lmontalv

Prospect

Posts: 118

Member Since: August 2011

Status: Offline

About me:

Signature:

Filter Posts by:

Entries	Thread Author	Posts	Activity
replied to Why does everyone think SF will beat Greenbay in NFL Betting I find it pretty sad that the GB backers are relying on the weather to be the determining factor in this game. SF has the better defense and will be running the ball against a poor defense overall. Having no Matthews is a big deal. Running the football and playing defense is the recipe for success in the playoffs. Kaepernick played his college ball at Nevada, it's not like that place is Fla St. The 9ers are going to run the ball down the throats of the GB defense and limit Rodgers' touches by doing so. GB doesn't have the horses to beat SF in GB or anywhere, that's why they're 0-3 vs Harbaugh in their last 3 meetings. View Post \| View Thread	jriv189	41	January 03, 2014 View Post \| View Thread
replied to STANFORD WILL GET SMOKED BY MICH ST. in College Football Have you not seen what the pac12 has been doing in bowl games? The Pac12 has basically dominated teams in the bowls.... 5-2 and one of those losses was Mike Leach brain farting with the game basically over... Pac12 is the 2nd best conference this year and you could argue top to bottom it's better than the SEC... The big 10 was not strong this past year at all.... Stanford will be the most physical team on both sides of the ball that Mich St has seen all year, without a doubt... Stanford probably has the most physical OL next to Bama in the country and they've perfected the art of holding and never get flagged for it... Mich St probably won't score more than 13 points in this game... View Post \| View Thread	pnutt	59	January 01, 2014 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Lane Kiffin says he is interested in the TEXAS job in College Football I'm interested in Bar Refaeli but that's not going to happen... Actually I have a better chnce of getting her than Lane Kiffen does of getting the Texas job.. View Post \| View Thread	StevenC	14	December 11, 2013 View Post \| View Thread
replied to THE GRIND III NCAA CBB 2013-14 '11- 51% '12 - 51% in College Basketball Might want to look at Mizzou, Nova, UCLA parlay... These teams are playing teams that will not be able to hang... Strongest play is nova, SC has not played a single quality opponent and 1 road game... Not to mention SC has no talent and this "run and gun" style is avg 72pts a game... View Post \| View Thread	uclalumnus	590	November 28, 2013 View Post \| View Thread
replied to THE GRIND III NCAA CBB 2013-14 '11- 51% '12 - 51% in College Basketball Quote Originally Posted by uclalumnus: USC +11 1 unit. Thats alot of points. OK Enfield, you talk a good game, here's your first real test vs Villanova. Ill bite. Cover you win me money, lose and SC looks bad. Win win. SC is horrible and will get run out of the GYM... Their whole lineup is D2 type players... Nova is going to run them... View Post \| View Thread	uclalumnus	590	November 28, 2013 View Post \| View Thread
created a topic Ucla vs. Stanford in College Football Well I'll start by saying I'm a ucla fan so you can take my assessment with a grain of salt. I can tell you that ucla has not really played up to its potential yet this year. Outside of the 2 quarters explosion ucla has been pretty ordinary offensively this year. But in saying that ucla is still amassing 600+ yds of offense and scoring over 40 pts a game. Defensively ucla has yet to allow a point scored in the 3rd quarter this year and something like 30 pts total in the 2nd Half. Also take into account of that 30 points allowed in the 2nd half 13 of those points allowed were when the 3rd stringers (bunch of true freshman) were playing. Personally I can see the why people will be all over Stanford, especially after they lost to Utah last week. What I think people are missing is the fact that this is not the same Stanford as last year. The spread up tempo offenses are moving the ball and scoring, ie Washington and Utah. Stanford is dinged up on the defensive side of the ball. Teams in the pac12 are making Hogan beat them and quite frankly Stanford is sorely missing guys like ertz and toilolo who provided hogan big mismatches. Don't forget that in the pac12 championship game @ Stanford last year, ucla was in control of the game until the last 4mins and had a chance to tie it but missed the fg. Stanford is not an intimidating place to play and there will be a huge ucla contingency there. I can guarantee you guys that ucla has had this game circled this year and Mora wil have these kids ready to play. It's going to be an interesting game but I do think you take the points and also the ml. I think a ml parlay of ucla, Utah and Udub is too good to pass up... Good luck on