Modified Morrison NHL System

Does anyone have the numbers on how many B and C bets come up in a complete season for all JM's system plays for NHL, NBA, MLB and NFL? Just an approx. Number?

Ok guys........... Can't wait til the pucks drop - how bout ya'll..............
The books are gonna get hit hard and they don't know it.........
Hahahaha................

A variation of what we got going on here is this
What do you all think????????

To give credit where its do I copied and pasted it by Mcbain at SBR




I posted about this possible NHL system in the NBA thread where we have been following the Morrison NBA system and I suggested it might work for hockey.

Good and bad news so far after going through this season's data in the NHL, looking for a possible any 3-game road trip A-B-C series betting system.

This season so far if one was to bet every visiting team heading out on a 3 game road trip (and split 6-game trip into two bets) on a straight moneyline bet record would be:

76 A wins
43 B wins
17 C wins

for 136 total wins which sounds nice.

However, you would encounter, if you bet moneyline with no filters:

27 losses

Your record is 136-27 and with series betting you are down for the season.

So with those numbers we have no system.

HOWEVER, if we bet the +1.5 line on all our road teams (when available and looking at the games only one team would have been favored on the road, DET), we would see

22 of those losses turn to wins
as there was at least one game in the series where our team lost by 1 goal.

Further, if we eliminated playing teams in the second 3 of a 6-game roadie, we could eiminate another

3 losses (and one of those was DET)

So we are down to 2 outright losses

The last filter that we could apply would be to elminate betting on the teams with the 5 worst road records (or 4 or 3, something like that).

That would eliminate another loss as OTT would not have been a play.

That would leave us with ONE outright loss, Carolina series starting on Jan. 8 of this year.

So applying a +1.5 betting strategy, skip the second 3 games of the long trips, don't bet on the absolute worst road teams, you could come up with a record of

145-1

(the original 136 wins plus the 22 gained by betting +1.5, take off 13 wins by skipping second set of 3 on 6-game trips and taking off the losses that simply would not have been bet.)

Is that clear to everyone? I'm sure not.

Anyway, that's all I've got. If this would work for previous seasons I am not sure yet but I invite anyone to take a look.




So there it is........
Again I am down for what's in the wings and much appriciative for Kong Bringing this to light........
Just figure I'd throw this on the wall and see if it sticks............
Let's rock guys..... See ya on the other side

MCBAIN NHL SYSTEM RULES:
(the 1st post of this thread tells you everything you need to know)

It is very simple. We bet NHL road teams when they go on road trips of at least 3 games. When the team is the favorite, bet moneyline. When the team is the underdog, bet puckline +1.5.

Make A bet, if it loses bet B so you still profit, if it loses bet C so you still profit on the entire series.

Using these filters should work for 09-10:
1. don't play first series of season or last for any team
2. don't play second series of 3 on any road trip
3. play +1.5 whenever available
4. eliminate teams with losing road records once at least 25 games have been played. (At start of year, could use road records from last season but that is iffy).
possible 5. do not play against top 2-3 RPI teams when they are at home





Again......... More copying and stuff
If this might help us........... Cool
If not.......... I understand - no need to reinvent the wheel
Thanks Kong..............

NJ - NOV 16, MAR 2
NYR - NOV 3, JAN 30
NYI - JAN 6, MAR 16
PHI - NOV 18, FEB 1, MAR 14
PIT - NOV3, JAN 9
BOS - JAN 13
BUF - NONE
MON - MAR 2
OTW - NOV 28, MAR 9
TOR - OCT 24, DEC 27
ATL - FEB 10
CAR - FEB 1
FLA - MAR 9
TB - NOV 16, DEC 11
WAS - DEC 12
CHI - NONE
CLB - JAN 19
DET - NONE
NAS - OCT 17, FEB 9
STL - JAN 18
CAL - NOV 10, FEB 5, MAR 25
COL - NOV 30, JAN 8
EDM - NOV 8, MAR 11
MIN - NOV 10
VAN - DEC 2, JAN30
ANH - OCT 6
DAL - JAN 10, MAR 6
LAK - OCT 10, NOV 9
PHO - OCT 3, MAR 13
SJ - OCT 15

Hey Kong,

You mention that one can make about 100 units using the modified labouchere system only betting A and B games.  What is the approximate unit difference if you were to use the same modified labouchere system as the three game chase?  Would you make more or less units this way. 

nolemanasses take it easy on him, after reading his posts I came to the conclusion that he has no fuckin clue what to do and he's probably just a kid, to prove it I went ahead and used my webcam to get a picture of him and this is what I got-  .   I rest my case!...lol

yea, that guy is going to get buried, if he would just read a little bit before he asks stupid questions.   Im sure after you tell him who to bet, he'll probably ask you where and how do you make bets. I've been reading different forum for a few years and this guy is really fucked up.  Hey, when I bored and want a laugh I'll look for his posts. gl

nice,  he's the guy out in left field and the game didnt start, put me in coach im ready to play,  

So I have a question about this if someone can clarify.  It is our goal to win 1 unit off of each 3 game away series in either the A or B game?  So if we were to win our unit on the A game we stop and move to the next play and dont touch the B game correct? If we were to lose the A game we will chase to the B game.  If we lose the B game we are done w/ that particular series but we move our increased unit size to the next play?  Thanks

 

i have the same question. im guessing we move it over to the next A bet. Can somebody clarify?

Also, im new to labouchere. can somebody post a scenario of how the lines would look after an A loss and also after a B loss?

it would really be appreciated.

ps lines are up now and pinny has MON PL +1.5 @ -255 and SJ ML @ -172.

jeezzz some guys are retared

the 1st NHL play is Roger Federer -420.

ROTFLMMFAO

that funny right there i am still laughing

play to win -170 is 170 to win 100..dont start big though have atleat 50 unit bankroll maybe more like 100

so you would have 2 lines say u lose

gm 1 50/50/85
gm 2 50/50/85

gm 2 would be to win 135