Roughshod, Great work! Keep it up!
Back to Lucky's question above. Only using Jets "O" and Miami's "D"...Are you using Jets "D" and Miami"s "O" as well?
Thanks in advance for taking the time. Peace.
Roughshod, Great work! Keep it up!
Back to Lucky's question above. Only using Jets "O" and Miami's "D"...Are you using Jets "D" and Miami"s "O" as well?
Thanks in advance for taking the time. Peace.
Roughshod, Great work! Keep it up!
Back to Lucky's question above. Only using Jets "O" and Miami's "D"...Are you using Jets "D" and Miami"s "O" as well?
Thanks in advance for taking the time. Peace.
10/12/09
Jets vs. Dolphins
I'm going to try to explain the math here so bear with me and feel free to ask questions.
Jets (Off.) 130.5R (+31.1) 166.7P (-67.9) 16.1YPPT (+0.7)
Opp. Allow 99.4 234.6 15.4
Dolphins (Def) 61.0R (-28.1) 238.5P (-20.1) 15.2 YPPT (+0.3)
Opp. Allow 89.1 258.6 14.9
Rushing (R) 130.5 + 61.0 = 191.5/2 = 95.8
(+31.1) - (-28.1) = 3.0/2 = 1.5 (95.8 + 1.5 = 97.3)
Strength of Schedule (SOS) (Using Sagarin Ratings, see USA TODAY)
NY Jets 20.91 (.980) (20.91/21.34 = .980)Repeat for MIA.
Miami 21.76 (1.020) (20.91 + 21.76 = 42.67/2 = 21.34)
Use Offense SOS for calculating R + P. (ex. 97.3 x .980 = 95.4)
Use Defense SOS for calculating YPPT. (ex. 16.2 x 1.020 = 16.5)
Final Calculations
Jets 95 (R) 175 (P) 270 (YDS) 16.5 (YPPT) 16.4 PTS
Dolphins 161 (R) 159 (P) 320 (YDS) 18.8 (YPPT) 17.0 PTS
The end part of the process is pure common sense. 16 PTS. can only happen 3 ways (commonly) which are all unlikely given that the Jets are only projected for 270 YDS. (2 TDs + 2PT con., a safety, or 3 FG's.) That being said 14 is more likely.
Projected Score
NY Jets 14
Miami 17
GL
10/12/09
Jets vs. Dolphins
I'm going to try to explain the math here so bear with me and feel free to ask questions.
Jets (Off.) 130.5R (+31.1) 166.7P (-67.9) 16.1YPPT (+0.7)
Opp. Allow 99.4 234.6 15.4
Dolphins (Def) 61.0R (-28.1) 238.5P (-20.1) 15.2 YPPT (+0.3)
Opp. Allow 89.1 258.6 14.9
Rushing (R) 130.5 + 61.0 = 191.5/2 = 95.8
(+31.1) - (-28.1) = 3.0/2 = 1.5 (95.8 + 1.5 = 97.3)
Strength of Schedule (SOS) (Using Sagarin Ratings, see USA TODAY)
NY Jets 20.91 (.980) (20.91/21.34 = .980)Repeat for MIA.
Miami 21.76 (1.020) (20.91 + 21.76 = 42.67/2 = 21.34)
Use Offense SOS for calculating R + P. (ex. 97.3 x .980 = 95.4)
Use Defense SOS for calculating YPPT. (ex. 16.2 x 1.020 = 16.5)
Final Calculations
Jets 95 (R) 175 (P) 270 (YDS) 16.5 (YPPT) 16.4 PTS
Dolphins 161 (R) 159 (P) 320 (YDS) 18.8 (YPPT) 17.0 PTS
The end part of the process is pure common sense. 16 PTS. can only happen 3 ways (commonly) which are all unlikely given that the Jets are only projected for 270 YDS. (2 TDs + 2PT con., a safety, or 3 FG's.) That being said 14 is more likely.
Projected Score
NY Jets 14
Miami 17
GL
10/12/09
Jets vs. Dolphins
I'm going to try to explain the math here so bear with me and feel free to ask questions.
Jets (Off.) 130.5R (+31.1) 166.7P (-67.9) 16.1YPPT (+0.7)
Opp. Allow 99.4 234.6 15.4
Dolphins (Def) 61.0R (-28.1) 238.5P (-20.1) 15.2 YPPT (+0.3)
Opp. Allow 89.1 258.6 14.9
Rushing (R) 130.5 + 61.0 = 191.5/2 = 95.8
(+31.1) - (-28.1) = 3.0/2 = 1.5 (95.8 + 1.5 = 97.3)
Strength of Schedule (SOS) (Using Sagarin Ratings, see USA TODAY)
NY Jets 20.91 (.980) (20.91/21.34 = .980)Repeat for MIA.
Miami 21.76 (1.020) (20.91 + 21.76 = 42.67/2 = 21.34)
Use Offense SOS for calculating R + P. (ex. 97.3 x .980 = 95.4)
Use Defense SOS for calculating YPPT. (ex. 16.2 x 1.020 = 16.5)
Final Calculations
Jets 95 (R) 175 (P) 270 (YDS) 16.5 (YPPT) 16.4 PTS
Dolphins 161 (R) 159 (P) 320 (YDS) 18.8 (YPPT) 17.0 PTS
The end part of the process is pure common sense. 16 PTS. can only happen 3 ways (commonly) which are all unlikely given that the Jets are only projected for 270 YDS. (2 TDs + 2PT con., a safety, or 3 FG's.) That being said 14 is more likely.
