Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Appreciate your stuff Bob....passed altogether on the Nats/Balt. Saved me some change. Angels +1.5 -110 locked for tmro already, might lay some on the under as well.
|
BirdsOnBat | 49 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by URZ262: sigh maybe you shouldn't post if you are going to quote streaks as a basis for your decisions. I can find a trend in any game that will back my opinion just by deciding what length of time I want to look at. If you are basing your handicaps on what someone has done over x amount of time, how about looking at their counterpart for the same amount of time, or better yet, for the same amount of time vs similar opponents. Roark and Guasman are ROOKIES! Neither has enough sample size to determine what their true numbers are. Roark pitched vs Philly, Cincy, and Philly again while they were possibly the worst batting orders in the majors at that time he faced them. Guasman throws 97mph, Roarke throws 88. 97 is way above average velocity, 88 is way below. Gausman has a better arm. The stats will not tell you who is better because there is not enough sample lol maybe you shouldnt post if you are going to use velo as the base to determine who the "better" pitcher is...97 mph doesn't mean sh*t if you cant' spot it, 88 with movement and the ability to put it where you want holds way more value than a young live arm..... I am still learning how to bet baseball and baseball is a streaking sport no matter how talented or dominate you are....why wouldn't you use them as a starting point to determine a side especially when the sample size is so small.. |
BirdsOnBat | 49 |
|
|
Balt..? wow.... Roark giving up only 4 ER in last 28 innings....Gausman has had some rough starts against quality offenses. What am I missing my man, because I had Nats at the top of my list today.
|
BirdsOnBat | 49 |
|
|
Not to mention the rest of the community on here who have no thoughts or opinions and b*tch and hate when they lose....lol.
|
Jdogg44 | 49 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Jdogg44: SPORTSFAN you are a clown bro, 17 hits and 10 WALKS in the game....bases were juiced 3 different times before the 9th inning. total over should have hit easily. give credit when credit is due, regardless of the angle. or just go f*ck yourself... Good hit JDOGG, I played a few years myself...ended with a PCL tear in high A. GL Noday Thanks for having my back.. Sorry to hear about your injury. I had tommy john and I'm one of few that my recovery didn't go so well. I see most of these guys on here no NOTHING about baseball and just talk and try and start arguments with people. Like you for example by what you said I can tell you know the game. There were so many stranded runners in the game it was insane... 2 nice catches to one by elsbury and one by rasmus A lot of stat monkeys and programming geeks that rely solely on numbers and rarely ever provide legit human elements to a prediction, and when they do more often than not makes little or no sense....most of which don't even watch the games, have never played beyond their years as a back-up infielder in high school... and overvalue thier query's of statistics that go back years and years that have no relevance to the current situations or match-ups...IMO. However, some of these guys have stuck around for a reason and know things that are not easily seen to the average baseball bettor (numbers wise). I try to couple this information with my own personal knowledge and experience to find the best possible spot to make a wager. If only I had more patience...the math side and lack of patience is where I fall short and is the reason I still look to a few on here to add info. |
Jdogg44 | 49 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by SportsFan9698: Yes you capped this game to have 5 runs in the 9th lol even a blind squirrel finds a nut now and then SPORTSFAN you are a clown bro, 17 hits and 10 WALKS in the game....bases were juiced 3 different times before the 9th inning. total over should have hit easily. give credit when credit is due, regardless of the angle. or just go f*ck yourself... Good hit JDOGG, I played a few years myself...ended with a PCL tear in high A. GL |
