What got into my mind: Is it possible that if this system predicts Underdog wins very well, that the othe way round, the game which are left out are predicting Fav wins better?
I will test it tomorrow.
The games left out for fav. wins.
0
What got into my mind: Is it possible that if this system predicts Underdog wins very well, that the othe way round, the game which are left out are predicting Fav wins better?
What got into my mind: Is it possible that if this system predicts Underdog wins very well, that the other way round, the game which are left out are predicting Fav wins better?
I will test it tomorrow.
The games left out for fav. wins.
that has has already been done, but not per-say from the posted thread leans off the sheet, it comes from another dog formula, your results should lean towards aprx a 68% WIN ratio; taking the lower bracket rated dogs² and reverse your handicap, or as you put it "the other way around" and yes, it's not only possible, it's highly probable. your backtrack will give a consistency reading to Favorite EFF/RL[-1.5] formula.....good stuff
0
Quote Originally Posted by orhane:
What got into my mind: Is it possible that if this system predicts Underdog wins very well, that the other way round, the game which are left out are predicting Fav wins better?
I will test it tomorrow.
The games left out for fav. wins.
that has has already been done, but not per-say from the posted thread leans off the sheet, it comes from another dog formula, your results should lean towards aprx a 68% WIN ratio; taking the lower bracket rated dogs² and reverse your handicap, or as you put it "the other way around" and yes, it's not only possible, it's highly probable. your backtrack will give a consistency reading to Favorite EFF/RL[-1.5] formula.....good stuff
that has has already been done, but not per-say from the posted thread leans off the sheet, it comes from another dog formula, your results should lean towards aprx a 68% WIN ratio; taking the lower bracket rated dogs² and reverse your handicap, or as you put it "the other way around" and yes, it's not only possible, it's highly probable. your backtrack will give a consistency reading to Favorite EFF/RL[-1.5] formula.....good stuff
Thank you. I will work on it tomorrow. ML and RL stats. Good to have some experienced users who can lead the way.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:
that has has already been done, but not per-say from the posted thread leans off the sheet, it comes from another dog formula, your results should lean towards aprx a 68% WIN ratio; taking the lower bracket rated dogs² and reverse your handicap, or as you put it "the other way around" and yes, it's not only possible, it's highly probable. your backtrack will give a consistency reading to Favorite EFF/RL[-1.5] formula.....good stuff
Thank you. I will work on it tomorrow. ML and RL stats. Good to have some experienced users who can lead the way.
Sunday plays: "Anyone notice the number of units the System plays has profited? +61.03 on flat bets would have a $25 bettor up $1525.75"
the documented thread speaks for itself, after review, your tracking stats based on a 2.5u bet would have added 152.57u to the BR- excellent tracking stat to the equations of MM connected to the plus side in which only dog play possess- a note of interest: Dan, how many hours did it take you?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24:
Sunday plays: "Anyone notice the number of units the System plays has profited? +61.03 on flat bets would have a $25 bettor up $1525.75"
the documented thread speaks for itself, after review, your tracking stats based on a 2.5u bet would have added 152.57u to the BR- excellent tracking stat to the equations of MM connected to the plus side in which only dog play possess- a note of interest: Dan, how many hours did it take you?
the documented thread speaks for itself, after review, your tracking stats based on a 2.5u bet would have added 152.57u to the BR- excellent tracking stat to the equations of MM connected to the plus side in which only dog play possess- a note of interest: Dan, how many hours did it take you?
Oh, I've been noticing this for quite some time. Simply wanted to make note of it for anyone concentrating more on the EFF Score or EFF plays. There is great value here and I hope everyone is taking advantage!
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:
the documented thread speaks for itself, after review, your tracking stats based on a 2.5u bet would have added 152.57u to the BR- excellent tracking stat to the equations of MM connected to the plus side in which only dog play possess- a note of interest: Dan, how many hours did it take you?
Oh, I've been noticing this for quite some time. Simply wanted to make note of it for anyone concentrating more on the EFF Score or EFF plays. There is great value here and I hope everyone is taking advantage!
My only question as far as tracking goes is on post #588 on 6/8 the system plays record was
164-203 for +4.37 units
On 6/9 post #591 the record was
169-210 for +43.97 units
Still positive units at that point but which is the correct number?
Thanks
Ugh, thanks for catching my error, I feel stupid. The correct number from 6/8 was +4.37, I screwed up the post for the 6/9 totals. The correct total for end of day 6/15 is +21.03 units, as we went on a good run. The 6/8 total of 4.37 should have changed to 3.97 after the 6/9 results of -.4 units, I missed deleting the 4 which changed this to 43.97.
Sorry guys for the error. I cannot apologize enough. The following post will have the correct system plays total.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Quote Originally Posted by CInderellaStory:
My only question as far as tracking goes is on post #588 on 6/8 the system plays record was
164-203 for +4.37 units
On 6/9 post #591 the record was
169-210 for +43.97 units
Still positive units at that point but which is the correct number?
Thanks
Ugh, thanks for catching my error, I feel stupid. The correct number from 6/8 was +4.37, I screwed up the post for the 6/9 totals. The correct total for end of day 6/15 is +21.03 units, as we went on a good run. The 6/8 total of 4.37 should have changed to 3.97 after the 6/9 results of -.4 units, I missed deleting the 4 which changed this to 43.97.
Sorry guys for the error. I cannot apologize enough. The following post will have the correct system plays total.
which has the same record and completely different units? I have no idea what the units should be but shouldn't the record been updated to 210-245 to include yesterday's results?
Good work here overall Dan, thanks for your time and effort
One question...are the system play units based on risking 1 UNIT?
Thanks
0
Danrules
The SYSTEM PLAY totals from post #614 are:
YTD 206-237 +61.03 units
in post #620 they are:
YTD 206-237 +17.82 units
which has the same record and completely different units? I have no idea what the units should be but shouldn't the record been updated to 210-245 to include yesterday's results?
Good work here overall Dan, thanks for your time and effort
One question...are the system play units based on risking 1 UNIT?
which has the same record and completely different units? I have no idea what the units should be but shouldn't the record been updated to 210-245 to include yesterday's results?
Good work here overall Dan, thanks for your time and effort
One question...are the system play units based on risking 1 UNIT?
Thanks
Apparently I should not post results late at night after a few beverages. I'll correct the record with my next post that include today's games.
Yes the system plays are 1 unit flat betting for ease of tracking. The system in which Degen got this from called for a money management system of 1.25% of your bankroll and then increase as the BR increases. A $25 bettor would have a $2000 bankroll and increase bets by $5 with every $400 gain.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Quote Originally Posted by oilcountry99:
Danrules
The SYSTEM PLAY totals from post #614 are:
YTD 206-237 +61.03 units
in post #620 they are:
YTD 206-237 +17.82 units
which has the same record and completely different units? I have no idea what the units should be but shouldn't the record been updated to 210-245 to include yesterday's results?
Good work here overall Dan, thanks for your time and effort
One question...are the system play units based on risking 1 UNIT?
Thanks
Apparently I should not post results late at night after a few beverages. I'll correct the record with my next post that include today's games.
Yes the system plays are 1 unit flat betting for ease of tracking. The system in which Degen got this from called for a money management system of 1.25% of your bankroll and then increase as the BR increases. A $25 bettor would have a $2000 bankroll and increase bets by $5 with every $400 gain.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.