Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
So sick of this crap. I likely still would have taken Dallas but did not know Chandler was out.
OKC are a weird team. Dallas was such a sucker bet |
Kurylyk98 | 2 |
|
|
The Bengals have lots to play for tonight!
Not sure why some feel otherwise? If they lose tonight, they go 9-5-1. The game next week would still be for the division but if they lose again next week they go to 9-6-1. That means if SD or Baltimore win and go to 10-6, they miss the playoffs. Guess what? They;ll lose to Denver and Pitts |
Kurylyk98 | 1 |
|
|
Why can't this team finish off games this year? They should be at least 2-2 right now. Losing to the Bucks and Grizzlies with big leads in the 2nd half is bad. I mean they're really not that bad of a team. Green needs to take more leadership, Sullinger looks promising, Olynyk could have potential and Bradley is a great defender. They're not a team of superstars but a team with a lot of decent players. Anyone think once Rondo gets back they could turn things around a bit and finish games? Usually 40 wins give or take is good enough for playoff spot in the East
|
Kurylyk98 | 1 |
|
|
Does this dope get paid by CBS sports to be a moron? I see he has the Bengals beating Falcons in the Superbowl ? I can see the Falcons maybe but the Bengals? I wouldn't be that surprised if the Bengals missed the playoffs altogether!
|
Kurylyk98 | 1 |
|
|
I'm a huge Celtics Fan too. The Celtics and Oakland Raiders are my favorite sports teams! I think with the lineup they have now they could win 40 games. I hope they keep Rondo to be honest. I'm guessing you also HATE the Miami Heat too. Still makes me sick we ran out of gas in game 7 last years vs the Heat. I think had we hung on we would have beat OKC in the Finals too
|
Kurylyk98 | 6 |
|
|
Anyone think the Celtics could get a playoff spot this season? I think they're pretty weak on the bench but I would guess the starting lineup would be Rondo, Bradley, Green, Bass and Olynyk. That doesn't seem like too bad of a lineup to me. I think best case scenario would be a 7-8 seed but in the East a record like 40-42 is often good enough to get in. I'm not saying they would necessarily do anything if they made the playoffs but I think they have a chance at a playoff spot.
|
Kurylyk98 | 6 |
|
|
Good luck man. I really think they win it all too if they stay healthy. Pierce was injured last season too.
|
CoachKidd | 29 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bob696969: I find it funny that people think the raider are a "lock" to win vs jacksonville, tennessese or the jets! People seem to forget that crappy teams lose to other crappy teams even when they are favorites. You're right but people seem to neglect the fact that any of those crappy teams can beat Denver, SF, Atlanta or New England on any given Sunday too. It's not like upsets NEVER happen in the NFL. To think Oakland will lose to every team they're the underdog to is foolish. So when you balance it all out I think Oakland could go 6-10 or better assuming they stay healthy and McFadden is effective. |
FadeOnly | 36 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Asomugha: and ill answer that question: They cannot go 10-6. End of story. And ure an idiot for thinking/expecting otherwise. And I hope you lose all your $5 bets too. Again retards, I never said they were gonna go 10-6. I suggested that as the best case scenario! They could quite easily go 5-11. I was asking could they could go 10-6? The couch experts that try and do the win totals week by week are hilarious. The Broncos and 49ers ALWAYS beat the Jaguars and Titans. The middle of the pack teams ALWAYS beat the bottom feeders too lol |
Kurylyk98 | 32 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by The Hawk: Besides not knowing English, you don't know football. If you think the Raiders make the playoffs, with whatever record, you've lost any cred about wisdom........... If ignorance is bliss, you must be very happy You're such a retard. I NEVER said they were gonna make the playoffs. I asked people what they thought of them this and posed the question could they go 10-6 and get a wild card? I hope you lose all your 5$ bets all NFL season |
Kurylyk98 | 32 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by The Hawk: The question mark at the end of your hypothetical is negated by the word "obviously" Which is obvious........to everyone but you. Let me know when you get past Grade 6 Hey brain wave...when I say obviously a 10-6 record at best? The fact that I asked what people thought of the Raiders to begin with and then said that obviously 10-6 was the best case scenario and put the ? there, that might mean could they possibly go 10-6 because that is my belief best case scenario. You'll also notice I said a wild card. And just since you seem super stunned, The Bronco's are in their division too. I tend to think Denver will win the division. In the NFL two can't win the division. Another team can make it with the wild card. 10-6 generally does it. If a Wild Card team can win 3 road games then they can play in the Super Bowl. Ohh, and 3 is a bigger number than 2. You need anymore wisdom? |
