around taking about how it is automatic and states rights. Instead he basically showed to the nation that he just saying GOP talking points to try to get elected but does not personally believe or can stand by principles of his own. You believe he said he was prolife... did he really or are you displaying to the entire site that there a clear disconnect between what trump actual says and does and what you choose to believe? Results should be interesting
|
Inyourlife16 | 48 |
|
|
Trump is the one that that brought up Temperment in the first debate. Let's not credit Hillary or her camp running a successful strategy when it is trump pulling out his gun and blasting himself in the foot repeatedly.
The problem is he talked Temperment but then in each debate became unglued and ended up showing to the entire world that he does not have the Temperment to be president. This was a poor choice of strategy by trump not some media conspiracy or genius ploy by Hillary. A presidential debate and a business deal are two completely different things in that Deceptive Donald not just standing up like a man and making a clear difinitive statement about him following the longnstanding American tradition and accepting the results of the election and just saying he will be a good American costed him big time. No media spin, no democrat ploy. Trump was given a cupcake question where all he had to do when asked if he would accept the results is say "yes" and stop talking. And he failed to do that bigtime.
|
zelo123 | 29 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by lordzud: My over under on how many women come forward and proclaim "He....sob......he took liberties with me. He reached up my skirt and fondled the holy of holies." is 24. The number now is at 12 and rises daily. Over under fondled Trump women is 24. I would bet the over if this bet was out there. Personally I would love to see Alec Baldwin play Donald Trump in the movie Donald Trump, Prison Biatch. The movie starts out with The Donald convicted of fondling Miss Teen Georgia of 2008. The little strumpet was only 16 at the time so off he goes to the big house. He is constantly getting his hair disheveled by other inmates. He is goosed about 5 times an hour. He is constantly yelling "Stop it I will sue you." Trump ofcourse said that everyone of them were liars. It's like being s little pregnant in my mind. You either believe that every single woman is lying or that trump is basically a sex offender. The lock her up slogan seems more and more ironic every day
|
lordzud | 37 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Inyourlife16: This Soros +500 feels like the "one that got away". They must have offered at +500 and received alarming action on the prop, locked it up and never reopened..........Just leaving it on the board as if to say "Look at what you missed"........Which leads one to ask the obvious question.......who would ever lay -1000 on "no"? The entire bet made no sense. HRC bringing home the WikiLeaks prop tonight for me. She used the word 3 times in a minute...right before Chris W. used it. Only got it once out of DT though. General Debate Observation: She had the luxury of mailing it in tonight.......She instead chose to mock and marginalize DT. DT just couldn't get out of his own way tonight. He looked OK early, but then became irritated. Did he gain any new voters tonight? Better question....what undecided voter listens to him say "he may not accept election results" and decides in his favor? Lastly, tonight was Not about appealing to the general electorate, as their minds won't be swayed. HRC saw it is an opportunity to recruit educated suburban republican women. I have zero idea who Trump was trying to recruit. BOL as we see this through till the end........ In looking at the odds on the board for the debate soros at +500 had far and away the best payout. I actually believe that Wallace said it first as one of his scripted questions. So considering the moderator set the table for wikilinks it was a great bet. I agree that Hillary taunted and toyed with trump tonight. Her made of Chinese steel joke had the audience Laughing while trump rambled on his lame smear rhetoric. Trump could have simply done two things in the debate that would have helped him big time. First was to say he was against abortion and take a solid stance as the prolife candidate with a definitive statement of i would like roe v wade repealed, like he says over and over that he would like to repeal Obamacare. Second was to when asked he would accept the election results, all he had to say was "yes, because i am a good American" rather than looking likena world class douchebag floundering around with this cupcake question. He just needed to say yes and stfu But Failed to do so. I did notice Hillary kinda go the feminist route. I am not sure if republican feminist haters would bite on this. But educated republican women just might. Trump never seems to be recruiting. Only trying to sway people away from Hillary, but never sells himself on why you should vote for him. Weird how someone that is supposed to be such a great business man looks so incompetent in marketing |
Inyourlife16 | 48 |
|
|
I was trying to think of the best joke of the election and we got it tonight when the audience roared in laugher to the point of the moderator begging them to stop.
https://youtu.be/9JcPnHnC98s |
SarasotaSlim | 69 |
|
|
I didn't quite understand the joke but someone explained it to me about Donald trump and his wacky comb over hair being the last person to be complaining about "bad ombrés"
https://nymag.com/selectall/2016/10/trump-bad-hombres-comment-spurs-ombre-hair-jokes-on-twitter.html
|
SarasotaSlim | 69 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Inyourlife16: I want to play this prop bet but it's currently Locked up..... Will 'George Soros' or 'Soros' be mentioned? All wagers have action. Moderator mentions included in the total count. Soros cashed too, in guessing that bovada locked it up knowing trump would be reduced to trying attack Hillary's character rather than debating issues. I knew once Trump skirted around the first roe v wade like a slimy politician slithering along on such and easy issue, I knew it was over for him. Why can't trump simply say that he is against roe v wade and he is the prolife candidate and at least pretend he has some principles that are conservative in nature?
|
Inyourlife16 | 48 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt: Certainly you fault Reagan, Bush, and Bush II the same. it's one thing to have disagreements over issues but if you are going to suggest that BENGHAZI!!!!! isn't the most tragic event that has ever occurred on September 11, or any other date, then you've definitely crossed the line Only on covers lol
|
bigvern1013 | 225 |
|
|
That and trump in his wild crazy machine gun approach attacking and trying shoot at everything and anyone that does not worship him and agree with him, he blasted Romney who is an important person to the Mormons.
Mormons are also not anti-immigrant so trump's divicive rhetoric is another turn off. Mormons have a high moral standard, like at but student may have to follow a moral code, so trump's actions and choices of personal conduct are revolting and deplorable to people actual moral fiber. With that said, although it McMullen makes sense, I would want something closer to +250 or at least +210 or better |
gmanusc2001 | 11 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.