like2betmore

Veteran

Posts: 1889

Member Since: November 2009

Status: Offline

About me:

Signature:

Filter Posts by:

Entries	Thread Author	Posts	Activity
replied to COVERS Motherfuckin' BLOODBATH in NFL Betting Covers bloodbath? Dont be dense. No one betting the farm on a double digit spread with a public favorite on the road. View Post \| View Thread	MDizzle23	16	October 25, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to FLACCO, SANCHEZ, RIVER won't ever WIN a SUPERBOWL in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by Dullivan: after seeing these sorry QB's makes u really appreciate how good Rodgers, Brady and Bree's are Brees is up and down with me. Even worst is the saints secondary. You have no idea which one shows up. I doubt marshawn lynch is that good of a RB. But thanks to the poor tackling in that playoff game that run will go down in history as one of the greatest run ever. View Post \| View Thread	ActionMagnet	32	October 25, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Ravens @ Jaguars IN GAME!!! in NFL Betting I stop trusting ravens offense after the jets game. It seemed like Flacco was lacking something. Then they had the bye week and the houston game he threw no touchdowns. Yes i know 50 50 hindsight but i personally didnt trust flaco so just avoided today game. View Post \| View Thread	ratherBgambling	1113	October 25, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Ravens @ Jaguars IN GAME!!! in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by bets2win: positive way to view it but with the Ravens just needing a SU Win, ya gotta be thinking this is a SURE WIN right??? I just hope he Hedged like 100 on Jax ML, which prolly paid 5-1 so youre lookin at ATLEAST +500.... I Hope!!! There no sure thing in professional sport. Why you play the game. I usually bet a nickel a game. I cant tell you how tempting it is just Money line a huge favorite and bet your life savings and make some seriousily dough. Just pull money from my 401k and IRA account bet 60,000 on ravens to just win. Payoff is 10,000 had ravens won. Thats a ridiculous return on a one day investment. It so easy and works like magic most week until you get f that is. Upsets happen all the time. View Post \| View Thread	ratherBgambling	1113	October 25, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to NFL TOTALS ACTION=>1PM=>4PM=>SNF=>MNF=>all right here in NFL Betting Some of you are idiots quit posting your plays if you dont agree. No one forcing his plays on you nor does anyone care for your opinion on his thread. If you want to voice your plays start your own thread. He is posting his plays for anyone that interested and a lot of us are. Anyone that been here long enough know how solid kalind totals are. I greatly appreciated kalind thoughts. If you think he is wrong then dont play his picks. View Post \| View Thread	kalind	449	October 02, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to SATURDAY EARLY GAMES 12:00 AM ESTRN in College Football Or better yet LSU might not even let Kentucky score View Post \| View Thread	Quantum_Leap	15	October 01, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to SATURDAY EARLY GAMES 12:00 AM ESTRN in College Football Sorry LSU not BAMA View Post \| View Thread	Quantum_Leap	15	October 01, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to SATURDAY EARLY GAMES 12:00 AM ESTRN in College Football Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap: Kentucky +31.5 @ LSU This line is absolutely retarded. LSU will not expose their best plays on defense and offense in a game they just need to suit up for and crack the pads then it's over. Game in hand? Yes. Blowout to the final whistle? The coaches of LSU, Alabama and Auburn make multi-millions because they are smart and know they have spies in their stadiums trying to figure out their go-to / bail us out plays. They try new schemes (because they have superior talent to do so). They don't care about the spread--THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR GAMBLING DOLLARS--so don't say it's a fix. The coaches hold back, and so do the players...and the linesmakers are trying to suck in your dollars trying to bet the obvious dominant FAVS. Taking the points here. Thats where we differ in opinion. Bama 2nd and 3rd string still very scary. Not to mention this is BCS football. How much you score base on who you play matters. So you score as much as you can you dont hold back. I think linemakers make these spread so high to intice players to bet on the dog. Too many factors involved to touch either side BOL. View Post \| View Thread	Quantum_Leap	15	October 01, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Houston down to -14.5,,,,that is down from -17 this AM in College Football Quote Originally Posted by yosemitesam: Houston Defense was the reason...this line went down to -14....and UTEP with an incredibly easy cover...never down more then 14 and never held back on offense...this HOUSTON DEFENSE really really stinks ... THEY CAN'T PLAY DEFENSE>>> I find that any team that cant play defense isnt worth more than a possession spread to win. Obviousily thats hindsight now but I would of gone with the over if I had to touch this game which I didnt. 