After this week is completed, I will compile all stats for ALL 120 Div-A teams ONLY.
I will exclude ALL games played against DIV-AA for each team.
This is the only reason I don't like system for college football. It produces "false" results because statfox counts all games played.
A team could average 400 yards on offense and score 33.0 ppg (12.12 YPPT), but when you removed games played against AA teams, that comes to 325 yards on offense and 24.5 ppg (13.3 YPPT)
Div-A team usually blow out AA teams, and completely skew their stats, and that's what I will avoid here.
I can have a formula in Excel that if a team has faced a team that is not one of 120 Div-A teams, DO NOT COUNT the stats, and leave it a blank. (It's like the game never happened).
Next weekend, we should have a better reading on college teams and is something worth looking.
You still need to handicap the game!
0
After this week is completed, I will compile all stats for ALL 120 Div-A teams ONLY.
I will exclude ALL games played against DIV-AA for each team.
This is the only reason I don't like system for college football. It produces "false" results because statfox counts all games played.
A team could average 400 yards on offense and score 33.0 ppg (12.12 YPPT), but when you removed games played against AA teams, that comes to 325 yards on offense and 24.5 ppg (13.3 YPPT)
Div-A team usually blow out AA teams, and completely skew their stats, and that's what I will avoid here.
I can have a formula in Excel that if a team has faced a team that is not one of 120 Div-A teams, DO NOT COUNT the stats, and leave it a blank. (It's like the game never happened).
Next weekend, we should have a better reading on college teams and is something worth looking.
For record keeping, these are the plays that differ at least +/-7 points from vegas line. (Sides only) (these are vegasinsider.com latest line at the time of this writing 1:00pm ET)
Indiana +4.5
Connecticut +8.5
Duke -4
Clemson +4.5
Northern Illinois -10.5
Penn State -4
Oklahoma -8
Texas -13
Navy +2.5
Air Force +9
Idaho +15.5
Washington State +35.5
Temple +2.5
Iowa +2
Fresno State -24
UNLV -1
Arizona State +7
North Texas +20.5
Western Kentucky +17
Let's see how these plays do today.
With Fresno State -24 and Arizona State +7 pending, record stands at:
12 wins - 4 losses - 1 Push (75.0%)
0
Quote Originally Posted by VGPOP:
For record keeping, these are the plays that differ at least +/-7 points from vegas line. (Sides only) (these are vegasinsider.com latest line at the time of this writing 1:00pm ET)
Indiana +4.5
Connecticut +8.5
Duke -4
Clemson +4.5
Northern Illinois -10.5
Penn State -4
Oklahoma -8
Texas -13
Navy +2.5
Air Force +9
Idaho +15.5
Washington State +35.5
Temple +2.5
Iowa +2
Fresno State -24
UNLV -1
Arizona State +7
North Texas +20.5
Western Kentucky +17
Let's see how these plays do today.
With Fresno State -24 and Arizona State +7 pending, record stands at:
The most accurate way, IMO, to calculate YPPT (Yards per point) is to calculate how teams gain yards vs TRUE scoring (and I mean, exclude interceptions return for TD, punt return for TD, block FG/Punt return for TD, kickoff return for TD, safeties, fumble return for TD)
Any scoring that is NOT when a team starts a drive to try to score.
For example,
In the game with Eagles at Panthers in Week 1, final score was Eagles 38 - Panthers 10.
Eagles gained a total of only 287 yards (185 passing + 102 rushing), yet it scored 38 points for an astonishing 7.55 YPPT.
That's not the true scoring, anyway.
Eagles scored 14 points off Carolina turnovers (and I don't mean, Carolina turned the ball over, and Eagles started to drive to endzone).
They scored with:
- Fumble return for TD - Punt Return for TD
So, their TRUE YPPT is 287 yards / 24 points = 11.96 YPPT
But this system looks really good.
Keep up the good work.
I use this same system (got from a book in '83 or '84 using the USFL) along with another system based on the all the teams strength of schedule along with my ratings that I adjust weekly.
I saw the same flaw you mention. So, if my strength of schedule system show 20-17 and the YPPT system shows, for example 31-14, I know that team won with turnovers, kick returns, etc. and maybe the other team lost because of them. That's why I went with Oakland over Philadelphia 2 weeks ago. That's my Rule 13 play. Hits about 65%.