Projected Score
NY Jets 14
Miami 17
GL
10/12/09
Jets vs. Dolphins
I'm going to try to explain the math here so bear with me and feel free to ask questions.
Jets (Off.) 130.5R (+31.1) 166.7P (-67.9) 16.1YPPT (+0.7)
Opp. Allow 99.4 234.6 15.4
Dolphins (Def) 61.0R (-28.1) 238.5P (-20.1) 15.2 YPPT (+0.3)
Opp. Allow 89.1 258.6 14.9
Rushing (R) 130.5 + 61.0 = 191.5/2 = 95.8
(+31.1) - (-28.1) = 3.0/2 = 1.5 (95.8 + 1.5 = 97.3)
Strength of Schedule (SOS) (Using Sagarin Ratings, see USA TODAY)
NY Jets 20.91 (.980) (20.91/21.34 = .980)Repeat for MIA.
Miami 21.76 (1.020) (20.91 + 21.76 = 42.67/2 = 21.34)
Use Offense SOS for calculating R + P. (ex. 97.3 x .980 = 95.4)
Use Defense SOS for calculating YPPT. (ex. 16.2 x 1.020 = 16.5)
Final Calculations
Jets 95 (R) 175 (P) 270 (YDS) 16.5 (YPPT) 16.4 PTS
Dolphins 161 (R) 159 (P) 320 (YDS) 18.8 (YPPT) 17.0 PTS
The end part of the process is pure common sense. 16 PTS. can only happen 3 ways (commonly) which are all unlikely given that the Jets are only projected for 270 YDS. (2 TDs + 2PT con., a safety, or 3 FG's.) That being said 14 is more likely.
Projected Score
NY Jets 14
Miami 17
GL
It's a fact that special teams are equally important to the offense/defense when capping any game. How is this variable calculated in? I can see all factors w/ how far offense needs to go vs defense, strength of shcedule etc. but how does it account for a team's strength in kicking game/ coverage teams etc. This is my only issue w/ it but so far can't argue your success, just wondering. BOL w/ it
It's a fact that special teams are equally important to the offense/defense when capping any game. How is this variable calculated in? I can see all factors w/ how far offense needs to go vs defense, strength of shcedule etc. but how does it account for a team's strength in kicking game/ coverage teams etc. This is my only issue w/ it but so far can't argue your success, just wondering. BOL w/ it
It's a fact that special teams are equally important to the offense/defense when capping any game. How is this variable calculated in? I can see all factors w/ how far offense needs to go vs defense, strength of shcedule etc. but how does it account for a team's strength in kicking game/ coverage teams etc. This is my only issue w/ it but so far can't argue your success, just wondering. BOL w/ it
It's a fact that special teams are equally important to the offense/defense when capping any game. How is this variable calculated in? I can see all factors w/ how far offense needs to go vs defense, strength of shcedule etc. but how does it account for a team's strength in kicking game/ coverage teams etc. This is my only issue w/ it but so far can't argue your success, just wondering. BOL w/ it
koko
I'm interested in knowing where you got software that does the calculations for you.
Thanks
koko
I'm interested in knowing where you got software that does the calculations for you.
Thanks
lou
I still struggle with the DOUBLE Negatives as well as positives. MY thought is w/Jets & Dolphins -67.9 & -20.1 you would split the difference -47.8/2 = -23.9. (202.6 - 23.9 = 178.7 x .980 = 175.1). And yeah no HF advantage bc I have yet to find an effective means to date.
lou
I still struggle with the DOUBLE Negatives as well as positives. MY thought is w/Jets & Dolphins -67.9 & -20.1 you would split the difference -47.8/2 = -23.9. (202.6 - 23.9 = 178.7 x .980 = 175.1). And yeah no HF advantage bc I have yet to find an effective means to date.
lou
I still struggle with the DOUBLE Negatives as well as positives. MY thought is w/Jets & Dolphins -67.9 & -20.1 you would split the difference -47.8/2 = -23.9. (202.6 - 23.9 = 178.7 x .980 = 175.1). And yeah no HF advantage bc I have yet to find an effective means to date.
Thanks for clearing that up about the double negatives. I thought since we add the positives together and then divide by 2 we would add all the negatives and divide by 2 since there all on the negative side. I know we subtract one from the other when one is a positive and one a negative. Thanks for clearing up the HFA also!
lou
I still struggle with the DOUBLE Negatives as well as positives. MY thought is w/Jets & Dolphins -67.9 & -20.1 you would split the difference -47.8/2 = -23.9. (202.6 - 23.9 = 178.7 x .980 = 175.1). And yeah no HF advantage bc I have yet to find an effective means to date.
Thanks for clearing that up about the double negatives. I thought since we add the positives together and then divide by 2 we would add all the negatives and divide by 2 since there all on the negative side. I know we subtract one from the other when one is a positive and one a negative. Thanks for clearing up the HFA also!
lou
I think you were correct with your Jets calculation earlier making the Jets 155P not 175P which changes their projected score to 15.1. Thankyou for catching my error as sometimes the number crunching becomes mindnumbing.
Thanks Again
lou
I think you were correct with your Jets calculation earlier making the Jets 155P not 175P which changes their projected score to 15.1. Thankyou for catching my error as sometimes the number crunching becomes mindnumbing.
Thanks Again
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.