Yeah - that's what I was afraid of - and included that comment in my post. It will defintely affect the results - but theoretically - it may filter out a a play here or there.....but a DOG on killer sports - should remain a DOG on Covers. Unless there are a lot of instances where a team is a DOG on covers but a favorite on Killersports.
I could be wrong - who knows
Yeah - that's what I was afraid of - and included that comment in my post. It will defintely affect the results - but theoretically - it may filter out a a play here or there.....but a DOG on killer sports - should remain a DOG on Covers. Unless there are a lot of instances where a team is a DOG on covers but a favorite on Killersports.
I could be wrong - who knows
So again - take these results with a grain of salt - and can be used directionally but hyvong is right - killer sports does not have the same odds as covers - therefore will filter out plays that could have been potential wins.
BUT I did find this - according to killer sports the system performs poorly in 4 game series - check it out
NO INTERLEAGUE AND NO 4 GAME SERIES
SQDL Query
t:line >=-110 and o:line>=-110 and t:line > o:line and C and SGS <=3 and season = 2009
2009 SU: 82-86 (0.2 rpg) average line: +100 / -110 on / against: -$400 / -$420 ROI: -2.4% / -2.3%
2010 SU: 63-58 (0.2 rpg) average line: +100 / -110 on / against: +$500 / -$1,128 ROI: +4.1% / -8.5%
2011 SU: 76-59 (0.5 rpg) average line: -100 / -109 on / against: +$1,709 / -$2,423 ROI: +12.6% / -16.4%
2012 SU: 49-27 (0.5 rpg) average line: -101 / -109 on / against: +$2,173 / -$2,647 ROI: +28.3% / -31.9%
Also if you only bet the 3rd game OF a 4 game series - it yeilds positive results
SQDL Query
t:line >=-110 and o:line>=-110 and t:line > o:line and C and SG =3 and SGS = 4 and season = 2011
2012 SU: 4-1 (0.8 rpg) average line: -100 / -110 on / against: +$300 / -$338 ROI: +59.8% / -61.7%
An extra 3 units in 2010, extra 7 units in 2011 and 3 units in 2012.
Irage - is there any way you can backtest interleague and 4 game series results with your database?
So again - take these results with a grain of salt - and can be used directionally but hyvong is right - killer sports does not have the same odds as covers - therefore will filter out plays that could have been potential wins.
BUT I did find this - according to killer sports the system performs poorly in 4 game series - check it out
NO INTERLEAGUE AND NO 4 GAME SERIES
SQDL Query
t:line >=-110 and o:line>=-110 and t:line > o:line and C and SGS <=3 and season = 2009
2009 SU: 82-86 (0.2 rpg) average line: +100 / -110 on / against: -$400 / -$420 ROI: -2.4% / -2.3%
2010 SU: 63-58 (0.2 rpg) average line: +100 / -110 on / against: +$500 / -$1,128 ROI: +4.1% / -8.5%
2011 SU: 76-59 (0.5 rpg) average line: -100 / -109 on / against: +$1,709 / -$2,423 ROI: +12.6% / -16.4%
2012 SU: 49-27 (0.5 rpg) average line: -101 / -109 on / against: +$2,173 / -$2,647 ROI: +28.3% / -31.9%
Also if you only bet the 3rd game OF a 4 game series - it yeilds positive results
SQDL Query
t:line >=-110 and o:line>=-110 and t:line > o:line and C and SG =3 and SGS = 4 and season = 2011
2012 SU: 4-1 (0.8 rpg) average line: -100 / -110 on / against: +$300 / -$338 ROI: +59.8% / -61.7%
An extra 3 units in 2010, extra 7 units in 2011 and 3 units in 2012.
Irage - is there any way you can backtest interleague and 4 game series results with your database?
I will have to create a field that calculates a 4 game series, but yes, I think I can do that.
We have a couple of potential games today. Slim pick'ins on these Interleague games.
I will have to create a field that calculates a 4 game series, but yes, I think I can do that.
