Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
YTD: (25-21) +9.35u 1* Toronto -106 vs Winnipeg 1* San Jose +212 vs Vancouver 1* Philadelphia +104 vs Pittsburgh 1* St. Louis -103 vs Detroit |
UnderdogKing | 2 |
|
|
Good luck Gris. Interested to see how this one turns out. UTSA should put up points, but will CC be able to match them? UTSA defense is god awful. The two CC QB's in the transfer portal weren't exactly lighting it up either. Tad Hudson should be starting at QB and is a bit of a wild card with little to no college experience. A big athletic 4* recruit in 2022 who originally signed to play at North Carolina before transferring to Coastal Carolina. He posted a mediocre 56% completion rate his senior year in high school, so his accuracy is in question. I think how he plays will determine the ATS outcome. |
Griswold1 | 5 |
|
|
I'm on Seattle as the big dog. |
mrphister | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by AJ86:
Quote Originally Posted by UnderdogKing: Yep. These dumb decisions are going to cost the Jets ATS. Should be up 6, sitting pretty for the cover. The New York Jets do not care about the spread.
They don't care about winning either. Kicking the FG is the right move in that situation to give your team a better chance of winning. Going for it on your own 30 early in the game is a bad move as well. They are clearly gambling. |
tboon | 19 |
|
|
Yep. These dumb decisions are going to cost the Jets ATS. Should be up 6, sitting pretty for the cover. |
tboon | 19 |
|
|
This is a championship type game, not round of 8. These two teams would be favored over any other team in the playoff. |
YELAWOLF | 6 |
|
|
YTD: (24-20) +9.35u 1* Florida -108 vs Tampa Bay 1* Seattle +210 vs Colorado |
UnderdogKing | 3 |
|
|
replied to
The irony. Both TX and Penn St have double digit spreads… while Ore and GA…
in College Football Oregon should be playing either Boise or Arizona St. Oregon and Ohio St are likely the two best teams in college football, yet are playing each other in the round of 8? |
getem474 | 11 |
|
|
NCAA my opt for neutral site games next year. |
PUSSYGALORE333 | 35 |
|
|
I agree. I think Ohio St. offensive struggles against Michigan will carry over into this game tonight. Ending the season the way Ohio St did at home against their biggest rival is troubling to me. Tennessee's front 4 is nasty. If the Vols can take care of the football, they can win this game. |
mrusso | 26 |
|
|
Alabama didn't deserve in based on the current format. Is Alabama a top 12 team? Yes. If we want the best 12 teams in the playoff, we might as well let Vegas pick the top 12 teams based on their ratings. |
Last2thirst | 26 |
|
|
Yeah, I don't like how only the 1st round we have home and away teams, then neutral site thereafter. Pick one or the other. |
NONEED4LUCK | 21 |
|
|
YTD: (30-22-3) +5.84u 1* California/San Diego St under 68 1st half (-110) |
UnderdogKing | 2 |
|
|
Picked up over 2 units last night. Big card today. YTD: (22-19) +8.2u 1* Montreal +103 vs Detroit 1* Minnesota +150 vs Winnipeg 1* Ottawa +112 vs Vancouver |
UnderdogKing | 12 |
|
|
Not an official play, but I do have a strong lean on Tennessee +7 points. I think they will give the Buckeyes all they can handle in a tightly contested game and wouldn't be surprised if they pull of the upset. Ryan Day gets sacked on Sunday. |
UnderdogKing | 20 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by crazy1464:
Great job so far!! Thank you. Enjoy the games tomorrow. |
UnderdogKing | 20 |
|
|
variance |
stevex01 | 7 |
|
|
Bama was too inconsistent this year. Didn't deserve a spot. I'm seeing Notre Dame as a 1.5 point favorite over Georgia next week. I lean to the Irish. |
joe pockets | 37 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by smac38:
Games like this are going to allow the committee to let in 3 or 4 loss SEC teams down the line. Which I hate. Yep this is boring as watching paint dry. Indiana clearly outmatched in talent. SOS actually means something. Changing the channel. |
Vic-Vega | 97 |
|
|
This is looking like an early turn-off. Indiana is outmatched. |
Irisheric777 | 13 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.