0
Quote Originally Posted by VGPOP:
The most accurate way, IMO, to calculate YPPT (Yards per point) is to calculate how teams gain yards vs TRUE scoring (and I mean, exclude interceptions return for TD, punt return for TD, block FG/Punt return for TD, kickoff return for TD, safeties, fumble return for TD)
Any scoring that is NOT when a team starts a drive to try to score.
For example,
In the game with Eagles at Panthers in Week 1, final score was Eagles 38 - Panthers 10.
Eagles gained a total of only 287 yards (185 passing + 102 rushing), yet it scored 38 points for an astonishing 7.55 YPPT.
That's not the true scoring, anyway.
Eagles scored 14 points off Carolina turnovers (and I don't mean, Carolina turned the ball over, and Eagles started to drive to endzone).
They scored with:
- Fumble return for TD - Punt Return for TD
So, their TRUE YPPT is 287 yards / 24 points = 11.96 YPPT
But this system looks really good.
Keep up the good work.
I use this same system (got from a book in '83 or '84 using the USFL) along with another system based on the all the teams strength of schedule along with my ratings that I adjust weekly.
I saw the same flaw you mention. So, if my strength of schedule system show 20-17 and the YPPT system shows, for example 31-14, I know that team won with turnovers, kick returns, etc. and maybe the other team lost because of them. That's why I went with Oakland over Philadelphia 2 weeks ago. That's my Rule 13 play. Hits about 65%.
its gambling any way you look at it. no system is going to be perfect. following a system like this its probably better to just play every play the same amount of $$$ and hope to cash in each week unless a play here matches one you really love. ANYTHING can happen....
0
Quote Originally Posted by bubbaganoosh:
How do you figure for an upset like TTech?
its gambling any way you look at it. no system is going to be perfect. following a system like this its probably better to just play every play the same amount of $$$ and hope to cash in each week unless a play here matches one you really love. ANYTHING can happen....
I use this same system (got from a book in '83 or '84 using the USFL) along with another system based on the all the teams strength of schedule along with my ratings that I adjust weekly.
I saw the same flaw you mention. So, if my strength of schedule system show 20-17 and the YPPT system shows, for example 31-14, I know that team won with turnovers, kick returns, etc. and maybe the other team lost because of them. That's why I went with Oakland over Philadelphia 2 weeks ago. That's my Rule 13 play. Hits about 65%.
STFU YU SUK SO BAD DUDE These Guys RULE TOOT YOUR LOOSING HORN SOMEWHERE ELSE
0
Quote Originally Posted by QuicKicK:
I use this same system (got from a book in '83 or '84 using the USFL) along with another system based on the all the teams strength of schedule along with my ratings that I adjust weekly.
I saw the same flaw you mention. So, if my strength of schedule system show 20-17 and the YPPT system shows, for example 31-14, I know that team won with turnovers, kick returns, etc. and maybe the other team lost because of them. That's why I went with Oakland over Philadelphia 2 weeks ago. That's my Rule 13 play. Hits about 65%.
STFU YU SUK SO BAD DUDE These Guys RULE TOOT YOUR LOOSING HORN SOMEWHERE ELSE
First, Cincinnati -16 and Oregon State +21 became plays with difference of +/- 7 points, and both were winners! (System predicted Cincinnati by 23 points, and USC by 14 points)
The official record for this week's college games:
15 wins - 5 losses - 1 tie (75.0%)
Second, I counted all games (sides only), and the plays were:
26 wins - 24 losses - 1 Tie
That means plays that differ by 6.5 points or less from Vegas line were:
11 wins - 19 losses (36.7%)
You see how important is to get plays that differ by at least a touchdown from vegas line to even consider it to play it.
0
Two things in today's games.
First, Cincinnati -16 and Oregon State +21 became plays with difference of +/- 7 points, and both were winners! (System predicted Cincinnati by 23 points, and USC by 14 points)
The official record for this week's college games:
15 wins - 5 losses - 1 tie (75.0%)
Second, I counted all games (sides only), and the plays were:
26 wins - 24 losses - 1 Tie
That means plays that differ by 6.5 points or less from Vegas line were:
11 wins - 19 losses (36.7%)
You see how important is to get plays that differ by at least a touchdown from vegas line to even consider it to play it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.