Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
More reasons for KC than Phil...I think KC will be the best outcome/ interest for the NFL...let's see what happens... GOOD LUCK |
van1976 | 6 |
|
![]() |
@Macwestie1 I saw you taking Philly as well, lot of Forum on Eagles GL |
van1976 | 6 |
|
![]() |
@justliketoplay I knew you were taking Philly--LOL
|
van1976 | 6 |
|
![]() |
Superbowl Sunday: Assuming there is a "best outcome" for the NFL Industrial Complex, what would it be? A close one? A Philly win?...a KC win? I won't muddy the field w/ my opinion...I haven't taken anyone yet--who cares anyway--lol Good Luck on who/ what ever you take, you people on Covers Forum... |
van1976 | 6 |
|
![]() |
I believe in streaks...they seem to come in at either 5, 7 or 10 game streak W/L before it goes bust... I.m thinking what's the best outcome for the "NFL Industrial Complex"...I think we know.... |
Lucky Luciano | 11 |
|
![]() |
Thanks took all 3 at the last minute... |
LAGameofInches | 11 |
|
![]() |
replied to
***Macwesties * Sun. Jan. 26, 2025 * NFL * NFC * AFC Championship * Football Plays***
in NFL Betting Without looking...I predicted Mac would take Wash and Bills...half right...Bills for sure ( I have them SB winner earlier at 6-1) ...not sure on the Wash-Phil yet, Philly Lean, ...everything points Philly here but, maybe too much? Washington DC gets Trump and a Superbowl???--lol What do I know? ...GL |
Macwestie1 | 64 |
|
![]() |
replied to
***Macwesties * Sat. Jan. 18, 2025 * NFL * AFC * NFC * Divisional * Football Plays***
in NFL Betting |
Macwestie1 | 43 |
|
![]() |
replied to
So much love for Washington, from prognosticators to pundits to bettors, you would think that this game should be a tossup
in NFL Betting @NutinButtLove |
begginerboy | 36 |
|
![]() |
@Ppkay I did mean to say illogical "Logic"--lol I do have a few on going ML parlays w/ phil as insurance plan ....if Phil wins by less than 5, it will be a GOOD DAY! |
van1976 | 4 |
|
![]() |
Yesterday LAC couldn't cover 3 away games in a row...I apply that "Logic" that Phil doesn't cover 3 home games in a row....hoping it stays close GB +5.5 |
van1976 | 4 |
|
![]() |
|
Macwestie1 | 43 |
|
![]() |
|
Macwestie1 | 43 |
|
![]() |
Ouch BUT, We'll get 'em today. I already put my games in, but not to sway, I'll post later. Glad not taking the Hout under after all. My "Goof" bet still in play, although I have a feeling it's the LAR that will be my downfall. |
LAGameofInches | 15 |
|
![]() |
Credit is due where Credit is due...Good calls on the Sat games. 2-0. My friend said Pitt sucked, but then again he liked LAC. Pitt plus 10 (w/ added juice), w/ the revenge angle was too tempting, .... a 1-1 day. GL on Sunday matchups... |
Macwestie1 | 75 |
|
![]() |
I learned the hard way the ATS regular season doesn't translate post season. I have Houston, but I should've also taken the Under---but I hate those over/unders--lol I am on Pitt+10 (-125) I also bought the 1/2 pt... My "goof play"very short money...all ML hous/bal/buff/phil/wash/minn 9 to 1 odds... although can't rule out the "LA wild fire angle" where one LA team gets in. |
LAGameofInches | 15 |
|
![]() |
@van1976 oops Houst +3 (-120) |
Macwestie1 | 75 |
|
![]() |
LAC better team here BUT....LAC three away games in a row, can they cover 3 away in a row?..Houst +3(even) a tail and Pitt +10 (-125) a fade ...final answer |
Macwestie1 | 75 |
|
![]() |
LAC 3rd Away game in a row, covering the 1st 2. Sometimes hard to cover all three...that's my monkey wrench |
LAGameofInches | 15 |
|
![]() |
A Det revenge angle from last year's playoff loss? At any rate, Bought a point from -4 (-115) to -3 (-150) Det Full game... Good Luck and HAPPY NEW YEAR! |
LAGameofInches | 10 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.