whatever ya do... View Post \| View Thread	lmontalv	1	October 17, 2013 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Kaepernick Crash Is Too Easy in NFL Betting I don't understand how people can rationalize that Atl has a good defense. They are 21st against the run and about to face a team that has more running looks than anybody (and now the pistol) in the NFL, run the ball EXTREMELY well behind probably the most physical running OL. Don't kid yourselves, the 9ers will run the ball down the throats of the falcons. If Atl wants to stack the box and run a cover 2 behind it Vernon Davis and the WRs are going to have a big day. It's not like every team doesn't try to stack the box against the 9ers. On offense if the 9ers don't get to Matt Ryan this game will be closer than it should. But what seattle couldn't do w/o Clemons, the 9ers with Smith & Smith will, and that's sack and hit Matt ryan all day. Atl will not be able to run the ball, haven't all year and they're not going to start now vs the best run def in the NFL. So it's going to come down to who can control the ball and clock, who do u think will be better at that? A team that can't run the ball vs a team that's one of the best in the league at stopping the run, or the team that's one of the best running teams in the nfl vs a team that's below average at stopping the run? Add that and factor in the coaches and how they prepare their teams. One guy that has his team in the nfc championship game 2x in his first 2 yrs as a head coach or a guy who's shown he just makes some bonehead calls? I'll bet Harbaugh over Smith everyday of the week and twice on sunday... on a side note, Kaepernick scored a 37 on the wonderlic, he isn't a dummy... View Post \| View Thread	BarrelledIn	93	January 16, 2013 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Pittsburgh at Mississippi..1 PLAY. 1 WINNER... WHO WANTS MONEY??? in College Football The 2 hottest cappers on this Board for bowl games have been Ted and CharlotteSports... The past 2 games Ted has had Oregon and A&M while Charlotte was on KSU and Okla.... View Post \| View Thread	tedwalsh7	36	January 05, 2013 View Post \| View Thread
replied to 1 PLAY. 1 WINNER. TEXAS A&M VS OKLAHOMA in College Football Brother.... u are tearing the cover off the ball this bowl season... appreciate the picks View Post \| View Thread	tedwalsh7	13	January 05, 2013 View Post \| View Thread
replied to JAN1,2012 BOWLS. made over 7k in last 3 days and im killen sides?? Do u want money.FOLLOW ME NOW!! in College Football Nice capping... I've been watching ur plays and they've been pretty much spot on... U and CharlotteSports are killing it... View Post \| View Thread	tedwalsh7	31	January 01, 2013 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Why did Pat Hayden endores Kiffin? in College Football No serious coach was going to look at SC while they're going thru their sanctions. Currently SC is only in year 1 of it's scholarship limitations and two more to go, so Lane Kiffen should be there for at least another year. On the bright side, SC will be even worse next yr and that may be the final straw to get Kiffen canned. View Post \| View Thread	Raiderpug	5	December 31, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Mizzou @ UCLA in College Basketball As a UCLA fan i saw this line and my eyes popped out of my head. UCLA shouldn't be laying points to anyone, and certainly not the #7 team in the country. UCLA just doesn't defend well and Missouri should score fairly often, I'm guessing the o150 should be the best bet. traditionally howland is tough when he has a week to prepare, but he just doesn't have athleticism on this squad to defend them effectively. UCLA does possess some firepower in Bazz, Adams and Anderson. My head says take Mizzou ml and the over... worth a 2 team parlay for me as an emotional hedge... View Post \| View Thread	TRAIN69	102	December 28, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to UCLA homecourt in College Basketball Here's my take as a UCLA fan. This current squad is not athletic and just aren't a very good defensive team. I do not think UCLA will be able to hang with Mizzou. My guess is the o150 should be a lay up. Missouri will score 80, i don't think ucla will be able to defend them for 40mins. The only thing UCLA has going for it is Howland is tough to beat with a full week to prepare. Personally I don't think it will matter. I just find it weird why Vegas put that line at UCLA -3 (unranked) vs the #7 team in the country. Knowing what i know, being an avid UCLA fan it seems too good to be true. My inclination is to take Mizzou ml and o150. View Post \| View Thread	Laroja	9	December 28, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to USC -3 at UCLA.....someone please tell me I'm an idiot