We have a couple of potential games today. Slim pick'ins on these Interleague games.
question regarding the filters and the plays today. the odds for milw closed at -115 and tor closed at -105.
also Sf odds are -130 and LAA are +110. These are according to Covers MLB Baseball Live odds & betting lines.
with the exception of some occasions, should the max line for both teams be -110? these plays passed the filters?
question regarding the filters and the plays today. the odds for milw closed at -115 and tor closed at -105.
also Sf odds are -130 and LAA are +110. These are according to Covers MLB Baseball Live odds & betting lines.
with the exception of some occasions, should the max line for both teams be -110? these plays passed the filters?
question regarding the filters and the plays today. the odds for milw closed at -115 and tor closed at -105.
also Sf odds are -130 and LAA are +110. These are according to Covers MLB Baseball Live odds & betting lines.
with the exception of some occasions, should the max line for both teams be -110? these plays passed the filters?
question regarding the filters and the plays today. the odds for milw closed at -115 and tor closed at -105.
also Sf odds are -130 and LAA are +110. These are according to Covers MLB Baseball Live odds & betting lines.
with the exception of some occasions, should the max line for both teams be -110? these plays passed the filters?
Why not tell us b4 the Yankees game started?
Why not tell us b4 the Yankees game started?
Why not tell us b4 the Yankees game started?
Why not tell us b4 the Yankees game started?
Remember, I just found this less than 30 days ago. I did back test it, but did not apply filters. It's got potential, but needs to be refined.
Giants baby, I told you Cain was good for a win. All I needed was Gaints to be able to hit and they did.
THE DOG AND PONY SHOW!
1. No bet if the line is higher than -110 for either team.
Some exceptions made for -111, but I'll review as needed.
2. Wait for the line movements to stop, some times moves happen up to 2-3 minutes before game time.
3. Take the DOG
4. Avoid games where the DOG is going to sweep a series.
5. Avoid games where there is a lot of line movement.
6/3 - Phillies - LOSS
6/3 - Brewers - LOSS
6/3 - Rangers - WIN
6/3 - Cardinals - LOSS
6/5 - Toronto - WIN
6/5 - Padres - WIN
6/8 - Washington - WIN
6/8 - Tampa Bay - WIN
6/10 - Cleveland - WIN
6/10 - Dodgers - WIN
6/12 - Oakland - WIN
6/12 - Philly - LOSS
6/13 - Boston v Miami - NO PLAY Weird Line Movements
6/13 - Brewers - LOSS
6/15 - Brewers - WIN
6/16 - Phillies - LOSS
6/18 - Brewers - WIN
6/18 - Giants - WIN
64% Winning Percentage
Remember, I just found this less than 30 days ago. I did back test it, but did not apply filters. It's got potential, but needs to be refined.
Giants baby, I told you Cain was good for a win. All I needed was Gaints to be able to hit and they did.
THE DOG AND PONY SHOW!
1. No bet if the line is higher than -110 for either team.
Some exceptions made for -111, but I'll review as needed.
2. Wait for the line movements to stop, some times moves happen up to 2-3 minutes before game time.
3. Take the DOG
4. Avoid games where the DOG is going to sweep a series.
5. Avoid games where there is a lot of line movement.
6/3 - Phillies - LOSS
6/3 - Brewers - LOSS
6/3 - Rangers - WIN
6/3 - Cardinals - LOSS
6/5 - Toronto - WIN
6/5 - Padres - WIN
6/8 - Washington - WIN
6/8 - Tampa Bay - WIN
6/10 - Cleveland - WIN
6/10 - Dodgers - WIN
6/12 - Oakland - WIN
6/12 - Philly - LOSS
6/13 - Boston v Miami - NO PLAY Weird Line Movements
6/13 - Brewers - LOSS
6/15 - Brewers - WIN
6/16 - Phillies - LOSS
6/18 - Brewers - WIN
6/18 - Giants - WIN
64% Winning Percentage
Good point! Remember when TOR was killin it in the Cactus Leagues...something like 18 wins in a row!!!
Good point! Remember when TOR was killin it in the Cactus Leagues...something like 18 wins in a row!!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.