van1976

@Ppkay

 I did mean to say illogical "Logic"--lol  I do have a few on going ML parlays w/ phil as insurance plan  ....if Phil wins by less than 5, it will be a GOOD DAY!

Yesterday LAC couldn't cover 3 away games in a row...I apply that "Logic" that Phil doesn't cover 3 home games in a row....hoping it stays close GB +5.5

Buff but i got the -9 line, it'll be a win looks like... and on GB -5 hoping phil wins by a FG as I have some ML parlays w/ phil... GL

  I have Buff got at -9, this will be a "W"...I have GB -5 as well...let's roll...

Ouch BUT, We'll get 'em today. I already put my games in, but not to sway, I'll post later. Glad not taking the Hout under after all.  My "Goof" bet still in play, although I have a feeling it's the LAR that will be my downfall.

Credit is due where Credit is due...Good calls on the Sat games. 2-0.  My friend said Pitt sucked, but then again he liked LAC. Pitt plus 10 (w/ added juice), w/ the revenge angle was too tempting, ....  a 1-1 day.  GL on Sunday matchups...

I learned the hard way the ATS regular season doesn't translate post season. I have Houston, but I should've also taken the Under---but I hate those over/unders--lol

I am on Pitt+10 (-125) I also bought the 1/2 pt...

My "goof play"very short money...all ML hous/bal/buff/phil/wash/minn  9 to 1 odds...  although can't rule out the "LA wild fire angle" where one LA team gets in.

@van1976

 oops Houst +3 (-120)

LAC better team here BUT....LAC three away games in a row, can they cover 3 away in a row?..Houst +3(even) a tail and Pitt +10 (-125) a fade ...final answer

LAC 3rd Away game in a row, covering the 1st 2.  Sometimes hard to cover all three...that's my monkey wrench

A Det revenge angle from last year's playoff loss?  At any rate, Bought a point from -4 (-115) to -3 (-150) Det Full game...  Good Luck and HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Mac and others, Good hit on Da Bears. True to form Seattle wins by 3 or less when I bet them. I did hit an NBA parlay (Ok-Hou-Det) so it was a plus night overall. I guess every one is happy...and by the way Mac (belated) Merry Christmas!

It could be Chicago...down the wire, but Seattle more motivated...Someone posted a couple weeks ago..."Bears have given up"  Kinda of a crap shoot here as "Vegas" just might make Chi cover the spread. Seattle has a habit of winning by 3 or less pts when I bet on them....all said Seat -4 (-120)  GL everyone...

 I wanna Wish you a MERRY CHRISTMAS FROM THE BOTTOM OF MY HEART! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DKyAQKkXOA  "LA Game  of..."  I follow just to see, but I hate over unders and prop bets...crap shoot for me.  I like to take full games, on my own...no one else to blame--LOL--I did hit a pretty good Home Dogs ML parlay the other day, Dallas clinched it. Happy NEW YEAR too!  --Van

It looks Pitt all the way on "Paper", but only 6 pts seems fishy.  Given the records and home advantage, I would think Pitt by at least 7pts. I go the Mac Way as well and take NYG +6 ... GL as well.

@smellybunty

 Good data point out. 18-27 if you factor SB losers as well... Theory is, "Champs" (any sport) are overly favored (MLB champs Texas Rangers--baseball did horrible $$ this year )But I did horrible in baseball as well--lol  I'll be going against the SB winner and loser...next 5 games each...I'll be going against KC and SF...out of 10 games...looking for 70% vs the spread number. We will know by October.  GL on the season...

I love playoff "Revenge Games", plus it is a GO AGAINST SB winner rule...this case KC...double whammy!! I'll take the 3, but I don't think I'll need them, play on BALT +3 (-125) Medium bet on the Opener...  GL   

General Rule --Go AGAINST SB winner (and loser), at least at beginning month of new season ...Balt +3 (-125)...  the juice has already gone up...if you are laying only 2.5 w/ KC? you must have some added "vig" on that line...GL

OOps wrong forum...but same hold s true for NBA championship teams...

Go against KC and SF...for the first month anyway....next 4 plays each...I'm doing it...Balt and Jets to start...GL