Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
i am not asking how much you guys earn but rather if it is a position that makes money? if you feel you cannot answer this question then so be it, but i dont feel that it is very intrusive |
Trufant24 | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by sd50:
LAKERS WANT RAJA BELL AND YOUR MOM FUCKING LOW LIFE PIECE OF SHIT MONKEY. I SPIT IN YOUR FACE. youre the low life making an alternative name in order to say some retarded shit.... good luck with your future endeavors? |
tyr139 | 10 |
|
|
I think hes a started that could get limited minutes on any team. He did it with Portland last year so I think he could do it again this year but I dont the knicks would bring him back..... Its too bad he couldnt stay healthy throughout his career. He was so talented.... But youre absolutely right the Knicks will not go anywhere in the playoffs until they get some kind of defensive presence. So they better keep that in mind. As much as Mike D'antoni's system does not incorporate defense he better realize that he needs some individual players that can defend other teams big men because Earl Barroon, Eddie Curry, and David Lee are not the answer..... |
MoneyShot | 38 |
|
|
how many hot dogs can you guys down at one time
|
dennishopson | 40 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by seanjohn007:
felton is good but your making it seem like hes an all star calliber player on the right team (i drafted him on my fantasy team so i know how good he can be). i just think its hard to compete when you dont have a true center of sg. how would that team compete against the lakers who have two 7 footers and the best sg in the game? you raise a valid point in terms of defense and hopefully they could get a big man like ronny turiaf or just someone to occupy that space on the floor for defensive purposes because eddie curry and earl barron do not play defense...... so youre right they need a big man to play defense so thats why i suggested camby if he doesnt retire but if they can just find someone to clog the lane they would be in good shape with the rest of the guys i listed.. |
MoneyShot | 38 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
I agree with you that Felton is one of the most underrated point guards in the league, but Gallinari at the 2? No chance he could guard everyday NBA shooting guards. I'd switch LeBron and Danilo and then you are starting to look good. i see what youre saying but that is just a technicality. you could easily have lebron guard the opposing teams best player. there is no law that states the sg has to guard the other sg....... but I think people are forgetting about ray felton, he is a proven passer and ball handler. he can also shoot 3s pretty well and averages more than a steal a game and is a decent rebounder. TEAMS NEED TO STOP SLEEPING ON RAY FELTON!!!!! |
MoneyShot | 38 |
|
|
chris paul is not going anywhere.... stop speculating about nothing..................
|
SiuLungBao | 20 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by seanjohn007:
i didnt see the part about camby, but even if you got camby that would be a terrible line up. would you really want danillo playing against kobe and wade? and you wouldnt have a real center. youd basically have 3 power forwards a huge sf and an average pg, i dont think that team is any where near as good as this years cavs. dude you could easily switch the defensive matchup when the time comes but you dont like that lineup that i posted? have you seen ray felton play? hes a very solid point guard in this league and I believe he can offer more than a guy like mo williams on the defensive side and has a much bigger frame than him as well as being a much better passer. but I think that knicks need to get either lebron or wade at this point because Joe Johnson and amare wont cut it. i doubt knicks fans want to be a 1st round and out team? |
MoneyShot | 38 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NewDarkDay:
its quite obvious u are clueless cause if they arent considering moving to other teams,they would have already signed with original teams,they are torn whether to leave their teams and go to Chicago cause Chicago has Rose and Noah Which would give them both better chances at winning multiple championships.And in my opinion if i were Wade,and James i would take the 75-80 million from the Bulls i mean how much money do u really need from the contracts,that kind of money should be plenty for rest of your life and your children,and there children,what im trying to say is money really shouldnt even be the issue,the issue should be where can i go to win championships,and win the most championships.if this was my decision i would go play for Chicago end of story its pretty easy for you to say take less money and go and win a championship in chicago but if they did that theyd be at least leaving 30 million dollars on the table if not more.... also both wade and lebron may not want to play together because they are both alpha males and want to be the leader of their respective teams so its pretty hard to speculate on such an issue |
coloradobuff | 13 |
|
|
you are wrong ive seen plenty of threads that have had comments supporting this dirtbag. his career is hopefully over.
|
tyr139 | 10 |
|
|
I keep seeing people posting garbage on this website about raja bell and whether the lakers should sign him or the cavs, knicks, heat, bulls, or whatever. He is done in the nba...... no teams wants this scrub...... his years in the association are most likely over. I do not want to hear anyone posting anything else on this site suggesting that a team should sign raja bell....... he played 6 games last season and played minimally in the 2 years prior to that. HE IS DONE |
tyr139 | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by depeche2:
I think a lot of people "give a shit". And your opinion is just one of many. Lebron and Wade, might stay; or one or both might not. You don't know nuttin'. disregard any comments by that guy vegasveteran hes gong senile...... |
coloradobuff | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by seanjohn007:
this is 100% impossible. they dont have the money to give out 3 max contracts (david lee will get something close to max)
its never 100% imposible man come on......... they could pay a luxury tax but hopefully they would not have to because like i said they dont necessarily have to sign Lee and could get some one else but Lee is not close to the max. hes near 10 mil a year and probably less. so they would have enough cap space is tmac would take less money. |
MoneyShot | 38 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by MoneyShot:
you are correct, amare is he wasnt lazy should be a good or great defensive player but he just doesnt care. The opposing big men put up big numbers on amare, amares rebounding numbers are inflated in the suns system and cause he plays the center spot. He is a poor rebounder.. hahha youre obsessed with those systems eh? ill give you this system merely because its the most prominent one in the nba but I think amare is a great fit in ny and if maybe the knicks can get one of my favorite point guards raymond felton and sign Lebron James already having signed amare they would look really good going intto next season with PG - Raymond Felton SG - Danillo Gallinari SF - Lebron James PF - Amare stoudemire C - either get David Lee to play undersized or sign a veteran like Camby or someone else what do you guys think of that lineup *raymond felton is one of the most underrated point guards in the nba |
MoneyShot | 38 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
"david lee, carlos boozer, Zach Randolph, Andrea Bargnani, brad miller, Dirk Nowitzki, Kris Humphries, Kevin Love, LaMarcus Aldridge." Every single one of those guys is a better defender and rebounder than Amare. The only one that is close, IMO, is Bargnani, but he's really more of a 3 than a 4. stop posting on this website |
MoneyShot | 38 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by akitch88:
That a way Blake Dewitt... lets go blue crew!!! blake de witt needs to start hiting |
akitch88 | 12 |
|
|
good work
|
MilwaukeeBob | 8 |
|
|
Svetlana Abrosimova thoughts? |
tyr139 | 6 |
|
|
|
MilwaukeeBob | 8 |
|
|
|
Pucksrus | 17 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.