All Forums | Systems & Strategies

MLB system releases...

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 238599
Posts: 2245
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 14473
Posted: #1801
 GL Kemosabe
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 71
Posted: #1802
Quote Originally Posted by BLACKEN1772:

TOR pitching change Cecil for Romero.  I have Cecil slated for tonight I don't know when the change was made and could have been before the games were posted therefore most would not realize a switch. I thought I would pass it on.  There has been a $.30 neg line move since 10pm est last night.


I'm confused, do you mean Romero is pitching instead of Cecil today. He's listed at every book I use.

In fact, I've seen Romero on the overnight odds so there has been no change there for a while.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 197
Posted: #1803
Now i need a little feed back.

I just did the calculation on the Minn Vs Detroit game today.  Is this what you got on the calculation?

Swarzak(BR/G) = 2.89 runs per game
Minnesota (RC/G) = 5.16 runs per game

Galarraga (BR/G) = 3.64 runs per game
Detroit (RC/G) = 4.75 runs per game

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 2312
Posted: #1804
Quote Originally Posted by snyder9:



I'm confused, do you mean Romero is pitching instead of Cecil today. He's listed at every book I use.

In fact, I've seen Romero on the overnight odds so there has been no change there for a while.


Cecil was originally slated to start, but was changed to Romero due to Toronto having the luxury of 2 days off this week. The Jays announced this change early last night, but I never saw the change at most books until around 2am et.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 71
Posted: #1805
Gotcha!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1806
ApacheM keep it tight
 
SN
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1807
MLB system releases Friday 08/07/09 Base_Runs formula...
 
Diamondbacks-106 ML
Cubs+135 ML
Braves+124 ML
RedSox+122 ML
Rangers+135 ML
 
Giants-135 RL
BlueJays+130 RL
WhiteSox+120 RL
Mariners+182 RL
 
ninePACformulated
projected ratio: 6/9  66.6%
 
 
R/R status ratio: 14/22  63.6%
 
SN
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2001
Posts: 14
Posted: #1808
A bad day but up 53 units because Rangers were the strongest play and fading Saunders was the way to go.

If he posts the units won or lost after the games then he can list the units risked before the games starts.

The reason he's not listing the units risked before the game is because then we would easily notice that he's not being honest.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2001
Posts: 14
Posted: #1809
Quote Originally Posted by MeMyselfandEye:

jasonr...Unit attachment isn't  that difficult for each individual handicapper. - if you would read the thread, it's all in there. Its takes time, and the correct application to understand.  I like the fact SN does not post his units.  If you  have an understanding of the ideas presented here you would already know the unit attachment...and for those that are 'bottomfeeders", it really upsets them. 

I bet there have been 50 posts through tthe entire thread asking "Why doesn't SN attach units?"  For those that have the understanding, the knowledge, the patience to learn, it's all there.

Historical Results:

Fri   7/24    +14.40
Sat  7/25    +13.84
Sun 7/26     -11.60
Mon 7/27    +12.20
Tues7/28    +18.42
Wed7/29     +2.38
Thurs7/30    +36.38
Fri    7/31    +20.52
Sat 8/1         +8.84
Sun 8/2       +15.45
Mon 8/3       + 3.85
Tues           -22.16

That is +112.52 Units in the last 12 days...


I can't buy into these numbers since the units risked aren't indicated before the games.  They could be bogus since they are posted after the game
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 71
Posted: #1810
How about you track back the units won/lost from the inception of this thread and make it simple for yourself by simply attaching 8 units to the RL, 4 to the ML/1st five inns, and 2 to the U/O.

If you don't count a unit return well into the +200s, then I'll pay some attention to your ramblings.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 2312
Posted: #1811
Quote Originally Posted by jasonr:

A bad day but up 53 units because Rangers were the strongest play and fading Saunders was the way to go.

If he posts the units won or lost after the games then he can list the units risked before the games starts.

The reason he's not listing the units risked before the game is because then we would easily notice that he's not being honest.


Not that you are worth a response, being the little creep you are.. but this is multiple times now where you are attacking this thread, and the host.

Now, as well, you are attacking his character, honesty, and integrity.

The only thing I can possibly say to you (and the nicest as well..) is please graduate high school so you have the skills necessary to read a book from cover to cover. If you would take 1 hour of your obviously "too busy to care" life and read this thread from beginning to finish, all of your questions will be answered. To your surprise, you may actually learn something as well.. even tho you have now proven on multiple occasions to not be capable of learning anything.

Assigned Unit value has been discussed in length throughout this thread. If one reads carefully and takes the time to comprehend what they are reading, you will know exactly how many Units he plays for on each wager.

In conclusion, everyone who contributes to this thread in a positive matter and understands what is going on here, can tell you almost exactly how many Units sports_Network is up or down well before he posts the results.

Nice try, but take your immature skills elsewhere..  you have overstayed your welcome here now. 


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 71
Posted: #1812
Just a note for those who bet on the Cubs game with listed pitchers - bet should be void as Zambrano didn't start.
I totally missed that until I just saw the highlights.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1813
[Quote: Originally Posted by sports_Network]
MLB system releases Friday 08/07/09 Base_Runs formula...
 