66 is freaking high total in college. Clearly it wasnt high enough. A team that can score but cant stop anyone else from scoring. Too risky for a backdoor cover. View Post \| View Thread	yosemitesam	27	September 30, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Prime example of the uncertainty of college football tonight... in College Football Quote Originally Posted by Tappy: It may just be me, but it's pretty obvious that the best teams, did not win tonight, and the predicted spreads were waaaay off. This goes to show that you can't bet a game because a spread looks weird, you just have to go with what you know, and bet it. Houston, is statistically a far better team than UTEP. They were favored by 17, and should have covered that. They didn't... Why, I don't know? Same thing with Pitt... They played poorly against a Notre Dame team, and lost. Pitt played the same team, and won. Once again, statistically, USF was the better team, and clearly the better pick. Why they didn't cover, is once again beyond me. All you can do in situations like this is not let it effect your thought process... Go with what works, and don't change your methods. Sure, look into the reasons why your teams didn't cover, and learn from that, but don't swap what works, for what doesn't work. I have drank a lot of whiskey, and went 0-2 tonight, and those are my ramblings... Good night sirs. Please define best team? If all you look at is records then you might have to adjust how you cap games. You had two home dogs to begin with. Plus Houston did win. They didnt beat the spread. Isnt it more plausible for the away team to have a bad game rather than the home team. Do you not realize home field in football is a huge advantage. Do you not realize prior to tonight last 3 meetings Pitt/USF pitt is 3-0 means they know how to deal with Daniels. Also Pitt could of been easily 4-0 coming into tonight instead of 2-2. Guess you didnt see how close those games they lost were. Then what about the fact other than the upset week 1 USF pull off against ND they have only played cupcake teams. You might want to review how much info you really looked at before making an educated guess. View Post \| View Thread	Tappy	29	September 30, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to $64 parlay 6 for $9k it will happen. in College Football Quote Originally Posted by troy9828: U already lost on that pick ob 2nires gme Guess we know what side your on. View Post \| View Thread	davidnguyener	26	September 29, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to $64 parlay 6 for $9k it will happen. in College Football Quote Originally Posted by davidnguyener: you must have just started betting.. you got alotta of learning son.. What even more surprising is it says he been here since 2004. Do you not see MIch ST,Clemson,Auburn are dogs? Those are 3 very live dogs too. I wish you the best of luck 64 bucks to win 9k is nice. View Post \| View Thread	davidnguyener	26	September 29, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Very big source and sharp play out of Las Vegas, Nevada. in Website Promotions Quote Originally Posted by PropKing82: I have a connect in Las Vegas, and he specializes in NFL Totals. In the last 5 seasons when I get this play the record stands at 59-12. Last year in the NFL there were only 6 selections for a record of 6-0. This week he has a play that falls into this category. Fade of follow my friends, you'll happy that you did follow though. New York Jets/Baltimore Ravens Over 40 Wait till gametime it will drop. Thanks for the info. I usually like to bet against the public. This only adds more confidence to the bet. View Post \| View Thread	PropKing82	99	September 28, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to MNF in NFL Betting Thank god I didnt see this in time. BEE you are one of the few cappers I will follow blindly without question. Youve made me so much over the past two seasons already. Great call on GT with -6.5 that was a nice way to start Saturday. Even better was the OK St. I was all set to pull the trigger on A&M. Needless to say your post made me take OK St. What a great comeback that was. View Post \| View Thread	BigEastExpert	41	September 28, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to what are your week 4 "What the Hell?" opening lines? in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by