Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Just wanted to stop back in and hope all is well. I have been off the forum for awhile but not of course off picking the ponies. Anyway just so excited for Sports Betting to come to my home track Oct 26th. I needed to rejoice!!
|
Mkuhi | 2 |
|
|
So im trying to go to the sugar bowl. I dont know though if its worth 550 for top tier seats on stub hub. Couple questions and any insight appreciated. Wondering if the price could drop and I buy them on stub hub closer to game date.or thetr is a thing call teamtix. I pay for the right to buy a ticket at face value. Wondering if anyone ever tried it. This led me wondering if anyone had insight who is going to make the college football playoff. Should I take a sec team or could it be Oregon. I dont know if team tix is worth it or if I should justbite the bullet and get top tier seats from stub hub. Dont know if this make sense but appreciate any help.
|
Mkuhi | 3 |
|
|
Peyton looking legit |
165yds | 27 |
|
|
My gut really makes me think that Luck has matured even more. Peyton is clutch but if the Colts are going to gel and become competitive again this is the team they have to do it against. Public is all over Peyton's nuts, and last years perceptions still have not adjusted. Vegas starts Sunday night off right. But the math is good. |
165yds | 27 |
|
|
Hope your doing well mstrH. Havent been on in awhile.
|
mstrH | 12 |
|
|
how degen is it to try the ML?
|
165yds | 27 |
|
|
Extremely glad I only had one unit on this one and still was intense. Upset I almost live bet Kentucky plus 4 coulda won both bets. Anyway much respect Jen. Wins a wi .
|
JFen31 | 54 |
|
|
My initial lean is the bengals. Anyone have any more insight?
|
Mkuhi | 1 |
|
|
They are on a mission. Senior qb lighting it up with senior wr. Defense is suspect so can always bet the over but I am confident they get the win.
|
Mkuhi | 2 |
|
|
I'm nor here to bash but hopefully you learned not to post like that again. I've said some stupid stuff here on covers but your last posts are just excuses. Some poor sucka may have just lost outright and had no idea about 2nd half plays and u parlaying nadal. For petes sake you put your tennis play in a thread that was suppose to make me a grajd in cfb. Comeon man.
|
Kelly_Slater | 110 |
|
|
I should have bet the rams team total under. And seattle is better the only problem is they were not 13 pts better especially with the two o tackles out. I bet the hawks but once the game started knew I waa in trouble. Great gameplan by rams d. 8 in the box and make wilson pasd which he could not with the amt of pressure they put on him.
|
Mkuhi | 9 |
|
|
Really bad logic yesterday. Hindsight for me is I should have bets ram team total under..I knew they would struggle to score. Anyway it got me thinking cuz I read this theory here year ago. What do people think about the flip flop of sunday/monday night game. If fav covers sunday dog covers monday. I remember reading about it. Wondering if any stats on it.
|
Mkuhi | 9 |
|
|
Agreed, I thought I learned some things and I have, but I still could not lay off the Hawks last night. I paid for it, but hopefully I just remember next time.
Good handicapping could have gotten you to choose the Rams without tons of discussion about line movement and rigged Vegas. The Rams D is no slouch, their front 8 is legit and the cornerbacks matched up well against seahawks. I did not realize the two O tackles for Seahawks were out because that changed the game tremendously. In hindsight I realize the best bets on the board were the Under and the Rams team total under at 14.5. I knew the Rams would struggle to put up points, I did not realize that the Seahawks would struggle as tremendously also.
|
Thesicilian0ne | 21 |
|
|
o yeh and cheers good pick to all Rams bettors . Games like these are what have taught me some sort of bankroll management.
|
cropduster | 44 |
|
|
I'm going to eat some of my words and apologize that I was blinded by the backup qb scenario. I knew Kellen Clemens was familiar with the Rams offense and that made me pay ( I did not however have as big of a wager on this game 80 in hawks, 220 on packers)
However, The only thing I hate about covers though is that people just post a pick with no evidence backing up reasons why. For this example, I did not realize both O Tackles were out for the Seahawks. I knew the Rams D was good but did not realize much about Quinn, who made the Seahawks offense really terrible. However again, that is my own fault in doing so little handicapping on the game and just playing by "feel". Again though I apologize for not the greatest sounding logic. But I did not think this game was a lock, but yeah it seems these are the games where Vegas lays the smacketh down.
|
cropduster | 44 |
|
|
Giants have to learn how to score TDs before that happens. Save your money and just pick your spots. Giants probably lose to Packers and Cowboys
|
darrel69 | 11 |
|
|
Hindsight the under or rams team total under best bet tonight. I had a feelings rams would not score td
|
Mkuhi | 3 |
|
|
So I said it was seahawks or a pass play for me and it looks like I should eat my words. The play did seem way to easy. I can admit when I am wrong and where not deep enough handicapping can get a casual player in trouble. I did not know both Seahawks tackles were out. I did know Kellen Clemens had played under Rams Offensive Coordinator for a long time and it was why I did not make a huge bet on the seahawks. Anyway I was wrong and will respect other opinions much more on covers as I did like the Hawks. Anywho I feel as if I learn from this mistake it will be good for me in the long run to have this experience under my gambling belt. GOOD JOB ALl rams bettors tonight...it was the sharp play |
Mkuhi | 3 |
|
|
My only thing about hedging is why add the final leg if your just going to hedge it anyway
|
jeff356us | 31 |
|
|
These rams backers better pray clemens isn't rusty....haven't you been watching...these backup qbs this year having tough time..look at bucks vikings..I'm hoping for a jags san fran scenario...42 to 10
|
FollowTheLine | 27 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.