Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
I think this may be a good HT play. If Indy is within 3-4 points at HT, I think Indy plus any points will be a solid HT play. Gotta see how Richardson does against the Detroit defense first.
GL to all! |
jdukes0004 | 7 |
|
|
I have been on the Mac train for a few weeks now. Choo Choo!! |
Macwestie1 | 48 |
|
|
@pavaman58 Mac cant be 0-4 this week. Mac is already 1-0.
|
Macwestie1 | 48 |
|
|
Why did this post remind me of a certain political candidate's speech? |
jasondemz | 5 |
|
|
replied to
What ever you like “ Tease with Tampa Bucs and thank me later - Giants are a train wreck w QB Jones exit
in College Football @topcatt89_OLD_11887 He has to get one right sooner or later, right?
:) |
RayRayK | 6 |
|
|
|
Macwestie1 | 35 |
|
|
Can someone explain why you would kick a FG on 3rd and 10 instead of taking another shot at a TD from the 10-yard line that would take less than 5 seconds? I understand they were down and needed an onside kick .... but 3rd down FG? I played the under 39.5 at HT so I am not complaining .... but dang. |
RSampsell | 6 |
|
|
replied to
***Macwesties * Thur. Nov. 07, 2024 * NFL * Week #10 * TNF * Football Play***
in NFL Betting Jumping on the @Macwestie1 bandwagon starting tonight. I have a gut feeling they are fixing to go on a run
I can feel it in my gambling bones! |
Macwestie1 | 35 |
|
|
I quit betting on Kansas City after MaHomes slid at the 5-yard line on a for-sure TD late in a game last year that would have covered.
I understand it was a "strategy" to run out the clock, but it still hurt.
|
Interstellar | 11 |
|
|
@Bitcoin777 Calm down Diddy! |
Bitcoin777 | 2 |
|
|
@the1toturn2 I am not the only one reporting this on the forum. Apparently, it is a pre-game glitch on the KOC contest |
Rowdie22 | 14 |
|
|
Covers have already given winners to Houston and the under I bet its a glitch ... Houston is Technically ahead getting 2.5 and the under is 42 in a 0-0 game
I am sure they will have it corrected after the game is finished |
RSampsell | 1 |
|
|
I bet its a glitch ... Houston is Technically ahead getting 2.5 and the under is 42 in a 0-0 game |
Rowdie22 | 14 |
|
|
I bet its a glitch ... Houston is Technically ahead getting 2.5 and the under is 42 in a 0-0 game |
RSampsell | 3 |
|
|
They already have my Jets pick a loss .... plus the under as a winner |
Rowdie22 | 14 |
|
|
Checking out some other members picks: Cover has Houston as a win and the under a winner.
And I like the Jets and over. |
RSampsell | 3 |
|
|
@aussievegas1777
|
maxwagers781 | 92 |
|
|
@TJZags598 Had him as well! Also parlayed him with Pitt and over also. Grrrr!
|
vanzack | 114 |
|
|
@vanzack Nice movement. BTC is 2 humps then a dump. Wash rinse repeat. |
vanzack | 114 |
|
|
@SportsIntuition
|
RSampsell | 5 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.