All Forums | Systems & Strategies

New YPPT Method

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 253696
Posts: 1286
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 166
Posted: #601
Thnks roughshod!!! Can't wait to see new idea.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 20621
Posted: #602

Your Right Steel Makes it NE 40 TB 12

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 13
Posted: #603
i a confused ho's plays do we go with.....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 92
Posted: #604
So when it projects the numbers the spread is already figured in?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 285
Posted: #605

VGPOP, thanks for the picks.  Its picking a lot of road teams.  Looks like the early plays are SD, MINN, NE, and SF.

 

GLTA.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 285
Posted: #606

VGPOP, thanks for the picks.  Its picking a lot of road teams.  Looks like the early plays are SD, MINN, NE, and SF.

 

GLTA.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 285
Posted: #607

VGPOP, thanks for the picks.  Its picking a lot of road teams.  Looks like the early plays are SD, MINN, NE, and SF.

 

GLTA.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 53
Posted: #608
Rough used a +/- 7 to be a play right?
Is it the same for NFL?

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 583
Posted: #609
Quote Originally Posted by VGPOP:

NFL Week 7 (Original system with statfox stats. 9-5-0 last week)

San Diego 37
Kansas City 17

Indianapolis 30
St Louis 8

Chicago 20
Cincinnati 19

Green Bay 20
Cleveland 16

Minnesota 29
Pittsburgh 21

New England 53
Tampa Bay 8

San Francisco 34
Houston 18

NY Jets 20
Oakland 8

Buffalo 23
Carolina 13

New Orleans 30
Miami 26

Atlanta 32
Dallas 13

Arizona 35
NY Giants 16

Philadelphia 26
Washington 9

Let's see how it does this weekend.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 14
Posted: #610
roughshot31 what are your  piks >
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 262
Posted: #611
what"s  going on .suddently stop without warning????????????
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2001
Posts: 41899
Posted: #612
The plays that differ at least +/- 7 points from Vegas line:

  • San Diego -5.5
  • Indianapolis -14.5
  • Minnesota +6
  • New England -15.5
  • San Francisco +3
  • Buffalo +7
  • Atlanta +5
  • Arizona +7 (Sunday Night)
  • Philadelphia -7 (Monday Night)
Let's see how they do.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 15749
Posted: #613

early on

sd looks good

minn tctc

indi good early

ne good

sf - uh no

3--1--1 lotta football to be played

hmmmm

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4417
Posted: #614

lookin good V
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 285
Posted: #615
Good stuff.  3-1-1.  Should have been 4-0-1 but we take a bad beat on the MINN game.  2 def TD's in the 4th by PITT.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 53
Posted: #616
Rough and VG..
What do you start doing this system?  After 1, 3 or ? weeks of data before it becomes effective?


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 59
Posted: #617

Quote Originally Posted by sinhdinh:

what"s  going on .suddently stop without warning????????????

Appreciate your info VG. Quick question, was Minnesota +/-7 from the vegas line? Vegas line was +6 but your numbers were Minn 29 Pitt 21. (difference of 8) which is not 7 more than 6..

Im sure Im just not following something right..

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 10
Posted: #618
Quote Originally Posted by featherstone222:

Appreciate your info VG. Quick question, was Minnesota +/-7 from the vegas line? Vegas line was +6 but your numbers were Minn 29 Pitt 21. (difference of 8) which is not 7 more than 6..

Im sure Im just not following something right..



Minn was +6 in vegas and projected to win by 8 so 6+8 is a difference of +14
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 59
Posted: #619
thanks 04ppt. got it now
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 252
Posted: #620
haha I went 6-0-2 using the system for NCAAF yesterday.

And looking good so far today for the NFL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 3200
Posted: #621

Welldone rm2673

 

Can you please post your picks next time.. !!!

 

By the way.. who would u pick Arizona +7 or Giant -7 ??

 

Cheer

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 1152
Posted: #622

Quote Originally Posted by t4ever:

Welldone rm2673

 

Can you please post your picks next time.. !!!

 

By the way.. who would u pick Arizona +7 or Giant -7 ??

 

Cheer

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 1152
Posted: #623

Quote Originally Posted by t4ever:

Welldone rm2673

 

Can you please post your picks next time.. !!!

 

By the way.. who would u pick Arizona +7 or Giant -7 ??

 

Cheer

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2001
Posts: 41899
Posted: #624
Quote Originally Posted by VGPOP:

The plays that differ at least +/- 7 points from Vegas line:

  • San Diego -5.5
  • Indianapolis -14.5
  • Minnesota +6
  • New England -15.5
  • San Francisco +3
  • Buffalo +7
  • Atlanta +5
  • Arizona +7 (Sunday Night)
  • Philadelphia -7 (Monday Night)
Let's see how they do.


4-2-1 in the afternoon games. Minnesota failed to cover at the last moment. They had this game. Before kickoff, 49ers were +3.5 at thegreek.com.

So, I don't know how to score that.

Anyway,

I have completed college football stats for all teams excluding games played against DIV-AA teams. (It took me about 13-14 hours to complete). To keep track of 120 teams is not an easy thing to do.

I no longer need statfox to produce the predictions, I have store all stats in Excel.

And these predictions will be with accurate stats accumulated.

By the way, why don't the author of this thread create a thread in college football forum for those games.?

Just an idea.....
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 110
Posted: #625
Awesome work VGPOP! BTW I sent a friend request.
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.