Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
There was a story a few months ago that Covers had changed owners.
And one out today that John Kelly the guy running EOG, is coming here as a manager. Anybody know anything of this?
|
PaddyMacR | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TheGoldenGoose: Calvin Ayer strikes again. He's calling himself Calvin Wilson now.
|
JerseyGazo | 8 |
|
|
Apparently this is where Bovada CS and processing was being run out of. May explain your problems. Hopefully not permanent.
It's never a good idea to have your money where the police are taking away computers and data and the guy running the show is using a phony name and is whereabouts unknown. Sorry, here's the link... If you want to know how bad it is, have a look at this. The guys listed on the right include the guys who were running things. Calvin tried to pull a Kazootek on them and it seems they had better friends in the Phillippine police than Cal did, and it all went to garbage from there. The upshot is that the company you are looking to get your money from is chasing 17 people for a $700 used scooter bought in 2009. It doesn't get much more desperate than that. |
cowboys811 | 8 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by cowboys811: Has anyone had any problems with payouts, the phones have been down for like a week now.. figured it may be the tsunami or something? I had a good chunk of change on there and i just received a check not too long ago with no problems but this was before the phone lines went down? Any insight would be appreciated We're a little behind here at Covers. Police raided the Bodog setup in Manila about 10 days ago. Looking for Calvin, but he wasn't found. He would have been arrested if he was. Here's the link... MANILA, Philippines – Police raided the Makati office of an online gambling billionaire, considered one of America’s most wanted, but failed to arrest him, an official has said. Calvin Edward Ayre, a Canadian businessman, is facing illegal gambling charges in the US, said Senior Superintendent Roberto Fajardo, chief of the Crime Investigation and Development Group-National Capital Region (CIDG-NCR). CIDG elements raided Ayre’s office around 3:30 p.m. on Thursday at the 22nd floor of the Enterprise Tower. Ayre, however, was not in his Makati office and Fajardo told INQUIRER.net that they have yet to confirm to Bureau of Immigration if Ayre has left the country. He was said to have operated call centers or Business Process Outsourcing firms while taking illegal casino and sports bets from international clients. Fajardo said in a phone interview that Ayre’s offices, two more at the RCBC building in Makati and Eton Building in Quezon City, were granted permits to operate by the Security Exchange Commission. Ayre, who used the false name “Calvin Wilson” while in the country, was listed in the US Department of Homeland Security as most wanted for illegal gambling and money laundering charges. The 52-year-old businessman is the founder of Bodog Entertainment Group, an online-based sports betting and casino games. American business magazine Forbes said Bodog is one of the world’s biggest online gambling firms with total winnings of $100 million as of 2012. Fajardo said the CIDG has seized gadgets and computer units the office used for taking illegal gambling bets. The CIDG-NCR chief added that they were still waiting for the assistance of the Anti-Cybercrime Group to conduct the forensic investigation on the seized items. He added that Ayre was also facing separate charges of rape and kidnapping for ransom in the country. On February 22 last year, the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland served Ayre an arrest warrant on charges of illegal gambling and money laundering. According to early reports, aside from Ayre, also indicted were James Philip, David Ferguson and Derrick Maloney as fellow website operators. A few days after, Ayre’s online gambling website bodog.com was shut down by US Department of Justice and US Immigrations and Customs Reinforcement Homeland Security Investigations. . . |
cowboys811 | 8 |
|
|
Oh, sleep deprivation, is it. Eyes are shot at the end of day and I thought it said "Sheep deprivation".
Christ, I thought, we have a lonely Scotsman here tonight.
|
searchwarrant | 43 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by SwishSwish1234: Slob hit the nail on it's head, The only people that care about this are women and the brigade, Over here all of my male friends haven't mentioned a word about it. Caring about a royal family member? No thanks, Now if this had been Beckham's kids I might have given a crap, He at least earned his way to the top. Beckham, an Englishman, was a great crosser of the ball and dead ball player. Scholes, another Englishman, had great vision and passing and was a fabulous goal taker when given the opportunity. Giggs was a magical Welshman who could twist the blood of defenders. All three were part of the greatest midfield soccer has ever seen. But the steel heart of that midfield beat in the chest of a Corkman. Who, as they whisper in the pubs around Cobh, is the real father of the wee Prince George. |
BAMA62 | 23 |
|
|
replied to
New member - I'm having problems getting paid from a sportsbook, can Covers help?
in Gaming Industry - US Quote Originally Posted by esplanade: My guess is Wagerweb. I just got paid today from Playersonly...it took 10 weeks. I'm sure Covers will help you though, just ask all the people who got help from Lou and Freedom on Beted (I mean had money stolen through a dubious association between Covers and Beted). Haven't been here for about a year. It's a rainy day in the Northwest Territories and I think to meself, I'll drop in to Covers if I can remember my password. What do I find? You, Esplanade, still friggin whining about BetEd. Get off the pot, man. Wipe your arse, stand up, pull your knickers up, flush, and stride forth into the world like a man, not some sniveling little sniveller. I say this as a friend.
|
wannabe_winner | 35 |
|
|
replied to
What could an unarmed USA do if their government became tyrannical?
in General Discussion
Here's how I see it.