Kurylyk98 | 32 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bizkilla: You talkin' bout luck? How "lucky" the HEAT got? Are you F ing kidding me? That's the game. Its all a game. 4 quarters. Possession for possession. Win or Lose. Don't put a play or a sequence of events over a few seconds under a microscope and then tell me how lucky they got. That's basketball. What they did is of historical significance. When their best player was turning the ball over, the next man had to step up. One had to grab a rebound, the other had to make a shot. That's why there are 5 guys on the floor wearing the same shirt. Its a team game and they won it as a team. As for the bet, I'm also not a big futures guy. But heck, its worked for you so as long as your interests don't conflict with mine, I wish you the best of luck. Pffft, don't even try and tell me they weren't lucky. SA completely blew it. The Heat will have a much tougher time this year in the East. I could see the Nets giving them a hell of a time. If Houston pulls off a big signing with Howard and Josh Smith in the West and Westbrook will back too. I honestly don't see Miami winning next year. If they would have lost it this year it would have been awesome to see them only win one championship in a lockout year vs a young team |
BostonCelticFTW | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by FadeOnly: Not to be a jerk, but if everyone followed this mindset of 'the best team always wins' then the Ravens wouldn't be the defending champs and, quite frankly, the entire league would be very boring. Upsets happen every week of the season. To say that the Raiders can't beat the Eagles or the Steelers or the Jets is nonsense. Nobody knows what the Eagles are going to look like, the Steelers have been steadily declining, and the Jets are the Jets. Honestly, if this Oakland team finishes 7-9 or 8-8, how shocked can you really be? I'm not calling them a playoff team, I'm only expecting a marginal improvement. At +115 and with what they've done in the offseason so far, I see tremendous value. Exactly. Good luck man. I find it funny when people try and do the win/loss for a team with the favorite ALWAYS winning lol. People seem to forget teams like Cleveland or Jacksonville will beat Denver or SF |
FadeOnly | 36 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by earthWake: I know that you didn't predict them to go 10-6, you were saying that was basically their ceiling. With that being said, their ceiling is more along the lines of 8-8. If the Raiders make the playoffs this year, I'll gladly post naked pictures of my girl, it WON'T happen There, finally someone who can read. I was posing the question could they could go 10-6 as the best case scenario? To think the Broncos would go worse than 10-6 is just foolish. I could see them being the best team in the NFL this year. Is your girlfriend hot? If she looks like Rosie O'Donnell then please don't post if Raiders make playoffs |
Kurylyk98 | 32 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Asomugha: and 10-6 would win the division. Ok, I'm not talking to you anymore lol. The Denver Bronco's are the AFC West. They have Peyton Manning! Also, his arm is reported to have strengthened a lot since last season and they have Wes Welker now. To think they don't go 11-5 or better is foolish. I would say at least 12-4. |
Kurylyk98 | 32 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by earthWake: Raiders suuuuuuck. Afc is loaded this year, Raiders have less than 10% chance of making the playoffs. And there's probably a decent chance they don't make it. Where I guaranteed a playoff berth is beyond me? As anyone can notice, I asked what people thought about them this year and threw it out there as to whether they could go 10-6 and make a wild card? |
Kurylyk98 | 32 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Asomugha: No u didnt. U said "They could get a wild card AT BEST" and then after u said that u said "With a like 10-6 record". No, you just reworded it. My original said.....". I would say obviously a wild card at best with like a 10-6 record?" For all you minimum wage uneducated folks that would mean, I would 10-6 AT BEST with a 10-6 record? Notice the question mark. That would mean I'm asking, a 10-6 record? As in could they get a 10-6 record cause that's I think the BEST case scenario is. How you ever passed grade 5 English class is beyond me. Or did you? |
Kurylyk98 | 32 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by The Hawk: " I would say obviously a wild card at best with like a 10-6 record?" Does this sound familiar? Think back. Way back. All the way to June 26th........... I don't know why I even chat with people who didn't get their grade 8 even. Notice the question mark at the end of that? I would say at best? Now to anyone even remotely intelligent that would probably indicate 10-6 at best? Meaning could they could go 10-6? If I were to say "I could see them going 10-6" that would be a statement rather a question. Anyone on here not work at McDonald's or Burger King? |
Kurylyk98 | 32 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kevmode: I disagree with you I believe the Nets have a chance to win it all next year. My concern is the bench and they also need a small forward to give Pierce plenty of rest. Nets were already a solid team without the additions. I don't see how teams are going to stop Lopez inside he is a monster down there. Nets will have the best starting 5 in the league but will their bench give them any production is the real question. I totally agree Kevmode. I'm over the Spurs now, was immature to blast your picks. I like the +1100 action on them on the futures now. I could see it dropping too as I think they'll get a couple good bench players soon. I think Pierce and Garnett still have a couple good years left. Pierce was injured last year too. As a Celtics fan though, I don't like the idea of completely blowing up the team. I hear Rondo is being shopped around now and I don't like that |
Mad_Skillz123 | 10 |
|
|
I think they could Miami a real run for their money. Granett will be still be a factor and Pierce was injured last year and had no elevation to his jump shot.
|
saigonbynight | 26 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.