Diamondbacks-106 ML...loss
Cubs+135 ML...scratched
Braves+124 ML...win
RedSox+122 ML...loss
Rangers+135 ML...win
 
Giants-135 RL...loss
BlueJays+130 RL...loss
WhiteSox+120 RL...loss
Mariners+182 RL...loss
 
ninePACformulated
projected ratio: 6/9  66.6%
 
 
R/R status ratio: 14/22  63.6%
 
SN
 
FINAL RESULTS:
2-6
units:-14.12
 
R/R status ratio: 14/36  39%
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1814
kreatture
 
SN
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 93
Posted: #1815
Quote Originally Posted by kreatture:



Not that you are worth a response, being the little creep you are.. but this is multiple times now where you are attacking this thread, and the host.

Now, as well, you are attacking his character, honesty, and integrity.

The only thing I can possibly say to you (and the nicest as well..) is please graduate high school so you have the skills necessary to read a book from cover to cover. If you would take 1 hour of your obviously "too busy to care" life and read this thread from beginning to finish, all of your questions will be answered. To your surprise, you may actually learn something as well.. even tho you have now proven on multiple occasions to not be capable of learning anything.

Assigned Unit value has been discussed in length throughout this thread. If one reads carefully and takes the time to comprehend what they are reading, you will know exactly how many Units he plays for on each wager.

In conclusion, everyone who contributes to this thread in a positive matter and understands what is going on here, can tell you almost exactly how many Units sports_Network is up or down well before he posts the results.

Nice try, but take your immature skills elsewhere..  you have overstayed your welcome here now. 


  Okay Children, and to be honest with majority of you I am old enough to be your dad...So take a seat and learn from someone who knows...First of all this thread is more less a School of learning, what you perceive to learn from it, depends on you and what you perceive is being discussed.  Your actions, they are only yours.   If you are unable to conceive a theory of handicapping, then that is your problem.  It is common knowledge that no one here is garanteeing any picks or winners of any particular game.  What is being discussed is different ways to eliminate obsticles that would other wise prevent from reading or GUESSING the outcome of a game.  So to be very polite about this I have only this to say to only the ones pertains to and that is '  GROW UP...BE QUITE...and QUITE WHINNING about your Stupidity in not keeping pace in what is being said.  THANK YOU, and Have a wonderful day!!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1816
snyder9
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1817
sevenleighton  solid call
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 93
Posted: #1818
Quote Originally Posted by jasonr:

A bad day but up 53 units because Rangers were the strongest play and fading Saunders was the way to go.

If he posts the units won or lost after the games then he can list the units risked before the games starts.

The reason he's not listing the units risked before the game is because then we would easily notice that he's not being honest.
OKay Son, first off WHO THE @@@@@@@DO YOU THINK YOU ARE even trying to get into someone else business, whatever anyone says they win or lose is irrelevent in regards to this thread....Comeon Grow up and take the diapers off, if you want to learn then continue reading, study and quit taking the easy way in life
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 71
Posted: #1819
SN

I was wondering if you're making any plays for NFL preseason? or do you only start during regular season.
If as you say that you perform much better in football than in baseball - I can't wait to see it.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1820
Quote Originally Posted by snyder9:

SN

I was wondering if you're making any plays for NFL preseason? or do you only start during regular season.
If as you say that you perform much better in football than in baseball - I can't wait to see it.

pre-season is just that; pre-season. Strictly recreational, time to study roster changes, players positioning for a starting role, quarterbacks getting their timing down, starters playing the first quarter, time to analize, not wager. How does one handicapp a scrimmage? flip a coin? the coaches, the players, could care- less who wins, or loses; only the home fans worship a win..as the set spread indicates: +3visitors  -3home  games that mean virtually 'nothing' except "coach performance" are played as such.. why squander away your BR on a scrimmage game? wait and get ready for the real thing, where a win actually has meaning, and a matchup can be handicapped realisticly...to each his own, if a game is on TV, and I am analizing performance with a cold one in hand, and seek added recreation/entertainment, sure, I'll put a twenty dollar bill on the dog, just don't take pre-season wagering serious, and go beyond a c note wager...talk to me on "week one" the best to you always

SN

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 53
Posted: #1821

 Kreat, 7, Snyder -

 The problem is we are giving what he wants.  Everyone had their shot at including myself. If we continue to respond to , this thread will degrade to the point of all the others. 
I propose if a $h1t stirrer gets smacked by someone after that we do not waste any more time and space on him . We can not fill these pages with useless banter and crap. And thats all I have to say about that!  
  BLKN
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1822
[Quote: Originally Posted by ApacheM]
 GL Kemosabe
 
2-6 might need a three day vacation for the mind, works wonders.. keep it tight, the best to you always
 
SN
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 443
Posted: #1823
SN - If you are declaring a respite for yourself, i offer my full support.  or at least as much as i can in an electronic environment.
 
i agree w/blacken. no breaths to be wasted on the haters -- children that they are. they seem to have forgotten that this mutual interest of all ours' is still called 'gambling'
 
plenty of baseball left this season. regroup my friend and live for yourself and no-one else 4 a few days.
 
feel free to PM me if u need to vent. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1824
toft33  a post as solid as they come, thx
 
SN
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #1825
BLKN, correct call, no replay required when evaluating the impaired. when serious commentary becomes ignorant, it then possesses humor ,in the abstract, which in return, entertains the intellectual concept of a "wart" ( a un-wanted virus that appears out of nowhere, for no particular reason other than to be nurtured, and fed attention until they are disolved, by a no response attitude) an extremely frustrated bottomfeeder looking for the edge in which he will 'never' find, based on approach alone...
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.