You look at the video of Tower 7. You agree it looks just like a controlled demolition. You know that never before in history has a steel building collapsed from fire. Tower 7 wasn't hit by an aircraft, it was only struck a glancing blow from debris from Tower 1 falling. Buildings which Tower 1 hit directly didn't collapse. Knowing all this, you believe that Tower 7 wasn't destroyed by controlled demolition. Because...if you believe that, then you also believe that Towers 1 and 2 weren't brought down by controlled demolition also, even though they are both picture perfect examples of controlled demolitions. Why do you believe this? Because you believe in an America in which that could never happen. A fairy tale America. If anybody in fairy tale America uses their guns to begin some sort of half assed revolt, the tyrannical government won't need the military or the police. As long as the people who believe Tower 7 fell down because of some desks burning and the paper in the photocopy cabinets flaming up, the tyrannical government can count on those people to gun down the people who revolt. Why would they take the guns away? |
TheFootball77 | 46 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69: An Iceberg? Really? Why no video? Where is the iceberg now? Ice vs steel....what do you think is gonna win? Why weren't there enough lifeboats for everyone? Of course the captain went down with the ship.....one less weak link...... Conspiracy!!!!! The Cocksucker's Fallacy, in action.
|
TRAIN69 | 110 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BMA: Apparently, then, such distinguished Americans as these NIST experts got together in some smoky back room and all of them agreed, for some ungodly reason, to do the most dishonourable deed imaginable-give organized crime, the CIA, the military-industrial complex, or whoever was behind the 9/11, a free pass in the murder of citizens of United States. You are engaging in what is commonly referred to as "The Cocksucker's Fallacy". It is a highly disreputable tactic of argument. You create an absurd version of your opponents theory, and then demand that he justify that version, which isn't his version at all. And then you declare yourself the winner. You're a fairly stupid person, BMA. Alone you are insignificant, but when millions of peckerwoods like you add up, you prevent the truth being found out because people want to believe the total horseshit that you are spouting.
|
dogunder | 599 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BMA:
And in the process, not only risk destroying everything they had worked for-their reputation and legacy to their families-but expose themselves to prosecution for the crime of accessory after the fact to murder. Ask yourself this: would any of these investigators, for instance, risk being remembered as an accessory after the fact to the murder of this nation's citizens, one who disgraced himself his country. Of course they would. Criminals take these risks every day. What's the matter with you. The mere asking of the question demonstrates the absurdity of the thought. No it doesn't. It demonstrates the absurdity of your denial. |
dogunder | 599 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by dogunder: Anyone who watches the buildings collapse and then concludes it was not a result of demolition is a fucking invalid. That's not the most intellectual way of saying it, but yes, you have stated the essential truth. What I find so amazing is the absolute vehemence with which these people resist anyone commenting on the very obvious evidence that the official story is untrue. I mean, what the fuck stake do they have in trying to deny the truth? Tower 7 came down from controlled demolition. Arabs did not fly those jetliners into those buildings. They may have been on board, but they did not remotely have the flying skills to take an aircraft down from cruising altitude and navigate to the targets and fly into them. Something very different was involved in that. There is no need to make any argument beyond that. No need to solve the case, lay it all on the government. Simply establish those two points above. Never mind NIST, Bildenberger group, the freemasons, all of that shit. That merely confuses the issue. If you establish the two points above, and see what your government does in the face of that, you are at the only truth that matters. If you feel the need to argue this with big letters and big red letters, you, my friend, are a fucking idiot. I'm sorry, but that is the simple unpleasant truth.
|
dogunder | 599 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Canada_Chris: What are you trying to get out of this thread? What's the point of debating this? You're mind is clearly made up and cant't be changed, as is ours. We just have differing opinions. You Shared your thoughts, we listened. The end. I'm just curious, Chris. You live in Canada, and you believe the Arabs with boxcars conspiracy theory? |
dogunder | 599 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799: Dog and Paddy. Get out of your parents basement. Hop in your Ford Pinto and take this act on the road. Go speak in public and I am sure you will find a few more youtube converts Fuck you. My parents are dead. I'm 64 years old, with bachelors and master's degrees in business. I'm an airline transport pilot and a college lecturer in business. What about you?
