citdl-appst over 136
sam-furm over 114.5
but-det over 117
clest-illch over 127
midtn-den over 119
webst-nocol over 138.5
sclar-sd over 115.5
pac-ucriv over 115
wgton-cal under 152
citdl-appst over 136
sam-furm over 114.5
but-det over 117
clest-illch over 127
midtn-den over 119
webst-nocol over 138.5
sclar-sd over 115.5
pac-ucriv over 115
wgton-cal under 152
citdl-appst over 136
sam-furm over 114.5
but-det over 117
clest-illch over 127
midtn-den over 119
webst-nocol over 138.5
sclar-sd over 115.5
pac-ucriv over 115
wgton-cal under 152
I am 8-1 right now and still have one more left to play (frsno-hav).
I'd love to make it 9-1...
citdl-appst over 136
sam-furm over 114.5
but-det over 117
clest-illch over 127
midtn-den over 119
webst-nocol over 138.5
sclar-sd over 115.5
pac-ucriv over 115
wgton-cal under 152
I am 8-1 right now and still have one more left to play (frsno-hav).
I'd love to make it 9-1...
Yes, you're right, sorry.
I was expecting to hit 6 out of 10 and I was just going to write to you that my capping method does 60% of the job and the rest is up to Lady Luck...
Yes, you're right, sorry.
I was expecting to hit 6 out of 10 and I was just going to write to you that my capping method does 60% of the job and the rest is up to Lady Luck...
citdl-appst over 136 74-72
sam-furm over 114.5 57-63
but-det over 117 66-61
clest-illch over 127 66-63
midtn-den over 119 51-63
webst-nocol over 138.5 82-76
sclar-sd over 115.5 64-62
pac-ucriv over 115 63-66
wgton-cal under 152 71-86
citdl-appst over 136 74-72
sam-furm over 114.5 57-63
but-det over 117 66-61
clest-illch over 127 66-63
midtn-den over 119 51-63
webst-nocol over 138.5 82-76
sclar-sd over 115.5 64-62
pac-ucriv over 115 63-66
wgton-cal under 152 71-86
Thank you, I hope to keep it over 60%.
Thank you, I hope to keep it over 60%.
There's no need for a spreadsheet.
Just add the numbers and use your logic when comparing them.
The key to good under play is basically the defensive number and the key to good over plays are both offensive and defensive. There's no strict rule about differences. For NCAAB especially the differences become significant as a percentage of the total set by the bookie. Add the smallest numbers and the biggest numbers, compare them with the total line and draw a conclusion. Based on the differences found are you willing to risk an amount of money on that?
Sorry, but there's no strict rule or complicated spreadsheet to do that.
There's no need for a spreadsheet.
Just add the numbers and use your logic when comparing them.
The key to good under play is basically the defensive number and the key to good over plays are both offensive and defensive. There's no strict rule about differences. For NCAAB especially the differences become significant as a percentage of the total set by the bookie. Add the smallest numbers and the biggest numbers, compare them with the total line and draw a conclusion. Based on the differences found are you willing to risk an amount of money on that?
Sorry, but there's no strict rule or complicated spreadsheet to do that.
No I don't use that anymore.
Take a look at my post above.
No I don't use that anymore.
Take a look at my post above.
Let's take a look at tor-no tonight, total line set at 185. Take the four numbers (points for and against for both teams) and arrange starting with the smallest number and finishing with the biggest. Something like that:
91.0 95.4 96.2 100.2
Add the smallest 91.0+95.4=186.4-185=1.4
Add the biggest 96.2+100.2=196.2-185=11.2
If we add the 2 differences 1.4+11.2=12.6 points over the total line, that's kind of 6.8% over the line. A small difference but I consider it enough to risk 1 unit on over, so I'll take over 185.
Avoid games of rivalry or games where there are strong motivational factors involved. Avoid extremely high totals (set around 230).
No spreadsheet needed.
Let's take a look at tor-no tonight, total line set at 185. Take the four numbers (points for and against for both teams) and arrange starting with the smallest number and finishing with the biggest. Something like that:
91.0 95.4 96.2 100.2
Add the smallest 91.0+95.4=186.4-185=1.4
Add the biggest 96.2+100.2=196.2-185=11.2
If we add the 2 differences 1.4+11.2=12.6 points over the total line, that's kind of 6.8% over the line. A small difference but I consider it enough to risk 1 unit on over, so I'll take over 185.
Avoid games of rivalry or games where there are strong motivational factors involved. Avoid extremely high totals (set around 230).
No spreadsheet needed.
atl-cha over 179.5
tor-no over 183
lac-mem under 203
uta-sac under 215
den-was under 205.5
NCAAB
fairf-can over 129.5
colu-pen over 130
atl-cha over 179.5
tor-no over 183
lac-mem under 203
uta-sac under 215
den-was under 205.5
NCAAB
fairf-can over 129.5
colu-pen over 130
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.