Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
WHAT |
BayArea342 | 20 |
|
|
yankees should still have enough firepower to win the series |
buffer | 13 |
|
|
lol |
maxwagers781 | 34 |
|
|
Scoring is suppressed again this year. Unders are 56% in all games and 57% in non-OT games. Maybe something to do with the play calling in the helmet of the QB |
Boisestateand8 | 28 |
|
|
5 trips into the red zone with 2fgs, awful stuff. Need to rerated SMU. |
PUSSYGALORE333 | 25 |
|
|
San Jose |
Raidernator76 | 51 |
|
|
That navy/temple total jumped off the page also, especially with Navy throwing the ball more. Hard to evaluate both teams at this junction of the season, with Temple turning it over 6 times and way outmatched against Oklahoma, but if they can contribute a bit like Bucknell did last week, I think the game should sail over. Up to 44 now. |
steponaduck | 55 |
|
|
GOGO JOE |
syracusejoe | 92 |
|
|
Awful stuff |
FastVegas | 131 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by steponaduck:
@Laroja San Jose State is a dead over team for me this year. Could not stop Sac. State until the late stages of the game (See my write up on action network for that one). I was on Jose -3 and doubled down when they were +305 live down 14-0...Jose took control in the second half and the final ended up being 42-24, but there could have been many more points. Sac state was stopped on downs at the 1 inch line, they also missed a FG, and also threw a pick at the SJSU 7 yard line. So while San Jose State did win and cover with relative ease, the turnovers prohibited this one from being even more high scoring. Sac rushed 41 times for 177 and while Navy Ken knows how to stop the option, San Jose state was up against a weaker and undersized Sac State and really did not get penetration or control the line of scrimmage until the later stages of the third. When Navy (SJSU Coach Ken Niamotulolo's old team, as everyone knows) would play AF/Army in the C-o-C games, there was much pomp and circumstance surrounding it, lots of pressure, and both sides would play keep away (service acadamy game unders 77% over 10 years) but SJSU is running the spread and shred this year, so no keep away to be found. I am concerned about AF running so poorly against Merrimack, so definately something to watch here, but I doubt AF will shut down the San Jose offense and whoever wins this will need to be at the 28 mark or so, so 28-21 or 28-24 seems reasonable in what should be quite a competitive game. I saw AF was stopped on downs in the redzone against Merrimack, missed Two FG's, and was in third down alot, so there is certainly cause for concern on the AF side. With the turnover of offensive personnel from last year to this year, they might have just needed a game to figure things out and really get some game reps, of which they can correct somethings for this week. Or not, and they are just really bad. Merrimack was 17/30 passing but for only 103 yards, that is shockingly low, not nearly the same passing attack that AF will see from San Jose State, but they were able to run it somewhat effectively on the AF defensive front 7. Really just expect airforce might have been holding back a bit in a game that they completely controlled vs. Merrimack (MU scored on the last play of the game to make the final 21-6).
That's great insight there, I'll need to look more into it but it makes sense completely. Although I do remember some people liking Sac State last week against SJSU; the SJSU TT could also be worth a look here. |
steponaduck | 55 |
|
|
San Jose St/ AF over 45.5
very interesting play, expecting a similar score to last year? |
steponaduck | 55 |
|
|
1-3
GSU+20 Hawaii/UCLA over 53 Clem/Georgia over 48.5 |
Laroja | 8 |
|
|
OH MY GOODNESS |
Digital_Media | 3 |
|
|
OVER HITS MY BROTHASA |
bkingsrep | 32 |
|
|
TCU/STANFORD OVER 59.5 |
Laroja | 8 |
|
|
That is a joke bro, you got scammed. |
GMoneyGTown | 15 |
|
|
Fun game, real old school. |
Greeceman | 36 |
|
|
0-3, was a disaster as all bets were correlated lol. Was way off. Got 1-2 more plays on deck soon. |
Laroja | 8 |
|
|
If Taylor is healthy and playing, then Minn looks really good. Best player on Minn and prob best player on the field. |
LB_Dirtbags | 71 |
|
|
over 50.5 seems quite interesting, im seeing 50% of showers but low wind. Weather is fine. |
LB_Dirtbags | 71 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.