|
dogunder | 599 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3: OK let's look at this "evidence" from YouTube... 1. 0:01: First off, this guy narrating sounds like a giant dork. Just want to get that out of the way. 2. 0:25: This about melted aluminum being silver and not glowing? The "evidence" is nothing more than a random ass photograph that could be ANYTHING. Also, the "experiment" that the photograph shows which claims aluminum doesn't luminesce in daylight... gee, that photo sure shows what appears to be an experiment that was done INSIDE a building, no? Hard to tell what "daylight" does to something when you are comparing it to non-natural light sources such as those found within buildings. 3. 1:09: What a great source, LOL -- quote is attributed to unnamed "reporter with rare access to the debris at ground zero". Sounds legit. 4. 1:14: Another legit source, some dude named "Burger" 5. 1:36: Who the hell is "Fuchek"? Hahahahaha this would be seriously laughable if people didn't believe this crap. 6. 2:06: More unnamed sources, this time "firemen and hazardous materials experts." 7. 2:35: Are we surprised that engineers, welders, people who work with steel etc. have never seen the level of destruction or deformation of this material in our lives? Because there were oh so many instances of fully fueled planes crashing into skyscrapers before 9/11? 8. 3:00: A president of some controlled demolition company is quoted to the "American Free Press" as saying there were spots of molten steel. What is the American Free Press? I'd never heard of it so I looked. Take a look at its Wiki page. Nothing like having racist and Holocaust denying publications as a source -- yay hate groups! I'll tackle the rest when I get back from some errands... can't wait to hear more paranoid ramblings. You are a fucking idiot even when a person is completely calmed down. In fact, the more anyone calms down, the more obvious it is you are a fucking idiot.
|
dogunder | 599 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799: Thanks Dog! This means a lot coming from someone like you who post videos from Islamic groups as gospel. It means a lot from someone like you who claims the government is evil and controlling while you want to jail people who don't agree with you. If someone does not have the same opinion as you fucks! There a few guys in history who thought like you. Adolf. Benito. Josef You sick fucks who believe youtube videos as being 100 percent factual are beyond help You're a fucking idiot. You have to refer to your betters as "sick fucks" and claim that YouTube videos which DO present facts about 9/11 aren't factual. Fuck you.
|
dogunder | 599 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by halofan: Sorry, I think you're confusing me with someone who would get involved in an internet argument with a mouthy Taig. I know you're an internet tuff guy, I can tell by the way you call everyone a fukkin idiot that doesn't agree with you, it really is so scawy. Why was it sad about Lenny Murphy? His job was done although why he didnt eradicate more filth is beyond me. Dont for get to call me a fukkin idiot when you reply tuff guy. No, I'm not confusing you for that. I have you exactly figured out. For what it's worth, I'm not a Catholic either. When I call someone a fucking idiot, you can take it to the bank that person is a fucking idiot. Certified. There's nothing "internet tuff guy" about that. I am simply stating a fact. Why would it be "scawy"? You're in your ghetto housing, you're sitting there in front of your stolen laptop, your IQ only marginally exceeding the number of skidmarks in your 10 day old knickers, 5 day old Kraft dinner still in a pot on the stolen picnic table on your concrete patio, what have you to fear? Now, as for Lenny, I'm going to first of all explain who Lenny was to the many people who don't know. Lenny Murphy was the ringleader of the Shankill Butchers, These were beyond question the most cowardly pieces of shit that claimed to represent the Loyalist side in the 30 odd years of murder in Northern Ireland. Murphy was a murderous psychopath. He and his gang murdered innocent people, mostly Catholics, after torturing them and in most cases slitting their throats. He was executed by two members of the IRA after his own side fed the IRA the information needed to plan the execution. Now, to put this in the context of this thread. You stand up, in an arsewise way, for those who really stand for murderers like the Shankill Butchers, writ large. The people who have evaded justice so far for the killing of over 3,000 people on 9/11. The people you stand up for, the fucking idiots you try to defend, have escaped justice so far. They can do so because of the endlessly yapping chihuahuas of the official conspiracy theory. I take a special interest in attacking those box on here. You scratch your balls, make sure you've spelled Taig right, and come on here like you're some hero riding to their defence. You're not. You're a nobody, in front of a stolen laptop in shitstained underwear trying to make a post or two that gives you some cred. There's a lot of smart people on Covers, despite the children like you. They don't need me to tell them that you are one cowardly bigoted box that would be despised by 95% of the good Loyalist/Unionist people of the North. But I will anyways, because it is in my nature. The RUC didn't bring Lenny Murphy to justice, the IRA did. It may take something like that to bring these murdering cocksuckers in the US to justice as well. As for calling you a fucking idiot, you're going to really have to raise your game to even merit that title. Right now, you're just some fuck in the ass goof. And I say that quite calmly. Very very calmly.
|
dogunder | 599 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799: Yes BMA! Stop that. You need to go to youtube! It is the GOSPEL of credibilty! Ask Dog. He posted vids from Islamic groups and said they were as real as real can get! So stop it BMA! Youtube is the place! Fuck off. There are many other things that could be said to a poptart like you, but Fuck off will do for now. At least you'll get the meaning of it. |
dogunder | 599 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by halofan: Love the way you seem to think your asinine arguments can somehow be enhanced if you call people f'kin idiotys and twats. Well, it provides a starting point. My argument is that Tower 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition. It's up to where you go from there. But there is no doubt Tower 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition. Which, you thick bollox, would have to have been in the building prior to the attack. So I hope that is of assistance to you. You must be a relative of Lenny Murphy. Sad about Lenny, no? |
dogunder | 599 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Randisist: Didn't djbrow respectfully asked you to "Please calm down on the language in the names. "? It is quite calm, given what it is the subjects are trying to do. |
dogunder | 599 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.