Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
I'm seeing Ducks +450 & Wild +650
Which is the better play? |
Kraut | 3 |
|
|
Aston Villa +2768 anyone? Lol
They have been the better side since that brutal opening 10 minutes |
HermosaBch | 5 |
|
|
I think Madrid gets it done v Juve.
Bayern v Barca will be great.. could go either way. Injuries is a problem for Bayern right now though. I would love to see Bayern get revenge v Madrid in the finals. |
Kraut | 2 |
|
|
I'm all over Wolfsburg -110 today Franz!
|
franz555 | 21 |
|
|
Wolfsburg @ +890 looks enticing...But am I better off rolling over each round instead??
|
Kraut | 2 |
|
|
Am I better off to take +260 now, or roll over each round?
|
Kraut | 2 |
|
|
Just ml parlay NE and Seattle then.. One less play to worry about and less juice
|
MTFN50 | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by stevopa: Quote Originally Posted by Kraut: Dude?? You are one of 100 people on this forum not reading and comprehending other posts, and it's getting old quick. I am not saying what is was or wasn't. I am explaining the rationale used by the NFL and referee's to make the call. In the view of the REFEREE'S, Dez Bryant did not make a "football move", because they did not warrant the arm movement as a "football move". Your initial question was about the goal line, and in regard to that I responded: if Dez had caught the ball and extended it to the goal line (which he did not so it makes arguing stupid) it would have been a TD.When all you dilettantes respond to me or other people, please try and read the posts for face value and not just an interpretation of what you think the person is saying.No, they couldn't. The play would have been dead as soon as crossed the goal line and it would have been a TD based on a legitimate "football move". The determination was that Bryant did not extend the ball in a significant manner to warrant a "football move". What do you guys not understand about this? You are talking about hypothetical situations that never occurred.So what you're saying is because he didn't cross the goal line then it is not a "legitimate" "football move"? Seriously dude?? I see.. so you all you are trying to do is regurgitate the NFLs BS and offer no opinion. Thanks! |
mp5070 | 149 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by stevopa: Quote Originally Posted by Kraut: No, they couldn't. The play would have been dead as soon as crossed the goal line and it would have been a TD based on a legitimate "football move". The determination was that Bryant did not extend the ball in a significant manner to warrant a "football move". What do you guys not understand about this? You are talking about hypothetical situations that never occurred.If he would've broke the goal line when he stretches and the ref calls a td, could they have then said that there was no "football move"???Gimme a break. So what you're saying is because he didn't cross the goal line then it is not a "legitimate" "football move"? Seriously dude?? |
mp5070 | 149 |
|
|
If he would've broke the goal line when he stretches and the ref calls a td, could they have then said that there was no "football move"???
Gimme a break. |
mp5070 | 149 |
|
|
Blatant screw job/make up call.
Anyone who is saying otherwise either had/has something to gain.. Or got screwed last week.. Or is just a Cowboys hater of some kind. How can anyone say that it was INDISPUTABLE that there was no "football move". |
richig761 | 67 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Metro413: Dark horse I like Boys vs Steelers Exactly how I see it too! Cowboys winning it. |
Crashdavis565 | 59 |
|
|
Clearly you are on ND and not the over.. or you would have called under backers the losers.
|
juveunits | 26 |
|
|
I have Murray as well, and I picked Dunbar... but now I'm reading Randle is the one practising with the 1st team offense.
|
slamspurs | 6 |
|
|
Hockey too? Good stuff amd!
Are you going larger on any of the 4? Thanks! |
amd | 28 |
|
|
Which 3 of the 5 to start?
I'm thinking Hilton, Garcon & VJax |
Kraut | 2 |
|
|
Was leaning this way too..
Standard? Or large play? Thanks amd |
amd | 66 |
|
|
Is this Atl play larger then a standard play amd?
|
amd | 162 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by amd: Sunday 6-2Atlanta +13.5 Respect your opinion amd... Is this play as large as your Browns and Lions yesterday? |
amd | 162 |
|
|
Anything tonight bro?
|
eeeallenccc | 203 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.