Hi guys, I haven't been on lately, been very busy. I am still working the filters. One of the filters in place is a what I call a 75-point rule. This is when a team that has lost its previous three games SU by more than a combined 75 points. When this situation arises, we actually filter that play. However, the anti-filter I have been working on states that a filtered play becomes a play if the margin at which that team loses to the spread decreases over its last three games.
One example this week is New Mexico (which lost ATS by 19, 17.5 and 7.5 in its last three games respectively). New Mexico is considered to be improving against the spread with each game. New Mexico has lost SU in its last three by a combined 93 points and would originally be a no play. So now New Mexico is favored here. Also, according to the system, we are supposed to bet the ML on a team that is favored... I placed a cap on the spread at -10. So you should place a bet on New Mexico ML (if you get it) or smaller on -9.5 if you don't like the juice.
The other team, Miami-Ohio (losing ATS by 25.5, 9.5, 6.5 respectively) was outscored by its opponents in the last contests by 112). The Redhawks also fit this weeks scenario of a filtered play that has been anti-filtered. Miami-Ohio is +7.5.
I will track the stats using this thread. Since I am still
working on the filters, it remains to be seen if the anti-filter
would benefit us more by bringing back the wins (and some of the
losses) or just leaving them off.
So in JM's notation, the plays for this week would be: NEW MEXICO ML [A] or NEW MEXICO -9.5 [A] at smaller bet MIAMI-OHIO +7.5 [A]
I will have a full explanation of the system in a few days. A couple people have already mentioned, it may be a good idea to play these using Labourchere. I will note all records as both series wins and losses as well as straight wins and losses. Let's start the season out right.
Cheers!
0
Hi guys, I haven't been on lately, been very busy. I am still working the filters. One of the filters in place is a what I call a 75-point rule. This is when a team that has lost its previous three games SU by more than a combined 75 points. When this situation arises, we actually filter that play. However, the anti-filter I have been working on states that a filtered play becomes a play if the margin at which that team loses to the spread decreases over its last three games.
One example this week is New Mexico (which lost ATS by 19, 17.5 and 7.5 in its last three games respectively). New Mexico is considered to be improving against the spread with each game. New Mexico has lost SU in its last three by a combined 93 points and would originally be a no play. So now New Mexico is favored here. Also, according to the system, we are supposed to bet the ML on a team that is favored... I placed a cap on the spread at -10. So you should place a bet on New Mexico ML (if you get it) or smaller on -9.5 if you don't like the juice.
The other team, Miami-Ohio (losing ATS by 25.5, 9.5, 6.5 respectively) was outscored by its opponents in the last contests by 112). The Redhawks also fit this weeks scenario of a filtered play that has been anti-filtered. Miami-Ohio is +7.5.
I will track the stats using this thread. Since I am still
working on the filters, it remains to be seen if the anti-filter
would benefit us more by bringing back the wins (and some of the
losses) or just leaving them off.
So in JM's notation, the plays for this week would be: NEW MEXICO ML [A] or NEW MEXICO -9.5 [A] at smaller bet MIAMI-OHIO +7.5 [A]
I will have a full explanation of the system in a few days. A couple people have already mentioned, it may be a good idea to play these using Labourchere. I will note all records as both series wins and losses as well as straight wins and losses. Let's start the season out right.
Yep, one game this week. The easiest way I found is to create a spreadsheet and track. I will see if I can post it to my ISP site and link a copy here.
0
Yep, one game this week. The easiest way I found is to create a spreadsheet and track. I will see if I can post it to my ISP site and link a copy here.
Kangy.....One of my favorite cappers on these boards. I did well with your CFB 2nd half plays last season. Good to see you still hard at work making us all better!! Thanks for the knowledge....it is much appreciated as always.
0
Kangy.....One of my favorite cappers on these boards. I did well with your CFB 2nd half plays last season. Good to see you still hard at work making us all better!! Thanks for the knowledge....it is much appreciated as always.
Couldn't pull it up...says the link was broken. Is it me? Or is it the link? Thanks for the spreadsheet Kangy. No idea how you guys find the time to put this stuff together....But I am grateful as always.
0
Couldn't pull it up...says the link was broken. Is it me? Or is it the link? Thanks for the spreadsheet Kangy. No idea how you guys find the time to put this stuff together....But I am grateful as always.
That one I can see...Thanks Kangy. Only play I've got today is Bowling Green at -1.5. I decided I was willing to part with the 1.5 for not laying the extra juice. This is highly unusual for me, usually I have about 8-10 plays on a typical college saturday!!! Restraint doesnt come easily for me. But there is no point playing a system if you are going to offset your winnings with losses on games that you are only playing for the action.....
we'll see how long I can resist.... + units will help
0
That one I can see...Thanks Kangy. Only play I've got today is Bowling Green at -1.5. I decided I was willing to part with the 1.5 for not laying the extra juice. This is highly unusual for me, usually I have about 8-10 plays on a typical college saturday!!! Restraint doesnt come easily for me. But there is no point playing a system if you are going to offset your winnings with losses on games that you are only playing for the action.....
we'll see how long I can resist.... + units will help
Please tell me I am not the only one on this forum who took Bowling Green giving the 1.5 instead of betting them on the moneyline???? I just wanted to save the juice and I figured if they won, the 1.5 would be a non-factor. Obviously it turned out to be a bonehead move!!
0
Please tell me I am not the only one on this forum who took Bowling Green giving the 1.5 instead of betting them on the moneyline???? I just wanted to save the juice and I figured if they won, the 1.5 would be a non-factor. Obviously it turned out to be a bonehead move!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.