Jdogg44 | 49 |
|
|
Correction:
STARTING BANKROLL: $5,000 CURRENT BANKROLL: $4,140 2H RECORD: 9-13-2 |
NoDayButToday | 14 |
|
|
PICKS 7/22/14 :
1-4-1: Strange day in baseball yesterday ALL PLAYS ARE $200 DODGERS (BECKETT) -110: -220 TIGERS F5 -130: PUSH CARDS F5 RL -115: -230 DODGERS F5 U4 -110: -220 LATE ADD: ANGELS F5 U5 -120: +200 A's F5 O3.5: -230 -$700.... STARTING BANKROLL: $5,000 CURRENT BANKROLL: $4,140 2H RECORD: 9-13-1 PICKS 7/23/14 Going to try and narrow my range starting today, I've been playing too many hands. GL INDIANS (BAUER) F5 -130 INDIANS (BAUER) -130 INDIANS (BAUER) -1.5 +125 Better pitching, offense and team overall at a decent price. Twins haven't seen Bauer, confident he sets his team up for success once again and ships the series. PIRATES (LIRIANO) -140 Dodgers can't hit lefties, absolutely dog sh*t vs. lefties. If Liriano controls his stuff long enough, Pit. should roll it easy. |
NoDayButToday | 14 |
|
|
LATE ADD:
ANGELS F5 U5 -120 A's F5 O3.5 |
NoDayButToday | 14 |
|
|
PICKS 7/22/14
ALL PLAYS ARE $200 DODGERS (BECKETT) -110 TIGERS F5 -130 CARDS F5 RL -115 DODGERS F5 U4 -110 |
NoDayButToday | 14 |
|
|
PICKS 7/21/14: 2-1 +230
GIANTS(VOG)/PHILL(LEE) U7.5 -120: -240 (doh!) WHITE SOX (SALE) RL +120: +240 NATIONALS RL +115: +230 STARTING BANKROLL: $5,000 CURRENT BANKROLL: $4,840 2H RECORD: 8-9-1 PICKS 7/22/14 DODGERS (BECKETT) -110 (line will only get worse jmo) |
NoDayButToday | 14 |
|
|
STARTING BANKROLL: $5,000
CURRENT BANKROLL: $4,610 2H RECORD: 6-8-1 ALL PLAYS ARE $200 PICKS 7/21/14 GIANTS(VOG)/PHILL(LEE) U7.5 -120 WHITE SOX (SALE) RL +120 NATIONALS RL +115 |
NoDayButToday | 14 |
|
|
7/20/14: 2-1 +$230
F5: RAYS F5 -140: +200 REDS F5 +110: -200 ADD: RAYS -1.5 +115: +230 STARTING BANKROLL: $5,000 CURRENT BANKROLL: $4,610 2H RECORD: 6-8-1 ALL PLAYS ARE $200 PICKS 7/21/14 GIANTS(VOG)/PHILL(LEE) U7.5 -120 |
NoDayButToday | 14 |
|
|
PICKS: 7/20/14
F5: RAYS F5 -140 REDS F5 +110 ADD: RAYS -1.5 +115 |
NoDayButToday | 14 |
|
|
Yesterday: 2-3-1
FG: ROYALS +110: -200 ASTROS EV: -200 NATS -130: +200 F5: ROYALS F5 -110: Push ASTROS F5 -110: -220 NATS F5 -130: +200 STARTING BANKROLL: $5,000 CURRENT BANKROLL: $4,380 2H RECORD: 4-7-1 ALL PLAYS ARE $200 PICKS: 7/20/14 F5: RAYS F5 -140 REDS F5 +110 |
NoDayButToday | 14 |
|
|
.....Calm down big guy, I just use it because its easier than noting "record after break" everyday, since that's when I decided to start posting all plays to keep better records. Once again appreciate the precise info tho. STILL LEARNING!! Good Luck
|
KeyElement | 19 |
|
|
STARTING BANKROLL: $5,000
CURRENT BANKROLL: $4,600 2H RECORD: 2-4 PICKS: 7/19/14 ALL PLAYS ARE $200 FG: ROYALS +110 ASTROS EV NATS -130 F5: ROYALS F5 -110 ASTROS F5 -110 NATS F5 -130 |
NoDayButToday | 14 |
|
|
Yesterday: 2-4 -$400
FG: GIANTS/MARLINS U7.5 -120: -240 BRAVES -1.5 +140: +280 INDIANS/TIGERS U8.5 -120: -240 MARINERS +130: -200 F5:(first five innings) Mariners +120: -200 TT: ANGELS U4 runs -115: +200 BANKROLL: $4,600 2H RECORD: 2-4 PICKS: 7/19/14 ALL PLAYS ARE $200 FG: ROYALS +110 ASTROS EV Most likely will add F5 on both games in the am as well. |
NoDayButToday | 14 |
|
|
*WARNING* NOT A PROFESSIONAL, FOLLOW WITH CAUTION*
I'm posting to keep more accurate records and to help with my discipline. All criticism is welcome, would love to continue learning from you all. BANKROLL: $5,000 2H RECORD: 0-0 *ALL WAGERS ARE $200* PICKS: 7/18/14 *WAY OVEREXTENDING TODAY* I know.. FG: GIANTS/MARLINS U7.5 -120 BRAVES -1.5 +140 INDIANS/TIGERS U8.5 -120 MARINERS +130 F5:(first five innings) Mariners +120 TT: ANGELS U4 runs -115 Will try and post notes and where my head is at when I can, GOOD LUCK to everyone. |
NoDayButToday | 14 |
|
|
*Price (-170) @ 4/17/2014 vs. Yankees: 5 IP, 10 H, 6 earned runs...My favorite pick on the board today was Yankees TT over 3.5 runs.
Interested in write-up, still might have to skip this game, GL. |
KeyElement | 27 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.