Rizz, even with three losses, record is great. Question ? Any chance that adding additional filters may help us the rest of the way? For example eliminating teams below .500? Any thoughts?
0
Rizz, even with three losses, record is great. Question ? Any chance that adding additional filters may help us the rest of the way? For example eliminating teams below .500? Any thoughts?
Rizz, even with three losses, record is great. Question ? Any chance that adding additional filters may help us the rest of the way? For example eliminating teams below .500? Any thoughts?
I usually do this after the all star break. I may do it earlier this year...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jattdoit:
Rizz, even with three losses, record is great. Question ? Any chance that adding additional filters may help us the rest of the way? For example eliminating teams below .500? Any thoughts?
I usually do this after the all star break. I may do it earlier this year...
hey rizz, i just want to say that i think u r doing a wonderful job and that people should just be patient and stay the course...i see a lot of people want to talk bad about the system or just quit..but only 3 series losses aint nothin to quit over...people should realize when you gamble there will be some losses...this system has been successfull for a while now and it is due for some losses...but im in it for the long haul because i can see the real value in this...so keep up the good work and ignore the buttholes!!!
0
hey rizz, i just want to say that i think u r doing a wonderful job and that people should just be patient and stay the course...i see a lot of people want to talk bad about the system or just quit..but only 3 series losses aint nothin to quit over...people should realize when you gamble there will be some losses...this system has been successfull for a while now and it is due for some losses...but im in it for the long haul because i can see the real value in this...so keep up the good work and ignore the buttholes!!!
It's the same question I asked him, and if you see above somewhere I think he said he would consider it. But i think were all on the same page with the .500 filter. It's the Rizz's call. The books are giving these good teams from last year over inflated juice, forcing them to fall into system plays when they normally wouldnt qualify.
0
It's the same question I asked him, and if you see above somewhere I think he said he would consider it. But i think were all on the same page with the .500 filter. It's the Rizz's call. The books are giving these good teams from last year over inflated juice, forcing them to fall into system plays when they normally wouldnt qualify.
I started on April 16th for two reasons. First, all teams had played
approximately 10 games at that point. It would be difficult to apply a
.500 filter any earlier in the season because a few wins or losses
creates a big swing. Second, there was no pending series at that
point. Started with the "Game 1's" on 4/16.
Seven winning series would not have qualified. Game 3 losses on DET
4/26 and SF 5/3 would have stood. The BOS series resulting in a game 3
loss on 5/6 would have been filtered out. Also the current PHI series
on game 3 tonight, would have been filtered out.
0
Beginning on 4/16 the following series would not have qualified with a .500 filter:
I started on April 16th for two reasons. First, all teams had played
approximately 10 games at that point. It would be difficult to apply a
.500 filter any earlier in the season because a few wins or losses
creates a big swing. Second, there was no pending series at that
point. Started with the "Game 1's" on 4/16.
Seven winning series would not have qualified. Game 3 losses on DET
4/26 and SF 5/3 would have stood. The BOS series resulting in a game 3
loss on 5/6 would have been filtered out. Also the current PHI series
on game 3 tonight, would have been filtered out.
Guys, This shat is unbelievable. What a horrible stretch we are on. We continue to see inflated lines on some popular teams that are having really crappy seasons, esp Phi and Bos..... I would advise those of you wanting to be more conservative to do the over .500 win percentage at home or stick just to the filtered plays. I would not blame anyone for bailing at this point. I have backtested the crap out of this and the win percentages for the different levels of plays always turned out pretty good but I can't even remember the last +money day we have had and now we are staring at another C bet. I am just hoping this ship rights itself soon.
0
Guys, This shat is unbelievable. What a horrible stretch we are on. We continue to see inflated lines on some popular teams that are having really crappy seasons, esp Phi and Bos..... I would advise those of you wanting to be more conservative to do the over .500 win percentage at home or stick just to the filtered plays. I would not blame anyone for bailing at this point. I have backtested the crap out of this and the win percentages for the different levels of plays always turned out pretty good but I can't even remember the last +money day we have had and now we are staring at another C bet. I am just hoping this ship rights itself soon.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.