justliketoplay

@UNIMAN

 Nice and very informative post 

The question I ask is who do you think is more bangable Kayleigh McEnany or Caroline leavitt? 

@pointspreadking

 So true but that's what the casinos and sport books love...ding dongs without a clue! 

@Daddy_Freddie

 Thanks bro no offense given whatsoever just clarifying and you or I may have took it wrong.... don't overfill yourself will lamb on Easter enjoy you and your family.

@Daddy_Freddie

 Yes but I said my son will be home not my step son nor my Grandson will be home or my adopted son will be home but that my son will be home...and a Happy Easter to you as well 

Mine is how one can be so clueless at their job.

Was talking to a utility employee about getting some updates done to my gas lines in my building when we set up the appointment and they wanted to know if I would be at the building when the serviceman came to perform the work.

I told them no my son would be home so they asked for my son's name and I responded Mike and then they asked what was his last name in which I replied......if he is my son and I told you that my son would be home what would you guess that his last name would be?

She replied oh yeah sorry your right my bad....Really? No shit! 

@buckubad

 If anyone Cleveland but other then them.... No KC No Minnesota and definitely No Chicago....Good luck and I like your chances buck 

@undermysac

 This is true but at -110 either side was the norm back in the day but the point I believe that raider was making is it is juiced on both sides yes since the beginning of time but juiced must differently with odds from -113 and or a - 111 depending on the side you choose so why the change and diversions from the standard -110 no matter if you like the over or under and not slanted off the -110 juice no matter what your play is like it used to be and I believe the lines have most definitely been altered since the beginning of time. 

@AndrewStang

 If you lost it would of been money deducted.but since you won and they don't like winners sorry you lost even after the fact.....thieves indeed!

Tough to find a good one but others on this site can and will be helpful...

.Good luck 

@TheGoldenGoose

 Great advice I'm pretty damn good myself and always hit and run but mostly $250-$500 and stop that's what keeps one under the radar.

Always Remember:

Pigs get fat and hogs get slaughtered and in this case ....banned! 

https://youtu.be/VKAiOBRFoQ8?si=bSovbhor8evSUdD1

Oh I noticed you mentioned futures then yes they should be able to cancel your initial out and honor the play as originally placed.

Hmmm maybe awfully tough if it's been cashed already.

Was it a substantial amount?

@jesron1269

 True that but in all reality Chicago was not a bad shot for todays game not to mention that the top three favorites to win the baseball championship has the Cubs in the top three alongside the Yankees and dodgers.

After the beat down from the cubs yesterday I would of most definitely would of thought the embarrassment alone would be dodgers as the play bringing in their A- game but thus far... cubbies look good no doubt.

@jesron1269

 No doubt you are holding a juicy ticket with a very juicy potential outcome. 

@jesron1269

Cubs and the under was a +525 before the game if played that way.

Still game to go though 

Thanks for always making it a point to stop in and wish me well fellas.

@D-Town

@Macwestie1 

@Fuse 

Enjoy the off season boys or catch you when your in a different sport forum with yours or mine plays. 

Love it when I have a play handicapped and it matches up with the reputable handicappers here on covers....Nice year owo congrats.

@chicubs09

 Whatever it takes bro.... congratulations! 

@Crusher13

Your a good handicapper crush just keep doing what your doing and eventually you will be the one on top because as you said.....this shit is tough to wager on!