All Forums | Systems & Strategies

New YPPT Method

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 253696
Posts: 1286
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 24546
Posted: #26
Crazy Math Shizz
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 391
Posted: #27
Very interesting
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 680
Posted: #28
YPPT measures efficiency for both offense & defense. The lower the offenses YPPT is (ex.12.5) the better, while a larger YPPT on defense is optimal (ex.20.0). YPPT is a measure of how far you need to travel to score or how far you force your oppent to travel to score.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 60
Posted: #29
Hi roughshod,
 
I'm afraid I have another question.  I did the math for the ind/ten game (it took me 2 hours) not really...lol....I noticed unless I'm wrong that you did not use HFA in that game and was wondering if you use it?  My score came out the same ind 28, ten 17 with no HFA added.  If you had added 3 to kcy you would have had another cover to go with this great week!  I know you only play  a 4 difference but I'm just saying a cover is a cover. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1685
Posted: #30
Great work!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 1839
Posted: #31
Very well done...
Bet with your wallet not your heart
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 598
Posted: #32
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 307
Posted: #33
roughshod31
 
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1723
Posted: #34
Can someone please explain how this math works? 


Nice work roughshod
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 881
Posted: #35
 nice
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 10
Posted: #36
I like this method.  It obviously not going to get results like this every week, but it is better than most.  Keep up the good work.  Look forward to some more from you.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 680
Posted: #37

10/12/09

Jets vs. Dolphins

I'm going to try to explain the math here so bear with me and feel free to ask questions.

Jets (Off.)       130.5R (+31.1)   166.7P (-67.9)  16.1YPPT (+0.7)

Opp. Allow       99.4                 234.6               15.4


Dolphins (Def)   61.0R (-28.1)    238.5P (-20.1)   15.2 YPPT (+0.3)

Opp. Allow        89.1                 258.6               14.9

Rushing (R)    130.5 + 61.0 = 191.5/2 = 95.8

                      (+31.1) - (-28.1) = 3.0/2 = 1.5     (95.8 + 1.5 = 97.3)

Strength of Schedule (SOS) (Using Sagarin Ratings, see USA TODAY)

NY Jets 20.91 (.980)     (20.91/21.34 = .980)Repeat for MIA.

Miami    21.76 (1.020)   (20.91 + 21.76 = 42.67/2 = 21.34)

Use Offense SOS for calculating R + P. (ex. 97.3 x .980 = 95.4)

Use Defense  SOS for calculating YPPT. (ex. 16.2 x 1.020 = 16.5)

Final Calculations

Jets          95 (R)    175 (P)   270 (YDS)       16.5 (YPPT)   16.4 PTS

Dolphins   161 (R)    159 (P)   320 (YDS)       18.8 (YPPT)  17.0 PTS

The end part of the process is pure common sense. 16 PTS. can only happen 3 ways (commonly) which are all unlikely given that the Jets are only projected for 270 YDS. (2 TDs + 2PT con., a safety, or 3 FG's.) That being said 14 is more likely.

Projected Score 

NY Jets     14

Miami        17

GL


       


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 5369
Posted: #38
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 1032
Posted: #39
Hey Roughshod great work looks like very good stuff. 
 
Just wondering where do you get all your stats and where do you find the SOS?
 
Thanks and GL.
 
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 34
Posted: #40
in your calculations where did you get the opp. allow figures from?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 60
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by roughshod31:

10/12/09

Jets vs. Dolphins

I'm going to try to explain the math here so bear with me and feel free to ask questions.

Jets (Off.)       130.5R (+31.1)   166.7P (-67.9)  16.1YPPT (+0.7)

Opp. Allow       99.4                 234.6               15.4


Dolphins (Def)   61.0R (-28.1)    238.5P (-20.1)   15.2 YPPT (+0.3)

Opp. Allow        89.1                 258.6               14.9

Rushing (R)    130.5 + 61.0 = 191.5/2 = 95.8

                      (+31.1) - (-28.1) = 3.0/2 = 1.5     (95.8 + 1.5 = 97.3)

Strength of Schedule (SOS) (Using Sagarin Ratings, see USA TODAY)

NY Jets 20.91 (.980)     (20.91/21.34 = .980)Repeat for MIA.