for laying 90% of my bankroll on USC! Please in College Football Being a UCLA fan i would never bet ucla in this game, unless I was 100% confident, but i follow both teams pretty closely... My guess is the safest bet is the over... Both defenses are not that good and most likely the team that has it last wins... View Post \| View Thread	brthestar	35	November 15, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to BIGGEST UPSET THIS WEEK ???? WV LAST WEEK in College Football Quote Originally Posted by ac_bum: LSU THIS WEEK I'm with you on this one... this line is too fishy for me... #6 team in the country going to play a new SEC team with flashy offense and suspect defense and the line was only -3? i know Kyle field is one of the toughest places to play (lsu not as great away from home) and A&M played Florida tough but come on... Line is begging for LSU money.... Think the only bet here is A&M ML... problem is i'm too much of a puss to make the bet.. LOL View Post \| View Thread	ac_bum	23	October 19, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
created a topic Trevor Bauer... watch out for this kid... in MLB Betting AZ starting Bauer tomorrow against the Braves... This kid is straight up nasty... Kid has 7 pitches he can throw at anytime and hit 95+ on the gun... AZ is a live dog tomorrow.. View Post \| View Thread	lmontalv	12	June 28, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to JACKSON SHOT WAS GOOD....I SLOW PLAYED IT ON PVR in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by Lefty1981: this was probably my worst loss in a loooong time. but im not too disappointed. it would seem fishy at first, but considering the circumstances, there was only .8 seconds remaining. sjax caught the ball and took a step back before releasing. the shot left his hand before the buzzer. but im assuming theyre saying the clock didnt start in time. its murky situations like these where vegas steps in. because you can argue both ways it shouldve counted or it shouldnt have. public must have pounded the spurs 2nd half. it is what it is....$10K swing. instead if being up 6K i'm down 3K. The game was lost when HArden hit that last 3. Shoulda coulda woulda forced Thabo to be the hero instead. The issue is the buzzer doesn't signal the end of the game, it's the lights on the backboard... they went off while the ball was still on his fingertips... if you watch the clock behind the backboard not TNT's clock which was off by .1 secs you'll see... i had OKC +5 in the 2nd half and was shocked that the shot counted with .8secs left so i watched it on DVR... My boookie counted it as a loss but that will have to change... View Post \| View Thread	sullyconor	80	June 05, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to I FUCKEN LOVE YOU STEPHEN JACKSON!! in NBA Betting The problem is the buzzer doesn't signal the end of the game, it's the lights on the backboard... the issue is TNT's clock running by the score was off by .1 secs from the clock behind the backboard... The ball was still on SJax fingertips when the lights went off... that's why it was called off... View Post \| View Thread	need2cover	49	June 05, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to JACKSON SHOT WAS GOOD....I SLOW PLAYED IT ON PVR in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234: Can ANYBODY explain why the Spurs would call a timeout down 5 with .8 left??? Hmmm..... Just to shoot a 3.... How strange If you watch the replay which i did b/c i had the thunder +5, it's not the buzzer but the lights that determines the shot... the ball was still on his fingertips when the lights go off... just saying... TBS's clock was .1 secs slower that what was on the clock on the backboard... Just watched it again and the lights go off on the backboard when the ball was still on his fingertips... View Post \| View Thread	sullyconor	80	June 05, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Followed Kentucky Basketball For 30 Years... in College Basketball Quote Originally Posted by Yumdog: Probably apples and oranges but the '96 would have destroyed these guys? Who would be guarding Anthony Davis again? walter McCarty, pope or Nazr Mohammed? View Post \| View Thread	PizzaBoyRick	32	March 26, 2012 View Post \| View Thread

About Us

Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials

Betting Guides

Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming

Sports Betting

US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps

Contests

Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools

The Covers community has

618,670

lifetime members worldwide

Join our community today

Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.

Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.

lmontalv Follow Follow Unfollow

lmontalv