Sareesataka: Actually, I didn't see the Lions-Vikings game, but I do know the Lions had to overcome a 20-0 deficit to win. The Vikings self-destructed in the 2H. The Lions appear to be a team that can capitalize on their opponent's mistakes, which is exactly what I am hoping they will continue do against the Cowboys (provided, of course, the Cowboys continue to make mistakes). The Cowboys are banged up right now, and it's going to be a huge test of their mettle going up against a team which seems to be hitting their stride. You might be right. Just offering other point of view. What I dont like is how the hell lions went scoreless the first half. Especially with the offensive power they have. Not even a FG. View Post \| View Thread	LeRinkRat	20	September 27, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Would this strategy work? in NFL Betting Betting 5000 to win 100 not too appealling if it gets to that point. I rather just bet 5000 once when I believe there a huge edge and go 1-0 the entire football season. View Post \| View Thread	Sopranoman27	25	September 27, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Why is everyone trying to call the upset? DALLAS gets an easy cover tonight. in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by RodWoman: Well, the guy has only 22 posts. Just getting warmed up, so Betmore, you are probably going to be reading a lot more of these short stories. Good kuck to you and Jack. We all had to start somewhere. Ive been around long enough. Ive seem them come and go. Im not saying he going to be the messiah of football. Yes maybe he will be a couple of post and after a month or so of losing he will quit. But what if he continues to have success or goes on a hot streak. Isnt his opinion going to be somewhat worthwhile while he is on this hot streak. At least appreciate the fact, he took the time and effort to do a writeup. I not trying to defend the guy. Just seems illogical that anyone would not welcome other people insight. Why are we at these forums? The guy has 22 posts??? He just started this month how many is he suppose to have? View Post \| View Thread	vegasjack2	29	September 27, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to NFL WEEK 4 in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by PapaShango: Sometimes people look too much into things. Skins are the correct bet IMO. BOL I just dont have a lean either way. Not to mention Ive been screwed more times than ive been right with that angle. Titans vs Jags week 1 prime example. I thought it was stupid to get rid of Garrard 6 days till gameday when he was the starting QB all preseason. Line moved from Titans being dogs to fav only to lose. Hell Fins vs Brown this week another prime example. Fins where dogs but if you got them near gametime they were favs. View Post \| View Thread	PapaShango	24	September 27, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to what are your week 4 "What the Hell?" opening lines? in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by Sareesataka: Detroit +1 +105 @ Dallas -1 -114, seems really off to me. The Cowboys looked disoriented against the Skins on MNF. They got away with a win, but if they continue to make those mistakes against the Lions, Stafford will steamroll right over them. Did you watch the Lions/Vikings game? Vikings went up 20-0. Before a complete breakdown the second half. Then again Cowgirls always seem to disappoint. I have no leans either way. There might be value in the Lions due to their shitty performance last week. Yes they won but they didnt cover. Especially against a team without a good QB. McNabb glory days are gone. View Post \| View Thread	LeRinkRat	20	September 27, 2011 View Post \| View Thread
replied to NFL WEEK 4 in NFL Betting Personally staying away from skins game. I expect the public will make them favorites before gametime. Which only feeds to my fear. Majority of team that end up crossing the zero due to public betting have lost. Whomever the oddmakers favor in the NFL startin lines less than 2.5 ends up winning. People are only going to remember how much the Rams got blown out last week. And how Skins cover against Dallas. View Post \| View Thread	PapaShango	24	September 27, 2011 View Post \| View Thread

About Us

Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials

Betting Guides

Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming

Sports Betting

US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps

Contests

Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools

The Covers community has

618,670

lifetime members worldwide

Join our community today

Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.

Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.

like2betmore Follow Follow Unfollow

like2betmore