Miami    21.76 (1.020)   (20.91 + 21.76 = 42.67/2 = 21.34)

Use Offense SOS for calculating R + P. (ex. 97.3 x .980 = 95.4)

Use Defense  SOS for calculating YPPT. (ex. 16.2 x 1.020 = 16.5)

Final Calculations

Jets          95 (R)    175 (P)   270 (YDS)       16.5 (YPPT)   16.4 PTS

Dolphins   161 (R)    159 (P)   320 (YDS)       18.8 (YPPT)  17.0 PTS

The end part of the process is pure common sense. 16 PTS. can only happen 3 ways (commonly) which are all unlikely given that the Jets are only projected for 270 YDS. (2 TDs + 2PT con., a safety, or 3 FG's.) That being said 14 is more likely.

Projected Score 

NY Jets     14

Miami        17

GL


Hey roughshod,   I got the Jets for 158.6 passing yards before sos is applied.  Can you check that?  I got nyj 166.7  (-67.9) + mia 238.5 (-20.1)

166.7+ 238.5 /2 = 202.6  202.6- (-67.9 + -20.1) /2 =158.6 pass yards for nyj?
 

Maybe I messed up again?  And all of this is with no HFA applied, correct?

 

Thank you

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 680
Posted: #42

shakes

Statfox.com (NFL Game Matchups)

Opp Def Avg.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 3307
Posted: #43
errrr... why only used one team's offense numbers and one team's defense numbers? 
in your first example, you only used Viks' O and only Rams' D.  in your later example, you only used Jets' O and only Dolphins' D. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 680
Posted: #44

lou 

I still struggle with  the DOUBLE Negatives as well as positives. MY thought is w/Jets & Dolphins -67.9 & -20.1 you would split the difference -47.8/2 = -23.9. (202.6 - 23.9 = 178.7 x .980 = 175.1). And yeah no HF advantage bc I have yet to find an effective means to date.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 680
Posted: #45

Lucky

Sorry about only showing a small part of the formula, but it takes me 15-20 minutes to write this all out by hand & I don't type well so if there is a particular part of this you don't understand show your work here and I will tell you if its right or how to correct it.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 139
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by roughshod31:

10/12/09

Jets vs. Dolphins

I'm going to try to explain the math here so bear with me and feel free to ask questions.

Jets (Off.)       130.5R (+31.1)   166.7P (-67.9)  16.1YPPT (+0.7)

Opp. Allow       99.4                 234.6               15.4


Dolphins (Def)   61.0R (-28.1)    238.5P (-20.1)   15.2 YPPT (+0.3)

Opp. Allow        89.1                 258.6               14.9

Rushing (R)    130.5 + 61.0 = 191.5/2 = 95.8

                      (+31.1) - (-28.1) = 3.0/2 = 1.5     (95.8 + 1.5 = 97.3)

Strength of Schedule (SOS) (Using Sagarin Ratings, see USA TODAY)

NY Jets 20.91 (.980)     (20.91/21.34 = .980)Repeat for MIA.

Miami    21.76 (1.020)   (20.91 + 21.76 = 42.67/2 = 21.34)

Use Offense SOS for calculating R + P. (ex. 97.3 x .980 = 95.4)

Use Defense  SOS for calculating YPPT. (ex. 16.2 x 1.020 = 16.5)

Final Calculations

Jets          95 (R)    175 (P)   270 (YDS)       16.5 (YPPT)   16.4 PTS

Dolphins   161 (R)    159 (P)   320 (YDS)       18.8 (YPPT)  17.0 PTS

The end part of the process is pure common sense. 16 PTS. can only happen 3 ways (commonly) which are all unlikely given that the Jets are only projected for 270 YDS. (2 TDs + 2PT con., a safety, or 3 FG's.) That being said 14 is more likely.

Projected Score 

NY Jets     14

Miami        17

GL


       




do you take into consideration that the stats were when they had pennington (for the most part)? Henne wasn't that spectacular in the win over pathetic buffalo.  Jets also getting calvin pace back, maybe a threat with edwards? and a skewed line because of the 24 points given up to the saints.  in the loss though, only 10 allowed by the defense.  I think sanchez will come out and try and prove himself.  just some thoughts.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 680
Posted: #47

moke

Right now I have to make due with the best information available to me. Defenses being wrongly held accountable for offensive miscues & vice versa is an unfortunate and difficult thing to account for when handicapping. None of us can account for a receiver tipping the ball to a defender or a special teams player running into his return man causing a fumble they are just things that happen. As for the Henne part of your question, teams adjust for the difference in talent (See Kevin Kolb, Seneca Wallace they did quite nicely).


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 419
Posted: #48
what is your record this year?  Thanks and good luck
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 394
Posted: #49
Wow...Thats crazy
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 3801
Posted: #50
Impressive
 
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.