Sorry gang I took a nap. Based on old formula I don't see this as being a play either way.
Chicago 17
Atlanta 21
GL
Sorry gang I took a nap. Based on old formula I don't see this as being a play either way.
Chicago 17
Atlanta 21
GL
Sorry gang I took a nap. Based on old formula I don't see this as being a play either way.
Chicago 17
Atlanta 21
GL
As you can see, the Vikings rate nearly two points better with this method and the predicted score is several points less. These are because of the inclusion of Minnesota's defensive YPP rating, which is well above average.
Most bettors using these, or any YPP system, generally look for a difference of at least five points between the predicted outcome and the point spread before making a play.
Remember, there is no correct way or incorrect way to use YPP numbers. You can use them short-term, as these two systems do, or use season statistics. Both will give the football bettor a different method of looking at the teams playing a particular game.
As you can see, the Vikings rate nearly two points better with this method and the predicted score is several points less. These are because of the inclusion of Minnesota's defensive YPP rating, which is well above average.
Most bettors using these, or any YPP system, generally look for a difference of at least five points between the predicted outcome and the point spread before making a play.
Remember, there is no correct way or incorrect way to use YPP numbers. You can use them short-term, as these two systems do, or use season statistics. Both will give the football bettor a different method of looking at the teams playing a particular game.
As you can see, the Vikings rate nearly two points better with this method and the predicted score is several points less. These are because of the inclusion of Minnesota's defensive YPP rating, which is well above average.
Most bettors using these, or any YPP system, generally look for a difference of at least five points between the predicted outcome and the point spread before making a play.
Remember, there is no correct way or incorrect way to use YPP numbers. You can use them short-term, as these two systems do, or use season statistics. Both will give the football bettor a different method of looking at the teams playing a particular game.
I knew about this system. The only thing I didn't know is fourth step that it uses a "four game average"?
It divides total yards by eight?
What happens when more games are played? Is it still divided by 8? Result will be too big of yardage.
Or each game is worth "2"?
As you can see, the Vikings rate nearly two points better with this method and the predicted score is several points less. These are because of the inclusion of Minnesota's defensive YPP rating, which is well above average.
Most bettors using these, or any YPP system, generally look for a difference of at least five points between the predicted outcome and the point spread before making a play.
Remember, there is no correct way or incorrect way to use YPP numbers. You can use them short-term, as these two systems do, or use season statistics. Both will give the football bettor a different method of looking at the teams playing a particular game.
I knew about this system. The only thing I didn't know is fourth step that it uses a "four game average"?
It divides total yards by eight?
What happens when more games are played? Is it still divided by 8? Result will be too big of yardage.
Or each game is worth "2"?
lou4062
Use OpenOffice.org it is a free option instead of excel.
GL
Thanks roughshod,
I am going to check that out right now. I appreciate it.
lou4062
Use OpenOffice.org it is a free option instead of excel.
GL
Thanks roughshod,
I am going to check that out right now. I appreciate it.
This morning I made some minor adjustments to the original YPPT formula from 10/11.
Whats New
Adjustment for HFA of 3.5 Pts. -1.75 Away/+1.75 Home
Take into account average number of plays both OFF/DEF.
Take into account average yards per play both OFF/DEF.
These changes alter the projected outcomes very little from original YPPT formula.
Tonights Projected Outcome Using these Changes.
Denver 389 Total Yds. 16.76 YPPT (23.21 PTS)
San Diego 288 Total Yds. 26.79 YPPT (10.75 PTS)
Adjusted Projected Score
Denver 23.21 - 1.75 HFA = 21.46 21
San Diego 10.75 + 1.75 HFA = 12.50 13
GL
This morning I made some minor adjustments to the original YPPT formula from 10/11.
Whats New
Adjustment for HFA of 3.5 Pts. -1.75 Away/+1.75 Home
Take into account average number of plays both OFF/DEF.
Take into account average yards per play both OFF/DEF.
These changes alter the projected outcomes very little from original YPPT formula.
Tonights Projected Outcome Using these Changes.
Denver 389 Total Yds. 16.76 YPPT (23.21 PTS)
San Diego 288 Total Yds. 26.79 YPPT (10.75 PTS)
Adjusted Projected Score
Denver 23.21 - 1.75 HFA = 21.46 21
San Diego 10.75 + 1.75 HFA = 12.50 13
GL
This morning I made some minor adjustments to the original YPPT formula from 10/11.
Whats New
Adjustment for HFA of 3.5 Pts. -1.75 Away/+1.75 Home
Take into account average number of plays both OFF/DEF.
Take into account average yards per play both OFF/DEF.
These changes alter the projected outcomes very little from original YPPT formula.
Tonights Projected Outcome Using these Changes.
Denver 389 Total Yds. 16.76 YPPT (23.21 PTS)
San Diego 288 Total Yds. 26.79 YPPT (10.75 PTS)
Adjusted Projected Score
Denver 23.21 - 1.75 HFA = 21.46 21
San Diego 10.75 + 1.75 HFA = 12.50 13
GL
Glad to see the HFA applied to your system roughshod31. You always seem to be tinkering to get it just right...that's a good thing!
Good luck!
This morning I made some minor adjustments to the original YPPT formula from 10/11.
Whats New
Adjustment for HFA of 3.5 Pts. -1.75 Away/+1.75 Home
Take into account average number of plays both OFF/DEF.
Take into account average yards per play both OFF/DEF.
These changes alter the projected outcomes very little from original YPPT formula.
Tonights Projected Outcome Using these Changes.
Denver 389 Total Yds. 16.76 YPPT (23.21 PTS)
San Diego 288 Total Yds. 26.79 YPPT (10.75 PTS)
Adjusted Projected Score
Denver 23.21 - 1.75 HFA = 21.46 21
San Diego 10.75 + 1.75 HFA = 12.50 13
GL
Glad to see the HFA applied to your system roughshod31. You always seem to be tinkering to get it just right...that's a good thing!
Good luck!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.