Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
YTD 4-2 Houston -1.5 |
akuwudikeeze | 216 |
|
|
Game bet down to 2.5, and even at 3 seemed to good to be true!! This has the same feel as the Minn / Wash game, where Wash was the favorite. Feels like a trap, but if i had to bet it, I'd be on Indy too. GL |
Metallica2467 | 30 |
|
|
Ytd 4-1
Fri pk: lakers +9.5 |
akuwudikeeze | 216 |
|
|
YTD 4-0
Thurs pk: miami -6 |
akuwudikeeze | 216 |
|
|
Is someone going to go back through and track the 1 pick per day records of the people posting? I guess give it a couple weeks and see who is actually following through with daily pick?
|
akuwudikeeze | 216 |
|
|
Ytd 3-0
Wed pick: GS +1 |
akuwudikeeze | 216 |
|
|
Ytd 2-0
Tues pk indy -1.5 |
akuwudikeeze | 216 |
|
|
Ytd 1-0
Minn +2 |
akuwudikeeze | 216 |
|
|
Miami - 5
|
akuwudikeeze | 216 |
|
|
I've bet MLB especially a lot of different ways and a lot of different strategies..... To be perfectly honest i've found the best way to consistently win is to pick 1 or 2 games, and bet the ML straight. Far too many times a team will win by 1 run, aka not covering the RL. If people could bet w/ patience, not chase to make up debts, and stick to routine you could probably win a little money. But I suppose whats the fun in that!! I've been up & down, and tried to stick with my 2 game ML parlay strategy, but the Win Percentage just isn't the same when I bet my 1 pick straight up, ML!!! Todays Pick: Braves -115... no Marte in Pitts lineup! Love me some Hudson |
Scotty2Hottie19 | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NoWorries21:
With the look of that golf swing u need to stick to bowling With a look at his golf swing, he should just quit playing sports |
amd | 43 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by amd:
Not true. I took the Tigers when, once again, they fukked me in the 9th inning in Minnesota. Good luck with Porcello and the bullpen. Good Call!! Leyland is such a nice guy to deal with such a $h!t bullpen |
amd | 25 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by rg3skins:
Stults isn't a good pitcher, but Petco makes gas-cans look like solid starters. Look at Jason Marquis last year. They actually brought in the fences. A lot of flight outs to RF are now going into Jack Deck for HRs |
Lind4MVP | 30 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69: An Oak/Dodgers ML parlay +160 might be just what the doctor ordered..... Like the 2 plays thus far Love this play! I threw Dbacks in with them to make it a 3! Here's hoping the Dodgers hold on
|
ManassaMauler | 18 |
|
|
1st post in ages!! Glad to see your still doing the covers. See you upgraded your Sharks logo as well lol.
Nice hit on Under. I took the Sox ML. Went the other way on the Milk game without some of their starters. GL this season
|
SJSharks99 | 35 |
|
|
Yes the Cats had 2 close games at home, and yes Oregon is probably the 2nd strongest team in Pac 12..... but ORE ML is sketchy!!!
Respect your write ups & picks, and get it in Law School. -Scott P U of AZ grad '04 |
JFen31 | 66 |
|
|
If anyone hates, tell them to put the lotion in the bucket or else it gets the hose again!!
|
TRAIN69 | 38 |
|
|
replied to
WEDNESDAY HUGE HUGE PLAY >>>>>>>>>>>>> WYOMING , WYOMING , WYOMING , WYOMING , WYOMING , WYOMING
in College Basketball
The line went down to -3.5, which would worry me a bit! GL though! I think Wyoming has ballers
|
reservoir-dogs | 21 |
|
|
Check my comment... i forgot i had the under teased!
|
qster | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by qster: What a BS game... wonder if Stern is going to fine Pop or the Spurs. Now we know how bad a Heat team can be and the coaching is worse... how does a team with their starts barely squeak out a win against the leftovers (Spurs)??? Next game, the Heat should rest Lebron, Wade, Bosh and Chalmers and see how BADLY the Spurs with their starters DEMOLISH the Heat on the road... quite pitiful. I think the only people happy were those that bet the under!! |
qster | 5 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.